Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -393. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,393–22,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 04:56
22,452
-27
16 Sept 2026, 17:01
22,479
-17
14 Sept 2026, 21:59
22,496
-14
13 Sept 2026, 08:40
22,510
-18
11 Sept 2026, 10:37
22,528
-42
8 Sept 2026, 13:21
22,570
-25
5 Sept 2026, 05:39
22,595
-24
3 Sept 2026, 11:37
22,619
-5
2 Sept 2026, 09:02
22,624
-11
1 Sept 2026, 08:38
22,635
-9
31 Aug 2026, 10:46
22,644
-8
30 Aug 2026, 08:35
22,652
-9
29 Aug 2026, 05:17
22,661
-6
28 Aug 2026, 03:53
22,667
-6
27 Aug 2026, 03:35
22,673
-4
26 Aug 2026, 05:42
22,677
-10
25 Aug 2026, 03:18
22,687
-9
23 Aug 2026, 19:06
22,696
-12
22 Aug 2026, 06:36
22,708
-9
20 Aug 2026, 22:34
22,717
first reading
Engagement
341 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.98%
avg views ÷ 22,452 subscribers
Avg views / post
669
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.537%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
86
of 341 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 84 of 86 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
341 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
57,519
Reactions total
302
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4h 20m
Average length
1m 50s
Measured directly from 142 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,127 reactions across 312 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
631
56.0%
👎
176
15.6%
👍
156
13.8%
🤬
102
9.05%
👏
62
5.50%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 313 of the 341 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 341 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ورود کمیسیون بهداشت مجلس به موضوع گرانی و گرانسازی دارو و توزیع نامتوازن ارز/ تحقیق و تفحص از حوزه غذا و دارو ادامه دارد؛ ضرورت ارسال مستندات تخلفات به کمیسیون
محمدبیگی، نایب رئیس کمیسیون بهداشت:
در جلساتی که طی دو، سه هفته گذشته برگزار کردیم، به موضوع گرانی دارو، گرانسازی دارو و همچنین توزیع نامتوازن ارز در حوزه دارو ورود کردیم و موضوع عدم تخصیص ارز مورد نیاز برخی گروههای دارویی را نیز مورد بررسی قرار دادیم.
ب…
حاجی دلیگانی، نایب رئیس کمیسیون اصل نود:
🔴حکمی که آقای پزشکیان به قالیباف به عنوان مذاکره کننده داده خلاف قانون است و باید لغو شود
🔴 قوهقضائیه باید به اظهارنظرهای آقای قائمپناه رسیدگی کند
🔴 در مجلس علیه قائم پناه معاون اجرایی رئیس جمهور اعلام جرم خواهیم کرد
🔴حکمی که آقای پزشکیان به قالیباف داده خلاف قانون اساسی بود
🆔 @Majlles_News
آقاتهرانی: جلسات مجازی مجلس تشریفاتی است
آقاتهرانی رئیس کمیسیون فرهنگی در نطق خود در جلسه مجازی امروز مجلس درباره مسئله وحدت اظهار داشت: ارزشیابی وحدت باید با اصولی تنظیم شود که محوریت آن ولایت باشد و مدار آن با ولایت بسته شود، نه به این معنا که هر چه گفته شد بدون تحلیل پذیرفته شود این نفاق است، بلکه باید با ولایتمداری گره بخورد.
وی همچنین به تعطیلی صحن مجلس اشاره کرد و گفت: در دوران کرونا هم مجلس را تعطیل نکردیم…
واکنش فاطمه جراره، نماینده مردم بندر عباس در مجلس به حمله جنایتکارانه آمریکا به یک عروسی و شهادت چند کودک: تو کوچهی شما هم عروسی میشه اما آن روز،روز عزای شما و پایان هیمنهی پوشالیتان خواهد بود
🔸ما از خون عزیزانمان در کوهستک نخواهیم گذشت؛ این جنایت بیپاسخ و بیحساب نخواهد ماند/ عصرِ بدون آمریکا آغاز شده است؛ هرچه بیشتر برای حفظ این سلطهی فرسوده تقلا کنید، عمیقتر در باتلاق شکست فرو خواهید رفت.
