💠 پاسخ ما به هر گونه خطایی محاسباتی دشمن، پیش بینی ناپذیر خواهد بود ✍️ محمدباقر قالیباف 💠 @ghalibaffan

Channel
شبکه رسمی هواداران قالیباف
@ghalibaffan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,030subscribers
-1,545 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001767341646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ghalibaffan |
| Description | شبکه رسمی هواداران دکتر قالیباف ارتباط با شبکه هواداری: @Ghalibaffan1 اینستاگرام: Instagram.com/ghalibaffann توئیتر: X.com/ghalibaffans ایتا: eitaa.com/ghalibaffan بله: Ble.ir/ghalibaffan روبیکا: Rubika.ir/ghalibaffan |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ghalibaffan |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:36 | 13,030 | -17 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:26 | 13,047 | +2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:21 | 13,045 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:57 | 13,057 | -16 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:11 | 13,073 | -28 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:09 | 13,101 | -13 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 13,114 | -54 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:28 | 13,168 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:10 | 13,173 | -19 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:21 | 13,192 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 13,198 | -11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 13,209 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 13,217 | -20 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:22 | 13,237 | -25 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:26 | 13,262 | -16 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 13,278 | -16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:50 | 13,294 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:06 | 13,304 | -6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:14 | 13,310 | -10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:14 | 13,320 | first reading |
Engagement
512 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.20%
- avg views ÷ 13,030 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 156
- 66 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.72%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 66
- of 512 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 62 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 512 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 10,318 |
| Reactions total | 174 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 06:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈13,600
- Videos
- ≈6,820
- Links
- ≈6,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4h 35m
- Average length
- 1m 26s
Measured directly from 193 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,072 reactions across 477 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,284 | 62.0% | |
| 👍 | 320 | 15.4% | |
| 👎 | 223 | 10.8% | |
| 😁 | 190 | 9.17% | |
| 🤬 | 25 | 1.21% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 0.724% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 0.29% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.193% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.145% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.097% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 478 of the 512 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,072 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 512 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 66 posts held from the last 30 days (10.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💠 #تقویم_خدمت 📖مروری بر فعالیتهای دکتر قالیباف در سالهای گذشته 🗓 ۱۵ آبان 🔺 ۱۳۹۱: بهرهبرداری از باغ موزه قصر 🔺۱۴۰۳: حضور و سخنرانی دکتر قالیباف در نشست اعضای شورای عالی نظام پرستاری 🔺۱۴۰۴: نشست اعضای فدراسیون اتاق های بازرگانی پاکستان با دکستر قالیباف رئیس مجلس شورای اسلامی- اسلام آباد 🔺 ۱۴۰۴: دیدار سید یوسف رضا گیلانی کفیل ریاست جمهوری و رئیس مجلس سنای پاکستان و دکتر قالیباف رئیس مجلس شورای اسلامی - اسلام…
💠قالیباف گفته بود ترامپ اول آمریکا رو تبدیل به اول اسرائیل کرده و انگار مردم آمریکا حرف قالیبافو قبول کردن. 🔺 وقتی عقلانیت و اقتدار میدانی و دیپلماسی با هم جمع بشن، کار به جایی میرسه که رقیب آمریکایی هم مجبور میشه اعتراف کنه حق با تهران بود؛ حق با قالیباف بود. حق با ایران بود! ✅ @ghalibaffan
❤3
