Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,187–2,221 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:56
2,191
-1
15 Sept 2026, 02:01
2,192
-7
11 Sept 2026, 08:39
2,199
-3
6 Sept 2026, 19:57
2,202
+2
2 Sept 2026, 08:04
2,200
-2
30 Aug 2026, 16:24
2,202
+2
27 Aug 2026, 20:53
2,200
+2
24 Aug 2026, 12:03
2,198
-5
20 Aug 2026, 18:43
2,203
-4
18 Aug 2026, 04:15
2,207
-5
14 Aug 2026, 18:13
2,212
-1
11 Aug 2026, 02:23
2,213
-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:20
2,216
-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:33
2,217
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:35
2,217
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
17m 11s
Average length
2m 09s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
329 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
138
41.9%
❤🔥
72
21.9%
❤
49
14.9%
😁
49
14.9%
🫡
12
3.65%
💔
4
1.22%
👎
3
0.912%
👏
1
0.304%
😨
1
0.304%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 329 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vayuvata. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
جناب سعدی میفرمایند:
گرت ز دست برآید، چو نخل باش کریم
ورت ز دست نیاید، چو سرو باش آزاد
این فرسته(پست) و دو فرسته دیگر را دوستی برایم فرستاد و خب لذت بردم؛ حقیقتاً برای من کمتر لذتی بالاتر از دیدن کسانی است که حتی وقتی اندک توانی دارند تلاش میکنند که زندگیشان، دوربر شان و حتی جهان را کمی بهتر کنند.
و هیچ چیز اندازه جماعت ترول و همیشه دم به مسخره بازی تهوع آور تر نیست(تقریباً به اندازه رجوی و مجاهدین خلق از اینها مت…
زنجیرهای از ۱۳ دهانه؛ ردپای یک دنبالهدار ازهمگسیخته روی گانیمد
تصویری از فضاپیمای گالیله در سال ۱۹۹۷، زنجیرهای از ۱۳ دهانهٔ برخوردی را روی گانیمد، بزرگترین قمر مشتری، نشان میدهد. این ساختار که Enki Catena نام دارد، در مرز نواحی تاریک و روشن سطح قرار گرفته است.
دانشمندان معتقدند این دهانهها حاصل برخورد ۱۳ قطعه از یک دنبالهدار هستند که پس از متلاشی شدن در اثر گرانش مشتری، پشت سر هم به سطح گانیمد برخورد کرد…
ایتالیا وقتی بعنوان یکی از متحدین در جنگ جهانی دوم بقدری بد عمل کرد که بر عکس بقیه متحدین اروپایی (آلمان و اتریش) بعد از شکست در جنگ به چند قسمت تقسیم نشد و هر کدوم از قسمتها هم توسط یکی از متفقین اشغال نشد.
------------------------------
@worldatwar1 📸
یک دستگاه تانک بریتانیایی Matilda در سال ۱۹۴۱، در حال انتقال با قطار از یکی از کارخانههای منطقهٔ میدلندز بریتانیا به مقصد جبههٔ شرقی، در چارچوب برنامهٔ Lend-Lease (برنامهٔ کمکرسانی نظامی و اقتصادی آمریکا و متحدانش به شوروی بود.).
#عکس_داستان
@vayuvata
خط تولید جنگندههای بریتانیایی Supermarine Spitfire Mk.I در کارخانهٔ ایتچن، بریتانیا، در سال ۱۹۳۹؛ در آستانهٔ آغاز جنگ جهانی دوم.
#عکس_داستان
@vayuvata
سلام!
امروز تولد کانال است! گویا سه سال گذشت متاسفانه برخلاف دوسال پیش ما هفته تولد کانال نداشتیم و رشته فرستهی ویژه هم نداشتیم...
در این سه سال ما داستان های گوناگونی را برای شما روایت کردیم تا کنجکاوی های خودمان را با شما سهیم شویم؛ اما احوالات این چند وقت و چند ماه مجال فعالیت نداد از قطعی سه ماهه اینترنت تا هزار جور مشکل دیگر که یک قلم آن جنگ است!
لیکن مانند همیشه میخواهم از همه عزیزان و دوستانی که ما را از روز…
سربازان تیپ یکم نیروهای هوابرد ژاپن پیش از اجرای یورش به فرودگاه آمریکایی یونتان در جزیره اوکیناوا. در پسزمینه، یک بمبافکن میتسوبیشی Ki-21-II دیده میشود(۲۴ مه ۱۹۴۵)
سربازان تیپ یکم نیروهای هوابرد ژاپن را پیش از حمله به فرودگاه آمریکایی یونتان نشان میدهد. هدف این عملیات، که با نام عملیات گیریتسو شناخته میشود، آسیب رساندن به هواپیماها و تأسیسات آمریکایی و کاهش برتری هوایی آنها بود. در پسزمینه نیز یک بمبافکن Mit…
👍12❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vayuvata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تاریخ قرن بیستم WW1-WW2 @historyworldwar2 · 27,295 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
🌐مطالب تاریخی @matalebtarikhim · 30,148 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
Red Lion Corps @RedLionCorps · 24,883 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
Minas Tirith @Minas_Tirith2024 · 42,681 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
MILITA CAMP @Milita_Camp · 22,986 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
Praetorio @P_raetorio · 40,282 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
🇮🇷Defenders Plus+ @defenders_plus · 29,844 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
🇮🇷وقایع الاتفاقیه نظامی🇮🇷 @defence_news · 49,740 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Parvaz dar oj @Parvazdaroj · 32,163 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
تجهیزات نظامی @tajhizat_nezami2017 · 24,039 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
دنیای آهنگ @dahaang · 25,191 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
جنگاوران @jangaavaran1390 · 137,615 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Fighter Radar | فایتر رادار @fighter_radar · 180,955 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Exciton Computer Missile Program @Exciton_missile_program · 31,121 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
کاتافراکت @cataphract1 · 60,047 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
دانشنامه دفاعی | اخبار جنگ @armyir · 30,965 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Partisan / پارتیزان @partisan2015 · 62,831 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
GENERAL @General_persiian · 34,327 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
🚀🇮🇷سلاح مدیا🇮🇷✈️ @Selahmedia · 28,479 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وایو(دست نوشته ها)” (@vayuvata), 2,191 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vayuvata.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.