🆔 @Majlles_News
نیکزاد، نایب رئیس مجلس: وضعیت برهنگی به گونهای است که در برخی سفرها دچار تردید میشویم آیا مقصد پرواز همانجایی است که اعلام شده یا خیر!
از محسن رضایی، انتظار داریم که قانون حجاب را تعیین تکلیف کنند
🆔 @Majlles_News
نائب رئیس مجلس: ایران ذرهای تردید و ضعف در دفاع از منافع ملی خود ندارد و در این واقعیت ذرهای اختلاف در بین ارکان مختلف حاکمیت، مردم و نیروهای مسلح نیست
🆔 @Majlles_News
🔻انتقاد کوچکزاده به سخن قالیباف درباره واکنش نظامی ایران بعد از تشدید محاصره
مهدی کوچکزاده نماینده تهران:
🔹طرف افاضه کرده: «اگر محاصره را تشدید کنند حتما پاسخ نظامی میدهیم»
یعنی حالا که گلوی ملت ایران را با محاصره دارید فشار میدهید تا تدریجا خفه شود، علیه شما اقدام نظامی نمیکنیم، و زجرکش شدن ملت را نظاره میکنیم تا کار تمام شود!
🔹 اما اگر گلوی ملت را محکم فشار بدهید (محاصره را تشدید کنید) که موجب مرگ دفعی و بد…
📸 قالیباف: تمام اقدامات آمریکا به تقلید از شیطان و خود آمریکا شیطان بزرگ است
رئیس مجلس :
🔹مدرسه میناب: کودکان قتلعام شدند. سالن ورزشی لامرد: بچهها سلاخی شدند. عروسی کوهستک: کودکان همراه با خانوادههایشان کشته شدند.
🔹اگر قدرتی مثل شیطان عمل کند، مثل شیطان هدف انتخاب کند و مثل شیطان بکشد، آن قدرت شیطان است.
🔹اگر همان قدرت، شیطانِ کوچکتری را که دقیقاً همین کارها را میکند حمایت و سپر کند، آنوقت خودش «شیطان بزرگ» ا…
رئیس کمیسیون امنیت ملی: روزی بود که ۱۳۰ کشتی آمریکایی در خلیج فارس حضور داشت؛ اما امروز حتی یک فروند کشتی آمریکایی در خلیج فارس پیدا نمیکنید؛
آمریکاییها به ۵۰۰ مایلی فرار کردهاند؛
دیگر قفل تنگه هرمز برای آمریکاییها باز نخواهد شد؛
🆔 @Majlles_News
رئیس کمیسیون امنیت ملی: هر نقطه ای که مبدا حملات بوده را مورد حمله قرار دادیم؛
ایران محیط دفاعی امنیتی خود را گسترده کرده و خودش تعریف میکند؛ به هر منطقه ای که بخواهد آن را توسعه میدهد؛
ایران برای مردم منطقه، ادراک جدیدی از امنیت در منطقه را بازگو کرده
🆔 @Majlles_News
عضو هیئت رییسه مجلس: دیگر زمان مقابله چشم در مقابل چشم نیست، از این پس به در مقابل چشم، به سر حمله خواهیم کرد/ گزارش داده شده است که از امارات به ایران حمله شده است و اگر گزارش تایید شود، میدانند چه اقدامی انجام خواهیم داد
🆔 @Majlles_News
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 341 posts we hold for @Majlles_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
حقوق کارکنان کشوری و لشکری @hoghogh_20 · 39,639 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
کانال فرزندان شاهد کشور @FARZANDANESHAHED · 93,591 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
جعبه اسرار @Secrets_Box · 66,972 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
هواشناسی ایران🔖 @iran_met · 46,284 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
🌐 بازنشست نیوز 🌐 @bazneshast_news · 28,554 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026
آموزش و عیب یابی خودرو @diadcarman · 108,350 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
شبکه خبری بازنشستگان @bazneshasteganirani · 84,688 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مجلس نیوز” (@Majlles_News), 22,452 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Majlles_News.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.