Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کمپ بیوانفورماتیک

Channel

کمپ بیوانفورماتیک

@BioinfCamp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,971subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001086117587
TypeChannel
Username@BioinfCamp
Created27 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BioinfCamp

Growth

6,9536,9716,9626 August 2026 — 6,955 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,955 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,956 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,953 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,962 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,965 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,962 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,971 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,968 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,963 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,971 subscribers6 August 20261 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 26 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,950–6,974 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 10:576,971+8
29 Aug 2026, 02:056,963-5
26 Aug 2026, 05:436,968-3
23 Aug 2026, 08:146,971+9
19 Aug 2026, 11:066,962-3
16 Aug 2026, 06:046,965+3
13 Aug 2026, 00:046,962+9
10 Aug 2026, 02:016,953-3
7 Aug 2026, 01:156,956+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:156,955no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:596,955first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 6,971 subscribers
Avg views / post
841
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held33 (17 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total13,458
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC235 viewsread 20 August 2026

فایل‌های .h5 یا HDF5 چیست؟ فایل‌های با پسوند .h5 مخصوص ذخیره‌سازی داده‌های علمی بزرگ هستن. این فرمت ساختار سلسله‌مراتبی داره (مثل فولدر و زیر‌فولدر) و برای کار با داده‌های حجیم و چندبعدی عالیه. ویژگی‌ها: 🔹 مناسب برای Big Data 🔹 ساختار منظم با groups و datasets 🔹 پشتیبانی از متادیتا و انواع داده‌ها کاربردها: 🔹ذخیره مدل‌های یادگیری ماشین (مثل Keras) 🔹 داده‌های علمی بیوانفورماتیکی 🔹 پروژه‌های پردازش تصویر و سیگنال و

18 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC536 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

قیافه‌م وقتی یه مقاله از سال 1998 همون چیزی رو میگه که من شش ماهه سعی دارم با اشک و عرق و خون ثابتش کنم! #زنگ_تفریح #پژوهش ---------- 🆔 @BioinfCamp

17 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC629 viewsread 20 August 2026

فهرست شبکه‌های عصبی که باید بدونید 🔹 Perceptron 🔹 Feed-Forward Neural Network (FFNN) 🔹 Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN) 🔹 Deep Feed-Forward Network (DNN) 🔹 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) 🔹 Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) 🔹 Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) 🔹 Autoencoder (AE) 🔹 Variational Autoencoder (VAE) 🔹 Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) 🔹 Self-Organizing Map (SOM) 🔹 Hopfield Network 🔹 Transformer Network 🔹 L

16 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC673 viewsread 20 August 2026

معرفی GeneCards: پایگاه داده ژن‌های انسانی 🔹 این پایگاه‌داده اطلاعات کامل و کاربرپسندی درباره تمام ژن‌های انسانی، چه ژن‌های شناسایی‌شده و چه ژن‌های پیش‌بینی‌شده، ارائه می‌دهد. 🔹 این پایگاه داده به‌صورت خودکار اطلاعات ژن‌محور را از حدود ۲۰۰ منبع وب مختلف جمع‌آوری و ترکیب می‌کند، از جمله اطلاعات ژنومی، ترنسکریپتومی، پروتئومی، ژنتیکی، بالینی و عملکردی. 🔹 با GeneCards می‌توان به راحتی اطلاعات دقیق و گسترده‌ای درباره ژ

15 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC735 viewsread 20 August 2026

معرفی Training Loss 🔹 معیاری است برای سنجش عملکرد مدل یادگیری ماشین روی داده‌های آموزشی در حین فرآیند یادگیری. 🔹 به زبان ساده، این عدد نشان می‌دهد پیش‌بینی‌های مدل چقدر با برچسب‌های واقعی داده‌های آموزشی فاصله دارند. 🔹 فرض کنید مدلی برای تشخیص گربه و سگ آموزش می‌دهید. اگر در یک دسته از تصاویر، مدل یک گربه را به اشتباه سگ پیش‌بینی کند، مقدار Training Loss افزایش پیدا می‌کند. سپس الگوریتم بهینه‌ساز تلاش می‌کند این خ

14 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC818 viewsread 20 August 2026