💠صدای شهر 🔺 رسانه ای برای شهروندان ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ ✅ @ghalibaffan
❤2
💠آمریکا از روزی که قدرت گرفته است تا کنون به دنبال بلعیدن ایران بوده و خواهد بود 🔺روزی این هدف را از طریق تسلیم حاکمان دست نشانده دنبال می کرده و امروز که با ایستادگی ملت یکپارچه و مستقل ایران مواجه شده است از ابزار جنگ نظامی و اقتصادی و شناختی استفاده می کند ✅ @ghalibaffan
❤2
💠یک راهبرد، یک مسیر و یک فرمان؛ ایران باید آنقدر قوی بشه که هیچ دشمنی حتی فکر حمله بهش رو هم نکنه! 🔺رهبر انقلاب تو پیام ۱۳ آبان میگن تنها راه رسیدن به بازدارندگی پایدار، ادامه مسیر "ایران هرچه قویتر" هست؛ مسیری که بدون وحدت ملی، انسجام اجتماعی و خدمت به مردم به نتیجه نمیرسه. ✅ @ghalibaffan
❤4
💠 بدون شک یکی از موضوعات مهم و فوری، همین موضوع معیشت مردم است که باید در اولویت قرار داشته باشد لذا همه باید به همدیگر کمک کنیم و نگوییم این مسئولیت دولت، مجلس، قوه قضائیه یا بخش خصوصی است، بلکه همه ما باید بایستیم و کارمان را انجام دهیم تا به نتایج مشخص و عینی برسیم. ✍️ محمدباقر قالیباف 💠 @ghalibaffan
❤4
💠 پاسخ قالیباف به ونس: از این سخنرانیها که بگذریم، چرا این حرفها را به رییست نمیگویی؟ 📌محمدباقر قالیباف در واکنش به پست شبکه گذشته جیدیونس معاون رئیس جمهور آمریکا در حساب کاربری خود در شبکهٔ ایکس نوشت: 🔺آمریکا حس قماربازی را منتقل میکند که مدام میبازد اما دیگر نمیتواند از پای میز قمار بلند شود. در حالی که آمریکا در لبهی پرتگاه #اول_اسرائیل ایستاده است، رئیس تو دارد مرحلهی بعدی جنگ را آماده میکند. از این سخ…
❤6
♨️ شکست سهمگین به عنوان بخشی از تاوان ترامپ 🔸 آنچه در انتخابات میاندورهای آمریکا رخ داد، فراتر از خوشبینانهترین انتظارات قبلی برای دموکراتها بود. شکست جمهوریخواهان در چند ایالت همیشه قرمز مانند تگزاس، کارولینای جنوبی و ارکانزاس پیام سیاسی این شکست را به بیش از یک نارضایتی اقتصادی تبدیل کرده است. واضح است که در اصل دشمنی با ایران، تفاوت ماهوی میان دموکرات و جمهوری خواه وجود ندارد اما قطعا این پیروزی نتایج قابل ت…
❤3
💠 رویکرد (چماق و هویج) هیچ تاثیری بر ایران ندارد. پیشرفت تنها زمانی حاصل خواهد شد که هفت شرط ایران مورد پذیرش قرار گیرد. ✍️ محمدباقر قالیباف 💠 @ghalibaffan
❤3
💠 #تقویم_خدمت 📖مروری بر فعالیتهای دکتر قالیباف در سالهای گذشته 🗓 ۱۴ آبان 🔺 ۱۳۸۵: صدای شهر افتتاح نخستین استودیوی رادیویی شهرداری 🔺۱۳۹۳: مجسمه عصر عاشورا رونمایی شد 🔺 ۱۴۰۴: آغاز سفر رسمی سه روزه دکتر قالیباف به پاکستان 💠 @ghalibaffan
❤3
💠چطور شما اینقدر راحت برای رسانههای دشمن خوراک خبری تولید میکنین؟ 🔺شبکه ۱۲ اسرائیل در گزارشی درباره اختلافات تو رأس حاکمیت ایران، دقیقا به مطالبی استناد کرده که اولین بار تو رسانههای جریان تندرو مثل نوبنیاد و رجانیوز منتشر شده ✅ @ghalibaffan
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 512 posts we hold for @ghalibaffan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ghalibaffan edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 15 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 1 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @ghalibaffan as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 10 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 10 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 14 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ghalibaf · 62,397
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
@Majlles_News · 22,066
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 September 2026
@MizSabz · 47,904
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@rasaee · 22,765
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
@iran_emrooz · 19,144
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 October 2026
@tarikhe_paahlavi · 37,442
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
@kheybarshekan · 142,836
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@majles · 71,151
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
@tweet_cade · 51,307
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 27 August 2026
@almayadeen_com · 53,404
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@imreza8 · 51,137
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
@naajm_ir · 24,924
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
@roozplus_ir · 206,770
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
@ecomedia_arzi · 42,740
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
@AkharinTwiit · 51,528
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شبکه رسمی هواداران قالیباف” (@ghalibaffan), 13,030 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghalibaffan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.