Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 90 days, net +948. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,237–30,469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 06:27
30,327
+24
3 Nov 2026, 06:11
30,303
+10
2 Nov 2026, 02:40
30,293
+20
1 Nov 2026, 00:21
30,273
+12
31 Oct 2026, 02:18
30,261
+9
30 Oct 2026, 03:28
30,252
+26
29 Oct 2026, 06:00
30,226
+21
28 Oct 2026, 00:59
30,205
+1
27 Oct 2026, 03:40
30,204
+6
26 Oct 2026, 06:56
30,198
+16
25 Oct 2026, 05:16
30,182
+6
24 Oct 2026, 01:46
30,176
+7
23 Oct 2026, 01:28
30,169
+16
21 Oct 2026, 21:01
30,153
+16
20 Oct 2026, 14:36
30,137
+11
19 Oct 2026, 17:20
30,126
+7
18 Oct 2026, 17:44
30,119
+2
17 Oct 2026, 19:10
30,117
+21
16 Oct 2026, 21:55
30,096
+9
15 Oct 2026, 20:07
30,087
first reading
Engagement
337 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 151 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 30,327 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,030
127 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
133
of 337 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
337 (1 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
385,199
Reactions total
3,583
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,540
Videos
≈724
Links
≈3,440
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
43m 13s
Average length
2m 42s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,579 reactions across 320 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,828
74.0%
🔥
526
4.97%
🤔
472
4.46%
👏
240
2.27%
👌
228
2.16%
👍
225
2.13%
❤🔥
223
2.11%
💯
183
1.73%
👀
174
1.64%
🕊
170
1.61%
💊
80
0.756%
🤩
66
0.624%
🥰
46
0.435%
🏆
44
0.416%
⚡
31
0.293%
🎉
26
0.246%
🙏
13
0.123%
🤝
4
0.038%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 323 of the 337 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,661 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 337 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 323 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @UIBiologists. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 337 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 133 posts held from the last 30 days (12.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💢 فقط ۲ روز تا آیین بزرگداشت پروفسور امیرعلی حمیدیه
📣 اتحاد زیستشناسان ایران و شاخه دانشجویی انجمن تولیدکنندگان و صادرکنندگان محصولات بیوتکنولوژی پزشکی ایران برگزار میکنند:
🏅آیین بزرگداشت پروفسور امیرعلی حمیدیه
🎖️ به مناسبت دریافت جایزه ارزشمند سازمان جهانی بهداشت (WHO) در حوزه کنترل سرطان، در این مراسم با پروفسور امیرعلی حمیدیه و مسیر علمی و فعالیتهای ارزشمند ایشان آشنا میشویم.
📌 این مراسم با حضور چهرههای ب…
🧠 راز فراموشی در یک کرم کوچک!
🪱 پژوهشگران ژاپنی، سازوکار عصبی و مولکولی فراموشکردن خاطرات را در کرم کوچکی به نام C. elegans شناسایی کردهاند؛ یافتهای که نشان میدهد فراموشی میتواند فرایندی تنظیمشده و انتخابی باشد.
🔬 این کرم با وجود داشتن تنها ۳۰۲ سلول عصبی، توانایی یادگیری و بهخاطر سپردن بوهای مختلف را دارد. پژوهشگران دریافتند مولکولی به نام NLP-47 در فرایند فراموشکردن نقش دارد. این مولکول با فعالکردن یک مسی…
💢 فرصت کارآموزی رایگان برای ۲۸۰ نفر!
🧑💻تجربهای بینظیر برای یادگیری و تسلط بر مهمترین حوزه علم بیوانفورماتیک، اُمیکس و هوش مصنوعی!
👩💻 یادگیری و تسلط بر علم بیوانفورماتیک به تمرین و انجام پروژههای عملی نیاز دارد. با توجه به این مهم در گام دوم طرح ملی بیوانفورماتیک علاوه بر سرفصلهای بسیار جامع، ۲۸۰ نفر از برگزیدگان فرصت حضور رایگان در پروژههای کارآموزی تخصصی را خواهند داشت.
🔻 در این پروژهها، منتورهای بسیار …
❕چرا یک درمان برای همه بیماران مناسب نیست؟
🧬 اطلاعات ژنتیکی بهتنهایی داستان یک سلول را روایت نمیکند. برای درک اتفاقاتی که رخ میدهد، باید ژنها، پروتئینها و فرایندهای متابولیکی را در کنار هم بررسی کرد؛ روشی که اُمیکس را به یکی از ابزارهای مهم پزشکی شخصیسازیشده تبدیل کرده است.
🔬 اصلا Omics یعنی چی؟
پسوند ـomics به مطالعه جامع یک مجموعه از مولکولهای زیستی اشاره میکنه.
مثلا Genome یعنی مجموعه کامل ماده ژنتیکی ی…
📚 #معرفی_کتاب
📕 A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution
📘 کتاب «شکافی در آفرینش؛ ویرایش ژن و قدرت بیسابقه برای کنترل تکامل»
✍️ نویسندگان: جنیفر داودنا (Jennifer Doudna) و ساموئل استرنبرگ (Samuel Sternberg)
✍️ جنیفر داودنا، از پیشگامان توسعه فناوری CRISPR-Cas9، به همراه ساموئل استرنبرگ در این کتاب داستان شکلگیری یکی از مهمترین فناوریهای ویرایش ژن را روایت میکند؛ فناوری…
💢 فرصت کارآموزی رایگان برای بیش از ۲۸۰ نفر از برگزیدگان دوره فوقجامع اُمیکس و هوش مصنوعی!
