آکادمی زبان روانشناسی pinned a photo

Channel
آکادمی زبان روانشناسی
@PsyEngAcademy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,334subscribers
+612 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001849051633 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PsyEngAcademy |
| Description | زبان تخصصی روانشناسی و علوم شناختی و علوم وابسته برای همه فارغالتحصیلان، دانشجویان و داوطلبان ایران پشتیبانی علمی: @zabaan_ravaan پشتیبانی فنی و فروش: @Zaban_psych_poshtibani مدیر اجرایی و بازاریابی: @zaban_manager |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PsyEngAcademy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 20,334 | +59 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 20,275 | +41 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 20,234 | +82 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 20,152 | +38 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 20,114 | +27 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 20,087 | +34 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 20,053 | +20 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 20,033 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 20,028 | +32 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 19,996 | +24 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 19,972 | +18 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 19,954 | +27 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 19,927 | +34 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 19,893 | +24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 19,869 | +31 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 19,838 | +65 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 19,773 | +36 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 19,737 | +15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 19,722 | first reading |
Engagement
61 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.5%
- avg views ÷ 20,334 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,180
- 53 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.17%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 54
- of 61 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 61 (25 July 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 274,370 |
| Reactions total | 3,201 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 319
- Videos
- 129
- Links
- 152
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1h 20m
- Average length
- 20m 09s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,321 reactions across 58 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,416 | 72.7% | |
| 👏 | 242 | 7.29% | |
| 😁 | 189 | 5.69% | |
| 💔 | 141 | 4.25% | |
| 👍 | 133 | 4.00% | |
| 😍 | 89 | 2.68% | |
| 😢 | 40 | 1.20% | |
| 🤯 | 25 | 0.753% | |
| 😱 | 15 | 0.452% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 0.391% | |
| 👀 | 11 | 0.331% | |
| 🤨 | 7 | 0.211% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,413reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 24
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 24
- of 60 we hold a reading for · 40%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PsyEngAcademy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 61 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
دفترچه انتخاب رشته منتشر شد (آزاد در این دفترچه نیست) https://www8.sanjesh.org/download/1405/arshad/cs/NOTECSArshad1405_v1.pdf
❤31😢8
❔ متنی که بهش پاسخ دادید ترجمه متن شماره 5 کنکور امسال روانشناسی بود :))) حتی فارسیش هم سخته نه؟ :)) خوب پس بیاید بهتون بگم چرا خیلی از بچه هایی که تلاش کردند به حقشون نرسیدند 👈 مسئله به "روایی" بد آزمون امسال برمیگرده. تصور کنید شما یک پرسشنامه "افسردگی" طراحی کنید ولی در اون تعداد زیادی سوالات "اضطراب" را بسنجند که یک متغیر بسیار متفاوت هست. در این حالت پرسشنامه شما دیگه نمیتونه بیماران افسرده تشخیص بده. زبان …
😢20💔14❤11🤯5🤨2👍1
کدام واژه نظر نویسنده را دربارهٔ معیارهای گزینش مقالات از سوی ویراستاران «آرشیو» بهتر توصیف میکند؟
- جانبدارانه21%
- عینی15%
- فراگیر21%
- تأسفبار4%
- دیدن نتایج39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
متن اطلاعات کافی برای پاسخ به کدام پرسش را در اختیار میگذارد؟
- چه چیزی روانشناسی تجربیِ مؤسسهٔ لایپزیش را از دیگر رویکردها متمایز میکرد؟16%
- مویمان چگونه به مرجعی محترم در روانشناسی تجربی و تربیتی بدل شد؟24%
- نخستین برنامهٔ وونت برای روانشناسی جدید تقریباً در چه سالی منتشر شد11%
- آیا انگلهارت از شاگردان ارشدی بود که زیر نظر مویمان تحصیل کرده بودند؟7%
- دیدن نتایج41%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
بر اساس متن، جایگاه مویمان در «آرشیو» ....................
