قصه اینجوری شروع شد …🧡 @pargarhami
❤30👏3😍3

Channel
@pargarwiki
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
131,352subscribers
+1,403 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001057957112 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pargarwiki |
| Description | پرگار اولین مرجع آنلاین مهاجرت ایران کانال هلدینگ پرگار @pargarwiki وب سایت www.pargar.group ربات @pargargbot پشتیبان @pargarteam پرگارپرداخت @PargarOnlinePay پرگاراینفو @pargarGinfo اینستاگرام instagram.com/pargar24 |
| Created | 18 July 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pargarwiki |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 5 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @PargarPositions/24426 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC | @pargarwiki/15984 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @PargarPositions | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @PargarPositions (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 24 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @PARGARIELTS. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:34 | 131,352 | -17 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:06 | 131,369 | +936 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:26 | 130,433 | -127 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:30 | 130,560 | +1,765 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:54 | 128,795 | -730 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 129,525 | -1,181 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 130,706 | -282 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:10 | 130,988 | -134 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 131,122 | -180 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:04 | 131,302 | -117 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 131,419 | -497 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 131,916 | -144 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:41 | 132,060 | -176 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:29 | 132,236 | -196 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:58 | 132,432 | -112 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 02:00 | 132,544 | -156 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 132,700 | +2,863 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 02:36 | 129,837 | -227 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 130,064 | -57 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 130,121 | first reading |
255 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 255 (26 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 430,040 |
| Reactions total | 1,630 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 02:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,199 reactions across 249 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,380 | 60.8% | |
| 👍 | 1,651 | 22.9% | |
| 👌 | 295 | 4.10% | |
| 🕊 | 291 | 4.04% | |
| 👏 | 244 | 3.39% | |
| 😍 | 216 | 3.00% | |
| 😢 | 68 | 0.945% | |
| 🙏 | 54 | 0.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 252 of the 255 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,247 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 255 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قصه اینجوری شروع شد …🧡 @pargarhami
❤30👏3😍3
قصهای که سالها طول کشید تا اسمش را پیدا کنیم… سال ۸۹، یکی از دانشجوهای پرگار مسیر مهاجرتش به آمریکا را با ما شروع کرد. تافل، GRE، اپلای، پذیرش، ویزا، سفارت، پیکاپ و پرداختها. تقریباً سه سال، قدمبهقدم کنارش بودیم. ویزا گرفت و رفت آمریکا. فکر میکردیم مأموریت ما تمام شده. تا اینکه کووید رسید. یک روز دوباره پیام داد؛ اما این بار نه برای اپلای و نه برای ویزا. پدر و مادر سالخوردهاش در ایران هر دو بیمار شده ب…
❤82👏12👌4😍3
تخفیف ویژه تافل با بیش از ده میلیون تخفیف 💫 پرگار پرداخت، طرح حمایتی هلدینگ پرگار 💫 🌟 کمترین در نرخ پرداخت ✌️ 🌟 سریعترین در انجام پرداخت 🚀 🌟 بالاترین در دقت پرداخت 🔎 ⚡️افتخار دیگری از هلدینگ مهاجرت تحصیلی پرگار 💥 🆔 @PargarPayment به ایدی زیر پیام دهید @pargaronlinepay
❤22👏5👌3
🇫🇮 فنلاند — PhD ددلاین: ۱۳ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶، ساعت ۲۳:۵۹ به وقت هلسینکی رشتهها: زیستشناسی مولکولی، بیوشیمی، داروسازی، زیستشناسی سلولی، شیمی دارویی و رشتههای مرتبط عنوان: Doctoral Researcher (PhD) in Protein Synthesis دانشگاه هلسینکی یک موقعیت دکتری کاملاً فانددار به مدت ۴۴ ماه در آزمایشگاه Sarah O’Keefe ارائه کرده است. پژوهش روی شناسایی مهارکنندههای جدید سنتز پروتئین با استفاده از Cryo-EM، ویرایش ژن، زیستشناسی سلول…
👍19❤4
