Channel
@Raavi_ir
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,296subscribers
-116 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001388016009 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Raavi_ir |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Raavi_ir |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 3,296 | -10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 3,306 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 3,313 | -11 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 3,324 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:42 | 3,333 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 3,337 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 3,344 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 3,351 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 3,365 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 3,373 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 3,382 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 3,396 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 3,407 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 3,412 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:09 | 3,412 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
183 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 86 | 47.0% | |
| 👏 | 37 | 20.2% | |
| ❤ | 33 | 18.0% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 9.84% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 2.73% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 1.64% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.546% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💢 دیر فهمیدید که یه عمریه عروسک خیمهشب بازی امثال کسایی مثل ترامپ و حتی رضا پهلوی شدید 🔹 ولی گوش نکردید تا خودتون با گوشت و پوست و استخونتون درک کردید و فهمیدید... 🆔 @Raavi_ir
👍16❤6👎2
📌 جدای از این اعتراف 🔹این جنگ ۳۸ روزه هم نشون داد که این حرفای امام خمینی هم درست بوده: 🔸«آمریکا دشمن شماره اول بشر و ما است، آمریکای جهانخوار، بزرگترین دشمن اسلام و مسلمانان جهان میباشد، آمریکای حیلهگر، دشمن شماره یک و به خون اسلام و استقلالشان تشنه است. 🔹آمریکا دشمن شماره یک مردم محروم و مستضعف جهان است. آمریکا برای سیطره سیاسی و اقتصادی و فرهنگی و نظامی خویش بر جهان زیر سلطه، از هیچ جنایتی خودداری نمینماید.…
👍15👎2🥴1
💢 این احمق و اون ۹۳۰۰ نفری که پستش رو لایک کردن، یه نکته خیلی ساده رو نمفهمیدن: 🔹توی سوریه اصلاً چیزی به اسم کارت بانکی یا عابربانک وجود نداشت. تازه الان، تو سال ۱۴۰۵-۲۰۲۶، برای اولین بار بهصورت محدود به یه عده خاص کارت دادن و حالا هم جولانی با کلی ذوق خریدش رو باهاش به رخ میکشه! 🔸 در حالی که تو ایران، کارت عابر بانک از سال ۱۳۷۱ بهصورت گسترده و عملیاتی توسط بانک سپه راه افتاد. ⭕️ داستان این جماعت هم همون ماجرای…
👏14👍2
🎥 ارتش نوین رضاشاه در شهریور ۱۳۲۰ 🆔 @Raavi_ir
😁6👎1
📌 وطنفروشها، جنگطلبها، آویزان شدههای از لنگ ترامپ و بیبی و عمو لیندزی برای بمب ریختن سر ایران و ایرانی، بعد از تمام شدن پروژهشان، برگشتهاند سر باشگاه و روتین پوستی و تست ضدآفتاب جدید و دستور غذای سنتی ایرانی... 🔹آنها در این جنگ هیچ چیز از دست ندادهاند. نه خانهای داشتند که سقفش پایین بیاید، نه بچهای که زیر آوار تکهتکه شود، نه شرفی که پایمال شود. 🔸اما برای مادران بچههای میناب زندگی هرگز مثل روزهای قبل …
👍5👏4❤2🥴1
🔺بهترین توصیف ممکن از مدل توسعۀ ایران در دوران پهلوی: 🔻«تهران آب لولهکشی نداشت، سالن باله و اپرا افتتاح میکرد» 🆔 @Raavi_ir
👍9
حمله ناگهانی بلایای طبیعی از آسمان 🌪 و زمین 💥 در تهران مرحله بعدی آتشفشان 🌋 بعدشم دایناسورها میان 🦖🦕 اگه بچههای خوبی باشیم قطعاً آدم فضایی و زامبیها هم میان پیشمون😂🤌🏻 🆔 @Raavi_ir
😁5
تنگهٔ هرمز 🌊 🚫 ورود آمریکایی و سگ ممنوع 🚫 🆔 @Raavi_ir
❤11👏2
📌 مردم کشورهای حوزه خلیج فارس چه گناهی دارند؟ 🔹کل دنیا الان از این جنگ ناراضیان، ولی نه به خاطر ما یا دلسوزی برای ایران؛ بیشتر از این ناراحتن که اقتصاد خودشون به هم ریخته. گرونی سوخت، صفهای بنزین و گاز، اعتراض مردم کشورها… همهش از اثرات همین درگیریهاست. 🔸 حالا واقعیت اینه که این وضعیت یه جورایی هم تقصیر خودشونه، هم چیزییه که بالاخره دارن نتیجهشو میبینن. 1⃣ ۴۷ ساله همین کشورها که الان از گرونی سوخت مینالن، …
👏6❤2
📖دیکشنری پهلویچیها: 🍅سس = مادهی قرمز 🐡آکواریوم = محفظهی حفاظتی ☀️نورالزهرا = نور 🏃🏻♂فرار = تبعید 🫡نوکری = دیپلماسی 💥بمباران = آزادی 🩸بچهکش = نقطهزنی 👫خیانت = میهنپرستی 🤲🏻التماس به ترامپ = اپوزوسیون 😵شکست = تاکتیک 🧍♀🧍🧍♂سهنفر تجمع = خیزش ملی 🎤 جاکفشی پارلمان = تریبون جهانی 🤳هشتگ / کامنت: فعالیت سیاسی 🆔 @Raavi_ir
👏9❤1🥴1
وضعیت ایران و آمریکا به روایت زخم کاری😂 🆔 @Raavi_ir
😁2
💢 ۲۰ سال گفتند برای نجات آمدهایم وقتی رفتند افغانستان ویران بود! بعد گفتند خودشان نخواستند رشد کنند! اول میگن برای نجاتت میایم. 🔹بعد بازی با کلمات شروع میشه: آزادی، دموکراسی، کمک به مردم، ساختن آینده بهتر. 📌 جریان مشابه در افغانستان و همین جریان باز در عراق اتفاق افتاد! ❌ وقتی میگیم تاریخ بخونید برای اینه. ۲۰ سال در افغانستان گفتن ما اینجاییم که ت.روریسم رو جمع کنیم، کشور رو بسازیم، مردم رو آزاد کنیم. 🔶آخرش چی…
👍3👏2🤨1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Raavi_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“راوی” (@Raavi_ir), 3,296 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Raavi_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.