Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فرازِ خاکستری

Channel

فرازِ خاکستری

@FarazTheGrey

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,622subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001719945501
TypeChannel
Username@FarazTheGrey
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FarazTheGrey

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5721,6221,5976 August 2026 — 1,588 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,588 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,586 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,581 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,577 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,576 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,575 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,574 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,575 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,572 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,581 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,620 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,622 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,565–1,630 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:151,622+2
13 Sept 2026, 16:221,620+39
9 Sept 2026, 19:181,581+9
1 Sept 2026, 02:081,572-3
28 Aug 2026, 15:521,575+1
25 Aug 2026, 19:471,574-1
22 Aug 2026, 13:131,575-1
19 Aug 2026, 04:471,576-1
16 Aug 2026, 05:081,577-4
12 Aug 2026, 20:151,581-5
10 Aug 2026, 00:291,586-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:201,588no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:361,588first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 11 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

258 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20177.9%
176.59%
💩176.59%
👎124.65%
🤣103.88%
🤬10.388%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 258 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC356 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍10👎21🤣1🤬1

27 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC598 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

▶️ بخش اخر گفتگو که شاید مهم ترین بخش برای ما باشد به دو موضوع مهم میپردازد: ◀️ ورود به فاز عملیات زمینی در سواحل و جزایر ایران پیپ با احتمال بیش از ۵۱ درصد پیش‌بینی می‌کند که طی ماه‌های آینده، خط قرمز عبور به عملیات زمینی (فاز ۳) در جزایر یا سواحل ایران شکسته خواهد شد. علت اصلی این امر، تشدید بحران اقتصادی جهانی، جهش قیمت بنزین در آمریکا و احتمال بروز حملات با تلفات انبوه است که ترامپ را در آستانه انتخابات، برای اث

👍5💩1

27 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC543 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

▶️ در این ویدئو درباره رویکرد چین و روسیه درباره جنگ ایران و آمریکا اینگونه توضیح داده میشود: 🇨🇳 چین پیپ موضع چین را ترکیبی از محاسبات دقیق امنیتی و امتناع از مداخله مستقیم نظامی می‌داند پکن به‌هیچ‌وجه نمی‌خواهد خاورمیانه وارد بی‌ثباتی مطلق شود و قاطعانه‌تر از آن، با تخریب و فروپاشی کامل ساختار ایران (Smashed) مخالف است؛ چرا که ایران یک هم‌پیمان کلیدی انرژی و استراتژیک برای چین محسوب می‌شود. با وجود مخالف بودن با ش

👍3💩1

27 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC504 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

▶️ در نیمه اخر این گفتگو موضوعات زیر مطرح میشود: 🔔 هم‌زمانی بحران بین‌المللی با انتخابات آمریکا؛ بازگشت به آشوب‌های دهه ۱۹۶۰ پیپ کابوس‌وارترین سناریوی پیش‌روی سیاست خارجی و داخلی آمریکا در پاییز ۲۰۲۶ را هم‌زمانی یک بحران بزرگ بین‌المللی با انتخابات می‌داند. او این وضعیت را با دهه ۱۹۶۰ میلادی مقایسه می‌کند؛ دوره‌ای که تقاطع یک جنگ فرامرز‌زیِ نامحبوب با تنش‌های شدید سیاسی داخلی، کشور را به ورطه آشوب، تظاهرات گسترده،

👍52👎1💩1

27 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC≈8,270 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

▶️ از دقیقه 1:02:00 تا بیست دقیقه از این ویدئو به گفتگو پیرامون احتمال تشدید حملات تروریستی - انتحاری علیه آمریکا بعد از ورود زمینی این کشور به خاک ایران اختصاص دارد. 🔔 این بخش‌ها نشان می‌دهد که آمریکا به دلیل ناکارآمدی حملات هوایی و نزدیک شدن به بحران کمبود شدید نفت، با احتمال ۵۰ تا ۷۰ درصد دست به یک عملیات زمینی محدود در سواحل جنوب شرقی ایران مانند چابهار یا جاسک خواهد زد. 🔫 هدف اصلی از این اقدام، کسب یک پیروزی ن

👍6👎1💩1

25 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC446 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

▶️ در دقیقه 21 تا 26 این مسئله مطرح میشود که آیا آیا جنگ اخیر موجب تقویت موقعیت ایران شده است یا خیر چرا؟ 📁 پیپ تایید می‌کند که ایران امروز بسیار قوی‌تر از زمان پیش از شروع جنگ در ۲۸ فوریه است. او توضیح می‌دهد دلیل این امر، تسلط ایران بر تنگه هرمز و توانایی آن در تهدید هر شناوری است که قصد عبور دارد. ایران این قدرت را با استفاده از پهپادها، مین‌های دریایی و موشک‌ها تثبیت کرده و مانعی ایجاد نموده که کنترل بر جریان

👍121💩1

25 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC420 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

▶️ در 9 دقیقه نخست این گفتگو پروفسور رابرت پیپ به تحلیل دلایل عدم موفقیت یادداشت تفاهم اسلام‌آباد میان آمریکا و ایران می‌پردازد. 🔑 او توضیح می‌دهد که مسئولان آمریکایی مانند معاون رئیس‌جمهور، مسئله را از زاویه‌ای کاملاً تجاری دیده‌اند و تصور می‌کردند با رویکرد پرداخت در ازای خدمات می‌توانند بحران را حل کنند. در این چارچوب، آمریکا پیشنهاد یک طرح بازسازی ۳۰۰ میلیارد دلاری را داد تا در ازای آن، ایران اقدام به بازگشایی ت

👍141

24 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC568 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💬 اولین محتوایی که در کانال منتشر می‌کنیم، گفت‌وگوی تازه و بسیار مهم برنامه The Diary of a CEO با پروفسور رابرت پیپ (Robert Pape) است؛ گفت‌وگویی که برای فهم روند جنگ ایران و آمریکا و پیامدهای احتمالی آن، ارزش ویژه‌ای دارد. ⛓ مشاهده کانال The Diary of a CEO 💬 برای درک اهمیت این مصاحبه، ابتدا باید خود برنامه را شناخت. The Diary of a CEO با اجرای استیون بارتلت، یکی از بزرگ‌ترین و پربیننده‌ترین پادکست‌ها و ویدئوکست‌های

👍29💩21

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @FarazTheGrey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HISTOGRAPHY
@HISTOGRAPHY · 31,727
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
تاریخ قرن بیستم WW1-WW2
@historyworldwar2 · 27,295
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
اخبارفوری/مهم 🔖
@Akhbar_Fourri · 53,914
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Exciton Computer Missile Program
@Exciton_missile_program · 31,121
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
Minas Tirith
@Minas_Tirith2024 · 42,681
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Praetorio
@P_raetorio · 40,282
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
محافظ گلدون من
@goldooneman · 4
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
عاشقان کتاب
@bookk_lovers · 27,062
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 September 2026
УКРАИНСКИЙ ДВИЖ
@wassupukraine · 27,949
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 September 2026
خاطرات و خطرات
@khateraaat · 22,210
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
🇮🇷وقایع الاتفاقیه نظامی🇮🇷
@defence_news · 49,740
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Parvaz dar oj
@Parvazdaroj · 32,163
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
آموزش اکسل | Ms Excel
@VBA_Excel · 101,861
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فرازِ خاکستری” (@FarazTheGrey), 1,622 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FarazTheGrey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.