📢 فرصت شغلی در حوزه هوش مصنوعی و بیوانفورماتیک در فرانسه 🇫🇷 🔹 مؤسسه IGMM-CNRS در مون‌پلیه فرانسه به دنبال جذب یک متخصص بیوانفورماتیک یا AI Engineer برای پروژه‌ای در زمینه هوش مصنوعی در کشف دارو است. 🔹 موضوع پروژه: توسعه روش‌های هوش مصنوعی و یادگیری ماشین برای پیش‌بینی پاسخ به دارو در سرطان کولورکتال مقاوم به درمان (CMS4) و کمک به شناسایی ترکیبات درمانی جدید. 🔹 تسلط خوب به یادگیری ماشین، آمار، ریاضیات و آشنایی با

13 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC767 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

💥 تنوع مردم آسیا در سلول‌های ایمنی انسان 💎 از سری پست‌های پایگاهِ خبری کمپ بیوانفورماتیک!!! 💎 لطفا برای مطالعه این مطلب علمی بر روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید 👇 💎 ResBio Post - Click Here #مقاله #بیوانفورماتیک ---------- 🆔 @BioinfCamp

12 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC866 viewsread 20 August 2026

🔹 دیروز یه سوال پرسیدیم که جوابش نرمال‌سازی داده‌ها بود. 🔹 داده‌ها رو قبل از آنالیز نرمال می‌کنیم چون وقتی مقیاس‌ها یا پراکندگی‌ها خیلی متفاوت باشن، مدل‌ها و تحلیل‌ها نمی‌تونن درست یاد بگیرن یا نتایج خوبی بدن. 🔹 بعد از نرمال‌سازی، داده‌ها روی یک مقیاس مناسب قرار می‌گیرن و تحلیل‌ها دقیق‌تر و قابل اعتمادتر میشن. #آنالیز_داده ---------- 🆔 @BioinfCamp

11 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC918 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🔹 به نظر شما روی این داده‌ها چه کاری انجام شده که چنین تغییری در توزیعِ آن‌ها ایجاد شده؟ 🧐 🔹 چرا تو آنالیز داده‌ها این کار رو انجام می‌دیم؟ 🔹 چرا داده‌های خام معمولاً در آنالیز، خروجی‌ها و نتایج دقیق و قابل اعتمادی ارائه نمی‌دهند، اما پس از انجام این تغییر، تحلیل‌ها پایدارتر، قابل مقایسه‌تر و قابل اعتمادتر می‌شوند؟ #آنالیز_داده ---------- 🆔 @BioinfCamp

10 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC871 viewsread 20 August 2026

معرفی G&T-seq Genome and Transcriptome sequencing یک روش تک‌سلولی (single-cell) برای تحلیل همزمان DNA و RNA است که به محققان اجازه می‌دهد تا ارتباط بین DNA و RNA در سطح یک سلول را بررسی کنند. 🔹 هدف اصلی: فهم تغییرات ژنتیکی (مانند جهش‌ها، کپی نامبر تغییرات CNVs) و بیان ژنی (transcriptional profile) در یک سلول. کاربرد در مطالعه تنوع سلولی، سرطان، توسعه سلولی، و بیماری‌های ژنتیکی. 🔹 روش کار: ابتدا سلول منفرد جداسازی

9 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC850 viewsread 20 August 2026

معرفی Nano Banana 🍌 🔹 یک ابزار هوش مصنوعی برای ویرایش و ساخت تصویر با استفاده از توصیف متنی! 🔹 با Nano Banana می‌تونی عکس‌ها رو بدون نیاز به مهارت طراحی یا فتوشاپ، فقط با نوشتن یک متن، تغییر بدی یا تصویر جدید بسازی. https://nanobananaimg.com #معرفی_ابزار ---------- 🆔 @BioinfCamp

8 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 20 August 2026

لنفوسیت‌های داخل‌اپی‌تلیالی یا IEL (Intraepithelial Lymphocytes) نوعی سلول ایمنی هستند که بین سلول‌های اپی‌تلیال روده باریک قرار دارند. ویژگی‌ها: 🔹 عمدتاً از نوع T lymphocyte هستند. 🔹 نقش مهمی در حفظ ایمنی مخاطی دارند. 🔹 اولین خط دفاعی در برابر آنتی‌ژن‌ها و عوامل خارجی (مثل ویروس‌ها، باکتری‌ها و پروتئین گلوتن) محسوب می‌شوند. #دانستنی‌ها ---------- 🆔 @BioinfCamp

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @BioinfCamp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 482,908 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

سیویلیکا، مرجع مقالات علمی
@civilicacom · 66,599
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کمپ بیوانفورماتیک” (@BioinfCamp), 6,971 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BioinfCamp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.