Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net +376. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,939–15,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 14:56
15,413
-11
3 Nov 2026, 13:30
15,424
+17
2 Nov 2026, 14:19
15,407
-8
1 Nov 2026, 11:29
15,415
+13
31 Oct 2026, 13:40
15,402
+28
30 Oct 2026, 15:46
15,374
-12
29 Oct 2026, 16:17
15,386
+29
28 Oct 2026, 13:30
15,357
-5
27 Oct 2026, 12:06
15,362
+61
26 Oct 2026, 11:30
15,301
-5
25 Oct 2026, 12:45
15,306
-16
24 Oct 2026, 13:55
15,322
+22
23 Oct 2026, 16:41
15,300
+1
22 Oct 2026, 14:51
15,299
-9
21 Oct 2026, 07:35
15,308
+3
20 Oct 2026, 02:07
15,305
+6
19 Oct 2026, 01:38
15,299
-5
18 Oct 2026, 00:09
15,304
+25
16 Oct 2026, 21:05
15,279
-6
14 Oct 2026, 22:34
15,285
first reading
Engagement
151 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.79%
avg views ÷ 15,413 subscribers
Avg views / post
739
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 151 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
151 (22 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
19,209
Reactions total
210
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 05:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,060
Videos
≈1,920
Links
≈233
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
22m 23s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,256 reactions across 87 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
673
53.6%
👍
145
11.5%
❤🔥
116
9.24%
💔
89
7.09%
🔥
62
4.94%
⚡
37
2.95%
👎
37
2.95%
🏆
23
1.83%
👌
20
1.59%
👏
20
1.59%
😍
15
1.19%
😱
11
0.876%
🍾
6
0.478%
💯
1
0.08%
🤩
1
0.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 151 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 148 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AirCraft_ir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 151 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
تا ۷۵٪ تخفیف در جشنواره پاییزی لینگانو!
تخفیف ویژه ۷۵ درصدی روی دوره جامع آموزش زبان لینگانو، فقط برای کاربران تلگرام🤩
✅ بیش از ۷۲ ساعت آموزش و ۱۴۶ جلسه آموزشی
✅ مناسب همه افراد، از مبتدی تا پیشرفته
✅ همراه با جزوه، تمرین و آزمون اختصاصی برای هر درس
و ۳ هدیه اختصاصی برای شما😍️️️️️️🎁
✨ مینیدوره «یادگیری زبان با سریال فرندز»
✨ مینیدوره «لغات و کالوکیشن»
✨ ۱ سال اشتراک رایگان هوشمصنوعی لینگانو (دستیار هوش مصنوعی …
📲اشتراک های هوش مصنوعی رو با بهترین قیمت تهیه کن!! @GptPluserBot
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
🛰پکیجهای آموزشی به ارزش 8میلیون بگیر
JOIN
🛰تعمییرات موبایل و تبلت
JOIN
🛰هر روز یک نکته انگلیسی
JOIN
🛰دنیای تکنولوژی ,الکترونیک و رباتیک
JOIN
🛰دانلود پروژه های معماری
JOIN
🛰آموزش شبکه های Cisco و مایکروسات
JOIN
🛰آرشیو تخصصی آبجکت 3DMax
JOIN
🛰دانلود آبجکت های رویت
JOIN
🛰پروکسی کتاب ، تجربه ای متفاوت !
JOIN
🛰آمورش رندرینگ در معمار…
دو Airbus غول پیکر در حال بلند شدن و نشستن از یک باند پرواز با چند ثانیه اختلاف... برج کنترلی که می تونه چنین مهارتی رو به نمایش بذاره
دیدن داره...
✈️ @aircraft_ir
👈 ثبتنام اولین بوتکمپ جامع طراحی سایت با وردپرس +هوش مصنوعی 🤖مکتب شریف شروع شد 😍
💻 توی این دوره یاد میگیری چطور با قدرت وردپرس و سرعت ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی، سایتهای فروشگاهی و شرکتی فوقحرفهای بسازی و وارد بازار کار و فریلنسری بشی 💼
👈 ثبتنام اولین دوره طراحی سایت با AI
"با امکان پرداخت ۴ ماهه و اعتبار اسنپپی + استعدادسنجی رایگان"
❗️گفتگو با مشاور ثبتنام هوشمند مکتب 🔽
🆔 @MaktabSharif_Admin
📱 کانا…
تصاویر محل برخورد هواپیمای لیرجت به کنار خیابانی در فلوریدا و شدت تخریب زمین در اثر زاویه و سرعت بالای سقوط.
یک فروند جت تجاری لیرجت ۶۰ با رجیستر N722BD در ایالت فلوریدای آمریکا سقوط کرد و تمامی ۹ سرنشین آن جان باختند.
این هواپیما از آستین تگزاس به مقصد باهاما در پرواز بود که خلبانان در ارتفاع حدود ۳۵ هزار پایی، وجود یخزدگی روی هواپیما و آشفتگی متوسط هوا را به کنترل ترافیک هوایی گزارش کردند.
✈️ @aircraft_ir
با کارت بلوبانکت پولدار شو
با دعوتت از دوستاتون به بلوبانک ۳۰۰ هزار تومن هدیه بگیرید.
۲۰ نفر رو دعوت کنی میشه ۶ میلیون پول 😍
چی از این بهتر
اگه بلو نداری با کد من حسابتو باز کن
NORBSA
اگه هم حساب داری زود دست به کار شو بقیه رو دعوت کن
🎯 دوره یکساله مدیریت کسبوکار
یک دوره جامع، تخصصی و کاربردی برای مدیران، کارشناسان، صاحبان کسبوکار و افرادی که به دنبال توسعه مهارتهای مدیریتی و ارتقای توانمندیهای حرفهای خود هستند.
✅ ۲۵۰ ساعت آموزش تخصصی و کاربردی
✅ برگزاری کلاسها پنجشنبهها
✅ برگزاری حضوری و آنلاین بهصورت همزمان
✅ ارائه گواهینامه معتبر از دانشگاه تهران
💰 شهریه دوره: ۴۸ میلیون تومان
📚 سرفصلهای دوره
🔹 مدیریت استراتژیک و طراحی مدل کسبوکا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @AirCraft_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 6 posts on @AirCraft_ir as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
34 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 140 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@AirCraft_ir named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@proghe_eda named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Production Line @ProductionLine · 26,608 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
🌐مطالب تاریخی @matalebtarikhim · 29,972 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
Parvaz dar oj @Parvazdaroj · 32,144 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Military Podcast | پادکست نظامی 🎙 @mili_podcast · 20,813 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
میلیتاری در پارسی @militaryinpersian · 19,977 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
کاتافراکت @cataphract1 · 59,762 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
تاریخ قرن بیستم WW1-WW2 @historyworldwar2 · 28,421 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
جنگاوران @jangaavaran1390 · 137,119 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Exciton Missile Program @Exciton_missile_program · 31,737 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
کانال راز قرآن @raz_quran · 22,503 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 September 2026
Minas Tirith @Minas_Tirith2024 · 43,129 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Tankograd🛡 @SNTankograd · 21,456 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 September 2026
Praetorio @P_raetorio · 40,963 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
Mekanism | مکانیزمها @mekanism · 57,258 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
کلبه آرامش ذهن @Kazbabae · 34,308 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
Mechanical Engineering ( ut_redc) @Mech_Engineering · 24,729 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AirCraft ✈️” (@AirCraft_ir), 15,413 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AirCraft_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.