کانالی برای نشر آموزه ها و مباحث مرتبط با عرصه زرهی و سایر بخش های نیروی زمینی
👈 تابع قوانین تلگرام
جهت ارتباط با مدیریت کانال : @SNTankograd_ad
جهت تبلیغات : @SNTankogradads
نخستین پست کانال : https://t.me/SNTankograd/3
Created
Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Tankograd 🇮🇷” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net -8,930. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,873–31,889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 22:48
21,444
-12
4 Nov 2026, 21:59
21,456
-20
4 Nov 2026, 01:01
21,476
-7
2 Nov 2026, 21:51
21,483
-8
1 Nov 2026, 23:16
21,491
+42
1 Nov 2026, 00:27
21,449
+51
31 Oct 2026, 03:15
21,398
+16
30 Oct 2026, 03:31
21,382
-26
28 Oct 2026, 23:59
21,408
-3
27 Oct 2026, 20:25
21,411
-24
26 Oct 2026, 22:09
21,435
-21
25 Oct 2026, 22:15
21,456
-9
24 Oct 2026, 22:25
21,465
+17
23 Oct 2026, 23:46
21,448
-16
22 Oct 2026, 20:11
21,464
+6
21 Oct 2026, 13:36
21,458
+112
20 Oct 2026, 09:44
21,346
+211
19 Oct 2026, 06:36
21,135
-3
18 Oct 2026, 08:47
21,138
+13
17 Oct 2026, 08:17
21,125
first reading
Engagement
197 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.1%
avg views ÷ 21,444 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,460
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 197 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
197 (2 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
206,840
Reactions total
3,152
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 05:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈33,300
Videos
≈4,210
Links
≈2,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23m 15s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,881 reactions across 197 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
7,499
44.4%
🤣
3,753
22.2%
❤
2,485
14.7%
💔
522
3.09%
🔥
448
2.65%
👌
399
2.36%
🤯
340
2.01%
👎
327
1.94%
👀
246
1.46%
🫡
239
1.42%
👏
216
1.28%
🥰
150
0.889%
😐
112
0.663%
🙏
41
0.243%
😍
39
0.231%
💯
27
0.16%
😘
23
0.136%
😢
12
0.071%
🤝
3
0.018%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 197 of the 197 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,881 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 197 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SNTankograd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 197 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔍 به کمک ارزشمند شما نیاز داریم 🤍
ما در قالب یک پروژه دانشجویی روی یک پژوهش کوچک کار میکنیم و برای این کار به دیدگاه شما نیاز داریم.
این نظرسنجی کاملاً ناشناس است، هیچ اطلاعات شخصی (نام، شماره تماس، ایمیل و غیره) دریافت نمیکند و کمتر از ۴ دقیقه زمان میبرد.
شرکت در نظرسنجی 👇🏻
https://survey.porsline.ir/s/MMUxxM9a
پیشاپیش ممنون از وقتی که میذارید 🙏
مسئله اصلی این است که در ج.ا هنوز به فهم این مسئله نرسیده اند که بازدارندگی یک مسئله چند وجهی یا چند جانبه است و شما به صرف در اختیار داشتن یک کارت مشخص قادر به تامین آن نیستید.
امروزه با پدیده بازدارندگی یکپارچه (Integrated Deterrence) رو به رو هستیم که به معنی ترکیب و هماهنگسازی تمام ابزارهای قدرت ملی (نظامی و غیرنظامی) در تمام حوزههای نبرد، با همکاری نزدیک متحدان و شرکای بینالمللی، برای جلوگیری از تهاجم دشمن ا…
این روزها بحث بمب اتم و بازدارندگی هسته ای بیش از پیش داغ است و عده ای تصور میکنند که در اختیار داشتن بمب اتم همچون کلید ورود به بهشتی است که سلامتی و بهروزی ما را تضمین میکند اما آیا در عمل اینچنین است؟
جمهوری اسلامی در بحث بازدارندگی حتی در چهارچوب ها و تعاریف کلاسیک بازدارندگی نیز بازی نکرده چه رسد به تعاریف امروزی از این مسئله. در نظریه کلاسیک بازدارندگی هر چند ابزار نظامی محوریت دارد اما نقش دیپلماسی و گزینه ب…
تصویر بسیار کمیاب سربازان و خدمه تانک سبک سری TNH (دقیق تر مدل TNHP) ایرانی به سال 1317.در اواسط دهه 1310 خورشیدی ( 1935میلادی)، ایران برنامهای گسترده برای نوسازی ارتش خود آغاز کرد. پس از بررسی گزینههای مختلف، تانک سبک TNH ساخت چکسلواکی انتخاب شد.
نخستین محموله این تانکها در فوریه 1937 (بهمن/اسفند 1315) وارد ایران شد و در قالب اولین واحدهای مکانیزه و زرهی ارتش شاهنشاهی سازماندهی گردید. ایران در ابتدای فرآیند خرید…
در خصوص معرفی کلاه محافظ NG-IHPS مطالبی دارم که انشالله فردا تقدیم خواهم کرد، نکات جالبی در خصوص این کلاه وجود دارد و به نوعی نقشه راه توسعه و بهبود کلاه های محافظ را نشان میدهد که بررسی آن خالی از لطف نیست.
@SNTankograd
این سیستم دارای یک بستر سختافزاری مشترک برای توزیع انرژی و خطوط داده است. این بستر کابلکشیهای اضافه در بخش خارجی کلاهخود را حذف کرده و مانع از گیر کردن کابلها به تجهیزات محیطی در حین عملیات میشود.
