Channel
@Exciton_missile_program
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,976subscribers
+375 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001537306555 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Exciton_missile_program |
| Description | Twitter: mohsenreyhani01 این کانال شخصی است و مطالب آن به صورت گاه به گاه و تصادفی آپدیت میشود. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Exciton_missile_program |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 30,976 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 30,993 | +7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 30,986 | +7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 30,979 | +42 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 30,937 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 30,938 | +28 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 30,910 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 30,917 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 30,923 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 30,922 | +56 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 30,866 | +296 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 30,570 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 30,581 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 30,591 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 30,601 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 30,601 | first reading |
63 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 63 (3 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 817,560 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
پارامتر SSPK (Single Shot Probability of Kill) احتمال اینکه که یک موشک رهگیر به تنهایی بتواند یک هدف را بزند نشان میدهد. ساخت سامانه پدافندی با SSPK=0.8-0.9 یک طراحی ایده آل و سطح بالا است. محاسبه آن براساس وزن بندی انواع عدم قطعیتها (تغییر وضعیت جوی، کارکرد موتور موشک...) و خطاهای سامانه (تشخیص زاویه عمودی و آزیموت هدف...) و انواع روشهای محاسباتی مانند استفاده محاسبات مونت کارلو ... صورت میگیرد. .بر این اساس با محاس…
نیروهای مسلح دولتی یمن یک محموله بزرگ تجهیزات نظامی شامل انواع موشک،مولتی روتور های بمب انداز و مهمات مربوطه و دیگر تسلیحات را که قرار بود به حوثی ها یمن منتقل شود را در بندر المخا توقیف کردند #حوثی #سلاح 🆔@WAR_ROOM_NEWS
تایوان رسما از طرف دولت چین به عنوان یک تجزیه طلب شناخته میشود. اما روابط تجاری تایوان با چین نزدیک به 200 میلیارد دلار است. تجزیه طلب چین هم باشی، 100 میلیارد دلار از شما واردات میکند، اگر مزیت داشته باشی. شما کشور بی ثباتی ساختید، یک کشور جنگ زده، مزیتهایتم الان ضعیف است. ترکیه به لحاظ اقتصاد در رده ایران نیست. گذشت آن دوران. GDP اسمی ترکیه 5.5 برابر ایران و GDP برابری قدرت خریدش 2.3 برابر ایران است. به لحاظ GDP P…
The naval blockade has been highly effective, and the current attrition primarily harms the IR. It seems the IR is preparing to start a new round of conflict to turn the unbearable economic attrition into a costly war of attrition. This may also aim to hit the US elections. @Exciton_missile_program 🚀
Video, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
از جناب ریحانی هم بابت حضورشان در پس زمینه و خواندن سطر اول خطبه نشست صوتی متشکریم. @P_raetorio
I prefer Iran’s geography to these name games. Iran has 2,154 km of southern coastline (2,440 km with islands), of which ~796 km is oceanic. Iraq’s coastline is a mere 58 km. a permanent Geostrategy catastrophe that no renaming can erase. in war, Saddam fully grasped this weakness. (Photo: speaker of the Council of Representatives of Iraq in X) @Exciton_missile_program 🚀
سریعترین رشدهای اقتصادی عمده در جهان از 1980 تا 2025 این دقیقا همان سالهایی است که در جنگ با عراق، درگیریهای پرونده هستهای و بعد توسعه امنیتی منطقهای سوزانده شد. نتیجه اش هم اینست که ایرانی حتی غذا درست نمیتواند بخورد و فقر غذایی دارد.. پایتخت مملکت یعنی عمق استراتژیکی که قرار بود امن باشد هم بین 30-40% حوادث جنگ را تحمل کرده است. توسعه دیجیتالی کمک کرد چندین کشور شمال-جنوب رشدهای بالا تجربه کنند، اینجا 3 دهه درگ…
در حمله امشب به کیف این احتمالا موشک اسکندر نیست. این احتمالا موشک بالستیک سری KN کره شمالی است که با سرعت بیشتری روی هدف فرود می آید. مانور pull-up شاید کمتر باشد. اما باز هم زاویه نزدیک به عمودی و تیز را مشاهده میکنیم. سرجنگی هم مشخصا بسی سنگین است. @Exciton_missile_program 🚀
بالستیک های ضد کشتی به شبکه ای سنسورها و اطلاعات وابسته هستند تا به حداکثر کارایی خود برسند و این با سیستم های داخلی پیشرفته تکمیل میشود. طبعا در آبهای نزدیک شانس اصابت افزوده میشود. مطلب پیشینم در ارتباط آمار بالستیکهای ضد کشتی حوثی. که نرخ اصابت موفق شاید زیر 20% و کمتر بود. هر چند همان زمان هم برایم باعث تعجب بود که همین میزان هم موفقیت دارند. باعث شد کمی دیدم را نسبت به بالستیک های ضد کشتی جدی تر کنم. البته تکنیک…
وزارت دفاع امارات متحده عربی از شناسایی دو موشک بالستیک پرتابشده از سوی ایران خبر داد. طبق این اعلام، دو موشک بالستیک پرتابشده از سوی ایران توسط وزارت دفاع امارات شناسایی شده است. یکی از این موشکها خارج از آبهای سرزمینی امارات و دیگری داخل آبهای سرزمینی این کشور سقوط کرده است. پ.ن: بالستیک ضد کشتی؟ 🧐
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @Exciton_missile_program. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 34,414 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Exciton Computer Missile Program” (@Exciton_missile_program), 30,976 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Exciton_missile_program.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.