Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ

Channel

Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ

@Spirit_and_life

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,077subscribers

+3,229 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526174319
TypeChannel
Username@Spirit_and_life
Descriptionارتباط با ادمین: @sprit_and_life_admin
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Spirit_and_life

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34,81738,07736,4477 August 2026 — 34,848 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,848 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,847 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,839 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,823 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,817 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,854 subscribers13 August 2026 — 34,838 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,819 subscribers16 August 2026 — 34,867 subscribers17 August 2026 — 34,894 subscribers18 August 2026 — 34,925 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,026 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,036 subscribers21 August 2026 — 35,109 subscribers22 August 2026 — 35,355 subscribers24 August 2026 — 35,833 subscribers25 August 2026 — 36,036 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,119 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,158 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,211 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,347 subscribers30 August 2026 — 36,485 subscribers31 August 2026 — 36,692 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,823 subscribers2 September 2026 — 37,071 subscribers3 September 2026 — 37,321 subscribers4 September 2026 — 37,598 subscribers7 September 2026 — 37,844 subscribers10 September 2026 — 37,912 subscribers12 September 2026 — 37,955 subscribers14 September 2026 — 37,993 subscribers16 September 2026 — 38,041 subscribers18 September 2026 — 38,077 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +3,229. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,328–38,566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:0038,077+36
16 Sept 2026, 07:1738,041+48
14 Sept 2026, 09:5537,993+38
12 Sept 2026, 19:0137,955+43
10 Sept 2026, 18:3837,912+68
7 Sept 2026, 13:5737,844+246
4 Sept 2026, 18:3937,598+277
3 Sept 2026, 06:2337,321+250
2 Sept 2026, 03:1237,071+248
1 Sept 2026, 03:4336,823+131
31 Aug 2026, 01:2736,692+207
30 Aug 2026, 04:1436,485+138
29 Aug 2026, 06:3436,347+136
28 Aug 2026, 08:5336,211+53
27 Aug 2026, 10:1936,158+39
26 Aug 2026, 11:1436,119+83
25 Aug 2026, 13:2236,036+203
24 Aug 2026, 12:5735,833+478
22 Aug 2026, 20:0835,355+246
21 Aug 2026, 13:5535,109first reading

Engagement

243 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.25%
avg views ÷ 38,077 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,760
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
103
of 243 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held243 (3 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total237,470
Reactions total6,039
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
524
Videos
250
Links
733

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2h 25m
Average length
24m 16s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,253 reactions across 218 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,70362.9%
👍1,93215.8%
👏5114.17%
🙏4083.33%
💯2261.84%
👌2111.72%
🔥1801.47%
🥰1731.41%
💔1671.36%
❤‍🔥1421.16%
🕊1200.979%
😭640.522%
😢610.498%
🤝400.326%
😍390.318%
😁370.302%
😨350.286%
💘290.237%
👎260.212%
🤔260.212%
23 further kinds1231.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 218 of the 243 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,253 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 243 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 219 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Spirit_and_life. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 243 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 21:15 UTC≈1,460 views39 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

خیلی جذاب بود برای خودم این برای من بود اگر دوست داشتین قرار بدین عکسها خیلی جذاب بود

❤24😍11👍3👌1

23 Sept 2026, 21:15 UTC≈1,430 views23 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

این نوشته انگلیسی رو به همراه عکسی که گذاشتم بدید ChatGPT: Fill the bag with things that resemble me براساس کل دادهای این مدتی که از من داری انجامش بده

❤13👍10

23 Sept 2026, 19:59 UTC≈1,370 views28 reactionsread 24 September 2026

گام دوم (مواجهه از طریق تخیل فعال / Active Imagination): در محیطی تاریک و آرام بنشینید. تنفس دیافراگمی انجام دهید. اجازه دهید این نیروی مهاجم چهره‌ای به خود بگیرد. با قلم و کاغذ با او وارد گفت‌وگو شوید: از او بپرسید: "تو چه می‌خواهی؟ کدام بخش از تواناییِ عمل (برای زن) یا کدام بخش از احساس و تنانگیِ من (برای مرد) را ندیده‌ام که این‌گونه مرا تخریب می‌کنی؟" گام سوم (تثبیت مسئولیت ایگو): به جای تسلیم شدن در برابر این ح…

