Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 22 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @ieltsexpresschannel. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
35 measurements spanning 42 days, net -430. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,116–51,675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 09:01
51,180
-25
15 Sept 2026, 11:19
51,205
-13
13 Sept 2026, 21:37
51,218
-9
12 Sept 2026, 06:37
51,227
-27
9 Sept 2026, 22:01
51,254
-28
6 Sept 2026, 14:58
51,282
-18
4 Sept 2026, 08:21
51,300
-14
2 Sept 2026, 21:24
51,314
+4
1 Sept 2026, 23:15
51,310
+6
1 Sept 2026, 01:03
51,304
-8
31 Aug 2026, 00:13
51,312
-27
30 Aug 2026, 01:45
51,339
-8
29 Aug 2026, 03:02
51,347
-11
28 Aug 2026, 00:08
51,358
-9
27 Aug 2026, 01:16
51,367
-6
26 Aug 2026, 04:29
51,373
-14
25 Aug 2026, 01:47
51,387
-9
23 Aug 2026, 17:15
51,396
-32
21 Aug 2026, 23:49
51,428
-21
20 Aug 2026, 15:24
51,449
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.62%
avg views ÷ 51,180 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,360
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
41 (16 July 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
28,370
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 06:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,730
Videos
≈406
Links
≈670
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 15m
Average length
12m 34s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🔵 چرا IELTS در ایران «برنده بازار» شد؟ 🎯
یک سؤال مهم:
اگر TOEFL سالهاست یکی از معتبرترین آزمونهای زبان دنیاست،
چرا IELTS در ایران اینقدر جا افتاد؟
جواب فقط «آسانتر بودن» نیست…
1️⃣ قدمت ≠ محبوبیت
TOEFL آزمونی قدیمی و بسیار معتبر است و امتیازش توسط هزاران دانشگاه و مؤسسه در سراسر دنیا پذیرفته میشود.
اما موفقیت یک آزمون در یک کشور، فقط به اعتبار جهانی آن بستگی ندارد.
بازار آموزش هم مهم است.
2️⃣ IELTS فقط برای دان…
🔵 رایتینگ تسک وان عجیب، گزارش شده از آزمون های اخیر آیلتس کامپیوتری - یک نمونه خوب از این تسک بخوانید 👇
این تسک عجیب ترکیب یک نقشه با یک لاین گراف هست که اگر صحت داشته باشه، این اولین بار هست که در گراف های ترکیبی یک نقشه بهمراه یک لاین گراف داده شده!
Good Model Answer:
The map and the line graph illustrate the growth of the Egyptian city of Alexandria in terms of both its physical extent and its population betwe…
🔵 رایتینگ تسک وان عجیب، گزارش شده از آزمون های اخیر آیلتس کامپیوتری
این تسک عجیب ترکیب یک نقشه با یک لاین گراف هست که اگر صحت داشته باشه، این اولین بار هست که در گراف های ترکیبی یک نقشه بهمراه یک لاین گراف داده شده!
The map and graph below show the growth in the physical size and population of the Egyptian city of Alexandria between 1840 and 1980.
@ieltsjournalchannel 🔴🔵
🔵 با بیش از ۶۱۰۰ کاربر در کانالهای اختصاصی (پریمیوم) در کنار شما رکورد جدیدی ثبت کردیم! به پاس اعتماد و همراهی شما ۶ دوره رایگان با آخرین بروز رسانی سال ۲۰۲۶ در اختیار اعضای کانالهای پریمیوم قرار گرفت.
از اعتماد و همراهی شما سپاسگزاریم 🌺🙏
جهت عضویت در کانالهای اختصاصی (پریمیوم) ارسال عدد 1️⃣ به آی دی زیر 👇
@ieltsexpress
👆
عضویت در کانالهای پریمیوم دائمی و آپدیتها رایگان است!
🔵 دورههای خودآموز چهارمهارته آمادگی آزمون آیلتس (آپدیت ۲۰۲۶)
✅ ارائه برنامهریزی آموزشی و درسی
✅ کاربرگهای تمرینی با پاسخنامه
✅ تدریس توسط اساتید بینالمللی
✅ دورههای لغت و گرامر رایگان
✅ تعیین سطح رایگان آنلاین
✅ ۶ دوره زیرمهارتی رایگان
جهت دریافت نمونههای رایگان و سفارش ارسال عدد 1️⃣ به آی دی زیر 👇
@ieltsexpress
👆
🔵 در سال 2025 پایینترین نمره تعلق میگیره به ... مهارت رایتینگ!
این آمار از طریق لینک زیر برای عموم در دسترس هست
https://ielts.org/researchers/our-research/test-statistics
💡 ما برای حل این مشکل و کسب نمره 7.0 در رایتینگ براتون یک راهکار عملی و تست شده داریم! دوره آفلاین و کاملا خودآموز ما به شما کمک می کنه در سال 2026 جزو نمرات 7.0 و نفرات برتر در لیست آمار امسال باشید!
جهت سفارش و اطلاع از شرایط دورهی تخصصی را…
🔵 تغییرات جدید محیط نرمافزار جدید آیلتس کامپیوتری رو دیدی؟
🟥 برای مشاهده ورژن رسمی نرمافزار شبیه ساز آیلتس، برای هر بخش از آزمون از لینک های زیر استفاده کنید:
The Listening Test
➡️ Start the Test
The Academic Reading Test
➡️ Start the Test
The Academic Writing Test
➡️ Start the Test
💡 THE ANSWER KEY
Academic Listening Answers
➡️ Check your answers
Academic Reading Answers
➡️ Check your answers
Academic Writ…
🔵 تافل یا آیلتس در سال ۲۰۲۶؟ انتخابی که میتواند هزینه و شانس اپلای شما را تغییر دهد!
اگر در سال ۲۰۲۶ قصد اپلای دارید، قبل از ثبتنام این نکات را بدانید 👇
🔹 هر دو آزمون برای داوطلبان ایرانی عملاً نیازمند سفر به خارج هستند. IELTS نیز از ژانویه ۲۰۲۶ در ایران برگزار نمیشود.
🔹 منابع آموزشی IELTS بسیار گستردهتر است:
کتاب، دورههای آنلاین و آفلاین، آزمون آزمایشی، مؤسسات آمادگی و اساتید باتجربه.
🔹 آمادگی برای IELTS م…
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @ieltsjournalchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
IELTS BANK @ieltsbank · 22,607 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
آیلتس تافل/ IELTS @ielts_990 · 45,351 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
Spark IELTS Assistant @sparkIELTSspeaking · 33,726 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 4 September 2026
️ ️اموزش مکالمه زبان انگلیسی @novinzaban · 50,128 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
AFARINESH | خانه آیلتس آفرینش @afarinesh · 78,965 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
StartQuiz @Startquiz · 63,894 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
GET ENGLISH @lezzateenglisi · 46,559 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
Dr. Ramin Rahmani @RahmaniRamin · 27,699 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
IELTSFamily | بيان برتر @ieltsfamily · 21,527 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
آیلتس تهران @IELTS_TEHRAN · 22,205 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
SaharCast🎙 @SaharCast · 34,402 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
آتیه آفرینان | مرکز تخصصی امور مهاجرت @applyabroadnow · 27,188 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
Visa Mondial | ویزا موندیال @visamondial · 25,333 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 September 2026
Ielts9 @iielts9 · 33,280 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
اقتصاد و قانون در آنتاریو @ontario_360 · 22,104 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
مهاجرت کاری و تحصیلی @internationalcollege · 53,398 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IELTS Journal” (@ieltsjournalchannel), 51,180 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ieltsjournalchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.