💯 دو ساعت دیگه پاک میشه . . . 🗓

Channel
Writing & Grammar 👨🏫
@writingandgrammar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
57,962subscribers
+69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001438536684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @writingandgrammar |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/writingandgrammar |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:08 | 57,962 | -44 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:05 | 58,006 | +8 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:34 | 57,998 | -22 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:07 | 58,020 | +49 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:56 | 57,971 | -46 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:29 | 58,017 | +7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:49 | 58,010 | -54 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 58,064 | -19 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 58,083 | +16 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:05 | 58,067 | -42 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 58,109 | +29 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 58,080 | +23 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 58,057 | -37 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:16 | 58,094 | -26 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:27 | 58,120 | +38 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:59 | 58,082 | -11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 58,093 | +27 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:44 | 58,066 | +5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 58,061 | -14 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:47 | 58,075 | first reading |
Engagement
242 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.09%
- avg views ÷ 57,962 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 635
- 74 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.693%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 80
- of 242 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 74 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 242 (16 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 46,959 |
| Reactions total | 295 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 10:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 49m 59s
- Average length
- 25m 00s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,151 reactions across 94 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 903 | 78.5% | |
| 👍 | 97 | 8.43% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 2.61% | |
| 🤩 | 24 | 2.09% | |
| 🙏 | 21 | 1.82% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 1.65% | |
| 👀 | 15 | 1.30% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 1.22% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 0.782% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.434% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 0.434% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.348% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 0.261% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.087% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.087% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 96 of the 242 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 242 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 80 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚨 اگه اینترنت قطع بشه، دسترسی به آموزش و درآمد سختتر میشه! همین الان عضو کانال شو؛ قبل از اینکه دسترسیت رو از دست بدی! 👇🔥 🏆 https://t.me/addlist/s5K7MNXOgAk2MDNk .
🔰 جنگ داره شروع میشه قبل قطع اینترنت حتماا عضو کانال ها بشید که محتوای کانال ها رو از دست ندید 🔵 @Armisstab ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ ⛳️دسته بندی : دانشگاهی و دانشجویی @journalacademic @med_article @akhtar_electronic_group @powerpointyar @resumedaran @manabe_daneshjooi @hamyarjozve @daneshgram @daneshgram @Jozve_baza ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ ⛳️دسته بندی : مهندسی مکانیک و برق @productionLine @mech_engineering @bargheeha @electronicghod…
👨🏫 برای رسیدن به هر سطح از زبان تقریباً چند کلمه باید بلد باشیم؟ 1⃣ این عددها خیلی تقریبی هستن 2⃣ اگه کلمات پرکاربردتر رو بلد باشید با حدود 20% کمتر هم به این سطحها میشه رسید، اما اگه کلمات کم کاربرد مثل اسمهای گیاهان یا داروها و... رو حفظ کرده باشید، ممکنه حدود 20% کلمهی بیشتر نیاز داشته باشید تا به سطح گفته شده برسید @writingandgrammar
