Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for روانشناسی یکپارچه سایمد

Channel

روانشناسی یکپارچه سایمد

@psymedgroup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,995subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001803903687
TypeChannel
Username@psymedgroup
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psymedgroup

Growth

1,9492,0031,9767 August 2026 — 1,949 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,951 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,970 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,973 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,975 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,977 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,980 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,998 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,000 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,003 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,995 subscribers1,9957 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,941–2,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 06:371,995-8
2 Sept 2026, 18:382,003+3
30 Aug 2026, 22:392,000+2
28 Aug 2026, 02:121,998+18
25 Aug 2026, 01:241,980+3
21 Aug 2026, 05:431,977+2
17 Aug 2026, 20:441,975+2
14 Aug 2026, 12:161,973+3
11 Aug 2026, 13:121,970+19
8 Aug 2026, 07:121,951+2
7 Aug 2026, 09:471,949first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 06m
Average length
1h 33m

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5043.5%
❤‍🔥3328.7%
🥰1613.9%
🙏108.70%
👏65.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2024 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC189 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

سایمد برگزار میکند دوره جدید رواندرمانی و مدیتیشن‌های شرق و غرب؛ سرفصل‌ها: -تحلیل روانشناختی روش‌های عرفانی شرقی و غربی -علوم اعصاب، فلسفه ذهن و پدیدارشناسی بالینی برای تخصیص تمرین‌ها و مدیریت آسیب‌زایی -روانکاوی و مدیتیشن -دسته‌بندی یکپارچه مدیتیشن‌‌ها بر اساس تحلیل فرآیندهای زیربنایی عصب-روانشناختی‌ -مدیتیشن‌های بدنمند و پردازش تروما - مرور تحقیقات علمی و پروتکل‌های بالینی مدیتیشن محور مانند ACT, MBSR, MBCT

❤‍🔥1

6 Jul 2026, 20:49 UTC713 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

متدهای رواندرمانی؛ تحلیلی برای جهت‌یابی تاریخ: ۱۷‌ام چهارشنبه ساعت ۱۵:۳۰ با دسترسی آفلاین فرم ثبت‌نام: https://forms.gle/imu7eryubJstY3ye9 پشتیبانی: @clinicpsymed توضیحات دوره: https://t.me/psymedgroup/741

6 Jul 2026, 20:46 UTC654 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

هر برخوردی با روان‌درمانی معمولاً از یک تردید بنیادین آغاز می‌شود: آیا روان‌درمانی واقعاً مؤثر است یا این فقط یک باور رایج میان درمانگران است؟ و اگر مؤثر است، آیا همه‌ی روش‌ها تقریباً به یک نتیجه می‌رسند یا برخی واقعاً برتری دارند؟ از دل همین تردید، پرسش آشنایی مطرح می‌شود: آیا رابطه‌ی درمانی همه‌چیز است و روش اهمیتی ندارد؟ آمارهای معروف این حیطه چقدر قابل اعتمادند؟ و آیا مفاهیمی مانند طرحواره و الگوهای ذهنی واقعیت

🙏5👍1

6 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC558 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

علاقه‌مندان به حضور و اطلاع از دوره اختصاصی مدیتیشن سایمد لطفا به گروه زیر ملحق بشن؛‌ برای دیزاین کارآمد و نهایی محتوا، نیاز به فیدبک شرکت‌کنندگان داریم: https://t.me/+XFQr5ku7at0yN2Nk

🥰1

5 Feb 2026, 20:03 UTC≈1,500 viewsread 7 August 2026

دانش‌آموختگان دوره اول و یک‌ساله رواندرمانی یکپارچه سایمد، به تعدادی از داوطلبین رواندرمانی‌ کم‌ هزینه ارائه می‌دهند. کسب اطلاعات بیشتر درباره شرایط یا درخواست ارزیابی از طریق ادمین: @clinicpsymed

3 May 2025, 11:08 UTC≈5,150 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مجموعه سایمد برگزار میکند؛ رواندرمانگری حرفه‌ای؛ دوره مورد-محور اخلاق‌ حرفه‌ای در رواندرمانی آمادگی برای مدیریت مراجعین پرچالش و پیشگیری از مشکلات قانونی و اخلاقی در رواندرمانی و فضای مجازی + مدرس: دکتر علی سلیمانی - دکتری روانشناسی بالینی از دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی تهران - روانشناس بالینی دارای پروانه رسمی مستقر در استرالیا - مبتنی بر تکست بین‌المللی اخلاق رواندرمانی آکسفورد با تطبیق بر نظام‌نامه‌ی اخلاق ای

