Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مکتب یونگ

Channel

مکتب یونگ

@carljung

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,888subscribers

+382 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001006863908
TypeChannel
Username@carljung
Descriptionصفحه اصلی #مکتب_یونگ مطالب تحلیلی با رویکرد روان‌شناسی تحلیلی و ناخودآگاه 🔗 کانال مهدی شفیعی: https://t.me/Mahdishafiei86 📷 اینستاگرام: https://www.instagram.com/mahdishafiei86 🌌 آسترولوژی یونگ: https://t.me/cgjung
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/carljung

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,5069,8889,6975 August 2026 — 9,506 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,506 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,507 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,515 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,522 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,540 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,569 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,580 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,584 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,608 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,636 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,672 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,681 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,694 subscribers26 September 2026 — 9,717 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,777 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,800 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,808 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,827 subscribers19 October 2026 — 9,847 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,864 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,885 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,873 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,879 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,888 subscribers5 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +382. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,449–9,945 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 09:169,888+9
1 Nov 2026, 19:099,879+6
29 Oct 2026, 16:079,873-12
26 Oct 2026, 12:409,885+21
23 Oct 2026, 02:189,864+17
19 Oct 2026, 16:059,847+20
17 Oct 2026, 00:219,827+19
14 Oct 2026, 10:279,808+8
11 Oct 2026, 02:179,800+23
5 Oct 2026, 01:559,777+60
26 Sept 2026, 12:389,717+23
17 Sept 2026, 21:189,694+13
13 Sept 2026, 12:199,681+9
9 Sept 2026, 19:569,672+36
4 Sept 2026, 07:169,636+28
31 Aug 2026, 16:429,608+24
28 Aug 2026, 13:189,584+4
25 Aug 2026, 10:349,580+11
22 Aug 2026, 09:449,569+29
18 Aug 2026, 14:099,540first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 9,888 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held63 (12 July 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total30,742
Reactions total402
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 21:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,070
Videos
≈64
Links
≈1,920

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 28s
Average length
5m 28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,893 reactions across 63 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,26967.0%
👍22111.7%
👏1749.19%
🔥492.59%
❤‍🔥442.32%
👌382.01%
💯361.90%
🤔140.74%
👎120.634%
🙏110.581%
🕊90.475%
😍60.317%
🤯50.264%
⚡40.211%
😡10.053%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,893 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

1 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,090 views40 reactionsread 5 November 2026

مفهوم «باکره» در روان‌شناسی کهن‌الگویی یونگ «سه الهه باکره اساطیر یونان عبارتند از آرتمیس (الهه شکار و ماه)، آتنا (الهه خرد و صنایع‌دستی) و هستیا (الهه کانون معبد و خانه). این سه الهه تجسم بخش‌های مستقل، فعال و غیروابسته روان زن هستند. واژه «باکره» در بعد اسطوره‌ای و روان‌شناختی به معنای عدم تجربه جنسی نیست؛ بلکه به معنای دست‌نخورده بودن، دست‌نخورده ماندن از انتظارات جامعه و «متعلق به خود بودن» است. کهن‌الگوی الهه ب…

❤20❤‍🔥9👏9💯2

31 Oct 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,200 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

شناخت خدا به معنای شناخت خود در والاترین و ناب‌ترین شکل است؛ یعنی نگاهی کوتاه به بخشی از وجودمان که فراتر از محدودیت‌ها، ترس‌ها، تردیدها و ذهن ایرادگیر ماست. هرچند این نیرو دیده نمی‌شود، وقتی افکار، باورها و احساساتمان با آن همسو شوند، می‌توانیم حضورش را به طور ملموس احساس کنیم. خدا ارتعاشی واقعی است که می‌توان تپش آن را در بدن، عشق در قلب و خشنودی در زندگی احساس کرد. این ارتعاش، با وجود رایگان بودن، ارزشمندترین گوه…

❤17👍7❤‍🔥3👏1

31 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,160 views12 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

زن مسئولِ تمام تاریکی‌های درون مرد دانسته می‌شود؛ حال آنکه مرد با این تصور آسوده است که در چشم همهٔ زنان پیرامونش، مظهرِ سرزندگی و روشنایی است. بااین‌حال، بهتر است به او توصیه شود که این تصور درخشان از خویشتن را در ژرف‌ترین تردیدها فروببرد. چنین ذهنی، که همچون مرکوریوسِ کیمیاگری سیمای یک فریبکار بزرگ را به خود می‌گیرد، چندان دشواری‌ای در اعتراف به همهٔ گناهان خویش ندارد؛ اعترافی که می‌تواند به‌طرزی کاملاً قانع‌کننده …

❤8👌2❤‍🔥1👍1

30 Oct 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,080 views18 reactionsread 5 November 2026

پاسخ به تعداد کثیر سوالات شما عزیزان سلام به همراهان گرامی؛ اخیراً بسیاری از شما عزیزان درباره جمله‌ای معروف از کارل گوستاو یونگ سوال کرده بودید؛ چرا یونگ این حرف را زد؟ یونگ این سخنان را در جریان تحلیل رویای یکی از مراجعانش (یک مرد غربی، تحصیل‌کرده و بیش از حد عقل‌گرا) مطرح می‌کند. در رویای این شخص، نمادهایی از فرهنگ شرق و اعراب ظاهر شده بود. یونگ چند نکته کلیدی را باز می‌کند: وقتی ذهن آگاه انسان غربی بیش از حد به…

❤7🔥5👍3👎1👏1💯1

30 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC962 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