هسته اصلی این پلتفرم نرمافزار اختصاصی AlertCentr است که دادههای حیاتی ماموریت را مستقیماً در سطح کلاهخود مدیریت کرده و هشدارهای صوتی و تصویری قابلتنظیم را به سرباز ارائه میدهد.
طراحی این پلتفرم به صورت باز انجام …
پیشتر در خصوص کلاه های محافظ IHPS آمریکا مطالبی در کانال منتشر شده اما در جریان رویداد نمایشگاهی AUSA 2026 که چندی قبل در آمریکا برگزار شد، یک مسیر ارتقای پیشنهادی برای نسل جدیدتر این کلاه ها یعنی NG-IHPS از سوی شرکت Galvion ارائه شد.
این بسته به روزرسانی یا توسعه قابلیت ها و فناوری ها که تحت عنوان سیستم Cortex EVO HALO ارائه شده در حقیقت یک معماری الکترونیکی و ماژولار بیرونی برای کلاهخودهای نظامی پیشرفته است که ام…
نگرش یا طرز فکر سومی هم وجود دارد که در حقیقت ترکیبی از مزیت های دو روش دیگر را مد نظر قرار میدهد. این مسئله بدان معنی است که شما بسته به شرایط از مزیت های هر دو نوع نگاه بهره میبرید.
به یک تعبیر هم از مزیت سیستم کنترل آتش پیشرفته در ترکیب با مهمات فاقد هدایت بهره میبرید که یک مزیت اقتصادی است و در شرایطی که لازم است از مهمات هدایت شونده نیز برای اهداف مهم استفاده میکنید.
البته نگرش سوم مستلزم این است که شما در همه…
در خصوص آتش باری توپخانه ای چندین نقطه نظر یا نگرش به مقوله دقت آتش و اطمینان از انهدام هدف وجود دارد. نخستین نگرش که این روزها طرفداران زیادی هم دارد این است که به جای استفاده از مهمات گران قیمت هدایت شونده باید از یک سیستم کنترل آتش پیچیده و پیشرفته که البته گران قیمت هم هست بر روی هویتزرها استفاده کنیم و به جای آن دقت آتش در شلیک مهمات فاقد هدایت یا مهمات معمول را افزایش دهیم. به صورت خلاصه نگرش نخست یعنی افزایش د…
ایجاد پل بیلی بر روی یکی از شاخه های کرخه در جریان عملیات آزادسازی بستان از سوی یگان مهندسی رزمی ارتش.هر آنچه که از روش ها و دستورالعمل ها، تجهیزات و .... در حوزه مهندسی رزمی امروزه در اختیار ارتش است در حقیقت میراث گذشته است و در چند دهه اخیر تحول خاصی در این حوزه صورت نگرفته (به یک تعبیر اگر پس رفت نکرده باشیم قطعا پیشرفت خاصی هم نداشتیم)
@SNTankograd
درود بر شما گرامیان، وقت بخیر🌷عبور تانک M47 ارتش از روی پل شناور PMP ایجاد شده در دوران جنگ با عراق. مهندسی رزمی یا به تعبیر دیگری مهندسی نظامی از نظر قدمت به تاریخ جنگ های بشری میرسد و مقوله جدید و تازه ای نیست اما مهندسی رزمی به تعریفی که امروزه میشناسیم تقریبا از دوره جنگ های جهانی به بعد تعریف شده است.
اما در ایران، ریشههای رسمی مهندسی رزمی در ارتش مدرن ایران به اوایل دهه 1300 خورشیدی و دوران پهلوی اول بازمیگر…
👍61💔13❤6👎1🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 197 posts we hold for @SNTankograd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 26 posts on @SNTankograd as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@SNTankograd named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sntankogrd named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
میلیتاری در پارسی @militaryinpersian · 19,959 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
Praetorio @P_raetorio · 40,963 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
🇮🇷وقایع الاتفاقیه نظامی🇮🇷 @defence_news · 49,400 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
کاتافراکت @cataphract1 · 59,757 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Military Podcast | پادکست نظامی 🎙 @mili_podcast · 20,801 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
Red Lion Corps @RedLionCorps · 25,168 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
Exciton Missile Program @Exciton_missile_program · 31,911 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
Minas Tirith @Minas_Tirith2024 · 43,129 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
جنگاوران @jangaavaran1390 · 137,074 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
مهمات @mohem_mat · 21,633 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 September 2026
Fighter Radar | فایتر رادار @fighter_radar · 185,161 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
MILITA CAMP @Milita_Camp · 23,739 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
Iranian Naval Force @Navy_Iranian · 20,806 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 September 2026
Parvaz dar oj @Parvazdaroj · 32,128 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
تاریخ قرن بیستم WW1-WW2 @historyworldwar2 · 27,583 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
world_newsly @World_Newsly · 261 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Partisan / پارتیزان @partisan2015 · 62,769 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
FactNameh | فکتنامه @factnameh · 109,966 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
MESHKAT | مشکات @Projectmeshkat · 19,303 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
GENERAL @General_persiian · 34,891 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
تجهیزات نظامی @tajhizat_nezami2017 · 22,953 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
🇮🇷Defender IRAN🇮🇷 @irDefender · 97,011 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
ارتش دفاعى اسرائيل @idfinfarsi · 94,717 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
🇮🇷Defenders Plus+ @defenders_plus · 30,036 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tankograd🛡” (@SNTankograd), 21,444 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SNTankograd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.