❤7👍1
اینم کانال VIPپولی ما رایگان خدمت شما😍
Signed Naziiam
به مناسبت تولد ادمین عمر چنلمون چنل VIP که قیمت یک میلیون هست به 100 نفر اول رایگان میدیم و بعد از 100 نفر به طور خودکار لینک باطل میشه جوین بدین👇🏻
Signed Naziiam
سرمایتو چندبرابر کن 🔻JOIN آموزش هک و برنامه نویسی از پایه (فول رایگان 🔻JOIN کانفینگ رایگان V2RAYNG نامحدود 🔻JOIN بزرگترین کتابخانه رایگان تلگرامم 🔻JOIN آموزش حسابداری تخصصی 🔻JOIN منبع تمام بازی های هک شده 🔻JOIN سیر تا پیاز هک و امنیت (فول رایگان) 🔻JOIN دانلود [مستقیم فونت] رایگان 🔻JOIN جزوه های پولی رایگان شده (PDF) 🔻JOIN برترین کانال فیلترشکن پرسرعت رایگان 🔻JOIN کانال حسابداری و آموزش اکسل و مالی 🔻JOIN …
Signed Naziiam
Writing & Grammar 👨🏫 pinned «🔥 تخفیف ویژه ۳۰ درصدی دورههای خودآموز زبان عمومی ۱ و ۲ مهلت استفاده: فقط تا ساعت ۲۴:۰۰ فردا (جمعه شب) اگر قصد دارید زیربنای زبان انگلیسی خود را برای مکالمه روان، نگارش آکادمیک یا ورود به دورههای تخصصی آزمونها (TOEFL, IELTS, PTE, CELPIP, MSRT, EPT) استانداردسازی…»
🔥 تخفیف ویژه ۳۰ درصدی دورههای خودآموز زبان عمومی ۱ و ۲ مهلت استفاده: فقط تا ساعت ۲۴:۰۰ فردا (جمعه شب) اگر قصد دارید زیربنای زبان انگلیسی خود را برای مکالمه روان، نگارش آکادمیک یا ورود به دورههای تخصصی آزمونها (TOEFL, IELTS, PTE, CELPIP, MSRT, EPT) استانداردسازی کنید، این تخفیف ویژه کوتاهمدت بهترین فرصت برای تهیه این دو دوره مرجع است. در این مجموعهها به جای حفظ کردن لیستی لغات، ۶ متن آکادمیک استاندارد موشکافی ش…
❤5🥰3
🔺 پیشنهاد میشود جامع ترین منابع آموزشی و تخصصی را از دست ندهید 👌🏻 ✔️ https://t.me/addlist/0qJPa_s2NcplYzRk
🌍 دنیای مجلات انگلیسی، رایگان 🕊 🆔 @EnglishMagazines_PDF ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ 🔻پکیجهای آموزشی به ارزش 8میلیون بگیر @Computer_IT_Engineering 🔻آموزش طراحی وب + SEO حرفه ای @AmoozeshWebsite 🔻دانلود رایگان پکیجها فرادرس و ... @WorldCode 🔻دانلود تکسچر و آبجکت @Voxel3DVray 🔻آموزش برنامه نویسی ANDROID از پایه @Android0to100 🔻نرم افزار و گیم برای سیستم PC @Narmafzarpc 🔻دانلود برنامه اندرویدی ها @Android_best 🔻انگلیسی ا…
⏱️ بررسی دقیق دو زمان کلیدی: Present Perfect Simple در برابر Present Perfect Continuous چرا انتخاب بین have done و have been doing نمره رایتینگ شما را تغییر میدهد؟ خیلی از زبانآموزان این دو زمان را با هم اشتباه میگیرند یا تصور میکنند میتوان آنها را به جای یکدیگر به کار برد. اما اگر از عینک «منطق ریاضی زبان» به این دو ساختار نگاه کنیم، تفاوت آنها در یک کلمه خلاصه میشود: «نتیجه» در برابر «فرآیند». بیایید فرم…
❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 242 posts we hold for @writingandgrammar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@writingandgrammar edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 25 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 14 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @writingandgrammar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 18 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👨🏻🏫 Although the manager's initial instructions appeared ________, subsequent clarifications made the procedure easy to follow.
- mandatory22%
- ambiguous55%
- explicit14%
- lucid10%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👨🏻🏫 Only by investing in renewable energy _______ mitigate the effects of climate change.
- governments can37%
- can governments26%
- do governments can22%
- governments will14%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
MSRT QUESTION 👨🏻🏫 Before his demise in 2013, ...... as a politician of great rapport.
- A) the recognition of Nelson Mandela7%
- B) Nelson Mandela being recognized20%
- C) many people recognized Nelson Mandela34%
- D) Nelson Mandela was recognized by many39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧑🏫 با توجه به پیامهایی که از دوستان دریافت کردم، آیا از خدمات ارائه شده توسط هلدینگ پرگار (پرداخت ارزی، مشاوره، رزرو آزمون...) رضایت داشتید؟ چه مؤسسهای رو برای این خدمات پیشنهاد میکنید؟
- بله14%
- تا حدودی28%
- خیر58%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧑🏫 در کدامیک از آزمونهای زیر شرکت کردهاید و یا قصد شرکت دارید؟
- CELPIP21%
- PTE42%
- EPT19%
- MSRT35%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
با توجه به مشکلات آزمونهای تافل و آیلتس، برنامه شما برای زبان چی هست؟
- تافل رو ادامه میدم تا ببینم چی میشه 🫠15%
- میرم یه جای دیگه آیلتس میدم ✊19%
- من دیگه حال ادامه دادن ندارم 😓26%
- زبان عمومیم رو تقویت میکنم تا آماده برای هر دو آزمون باشم 😍40%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 242 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Armisstab · 1,61247 posts"..#یزید.."
