Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for حامین مدیا | صفرتاصد ازدواج

Channel

حامین مدیا | صفرتاصد ازدواج

@hamin_media

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,015subscribers

-179 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001284808572
TypeChannel
Username@hamin_media
Created5 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hamin_media

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,01519,35419,184.56 August 2026 — 19,194 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,194 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,181 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,158 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,147 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,354 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,341 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,329 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,311 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,300 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,284 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,268 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,251 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,252 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,275 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,247 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,230 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,200 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,193 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,179 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,161 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,156 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,141 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,122 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,113 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,106 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,090 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,057 subscribers7 September 2026 — 19,037 subscribers10 September 2026 — 19,015 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 35 days, net -179. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,964–19,405 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 15:5519,015-22
7 Sept 2026, 14:3719,037-20
4 Sept 2026, 18:3719,057-33
3 Sept 2026, 07:0619,090-16
2 Sept 2026, 01:2819,106-7
1 Sept 2026, 03:3619,113-9
31 Aug 2026, 00:4619,122-19
29 Aug 2026, 22:0719,141-15
28 Aug 2026, 20:4719,156-5
27 Aug 2026, 21:0719,161-18
26 Aug 2026, 23:0819,179-14
26 Aug 2026, 00:5219,193-7
24 Aug 2026, 22:2419,200-30
23 Aug 2026, 11:3419,230-17
21 Aug 2026, 20:5419,247-28
20 Aug 2026, 16:1219,275+23
19 Aug 2026, 15:3419,252+1
18 Aug 2026, 18:1819,251-17
17 Aug 2026, 15:1819,268-16
16 Aug 2026, 08:1519,284first reading

Engagement

216 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.01%
avg views ÷ 19,015 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,520
152 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
152
of 216 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held216 (4 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total231,509
Reactions total4,078
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30m 25s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,455 reactions across 213 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,41844.3%
👍1,04219.1%
😁83615.3%
💔4177.64%
👎1923.52%
👏1813.32%
🔥821.50%
😭731.34%
😍661.21%
👌651.19%
😢460.843%
🤔370.678%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 213 of the 216 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,455 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 216 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:03 UTC544 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

اگر چه‌ خواب نیاید به‌ چشم کم سویم.... ولی به خاطر تو شب بخیر می‌گویم ✋ _امیرخسرو دهلوی 🆔 @Hamin_media

5

2 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC818 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026

بیاین سعی کنیم این رسم فضولی کردن که هزار جوره توجیهش میکنیم که اسم قشنگ تری داشته باشه رو از سرمون بندازیم 👌... کادو چی‌ برات گرفت؟ طلا رو که حتما خرید؟ وا دختر فلانی رو واسش خریدن واسه تو نخریدن؟😳 قراره شما چی بخرین واسش؟🧐 عه عروسیتون کیه؟ مگه میشه بوفه نخرین؟ سرویس کمتر از ۲۴ نفره؟ نه بابا مردم چی میگن! حلقه ازدواجت همینه؟ حلقه نامزدیت کو؟ عه! نخریدن؟!چرا انقدر کوتاه میای؟! لباس چی؟ فقط همینارو خریده؟ خجالت نمیکش

👍197

2 Sept 2026, 13:57 UTC874 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

کور بشه چشمی که نمیتونه تمدن و قدرت ایران رو ببینه...😡 وقتی دشمن با گستاخی تمام به مدرسه و مراسم عروسی و بیمارستان حمله می‌کنه بیش تر میخواد انگیزه و امید رو مورد هدف قرار بده نه چیز دیگه ای رو...... 🔸عروسی : نماد تشکیل خانواده و جمعیت سالمه 🔸مدرسه نماد علم و دانش و تکنولوژی 🔸بیمارستان نماد بهداشت روانی و جسمی مردم این وحشی بازی ها هم برا اینه که دیده این جا کسی سر خاک کشورش باج نمیده لجش دراومده ترامپ احمق🤮

26😁2🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTC943 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

خیلی سختش نکنیم ✨ همیشه که نباید رفت کافه... مهم با هم بودنه.. این که تو خونه یه چایی ، دمنوش یا حتی یه لته ای چیزی درست کنی و بشینی با همسرت بخوری❤️ 🆔 @Hamin_media

18👏5

2 Sept 2026, 10:10 UTC950 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

کاری از رسانه حامین مدیا در محکومیت حملات متجاوزانه آمریکایی_صهیونی به خاک کشور و مراسم عروسی مردم عزیز سیریک💔 #تولید_اختصاصی_حامین_مدیا 🆔 @Hamin_media

💔291

2 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,020 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

