Channel
@M_S_A_Institute
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
936subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001843373428 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @M_S_A_Institute |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/M_S_A_Institute |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 936 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 938 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 942 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 943 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 945 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 945 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
653 reactions across 17 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 322 | 49.3% | |
| ❤ | 94 | 14.4% | |
| 👎 | 71 | 10.9% | |
| 😁 | 56 | 8.58% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 5.51% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 1.99% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 1.07% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 1.07% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 0.919% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 0.919% | |
| 🤨 | 6 | 0.919% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 0.919% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 0.766% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 0.613% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 0.613% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.459% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.306% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.306% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.153% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.153% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.153% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 653 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2025 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Two tips for all future buyers: Don’t bother trying to purchase the Shahed-136 — just copy it. And for ballistic systems, don’t go to the Ministry of Defense; instead, find a connection with the IRGC and request to buy Raad-500 directly
😁22❤9🤣3
The U.S. appears ready for a scaled-up 12-day war playbook: heavy SEAD first, then targeting Iran’s ballistic missiles. But Iran’s plan is known and different. With calibrated moves across the region, it can guarantee oil above $200 for months and, through escalation, trigger a global energy shortage by damaging production infrastructures.
👍34🔥5💩4❤2👀2👎1😁1
"In strategy, there’s a term: 'Active Inertia' when failing systems respond to crises by doing more of what caused the crisis. Larijani, Shamkhani, Ahmadian,jalili... Enough said.
👍17🤬5😭5😁4👎2👏2❤1
Iran’s army just launched a nationwide call to "find" drone counter solutions and operational products; not "build" one : with a $30,000 prize. Cost of one shahed drone . So that's why...
❤22👍3
Why won’t senior officials and generals admit defeat? Because admitting failure means accepting responsibility; for years of budgets, ranks, privileges, and free elite education, all justified to protect the nation. But when it mattered most... commanders were asleep, systems failed, and the enemy struck at will. So who will answer for this defeat? Who justifies a war machine that breaks at first contact with the ene…
👍27👎14👌1
The 12-day war ended in Iran’s undeniable defeat. Calling it a “victory” was, at best, a short-term morale patch. But 40 days on, this lie hasn’t faded—it’s calcified. Now it's doctrine. Fabricated documentaries, speeches, and reports are rewriting failure into triumph. The system isn’t just lying to the world—it’s lying to itself. If this myth-making is deliberate, it’s betrayal. If unintentional, it’s proof of a sy…
👍25👎15👏4👌1
Dear Taiwan, we can sell you better and hardly proven effective drones: " Shahed-136" for 1/20 the price. Or just do what Russia, China, USA (and now sweden,Ethiopia, Sudan, Venezuela...) did. copy them for free.
👍30😁6❤2🤬1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥30🤨6
https://www.eranshahr.com/myths/busalame
😁21👍1🗿1
An enemy ship spots a jet on the horizon—eyes on the sky, fingers on SAM triggers. The unknown aircraft, warned, turns back... but beneath the waves, the real threat is already on its way. #UCAV #Navy #Iran #Torpedo
❤17👍6👀4🤓1
Iran’s military commentators simply can’t comprehend why #Russia cites “strategic concerns” to avoid arming Iran—yet sells 5th-gen fighters to #India against #China and S-400s to NATO-member Turkey.
👍41❤3👎3🔥1😁1
Why can’t China become a real superpower? The U.S. has all the tools: tech, capital, military might"and" still actively pushes arms sales to lock in alliances at key chokepoints. Even Russia learned this long ago. China stays passive. even where allies are ready. Real power means creating dependencies, not just hoping for alignment. If Beijing wants loyalty in the next big war, it must learn from Washington: pressur…
👍36🤮4🍌2👎2❤1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @M_S_A_Institute. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MSAI” (@M_S_A_Institute), 936 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/M_S_A_Institute.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.