وویس مهم❗️❗️❗️ نکته دارند رزدینتی رو بررسی میکنن رندوم ممکن ماههای اینده شدیدتر شه شاید هم جز مدرک بخوان❗️ تجربه و فیدبک کنسلی رو به پرگار ارسال کنید @pargaronlinepay
❤1

Channel
@PARGARIELTS
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,803subscribers
+232 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001139440067 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PARGARIELTS |
| Description | بررسی تخصصی نکات #آزمون_IELTS ✔️گروه IELTS t.me/+RFnnTH6aMsCBFvdg ❇️ کانال دسترسی سریع به بخشهای مختلف پرگار 🆔 @pargarGinfo 🔸لینک تمام گروهها 🆔 @pargarGlinks 🔸 ربات ارتباط با پرگار 🆔 @pargarGbot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PARGARIELTS |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:50 | 25,803 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:30 | 25,806 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 01:30 | 25,807 | +2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:18 | 25,805 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:25 | 25,808 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:47 | 25,811 | +5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:49 | 25,806 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:09 | 25,812 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 25,814 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:29 | 25,821 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 25,823 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:50 | 25,825 | +6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:56 | 25,819 | +39 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:41 | 25,780 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 25,784 | -11 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:28 | 25,795 | +1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 25,794 | +12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:26 | 25,782 | +7 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:50 | 25,775 | +4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 23:05 | 25,771 | first reading |
75 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 133 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (8 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 72,241 |
| Reactions total | 110 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
286 reactions across 54 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 170 | 59.4% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 18.5% | |
| 🙏 | 47 | 16.4% | |
| 🎉 | 14 | 4.90% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.699% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 286 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
وویس مهم❗️❗️❗️ نکته دارند رزدینتی رو بررسی میکنن رندوم ممکن ماههای اینده شدیدتر شه شاید هم جز مدرک بخوان❗️ تجربه و فیدبک کنسلی رو به پرگار ارسال کنید @pargaronlinepay
❤1
تافل ظاهرا دیگه تموم راه دور زدن هم نیست ، ظاهرا بطور غیر رسمی داره ملیت رو هدف میگیره از دیشب کنسلی ها شروع شد و مثل الگوی قبلی در طی روزهای اینده به یکباره حجم بیشتر میشه ما که تموم شده میدونیم مگر اینکه واقعا روزهای اینده این الگو ادامه دار نشه ⚠️ فعلا چند روز تا مشخص شدن این ماجرا به هیچ وجه سمت تافل نرین و اصلا ثبت نام نکنید چون ضرر کنسلی و پیگیری و … عدم ریفاند حتی با ادعای ریفاند تافل هم پر از مشکل! اگ…
تعداد کنسلی ها داره بیشتر بشه تافل ظاهرا درش کلا تخته شد برای ایرانی ها گفته بودیم دیروز تکرار همون سناریوی قبل
👍2
پیام بچه ها
🎉2
توهمین یکی دو روز اگه حجم کنسلی بره بالا شکنکنید داستان داره تکرار میشه فعلا ازمون تافل رو پاز کنید⚠️
🎉3
این سنتر ترکیه دلیلش گفتن تعطیلی سنتر اگر سنتر دیگه ای هستین چه ارمنستان چه ترکیه کنسل شدید به @pargaronlinepay پیام بدید
🎉3
امروز پیاهتمهایی داریم مبنی بر کنسل ازمون برخی بچه ها البته علت واضحا بیان نشده بعضی اکانتها که اصلا اتومات از داخل اکانت وقت دیلیت شده کلا بعصی هم که در تصاویر مشخص ایمیل کنسلی دادن هم ترکیه هم ارمنستان این اتفاق افتاده امیدوارم که باز قانون جدیدی برای ایرانیها نباشه جالبه اینقدر بی مسبولیتن که ازمونی که فردا بوده روالان کنسل کردند!! ایرانی باید هزینه پروازو هتل بده لحظه اخری کنسل کنند! لعنت به سیاستهای خارجی …
👍14❤1🎉1
دو ماه پیگیری، بدون یک ریال کارمزد؛ این همراهی باید دیده شود. این تصاویر از تعدادی از شیت پیگیری ریفاند تافل که واقعیت چیزی که داره ارايه میشه و صرفا ادعا نیست. پشت هر ردیف این فهرست، متقاضیای بود که با لغو تافل، نگران پول، آزمون و آینده برنامه اپلای خود شده بود. ما در پرگار پرداخت، مسئولیت پیگیری و رسیدگی به این پروندهها را پذیرفتیم؛ با وجود تحریمها، محدودیتهای پرداخت و تمام موانع بازگشت وجه. انتخاب را به …
❤7👍2
IELTS Channel pinned a photo
🍂 ثبتنام ترم چهارم کلاسهای نیمهخصوصی پرگار کلاسهای آنلاین کمجمعیت، حداکثر ۵ زبانآموز، با برنامهریزی منظم، تقویت هر چهار مهارت و پیگیری مستمر استاد. 🎁 بهدلیل استقبال و درخواستهای زیاد، تخفیف ویژه برای ۱۵۰ نفر اول در نظر گرفته شده؛ بعد از تکمیل ظرفیت، شهریه بدون تخفیف اعمال میشود. ✅ دو جلسه در هفته | هر ترم ۵ تا ۷ هفته ✅ تکلیف منظم و فیدبک تخصصی ✅ تعیین سطح رایگان برای رزرو تعیین سطح و دریافت تخفیف، عبارت…
❤3
⚠️ اعلام ظرفیت محدود باقیمانده؛ کلاس نیمهخصوصی آیلتس استاد موسوی بنا به درخواست مکرر شما عزیزان، یک کد گروه جدید برای کلاسهای نیمهخصوصی آیلتس ایجاد شد. این دوره ۱۰ جلسهای است و روی تمامی مهارتهای آزمون (چهار مهارت اصلی) به صورت تخصصی کار میشود. 🔹 مشخصات دوره: * موضوع: کلاس نیمهخصوصی آیلتس * ساختار دوره: ۱۰ جلسه جامع (کار روی هر ۴ مهارت) * زمان برگزاری: شنبهها و سهشنبهها - ساعت ۲۰:۰۰ (۸ شب) * مدرس: استاد …
❤3👍1
Join Our Language Education Team We are seeking qualified instructors to join our expanding language education programs. Open Positions We are currently recruiting experienced educators for the following divisions: - IELTS Preparation - TOEFL Preparation - Duolingo English Test Coaching - GRE Verbal & Analytical Writing - German Language Instruction Application Requirements Interested candidates should submit: …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @PARGARIELTS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IELTS Channel” (@PARGARIELTS), 25,803 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PARGARIELTS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.