Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کبریت مدیا

Channel

کبریت مدیا

@KebritMedia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,337subscribers

-144 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001097579577
TypeChannel
Username@KebritMedia
Created22 November 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/KebritMedia

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,33717,48117,4095 August 2026 — 17,481 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,481 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,476 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,471 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,470 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,467 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,461 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,459 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,454 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,447 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,436 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,433 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,423 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,416 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,412 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,408 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,397 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,387 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,386 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,385 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,382 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,373 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,368 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,364 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,357 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,355 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,357 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,356 subscribers7 September 2026 — 17,337 subscribers5 August 20267 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 32 days, net -144. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,315–17,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 03:1917,337-19
4 Sept 2026, 13:0017,356-1
2 Sept 2026, 21:5617,357+2
1 Sept 2026, 22:3617,355-2
31 Aug 2026, 22:0817,357-7
31 Aug 2026, 01:1417,364-4
30 Aug 2026, 02:3517,368-5
29 Aug 2026, 04:2417,373-9
28 Aug 2026, 07:0517,382-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:1317,385-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:0617,386-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:5717,387-10
24 Aug 2026, 03:2417,397-11
22 Aug 2026, 12:1417,408-4
21 Aug 2026, 04:3317,412-4
20 Aug 2026, 02:3217,416-7
19 Aug 2026, 00:1117,423-10
17 Aug 2026, 22:4717,433-3
16 Aug 2026, 22:3517,436-11
14 Aug 2026, 09:2417,447first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 4 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 17,337 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,020
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held33 (4 January 202631 August 2026)
Views total39,270
Reactions total396
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44m 18s
Average length
1m 26s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,063 reactions across 33 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,11654.1%
💔2049.89%
👍1959.45%
🤡1497.22%
👎1336.45%
😁552.67%
😭452.18%
🤮341.65%
😢231.11%
🤣180.873%
❤‍🔥170.824%
👏160.776%
🔥160.776%
💘60.291%
😍60.291%
🥰60.291%
🥱60.291%
🥴50.242%
🕊30.145%
😐20.097%
6 further kinds80.388%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,063 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC≈1,590 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

به دخترا سیبیل دادیم تا برن خواستگاری 👀💍 اولش از انتظاراتشون پرسیدیم... و بعدش قرار شد خودشون خواستگار خودشون بشن🙃 نسخه کاملش رو تو آپارات کبریت ببین🌷https://www.aparat.com/v/utsc778 ✅ @kebritmedia

😁14👍65👎2💔1

31 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,740 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

کاش پدر و مادرم اینطوری درکم کنن❤️🙂 ویدئوی کاملش رو اینجا ببین👇 https://www.aparat.com/v/mffii3j

13👍6👎1

29 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC≈2,100 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

مادر رو ببینی دختر رو میگیری؟👀💍 فقط ضرب المثله؟ یا تو واقعیت هم بهش اعتقاد داری؟ نظر آقایون رو بشنوید✋ ✅ @kebritmedia

😁12👍42👎1

27 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC≈2,590 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

این چراغ جادو 🪄 میتونه یه چیزی رو تو خانواده‌ت تغییر بده! انتخاب شما چیه؟🤔 ✅ @kebritmedia

11🥴3

24 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC≈3,110 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

نمی‌تونستم حرف بزنم یا راه برم! چرا؟ دلیلش رو تو ویدئو ببینید💔 اگه تجربه مشابهی داری حتما برامون تعریف کن🙌 ویدئوی کاملش رو اینجا ببین👇 https://www.aparat.com/v/mffii3j ✅ @kebritmedia

8💔2

23 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC≈3,020 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

کنکور ازت چی گرفت؟🙁 تو هم برامون بنویس! ویدئوی کاملش رو اینجا ببین👇 https://www.aparat.com/v/mffii3j ✅ @kebritmedia

😭10👍4🥱32👎2🤣2

22 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC≈2,810 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

تو مگه کنکور نداری؟🤨🧐 شما هم تو زمان کنکور جمله عجیبی شنیدید که اذیتتون کنه؟ ویدئوی کاملش رو اینجا ببین👇 https://www.aparat.com/v/mffii3j ✅ @kebritmedia

🤣7👍53🥴2👎1

20 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC≈3,270 views42 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

ولی کنکوری های امسال خیلی سختی کشیدن🙂💔 بعد از ضبط ویدئوی اصلی، نشستیم پای درددلشون... ویدئوی کاملش رو اینجا ببین👇 https://www.aparat.com/v/mffii3j ✅ @kebritmedia

21💔8🤣5😢5👍3

19 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC≈3,480 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

حدس بزن کی کنکوری نیست؟😉📚 قسمت دهم کبریت اوت منتشر شد🔥 ۶ تا کنکوری رو دورهم جمع کردیم ولی یکیشون داره نقش بازی میکنه و کنکوری نیست... ویدئوی کاملش رو اینجا ببین👇 https://www.aparat.com/v/mffii3j ✅ @kebritmedia

17👍3😐2🗿1😍1

18 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC≈3,550 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

عملیات موفقیت آمیز آمریکا در ایران!😶 درست خوندی! کاملا موفق بوده✅👌 این ویدئو رو حتما ببین تا ماجراش رو بفهمی! ✅ @kebritmedia

32👍13🤮8👎1🤡1

17 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC≈3,480 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

حاضری شرایط عجیب این قرارداد رو قبول کنی؟👀 برای رسیدن به موفقیت؟🤔 قرارداد عجیبی که یک میلیون نفر قبولش کردن...🫢 ✅ @kebritmedia

23🥰3👎1👻1💔1

15 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈3,650 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

یه سلاح آمریکایی تو ایران هست❌ که میتونه یه بحران خیلی بزرگ به وجود بیاره😳 ویدئو رو ببین تا داستان رو بفهمی... ✅ @kebritmedia

👍29🤡7👎43🤣2🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @KebritMedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پشتیبانی ترفند
@tarfannnnnd · 300
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 28 August 2026
طنز سیاسی دکترسلام
@drsalaam · 34,152
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کبریت مدیا” (@KebritMedia), 17,337 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KebritMedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.