❤17🙏7👏3🔥1

23 Sept 2026, 19:59 UTC≈1,400 views34 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

تمرین این پست در اینستا لینکش هم قزار میدم ۱. کتاب «پروژه بهشت: تبارشناسی فرافکنی در روابط» اثر جیمز هالیس؛ به دلیل باز کردن خطای تحمیل نقاب‌های آنیما/آنیموس به شریک عاطفی. ۲. کتاب «آنیما: آناتومی یک مفهومِ کهن‌الگویی» اثر جیمز هیلمن؛ به منظور درک دقیق ماهیت شاعرانه و سوماتیک زنِ درون در روان مرد. پروتکل بالینی: «تفکیک کهن‌الگوی مکمل از ایگو» (Syzygy Disidentification Protocol) (این تمرین ساختارمند با هدف قطع تسخ…

❤17👍12🥰3🔥2

23 Sept 2026, 11:19 UTC≈1,680 views54 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

اگر دوست داشتین این پست ببیند https://www.instagram.com/p/DdoDLRCldzd/?stkn=NTkyZHVkajhiMnlt

❤37🕊12👍4👏1

22 Sept 2026, 21:27 UTC≈1,970 views72 reactionsread 24 September 2026
File

یک شاعر برهمن پیر هندی به نام سیمانتا چاترجی که اصلا یک بنگالی بود وقتی داستان دو گدای رود گنگ را برای رابرت تعریف میکند که آنها را زمانی که کودک خردسالی بود در کنار رود گنگ مشاهده کرده بود و دیده بود که چطور یکی از آنها لقمه نانی را از دهان گدای دیگر که در حال مرگ و بسیار نزار بوده، می رباید و گدای درمانده را در اوج دردمندی و ناامیدی رها میکند. سیمانتا به رابرت میگوید در آن سالهای کودکی تا دو سال از دیدن آن صحنه غص…

❤66👏6

22 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC≈1,710 views60 reactionsread 24 September 2026

✔️ دعوت به یک تمرینِ یونگی: آیا جرأت دارید امروز، فقط برای "بیست دقیقه"، بدون گوشی، بدون موسیقی، بدون کتاب و بدون حضورِ هیچ‌کس، در یک اتاقِ ساکت بنشینید؟ به افکار، اضطراب‌ها و صداهایی که در آن سکوت بالا می‌آیند نگاه کنید... فرار نکنید. آن‌ها دقیقاً همان بخش‌هایی از روانِ شما هستند که برای کامل شدن [Individuation]، منتظرِ ملاقات با شما نشسته‌اند. شما وقتی با خودتان تنها می‌شوید، چه هم‌نشینی برای خودتان هستید؟ برا…

❤42👍9🕊7🔥2

22 Sept 2026, 21:21 UTC≈1,530 views63 reactionsread 24 September 2026

۱. شلوغیِ مداوم، کارِ زیاد، چک کردنِ بی‌وقفه‌ی گوشی و پناه بردن به جمع، اغلب نشانه‌ی موفقیت نیست؛ بلکه یک «مکانیسم دفاعی» برای فرار از ملاقات با هیولایِ درون است. ما بیرون را شلوغ می‌کنیم تا صدایِ سکوتِ درونمان را نشنویم. ۲. وقتی بیمار به یونگ می‌گوید "اگر تنها باشم افسرده می‌شوم"، یونگ می‌داند که این افسردگی بالینی نیست! در روان‌شناسیِ تحلیلی، وقتی انرژیِ روانی (لیبیدو) از دنیای بیرون قطع می‌شود، به اعماقِ ناخودآ…

👍39❤11👏7🙏6

22 Sept 2026, 21:19 UTC≈1,520 views52 reactionsread 24 September 2026

تو برای خودت چه هم‌نشینی هستی؟ در روان‌شناسیِ اعماق، یکی از تکان‌دهنده‌ترین خاطراتِ بالینیِ کارل گوستاو یونگ، تقابلِ او با یک بیمارِ به‌شدت «برون‌گرا» است. مردی که موفق، شلوغ و همواره در حالِ فعالیت بود، اما از یک خلأ پنهان رنج می‌برد. یونگ دیالوگِ مطبِ خود را این‌گونه روایت می‌کند: «یک روز مردی که بسیار برون‌گرا بود نزدم آمد. او همیشه از صبح تا دیروقت سرش شلوغ بود و خودش را در کار غرق می‌کرد. به او گفتم: "تو باید …

❤40👍8👏2🥰2

22 Sept 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,790 views64 reactionsread 24 September 2026

این تمرین ساختارمند بر اساس تکنیک‌های روان‌کاوی برای آگاه‌سازیِ تروماهای ناخودآگاه و توقفِ الگوهای سمی طراحی شده است). هدف: انتقالِ یک تکانه‌یِ "مبتنی بر اصل لذتِ شیطانی" (ناخودآگاه) به "فرایند ثانویه" (آگاهیِ بالغانه) جهت توقفِ انتخاب‌های تکراریِ مخرب. گام اول (ثبتِ چرخه‌ی تکرار / Pattern Recognition): در یک جای آرام بنشینید. سه مورد از شکست‌های عاطفی، شغلی یا دوستیِ بزرگِ گذشته‌ی خود را روی کاغذ بنویسید. حالا به …