👍5

20 Mar 2025, 09:00 UTC≈4,100 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

نوروز پیروز🪻🍄🪷

🥰15❤‍🔥2

8 Mar 2025, 08:36 UTC≈4,430 viewsread 7 August 2026

مشاهده لایو ضبط شده مصاحبه با دکتر سلیمانی در اینستاگرام سایمد: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DG5S483t2NZ/?igsh=bjcxcHQybWRxMDdh مشاهده در تلگرام دانشگاه سایمد: https://t.me/psymedacademy/1377

1 Mar 2025, 10:17 UTC≈4,380 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مجموعه سایمد برگزار میکند؛ نشست انتقال تجربه مهاجرت و کار به عنوان روانشناسی بالینی در استرالیا با پرسش و پاسخ مهمان: دکتر علی سلیمانی دکترای روانشناسی بالینی از دانشگاه علوم‌ پزشکی شهید بهشتی؛ روانشناس دارای پروانه کار در استرالیا جمعه ۱۷ اسفند ماه ساعت ۱۳ به وقت تهران ثبت شماره موبایل برای ارسال لینک: https://forms.gle/etcYJT1N3HoBVpp56 @psymedacademy

👍8

6 Jan 2025, 12:08 UTC≈4,690 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تسلط بر تشخیص‌گذاری به شیوه DSM, ICD چالشی در طی عمر حرفه‌ای اغلب بالینگران باقی میمونه. دلیل این موضوع پراکندگی و پیچیدگی ظاهری این مدلهاست که مانع از بررسی دقیق میشه و شکافی بین دستنامه و بالین میسازه. آیا میشه به شیوه این دستنامه‌هارو آموخت که بالینگر یک بار برای همیشه تشخیص‌گذاری اختلالات مختلف رو شفاف درک کنه و بتونه به کار بگیره؟ با وجود تمام کاستی های این مدلها مرسوم‌ترین شیوه محاوره و اشاره به مشکلات روانشنا

❤‍🔥6👍3

5 Jan 2025, 08:49 UTC≈6,250 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مجموعه سایمد برگزار میکند؛ دوره آنلاین ساختن DSM تسلط بر DSM-5TR به شیوه شبکه‌ای سرفصل‌ها: تاریخ تشخیص روانپزشکی نحوه ساخت دستنامه تشخیصی اعتبار، ابعادیت، کاربرد بالینی تغییرات نسخه‌های مختلف تسلط بر اختلالات DSM-5TR در 5 ساعت به شیوه شبکه‌ای (در ابتدای دوره ارائه میشود تا شرکت‌کنندگان آزمون‌ها بتوانند زودتر استفاده کنند) علامت‌شناسی و تشخیص افتراقی انتقادات از DSM شرح مفصل سایر سیستم‌ها و روش‌های تشخیصی روان مد

❤‍🔥7👍1

23 Nov 2024, 14:38 UTC≈3,660 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔶 فیلم جلسه سوم از سلسله ژورنال کلاب‌های روانشناسی علمی ▫️برگزار شده توسط مجموعه اعصاب و روان Psymed و مجموعه Persian RFT ▪️ارائه‌دهنده: لیلا اکبرپور (ارشد روانشناسی شخصیت) 🔰تاریخی که ژورنال کلاب برگزار شد: ۱ آذر ۱۴۰۳ ▫️برپایه مقالات: آینده‌ی شخص‌شناسانه‌ی درمان شناختی-رفتاری: چه چیزی میان انتقادات وارده به توسعه‌ی اکت برجسته است؟ ▪️نویسندگان: استیون هیز، جوزف کیاروچی و استفان هافمن

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @psymedgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

National Geographic farsi
@nationalgeographicfarsi · 35,704
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
کاپلان‌خوانی
@kaplansadockk · 37,424
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ
@Spirit_and_life · 37,844
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
کانال اتحاد زیست‌شناسان ایران
@UIBiologists · 29,799
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
کلوزآپ روانشناسی
@Closeup_psychology · 69,538
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روانشناسی یکپارچه سایمد” (@psymedgroup), 1,995 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psymedgroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.