@YAZIlD · 81 post🔴Asheghane_Barca🔵 | عاشقان بارسا
@asheghane_barca · 16,5211 postنکتههای نگارش و ویراستاری انگلیسی
@english_editing · 1711 post💮تبادلات تخصصی انگلیسی هدهد
@hod_hod_Tabadol · 2471 postIELTS & TOEFL Advancement (All Skills)
@ieltstoefladvancement · 2,3171 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 67 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@WritingandGrammar1 · 13,56782 posts💮تبادلات تخصصی انگلیسی هدهد
@hod_hod_Tabadol · 2479 postsتبادلات کاوش
@kavoshtab · 106 postsتبادل روزانه یونیورسال
@tabadolmax20 · 663 postsمرکز آموزش کامپیوتر
@AmoozeshWebsite · 96,7942 posts📱android_best
@android_best · 44,7612 posts🎓 ENGLISH_ILI
@English_ili · 31,1522 postsFreelancer
@job_freelancer · 31,9372 postsآموزشهای کامپیوتر و موبایل
@Pc_IT_Mob · 91,9162 postsProxy Saver
@Proxysarver · 32,8242 postsUnii_kar
@unii_kar · 23,5252 postsترفند آموزش تکنولوژی و فناوری
@CEngineer93 · 102,2051 postتقویت (مکالمه) با کارتون های 8 دقیقه ای سان شاین
@EnglishCartoonn2024 · 23,1111 postʜᴀᴄᴋ 4҉҈ ᴍᴀɴ
@Hack4Man · 7,8201 postHashtagify! | آموزش هوش مصنوعی
@hashtagifyofficial · 12,8611 postکانون تبادل لینک اقاقیا
@LinkExchange_Acacia · 1391 postشبکه و امنیت،تکنولوژی،هوش مصنوعی
@Netwo0rk · 53,8031 postکتابخانه مهندسی کامپیوتر و پایتون
@programmers_street · 30,9041 postTACTIC English
@PTEnglishtest1 · 50,8351 postPython Forever
@PythonForever · 131,8911 postآزمون طراحی معماری نظام مهندسی
@tarrahimemari · 11,6641 postVOXEL 3D OBJECT
@Voxel3DDVray · 12,8141 postVoxel studios 3D Object
@Voxel3DVray · 64,1481 postVoxel studios Learning
@VoxelLearn · 30,2371 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Android0to100 · 62,25837 postsمرکز آموزش کامپیوتر
@AmoozeshWebsite · 96,79436 postsComputer & IT Engineering
@Computer_IT_Engineering · 189,42836 posts📱android_best
@android_best · 44,76135 postsProgramming <-> برنامه نویسی
@Amozesh_4u · 29,17431 postsBlack Security Team
@Black_Security · 63,96031 postsآموزشهای کامپیوتر و موبایل
@Pc_IT_Mob · 91,91627 postsفونت برتر
@FontBartar · 113,85825 postsWindows APP
@Narmafzarpc · 55,35225 postsiGraphical
@iGraphical · 66,24224 posts🌏 دنیایِ 🎓 جزوه 📚
@Donyayejozveh · 54,86723 postsخانه هنر و گرافیک
@g_v_h · 69,13022 postsTACTIC English
@PTEnglishtest1 · 50,83522 postsانگلیسی با رضا آرش نیا
@arashniaenglish1 · 74,70321 postsکانال تبادلات پر جذب آرمیس
@Armisstab · 1,61221 postsEnglish online
@Eng_Online · 36,48721 postsپشتیبان فونتس کلاب
@fontsclub · 4,39521 postsهمه چیز در مورد حسابداری
@hesabdarijozveh · 54,68521 postsفونت گرام
@i_font · 120,22821 posts📚PDFبانک📚
@bank_keetab · 81,15020 postsگروه معماری چهارسوق
@CHAHAR_SOOGH_archi_gp · 14,95420 postsجزوه یاب 📖
@jozve_finder · 83,24220 postsمهندس یار
@mohandesyar · 65,52620 postsPython Forever
@PythonForever · 131,89120 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 8
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 5
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@writingandgrammar named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 4 posts, 18 August 2026 – 15 September 2026 · confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 15 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 2 posts, 20 August 2026 – 4 September 2026 · confirmed gone 7 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 27 September 2026 – 27 September 2026 · confirmed gone 7 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 8 posts, 25 August 2026 – 5 September 2026
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@WritingandGrammar1 · 13,567#1
@english_cafe · 19,377#2
@Englishgrammar606 · 50,436#3
@quizworld310 · 6,972#4
@ieltstoefladvancement · 2,317#5
@improveReading · 20,448#6
@class_englysh · 28,125#7
@voa_learning_english · 74,373#8
@ENG_PODCAST · 15,677#9
@PTEnglishtest1 · 50,835#10
@TOEFL_HELPER · 4,043#11
@Linguistics_TEFL · 11,009#12
@rahmaniquiz · 3,758#13
@English_ltt · 19,420#14
@EnglishConversationIsEasys · 59,714#15
@PythonForever · 131,891#16
@Eng_Online · 36,487#17
@gre_borzabadi · 5,608#18
@ieltsbank · 22,638#19