❤36👍14💯7🙏6👏1

21 Sept 2026, 20:26 UTC≈2,130 views62 reactionsread 24 September 2026
File

🎵 Sange Ghabre Arezoo -Artoosh به بهای نابودیم عاشقش شده‌ام. اما عاشق شدن به معنای دوست داشتن نیست. ممکن است عاشق زنی بشوی و در عین حال از او نفرت داشته باشی. این را به خاطر بسپار. #فئدور_داستایفسکی #برادران_کارامازوف همهء ما از درون تاریکی میل به نور و روشنایی داریم." شبت بخیر چون هیچکس نباید بدون شب بخیر بخوابه...⭐️🦋✨ @spirit_and_life ✅ @Spirit_and_life ✅

❤49👍8🔥4🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 243 posts we hold for @Spirit_and_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Spirit_and_life edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

روان تحلیل
@ravantahlil · 9,818
#1
یونگ نگار
@jungnegar · 16,190
#2
روان‌کاوی زندگی روزمره
@freudisalive · 9,907
#3
روانکاوی کلاسیک/ژانوس
@psychoanalysis_classical · 2,714
#4
مکتب یونگ
@carljung · 9,694
#5
کارل گوستاو یونگ
@carlgustavjung · 5,378
#6
vkends | مجله ایده‌ها
@vkends · 24,724
#7
کتابخانه فرهنگی آکادمی یوگا نیروانا
@SamadhiLibrari · 6,042
#8
[گروه روان‌تحلیلی بینش]
@InsightGroup_ir · 7,143
#9
کهربی - جنرالیست
@kahrobi_generalist · 1,746
#10
کاگنیشن تایمز | اخبار علوم شناختی
@CognitionTimes · 4,977
#11
𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖘𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖉
@ReasonableMind · 5,944
#12
♡ادبیات‌درمانی♡
@literatureTerapy · 412
#13
دانشگاه سایمد
@psymedacademy · 1,405
#14
Kierkegaard | کی‌یرکگارد
@kierkegaard3 · 18,890
#15
فروید و روانکاوی
@Sigmund_freuddd · 14,943
#16
آرتور شوپنهاور ©
@schopenhauer_page · 9,247
#17
Return to Freud (fa)
@Freud2Lacan · 5,888
#18
Pourya's Channel
@pouryachannel · 685
#19
روانشناس
@MinimalRavan · 2,162
#20
روایت فَردیَت (آیدین آرِتا) - Individuation
@AydinAreta · 6,710
#21
درمانِ تحلیلی
@AnalyticTherapy · 4,089
#22
مکالمات روانکاوی
@mokalematJR · 1,300
#23
حالِ کوک
@halecook · 3,153
#24
rahnamone
@rahnamone · 969
#25
شطحیات
@DeterminateNegation · 885 (as read 1 September 2026)
#26
تحلیل رویاها
@tahlilekhabha · 949
#27
روانشناسی یونگ و تکامل فردیت
@JungianPsychology · 1,430
#28
کلینیک مغز دنیای شناخت
@PsycheSci · 4,220
#29
روانشناسی یکپارچه سایمد
@psymedgroup · 1,997
#30
🧠اسکوپ روانشناسی
@PsychologyScope · 5,141
#31
پرسونا
@psychology_personaa · 19,910
#32
شمنیزم
@ShamanismToltec · 7,712
#33
تعمّق - فلسفه و هنر
@Taamoq · 13,678
#34
التیام روان🌱
@eltiiameravan · 8,688
#35
روانشناسی نقاد
@mohammad_eynizadeh · 16,771
#36
روانشناسی/Psychology Ψ
@Psychology_134 · 14,733
#37
کتاب سرخ یونگ
@jung_redbook · 1,575 (as read 1 September 2026)
#38
مدرسه
@Saalekia · 3,949
#39
هایدگر و‌ اگزیستانسیالیسم
@Heideggerrrr · 8,768
#40
روان‌درمانی اگزیستانسیال
@ExistentialAcademia · 4,603
#41
فلسفه | شوپنهاور
@Philosophy_Sch · 7,525
#42
تاریخ فلسفه با ابوذر شریعتی
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,794
#43
سایت پانویس
@PanevisDotCom · 2,686
#44
اسپینوزا و فلسفه
@Spaph · 4,450
#45
اهل نوشتن
@ahleneveshtan · 6,347
#46
کتب روانکاوی
@psychoanalytic_books · 3,096
#47
گروه کاگنوز| Cognos team
@cognosteam · 2,902
#48
MythoTherapy | افسانه درمانی
@mythotherapy · 397
#49
مؤسسه‌ روانشناسی ایماژ
@image_Institute · 675
#50
آکادمی دنیای شناخت
@CognitionWorld · 8,595
#51
کارل گوستاو یونگ _ C.G.Jung
@cgjung · 2,570
#52
Rozhashemi
@rozhashemi · 476 (as read 1 September 2026)
#53
فلسفه و جامعه‌شناسی