🧑💻در گام دوم طرح ملی بیوانفورماتیک، بیش از ۲۸۰ نفر از برگزیدگان دوره فوقجامع اُمیکس و هوش مصنوعی، فرصت کارآموزی رایگان با هدایت منتورهای برجسته و اساتید بهنام بیوانفورماتیک کشور را خواهند داشت.
⚠️ با توجه به ظرفیت محدود این دوره، از هر ۴ نفر شرکتکننده، ۳ نفر شانس حضور رایگان در پروژههای کارآموزی را خواهند داشت.
📌 برای آ…
🐩 سگ رباتیکی که با نورونهای انسان حرکت میکند!
🧠 تصور کنید سلولهای عصبی انسان بتوانند به یک ربات فرمان حرکت بدهند! دانشمندان با کشت نورونهای انسانی روی تراشهای مجهز به الکترود و اتصال آن به یک سگ رباتیک، سامانهای ساختهاند که میتواند فعالیت الکتریکی شبکه عصبی را دریافت و به فرمانهای حرکتی تبدیل کند.
⚡️ الکترودها تبادل دوسویه سیگنالهای الکتریکی میان نورونها و سامانه رباتیک را ممکن میسازند و فعالیت شبکه عصب…
🦠 وقتی میکروب کشت نمیشود، DNA هنوز حرفی برای گفتن دارد!
❓ اگر میکروبی در آزمایشگاه رشد نکند یا آزمایشهای معمول نتوانند هویتش را مشخص کنند، چطور میتوان آن را شناسایی کرد؟ گاهی پاسخ در ردپای ژنتیکی همان میکروب پنهان شده است!
🧬 متاژنومیکس چیه؟
🧫 در یک نمونه از خاک، آب یا بدن انسان، ممکن است تعداد زیادی میکروب مختلف وجود داشته باشند. متاژنومیکس روشی است که به ما اجازه میدهد DNA این میکروبها را مستقیماً از نمونه ب…
💢 دوره فوقجامع اُمیکس و هوش مصنوعی؛ گام دوم طرح ملی بیوانفورماتیک
🧑💻 یادگیری بیوانفورماتیک علاوه بر مباحث تئوری، به کسب مهارت عملی و آشنایی با کاربردهای پژوهشی و تخصصی آن نیاز دارد.
📚 چرا در این دوره شرکت کنیم؟
🔸 ارائه سرفصلهای جامع با پوشش کامل مباحث، از پیشنیازها و مقدمات تا کاربردهای تخصصی(برای اولین بار در کشور، تمامی شاخههای اُمیکس در قالب یک دوره جامع ارائه میشوند.)
🔸 بیش از ۱۶۰ ساعت آموزش تخصصی و پرو…
🕊 درگذشت مارتا شهبازی؛ پژوهشگری که رازهای رشد اولیه جنین انسان را آشکار کرد
👩🔬 مارتا شهبازی، زیستشناس مولکولی و سرپرست گروه پژوهشی در آزمایشگاه زیستشناسی مولکولی MRC دانشگاه کمبریج، در سانحه برخورد دو قطار سریعالسیر در اسپانیا جان باخت. او در زمان وقوع حادثه، در مسیر سفر به کنگره انجمن زیستشناسی رشد اسپانیا بود تا جایزه علمی سال ۲۰۲۶ این انجمن را دریافت کند.
🔬 شهبازی از پژوهشگران برجسته در زمینه رشد اولیه جنین…
کانال اتحاد زیستشناسان ایران pinned «در سه پست بالا به این سوال پاسخ دادیم آیا بنظر شما فریلنسری یک تبلیغات زرد و غیر واقعی هست یا افراد با مهارت بالا به صورت فریلنسری میتونن کسب درآمد کنند؟ نظر خودتون رو در گروه اتحاد کامنت کنید»
Showing the 12 most recent of 337 posts we hold for @UIBiologists. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@UIBiologists edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 6 posts on @UIBiologists as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
25 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
⁉️بزرگترین دغدغهات برای ورود به صنعت بیوتکنولوژی چیه؟
1️⃣شناخت مسیرهای شغلی38%
2️⃣مهارتهای موردنیاز45%
3️⃣انتخاب مسیر مناسب36%
4️⃣ورود از دانشگاه به صنعت54%
The shares total 173%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 337 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 92 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 117 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
موسسه بین المللی علوم نوبنیاد @iins_ir · 36,191 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
کانال سلولی و مولکولی دکتر ابرقوئی @Dr_abarghooi · 20,409 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 September 2026
Lab_science @Lab_science · 19,887 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 September 2026
لبتل نیازمندی آزمایشگاههای ایران @LabTel · 28,973 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
زبان عمومی ارشد و دکتری @RMS_English · 53,642 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
دانشجو یار | کاد گروپ @kadgroup_telegram · 23,820 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
کانال سلولی مولکولی دکتر عرب_بیوما @arabbioma · 20,302 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال اتحاد زیستشناسان ایران” (@UIBiologists), 30,327 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UIBiologists.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.