@khodAmooz_zban · 18,574#20
@bestidioms4you · 7,494#21
@TOEFL_IELTSS · 15,559#22
@EN_4_KIDS · 10,129#23
@max_academy · 69,730#24
@English_lang_learners · 20,395#25
@AmoozeshWebsite · 96,794#26
@IELTSclubs · 7,251#27
@Vocabulary_Master · 1,722#28
@programmers_street · 30,904#29
@grammarfad · 17,024#30
@ielts7ir · 4,631#31
@english_converstaion · 6,832#32
@IELTS_Super_Pack · 14,736#33
@Startquiz · 63,201#34
@ketabkhaneh_daneshjoyan · 110,199#35
@QaraeiEnglish · 4,354#36
@Ellipsis50 · 21,098#37
@EnglishAudioLibrary · 42,192#38
@English_Mr_Karimi · 59,749#39
@ieltsspeakingassistants · 6,385#40
@ALFACOD · 6,035#41
@grobP1 · 26,864#42
@pajoohehgroup · 59,356#43
@ibtil_TOEFLiBT · 19,649#44
@tarjjommee · 22,848#45
@Rate_My_Essay · 2,588#46
@English_with_Majidi · 2,327#47
@IELTSwise1 · 2,526#48
@Ielts_Tafel · 10,986#49
@usuk1 · 49,483#50
@ielts2official · 3#51
@TestHelperTOEFL · 9,840#52
@academimehdi · 16,062#53
@EnglishMarya · 14,476#54
@Englishnutsbolts · 10,223#55
@jozve_finder · 83,242#56
@CEngineer93 · 102,205#57
@narenjiemahv · 385 (as read 23 August 2026)#58
@behboud_music · 21,676#59
@Radio_Zaban · 22,946#60
@engmarya_k · 25,215#61
@ApplyPosition · 8,430#62
@Whats_Up_Buddies · 545#63
@instalingo · 5,602#64
@italybysaba · 1,298#65
@freesources_TOEFL · 4,324#66
@Mat_Clark_Speaking · 3,342#67
@MyVoiceTOEFL · 6,138#68
@filter_jadouyi · 8,906#69
@smartitaly_org · 26,681#70
@mohagheghabzar11 · 10,866#71
@ipschannel · 84,356#72
@music_lyrics_tele · 10,099#73
@bank_keetab · 81,150#74
@English_cafe8 · 12,807#75
@friendsemovie · 7,215#76
@Donyayejozveh · 54,867#77
@hassanfarahani48 · 15,401#78
@job_freelancer · 31,937#79
@karynet · 15,727#80
@fatemeh2666 · 322#81
@RockMusicLovers · 1,611#82
@lEnsamhetl · 426 (as read 23 August 2026)#83
@English_quizess · 2,232#84
@ieltsrealtestT2Qs · 9,554 (as read 23 August 2026)#85
@hodayoga · 5,290#86
@booster_IELTS · 13,137#87
@spani134 · 3,542#88
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@english_cafe · 19,377
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 October 2026
@class_englysh · 28,125
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
@improveReading · 20,448
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 September 2026
@Eng_Online · 36,487
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
@voa_learning_english · 74,373
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@English_lang_learners · 20,395
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
@Englishgrammar606 · 50,436
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
@PTEnglishtest1 · 50,835
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
@grobP1 · 26,864
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
@EnglishConversationIsEasys · 59,714
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@usuk1 · 49,483
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
@Startquiz · 63,201
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
@ieltsbank · 22,638
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
@behboud_music · 21,676
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 September 2026
@english_prism · 38,893
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
@EnglishAudioLibrary · 42,192
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@easy_englishgrammar · 25,916
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 September 2026
@Radio_Zaban · 22,946
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
@ieltsjournalchannel · 50,694
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
@Ellipsis50 · 21,098
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026
@jozve_finder · 83,242
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
@pajoohehgroup · 59,356
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
@ketabdooni · 149,697
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Writing & Grammar 👨🏫” (@writingandgrammar), 57,962 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/writingandgrammar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.