اگر به فقدانِ خیال‌پردازی، الهام و سرزندگیِ درونی خود با تأمل بنگرید؛ همان حالتی که به‌صورت رکودی محض و برهوتی سترون تجربه‌اش می‌کنید، و اگر این خلأ را با توجه و اشتیاقی بارور کنید که از هراسِ مرگِ درونی‌تان برمی‌خیزد، آنگاه چیزی در وجودتان مجال شکل‌گرفتن خواهد یافت. زیرا خلأ درونی شما، اگر تنها اجازه دهید به درونش راه یابید، می‌تواند همان‌قدر سرشار از غنا باشد که در ظاهر تهی است. اگر پذیرای این «ندای وحشی» (ندای حی…

❤6👌1

29 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,010 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Even if the ego should be (as I think) the supreme point of the self, a mountain infinitely higher than Mt. Everest, it would be nothing but a little grain of rock or ice, never the whole mountain. Although we receive the light of consciousness from the self and although we know it to be the source of our illumination, we do not know whether it possesses anything we would call consciousness. حتی اگر ایگو، آن‌گونه که…

❤9👍1👏1

28 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,180 views39 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

"This religion [Islam] has been misrepresented by prejudiced teachers; we have a funny idea of Islam through bad education. It is represented by our theologians as dry and empty, but there is tremendous life in it, particularly in Islamic mysticism, which is the secret backbone of Islam." «این دین [اسلام] توسط آموزگاران مغرض (دارای پیش‌فرض‌های منفی) به اشتباه معرفی شده است؛ ما به دلیل آموزش بد، تصور عجیبی از اسلام د…

❤‍🔥10👎9❤7🤔6👍4👌2⚡1

27 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,280 views12 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤8👍3👏1

27 Oct 2026, 10:45 UTC≈1,150 views13 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

تاریکی در غیاب نور وجود دارد و #نفس (ایگو) در غیاب #هوشیاری 🌗 ژرفای ناخودآگاه را دریابیم... 📌 کانال‌های مکمل: مهدی شفیعی | کارل گوستاو یونگ | سمبل‌ها و اسطوره‌ها | گروه مشاوره 📲 اینستاگرام 🔗 @carljung ©️

❤10👏2👍1

26 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,340 views22 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

هر طوری بخواهیم تعبیر و تفسیر فاضلانۀ عبارت "خدا عشق است" را بنمائیم، بهر حال این عبارت، جمع اضداد خداوندی را تأیید میکند. من بارها و بارها در تجربۀ کاری و نیز در زندگی‌ام با راز عشق مواجه شدم و هرگز نتوانستم بگویم که چیست، زیرا ما به عمیق‌ترین معنای کلمه، قربانیان و بازیچه‌های "اروس" مربوط به آفرینش این عالم هستیم. به همین جهت من این واژه "عشق" را در میان گیومه نهادم تا نشان دهم که این کلمه را به معنای میل، ترجیح، ط…

❤14👍4❤‍🔥2👌2

25 Oct 2026, 16:38 UTC≈3,480 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

میشود گفت که «سایه شخصی» پلی ست به سوی «سایه جمعی» یا دری ست گشوده به سوی سایه جمعی. «سایه جمعی» به شکل توده و انبوهی از افراد پلید «روان پریش» ظهور میکند و مانند آن است که شما در اتاقی باشید و یک در آن را نبسته باشید، آنگاه «شیطان» از آن در وارد شود. ولی اگر شما «سایه فردی» خود را بشناسید، میتوانید همه درها را {به روی او} بسته نگاه دارید. ✍️ ماری_لوِئیز_فون_فرانتس 🌗 ژرفای ناخودآگاه را دریابیم... 📌 کانال‌های مکمل: …

❤11

25 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,330 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

چون تحلیل خواب بیش از آنکه فنی بر مبنای قواعد باشد تبادلی دیالکتیکی‌ست میان دو شخصیت. که اگر آن را به منزله‌ی فنی مکانیکی بکار بندیم شخصیت روانی خواب‌بیننده امکان ابراز وجود نمی‌یابد و حل مشکل درمان به این پرسش ساده بستگی خواهد داشت که کدام‌یک از این دو، روانکاو یا خواب‌بیننده بر دیگری چیره خواهد شد؟ درست به همین سبب بود که من بکارگیری خواب مصنوعی را کنار گذاشتم، زیرا نمی‌خواستم اراده‌ام را به بیمارم تحمیل کنم. من می…

❤6

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @carljung. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ
@Spirit_and_life · 39,579
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
زندگی سالم (سوده هروی) روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ
@zendeegiesaleem · 156,573
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
پرسونا
@psychology_personaa · 20,686
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 September 2026
دیالوگ هایی که به یاد می ماند
@dialogbeyadmandani · 22,088
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
دکتر آذرخش مکری
@DrAzarakhshMokri · 202,918
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
کدکیهانی
@KoOdkEYHani888 · 21,793
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 September 2026
Dr Sargolzaee podcast
@drsargolzaeipodcast · 23,732
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
GEM Fit | جم فیت
@GEMFit · 26,019
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 September 2026
کتابخانه
@booksofus · 51,854
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
دکتر محمدرضا سرگلزایی drsargolzaei
@drsargolzaei · 35,625
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
ArianAstrologer
@arianastrologer · 30,045
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,148
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Dr Behzad Chavooshi
@drbehzadchavooshi · 53,531
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
دکتر جو دیسپنزا
@dr_joedispenza · 29,317
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
IELTS Journal
@ieltsjournalchannel · 50,712
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
غلط ننویسیم
@ghalatnanevisimm · 21,490
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مکتب یونگ” (@carljung), 9,888 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/carljung.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.