تأخیر طولانی ویزا، موقعیتهای پژوهشی استرالیا را تهدید میکند گزارش ۲ نوامبر تایمز اجوکیشن درباره تأخیرهای طولانی و نامشخص ویزای دانشجویان پژوهشی است؛ خبر از توقف رسمی صدور همه ویزاهای دانشجویی نمیدهد. بیش از ۱۵۰ متقاضی از بلاتکلیفی شکایت دارند؛ میانه انتظارشان حدود هشت ماه است، بیش از ۵۰ نفر بالای یک سال منتظر ماندهاند و ۹۰ نفر میگویند موقعیت دکتری دارای فاندشان در خطر است. یک متقاضی چینی پس از ۱۴ ماه انتظار، م…
❤20👍3👌2
پرگار جوانه میزند… 🌱 چیزی در راه است از ریشهای که میشناسید
❤29😍3👏2
معرفی دانشگاه پادووا | University of Padua ✅ زمان: راند اول بسیاری از رشتههای بدون ظرفیت محدود، از ۱۵ سپتامبر تا ۱۵ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶؛ رشتههای ظرفیتمحدود تقویم جدا دارند. ✅ زبان: حداقل B2؛ در فهرست جدید دانشگاه، آیلتس ۶، تافل با مقیاس قبلی ۸۶ یا مقیاس جدید ۴٫۵، دولینگو ۱۱۵ و PTE Academic ۶۵ پذیرفته شدهاند. ✅ تافل هوم: بله، صریحاً پذیرفته شده. ❗️ نکته اپلای: امکان ارسال مدرک زبان بعد از درخواست اولیه وجود دارد؛ طبق …
❤25👌2👍2
🇸🇬 سنگاپور — Master by Research با امکان دریافت بورسیه ددلاین: ۱۵ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶ رشتهها: ارتباطات، مطالعات رسانه، روزنامهنگاری، روابط عمومی، ارتباطات سلامت، مطالعات اطلاعات و رشتههای مرتبط عنوان: Master of Communication Studies (Research) — NTU Singapore دانشگاه فناوری نانیانگ برای ورودی آگوست ۲۰۲۷ دانشجوی ارشد پژوهشمحور میپذیرد. متقاضیان بینالمللی میتوانند برای بورسیه رقابتی NTU Research Scholarship درخواست د…
❤25👍5
راهنمای جدید بورسیه دولتی تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه شیآن جیائوتونگ | ورودی ۲۰۲۷ عنوان: Xi’an Jiaotong University International Postgraduate Programs 2027 مقاطع: کارشناسی ارشد و دکتری مسیر بورسیه: CSC Type B ددلاین: ۳۱ مارس ۲۰۲۷، ساعت ۱۷ به وقت پکن وضعیت: درخواست بورسیه طبق راهنمای جدید از زمان انتشار اطلاعیه قابل ثبت اعلام شده است. دانشگاه شیآن جیائوتونگ راهنمای عمومی پذیرش بینالمللی کارشناسی ارشد و دکتری برای …
❤23👍2
لیست دوم از پیش بینی ها و تحلیل های پرگار پیش بینی ها و تحلیل های لیست اول را در اینجا می توانید مطالعه کنید. ما در پرگار عادت داریم که زیاد تحلیل و پیش بینی میکنیم و این باعث شده توانمند بشیم. در چند سال گذشته، تحلیل های زیادی در مورد قوانین مهاجرتی داشتیم و تاکنون 🔣1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣👍 لیست دوم از پیش بینی ها و تحلیل های پرگار: ⬅️ دو سال قبل از رای آوردن آقای ترامپ پیش بینی کردیم که برنده شدن آقای ترامپ باعث می شود که ف…
❤23👍5👌2
دو ماه پیگیری، بدون یک ریال کارمزد؛ این همراهی باید دیده شود. این تصاویر از تعدادی از شیت پیگیری ریفاند تافل که واقعیت چیزی که داره ارايه میشه و صرفا ادعا نیست. پشت هر ردیف این فهرست، متقاضیای بود که با لغو تافل، نگران پول، آزمون و آینده برنامه اپلای خود شده بود. ما در پرگار پرداخت، مسئولیت پیگیری و رسیدگی به این پروندهها را پذیرفتیم؛ با وجود تحریمها، محدودیتهای پرداخت و تمام موانع بازگشت وجه. انتخاب را به …
❤34👏4🙏2
از پرگار بپرس بورسیه برای مقطع ارشد تقریبا خیلی محدود و سخت هست برای ایرانی ها. اکثر بورس ها برای مقطع دکتری هستن که شامل بورسیه های داخلی دانشگاه ها، بورسیه های صنعتی (پروژه های تعریف شده توسط صنایع)، بورسیه های UKRI و Innovate UK، و بورسیه های خاص دیگه که به صورت محدود و مختص رشته های خاص میشن هستن. برای بررسی شرایط شخصی مناسب خودتون با ادمین بریتانیا در تماس باشین. ارتباط با پشتیبان جهت مشاوره تخصصی👇 @PargarBri…
❤12🙏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 255 posts we hold for @pargarwiki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@pargarwiki edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 18 posts on @pargarwiki as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظرتون تا قبل انتخابات امریکا جنگ میشه ؟ بعد اون چطور ؟
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
۵ مقصد مناسب دکتری برای ایرانیها؛ از شانس فاند تا مسیر سریعتر ویزا کدوم به نظرتون شانسش بیشتر؟
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
خب باز بزن بزن سمت جنوب قبلا همچین وقتهایی میگفتیم بچه ها متضرر نشن پرداختشونو زودتر بزنن اما انگار الان نسبت به قیمتها مسخ شدیم ! بچه ها سرمایه تون روی چیه الان ؟
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
برای “ از پرگار بپرس” بعدی کدوم کشورو بذاریم ؟ این سبک پرسش و پاسخ رو اگر دوست داشتید حتما با لایک و قلب نشون بدید
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 255 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 41 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pargarwiki named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
15 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ApplyAbroad | هلدینگ پرگار” (@pargarwiki), 131,352 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pargarwiki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.