- مانع اصلیِ ارائهٔ یافتههای علمی روانشناسانی با اندیشههای بهکلی نو، همچون وونت، به عموم بود16%
- او را از پیگیری پژوهش حوزههای اصلی مورد علاقهاش یعنی روانشناسی تربیتی و آزمایشگری تربیتی، بازداشت5%
- امکان انتشار آثار روانشناسان کمترشناختهشده در همه شاخههای این رشته را در نشریهای معتبر فراهم کرد27%
- او توانست دیگر روانشناسان تجربی را از پیشرفتهای مرتبط در روانشناسی تربیتی و آزمایش تربیتی آگاه کند52%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
بر اساس متن، کدامیک از عبارتهای زیر نادرست است؟
- «آرشیو» به مجمعی برای یکپارچهسازی روانشناسی تجربیِ مؤسسهٔ لایپزیش با دیگر رویکردهای تجربی بدل نشد.7%
- «آرشیو» همچون قرینهای برای «مطالعات فلسفی» طراحی شده بود تا روانشناسی عمومی-تجربی را نهادینه کند.11%
- علاقه به کاربست اصول روانشناختی در مسائل تربیتی در سالهای پایانی سدهٔ نوزدهم بسیار چشمگیر بود.14%
- میتوان گفت باورهای وونت و مویمان دربارهٔ ویژگیهای اساسی روانشناسی بهشدت با یکدیگر در تعارض بود.14%
- دیدن نتایج54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
کدامیک از شگردهای زیر در بند دوم به کار رفته است؟
- تعریف15%
- نقلقول مستقیم8%
- پرسش بلاغی4%
- نقل قول غیر مستقیم19%
- دیدن نتایج54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💔4❤1
📌 احتمالاً یک سوال دیگه هم برای شما پیش بیاد بچه ها که پرداختنش بهش به بچه های سال های بعد کمک می کنه. چرا برخی داوطلبان باوجود تلاش فراوان برای زبان -فارغ از منبع- امسال و پارسال نتیجه نگرفتند؟ 📖 برای پاسخ به این سوال باید یک آزمون باهم بدیم. برای خواندن متن زیر و پاسخ به سوالاتش فقط و فقط 10 دقیقه فرصت دارید (لطفا کسایی که امسال کنکور شرکت کردن فقط گزینه دیدن نتایج را بزنند، شما می دونید چرا 😃) 👈 "دو نشریهٔ متقد…
😱6❤5😢3
📌 درباره شرایط سوم که نوشتیم دوستانی که محصولی از ما نداشتند ولی درصد بالای ۸۰ گرفتند هم هدیه میگیرند، توضیحی برای شفافیت بدم 👈 مصاحبه ازشون متنی و کوتاه هست و هیچ تبلیغاتی در کار نیست. بههیچعنوان قرار نیست، سواستفادهای بشه. هدفمون چیز دیگری هست. بچهها همیشه فکر میکنند "مرغ همسایه غازه"، کسی که بالای ۸۰ گرفته لابد یه تکنیک و منبع و استاد مخفی داره که بقیه نداشتند. نه واقعاً چنین نیست، برای من از الان متن مصا…
❤58👏9
#هدیه_کتاب 🎁 بچههای ارشد سال گذشته، ممنونم که این یک سال همراهم بودید. امیدوارم تونسته باشم درسهایی هرچند کوچک بهتون یاد بدم. ❤️ به رسم یادبود، هدیهای کوچک تقدیم دوستانی میشه که درصد بالای 49 آوردن. دلم میخواست بتونم این هدیه رو به همهی شما عزیزان بدم؛ حقیقتاً ارزش اعتماد شما خیلی بیشتر از این حرفهاست. پوزش و شرمساری منو پذیرا باشید. 📑 هدیه به دوستانی با این شرایط تعلق میگیره: ۱- درصد بالای 49 در زبان تخص…
❤80💔10👍3
8️⃣ ملاکهای شخصی شما: آره درسته که گفتم 7 تا ملاک ولی همه شما مسلماً یک سری ملاک شخصی هم دارید! باید ملاکهای شخصی را بنویسید و به صورت عینی تعریف کنید! یعنی چی عینی؟! یعنی فرضاً سوالات عجیب غریبی مثل اینکه کدام دانشگاه معتبرتره هیچ تعریف عینی ندارند 😁 یعنی چی کدام دانشگاه معتبرتره؟! ملاکتون چیه؟ ملاکتون رنکینگ جهانی دانشگاه هست یا چی؟! پس ملاکها عینی باشه. مثلاً ملاک عینی یعنی چی؟ یعنی فرضاً این سوال که آیا من با …
❤63👏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @PsyEngAcademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدام واژه نظر نویسنده را دربارهٔ معیارهای گزینش مقالات از سوی ویراستاران «آرشیو» بهتر توصیف میکند؟
- جانبدارانه21%
- عینی15%
- فراگیر21%
- تأسفبار4%
- دیدن نتایج39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
متن اطلاعات کافی برای پاسخ به کدام پرسش را در اختیار میگذارد؟
- چه چیزی روانشناسی تجربیِ مؤسسهٔ لایپزیش را از دیگر رویکردها متمایز میکرد؟16%
- مویمان چگونه به مرجعی محترم در روانشناسی تجربی و تربیتی بدل شد؟24%
- نخستین برنامهٔ وونت برای روانشناسی جدید تقریباً در چه سالی منتشر شد11%
- آیا انگلهارت از شاگردان ارشدی بود که زیر نظر مویمان تحصیل کرده بودند؟7%
- دیدن نتایج41%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
بر اساس متن، جایگاه مویمان در «آرشیو» ....................