اگه به دنبال رابطه ی عاطفی سالم هستین خیلی به این نکات توجه کنین : 🔹هیچ مسئله احساسی خود به خود حل نمیشه پس صادقانه و با خونسردی درمورد مشکلتون صحبت کنین چون شفافیته که رابطه رو نجات میده ✅ 🔹 تو رابطه به دنبال برنده شدن نباشین ! به جای اینکه تلاش بکنین که کی راست میگه حق با کیه و مقصر کیه به دنبال راه حل و پذیرش باشین ✅ 🔹 احساسات طرف مقابل رو به هیچ وجه نادیده نگیرین چون بعدا مشکل ساز میشه حتی اگه به روی خودش نیار

3👍2👏2

2 Sept 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,000 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026

خوش قلب ترین آدما اونایین که نگران تاثیر حرفاشون رو قلب بقیه هستن... . این مسئله رو تو انتخاب همسر در نظر بگیرید❤️ 🆔 @Hamin_media

25

2 Sept 2026, 05:47 UTC≈1,150 views62 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

این بچه ها تنها گناهشون این بوده که تو یه مراسم عروسی شرکت کردن...💔 ثمره این همه سال جنایت آمریکا و اسرائیل تو افغانستان و عراق و لیبی و سوریه و ویتنام و فلسطین و.... . حالا هم به خیال خودش اومده سراغ تمدن ایران اما زهی خیال باطل 😡 مرگ بر آمریکا مرگ بر اسرائیل #جان_فدای_ایرانیم🇮🇷 🆔 @Hamin_media

💔50😭12

2 Sept 2026, 05:25 UTC≈1,170 views54 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⚫️ حمله وحشیانه آمریکایی_صهیونی به ساختمان های مسکونی و مراسم عروسی در سیریک که منجر به شهادت فرزندان ایران در تاریخ ۱۰ شهریور ۱۴۰۵ شد رو به شدت محکوم می‌کنیم.... . جان فدای ایرانیم 🇮🇷 🔻طراح: مصوِّر 🆔 @Hamin_media

😢29💔212😁1😭1

1 Sept 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,450 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026

یکی از چراهای آمار طلاق تغییر معیارهای انتخاب همسر هستش مسائل مالی ، تحمل گرایی و ظاهر هر چند هم که اصطلاحا فیک باشه بر اعتقادات، ساده زیستی،ثبات اخلاقی و اصالت وجودی و خانوادگی طرفین ارجحیت پیدا کرده ✍️ مهربانو 🆔 @hamin_media

13👍4👎3🤔2

1 Sept 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,430 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026

بابام شدیداً اعتقاد به ازدواج فامیلی داره.... . دیشب سر شام می‌گفت پسر تو باید با فامیل ازدواج کنی دقیقا مثل من که مادرتو گرفتم ، عموت که زن عموت رو گرفت ، داییت که زن داییت رو گرفت.... . 😂 پ.ن: هیچی دیگه منم قبول کردم... .😂 🆔 @Hamin_media

😁24🤔3

1 Sept 2026, 10:44 UTC≈1,570 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

برگرفته از کتاب دلفین ها پرواز می کنند😂 🆔 @Hamin_media

😁22👎41

Showing the 12 most recent of 216 posts we hold for @hamin_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTCAnonymous Poll320 voters

به نظر شما چه قالب محتوایی برای انتقال محتواهامون بهتره؟!!

  1. به صورت متن کوتاه باشه39%
  2. به صورت متن بلند باشه15%
  3. پادکست بسازین برامون21%
  4. اینفوگرافی و اسلایدی باشه30%
  5. ویدئو کوتاه باشه بهتره53%
  6. ویدئو بلند باشه بهتره16%
  7. سوالات چند گزینه ای بپرسین23%
  8. محتوای داستانی و تجربه افراد46%
  9. برگزاری چالش21%

The shares total 264%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTCAnonymous Poll370 voters

به نظر شما در مورد کدوم یکی از موضوعات زیر بیشتر محتوا گذاری کنیم بهتره؟!!🤔

  1. خودشناسی پیش از ازدواج 🧐52%
  2. مهارت های ازدواج ✨55%
  3. فان ازدواجی 😂24%
  4. پاسخ به سوالات مخاطبین 📝28%
  5. پروسه آشنایی و خواستگاری 😍51%
  6. مسائل مالی ازدواج 💸34%
  7. معرفی کتاب 📚23%
  8. چالش زندگی مشترک 🫣51%
  9. ویدئو روانشناس 🎥25%
  10. متن و شعر عاشقانه ❤️18%

The shares total 361%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTCAnonymous Poll277 voters

به نظر شما در طول روز چند محتوا تو کانال قرار بگیره بهتره؟!!

  1. ۵ محتوا45%
  2. ۱۰ محتوا33%
  3. ۱۵ محتوا12%
  4. ۲۰ محتوا16%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 216 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr.mostafanaeimi
@drmostafanaeimi · 139,769
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
شبکه شاغلین مؤمن🇮🇷
@shaghelin · 65,636
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حامین مدیا | صفرتاصد ازدواج” (@hamin_media), 19,015 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hamin_media.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.