@Philosophy_files · 29,893
#54
دریچه
@Daricheh_1 · 2,272
#55
کتاب گمشده
@thelostbook · 8,915
#56
Sempé
@sempearchive · 687
#57
Liberty Institute / انستیتو لیبرتی
@liberty_institute · 3,479
#58
تکامل و عصب-زیبایی شناسی
@neurobiology_of_art · 2,068
#59
Dream of flying
@fly_around · 711 (as read 1 September 2026)
#60
پارادوکس
@metahistorical · 1,188
#61
@litera999کتابخانه‌وموزه
@litera999 · 74,822
#62
اخبار علوم شناختی و روانشناسی
@neurocognitionandlearning · 4,868
#63
دانش، آگاهی
@daneshagahi · 28,319
#64
رشد شخصيت | Diamond
@diamond_karizma · 4,217
#65
خودشناسی🌻
@ordi_fb · 1,266
#66
Dr Sargolzaee podcast
@drsargolzaeipodcast · 23,848
#67
اُکولتیسم باستانی
@AncientOccultism · 4,314
#68
Miladfallah.ir
@miladfallah1 · 8,698
#69
اتاق تله شناسی، دپارتمان طرحواره
@stiranpsa · 2,009
#70
آرشیو کانال درسگفتار فلسفه و معارف
@dghjvjk · 8,387
#71
Baharan
@Ba_haran · 7,668
#72
be_name_haghighat
@be_name_haghighat · 2,847
#73
دال‌طال ( درسگفتارها )
@daltal · 15,488
#74
فیه ما فیه
@fihehmafih · 9,443
#75
باشگاه ادبیات
@BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,175
#76
فایل کارگاههای روانشناسی
@psykargah · 23,109
#77
نطقیات
@nutqiyyat · 29,956
#78
مخزن کتاب های pdf ادبی
@pdf_kotob_e_adabi · 23,868
#79
کتابسار
@ketaabsaar · 10,484
#80
ذهن‌های ناهشیار
@MindsOfTheUnconscious · 2,275
#81
Too Loud a Solitude
@ToooLoud · 4,297
#82
کانال خام گیاهخواری آوانسیان،ایران
@vegetarianism · 3,499
#83
روان‌درمانگر
@ravandarmangar_R · 3,435
#84
دکتر محمدرضا سرگلزایی drsargolzaei
@drsargolzaei · 35,895
#85
تجربه‌های‌ روان‌پزشکانه
@Psychiatryexpriences · 8,045
#86
EHIA
@ehiatums · 7,351
#87
فلسفه اگزیستانسیالیسم و روانکاوی
@phenomenology_existentialism · 18,826
#88
فیلم های کوتاه روان شناسی
@psyshortmovies · 34,438
#89
مُنکَسِرْ🌱
@Thebrokennn · 4,159
#90
Bahram Beyzaie
@beyzaiebahram · 4,408
#91
‏♫︎ موسیقی بی‌کلام
@InstruSongs · 15,396
#92
حسن کسائی
@hasan_kasai · 7,095
#93
Princejan Musicbar
@princejan_musicbar · 4,786
#94

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

vkends | مجله ایده‌ها
@vkends · 24,724
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
بنیاد فرهنگ زندگی ـ سهیل رضایی
@bonyadfarhangzendegi · 36,666
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
فیلم های کوتاه روان شناسی
@psyshortmovies · 34,438
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
| پادکست فارسی انسانک |
@ensanak · 31,485
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
زندگی سالم (سوده هروی) روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ
@zendeegiesaleem · 157,463
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
Dr Sargolzaee podcast
@drsargolzaeipodcast · 23,848
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
HIGH MOVIES
@high_moviess · 52,891
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
فایل کارگاههای روانشناسی
@psykargah · 23,109
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 September 2026
Anousha
@anousha_eternal · 82,760
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
🔰پکیج های روانشناسی💯
@package_psy · 21,228
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
علاقمندان به «دکتر آذرخش مکری»
@azarakhsh_mokrii · 24,314
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ” (@Spirit_and_life), 38,077 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Spirit_and_life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.