- مانع اصلیِ ارائهٔ یافتههای علمی روانشناسانی با اندیشههای بهکلی نو، همچون وونت، به عموم بود16%
- او را از پیگیری پژوهش حوزههای اصلی مورد علاقهاش یعنی روانشناسی تربیتی و آزمایشگری تربیتی، بازداشت5%
- امکان انتشار آثار روانشناسان کمترشناختهشده در همه شاخههای این رشته را در نشریهای معتبر فراهم کرد27%
- او توانست دیگر روانشناسان تجربی را از پیشرفتهای مرتبط در روانشناسی تربیتی و آزمایش تربیتی آگاه کند52%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
بر اساس متن، کدامیک از عبارتهای زیر نادرست است؟
- «آرشیو» به مجمعی برای یکپارچهسازی روانشناسی تجربیِ مؤسسهٔ لایپزیش با دیگر رویکردهای تجربی بدل نشد.7%
- «آرشیو» همچون قرینهای برای «مطالعات فلسفی» طراحی شده بود تا روانشناسی عمومی-تجربی را نهادینه کند.11%
- علاقه به کاربست اصول روانشناختی در مسائل تربیتی در سالهای پایانی سدهٔ نوزدهم بسیار چشمگیر بود.14%
- میتوان گفت باورهای وونت و مویمان دربارهٔ ویژگیهای اساسی روانشناسی بهشدت با یکدیگر در تعارض بود.14%
- دیدن نتایج54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدامیک از شگردهای زیر در بند دوم به کار رفته است؟
- تعریف15%
- نقلقول مستقیم8%
- پرسش بلاغی4%
- نقل قول غیر مستقیم19%
- دیدن نتایج54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
بیاید بازم با ریشه ها بازی کنیم! با توجه به این ویدئو معنی کلمه president که در واقع pre+resident هست به نظرتون یعنی چی؟
- کسی که در صدر اقامت دارد یا همون رئیس43%
- کسی که پیش از این ساکن جایی بوده یا همون ساکن قبلی26%
- کسی که هنوز ساکن نشده یا همون غیر ساکن8%
- کسی که بعد از دیگران انتخاب میشود یا همون جانشین24%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 61,628 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@psychooplan · 15,18326 postsارشد مشاوره 📚
@moshaverenegar · 1,3945 postsآکادمی علوم شناختی
@CogSciAcademy · 6162 posts🍀نويد زندگى🍀
@NavideZendegi · 7,4922 postsروعان | روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی ایران
@psyedumedia · 19,9112 postsکانال رسمی روانشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اهواز
@ravan9807 · 4,0122 posts🌱روان برگ(کنکور روانشناسی)
@ravan_barg · 12,2392 postsصدای ارامش زندگی
@sedayearameshezendegi · 7,9122 postsآشنایی با فرزندم
@AsnAyiBaFarZanDam · 8,2111 postاخبار دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد
@Azadtnb1 · 164,8851 postکلوزآپ زبان ارشد و دکتری روانشناسی
@Closeup_language · 15,2641 postآکادمی دنیای شناخت
@CognitionWorld · 8,6371 postاطلاع رسانی آموزشیار
@IauAmozeshyar · 316,7551 postکاپلانخوانی
@kaplansadockk · 37,4831 postکنکور روانشناسی بالینی
@konkoreravanshenasi · 20,7401 postارتباط بــدون خشونت
@leilamaher1psychologist · 6,7681 postلینک دروس روانشناسی
@linkclasslinkiii · 4,1791 postپژوهش و روانشناسی
@p_reaserch · 3,8331 postنادیه زارعی | روانشناس
@psy_nadiehzareei · 16,2221 postPSYCAD | آکادمی روانشناسی
@psycad · 1,5251 postرویکردهای درمانی
@Psycho_Approaches · 15,8651 postروانـشـناســـی +
@Psychology_Gazor · 13,3521 postرواننگار | فاطمه عزلتی
@ravannegar_ozlati · 8231 postاطلاع رسانی دانشگاه آزاد
@Shriaus · 56,1011 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@EnglishPsychology011 · 2,5312 postsآکادمی زبان ارشد دکتری (دکترمهاجرنیا)
@Drmohajernia_Eng_Acdmy · 21,5731 postFarzaneh_psychologyy
@farzaneh_psychologyy · 3,5761 postساینکس | کنکور ارشد و دکتری روانشناسی
@psynex · 4,1051 postزبان عمومی ارشد و دکتری
@RMS_English · 52,0231 postزبان ارشد وزارت بهداشت | حسین مرجانی
@SefrtaSad_ZabanBehdasht · 1,2841 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@insightAcademia · 52,678
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
@Closeup_psychology · 68,920
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
@DrAzarakhshMokri · 200,699
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی زبان روانشناسی” (@PsyEngAcademy), 20,334 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PsyEngAcademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.