Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for روان‌کاوی زندگی روزمره

Channel

روان‌کاوی زندگی روزمره

@freudisalive

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,206subscribers

+611 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001681518621
TypeChannel
Username@freudisalive
Descriptionروان‌کاوی زندگی روزمره راه ارتباطی @freudisalive1 صفحه‌اینستاگرام https://www.instagram.com/freud.is.alive
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/freudisalive

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,59510,2069,900.57 August 2026 — 9,595 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,595 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,600 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,615 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,646 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,679 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,699 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,735 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,768 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,790 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,816 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,865 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,895 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,907 subscribers29 September 2026 — 9,985 subscribers7 October 2026 — 10,017 subscribers11 October 2026 — 10,038 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,044 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,054 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,061 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,062 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,077 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,083 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,094 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,101 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,118 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,135 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,152 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,164 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,168 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,176 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,175 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,177 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,188 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,191 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,187 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,193 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,202 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,206 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
39 measurements spanning 90 days, net +611. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,503–10,298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 09:4810,206+4
4 Nov 2026, 08:4110,202+9
3 Nov 2026, 08:1910,193+6
2 Nov 2026, 09:2610,187-4
1 Nov 2026, 10:5510,191+3
31 Oct 2026, 11:5610,188+11
30 Oct 2026, 14:4710,177+2
29 Oct 2026, 13:3610,175-1
28 Oct 2026, 15:2910,176+8
27 Oct 2026, 18:4110,168+4
26 Oct 2026, 15:5910,164+12
25 Oct 2026, 16:0910,152+17
24 Oct 2026, 13:3110,135+17
23 Oct 2026, 10:2010,118+17
22 Oct 2026, 13:4810,101+7
21 Oct 2026, 08:0510,094+11
20 Oct 2026, 06:4910,083+6
18 Oct 2026, 06:1110,077+15
17 Oct 2026, 03:4010,062+1
16 Oct 2026, 00:5610,061first reading

Engagement

97 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 10,206 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,730
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 97 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held97 (23 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total39,702
Reactions total137
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 20:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
335
Videos
46
Links
100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,952 reactions across 77 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,23975.8%
👍2568.67%
👌1023.46%
💔812.74%
👏551.86%
🔥511.73%
🤔260.881%
❤‍🔥250.847%
👎200.678%
🥰190.644%
😭150.508%
😁100.339%
😢90.305%
😇80.271%
💘70.237%
🌚50.169%
🕊40.136%
🥴40.136%
🤡30.102%
💯20.068%
9 further kinds110.373%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,952 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (26.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 5 November 2026

می‌توان بلوغ را چنین تعریف کرد: اینکه بتوانیم در زمان مناسب، با هرکس چنان رفتار کنیم که سزاوار آن است؛ احساساتی را که به خودمان تعلق دارند و باید نزد خودمان نگه داریم، از احساساتی تشخیص دهیم که باید بی‌درنگ با کسانی در میان بگذاریم که آن‌ها را در ما برانگیخته‌اند؛ و این احساسات را به کسانی منتقل نکنیم که بعدها وارد زندگی‌مان می‌شوند و سهمی در برانگیختن آن‌ها نداشته‌اند؛ ما بیشتر اوقات بالغ نبودیم. ● @freudisalive ●…

3 Nov 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 5 November 2026

اما نمی‌توان بدون اعتماد کردن زندگی را گذراند؛ وگرنه در بدترین سلول ممکن زندانی می‌شویم: خودمان. ● @freudisalive ● گراهام گرین وزارت ترس

2 Nov 2026, 08:23 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 5 November 2026

خشم از آن کسانی است که دل در گرو چیزی دارند؛ کسانی که برای خود هدف‌ها و دل‌مشغولی‌های مهمی دارند (نه آدم‌های بی‌تفاوت، بی‌خیال یا افسرده). به بیان دیگر کسانی که می‌بینند چیزی به‌درستی پیش نرفته است، اما در همان حال، در اوج خشونت خود، «می‌دانند» که اوضاع می‌توانست جور دیگری باشد. این گسست ممکن است از درون سرچشمه گرفته باشد؛ از کارکرد خاموش آنچه سائق مرگ می‌نامیم، یا از بیرون، از مواجهه با دیگری‌ای که همیشه ناکاممان …

2 Nov 2026, 06:36 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 5 November 2026

اگر خشممان را از دست بدهیم پیوندمان با کودکی را از دست خواهیم داد. ● @freudisalive ● آدام فیلیپس هیولا در مهد کودک

1 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 5 November 2026
File

ژوزف گران و ژان در جوانی ازدواج کرده بودند. سال‌ها گذشت؛ کار، فقر و سکوت شب‌هایشان بر سر میز شام، جایی برای شور و اشتیاق باقی نگذاشته بود. ژان رنج کشیده بود و سرانجام گران را ترک کرد. کامو مضمون نامه‌ای را که ژان برای همسرش نوشته بود، چنین نقل می‌کند: «دوستت داشتم، اما حالا خسته‌ام... از رفتن خوشحال نیستم، اما برای از نو شروع کردن لازم نیست آدم خوشحال باشد.» ● @freudisalive ● آلبر کامو، طاعون

1 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Therapy Done Right, 2026 Original title: Lo dejamos acá ◇ 1h 38m یک روان‌کاو معروف آرژانتینی که دیگر به روش‌های معمول روان‌درمانی اعتقادی ندارد، تصمیم می‌گیرد پنهانی در زندگی بیمارانش دخالت کند تا به آن‌ها کمک کند. این کار در ابتدا نتایج خوبی به همراه دارد، تا اینکه نویسنده‌ای که مدتی است نمی‌تواند چیزی بنویسد، به سراغ او می‌آید. ● @freudisalive از اینجا می‌تونید دانلود کنید.

1 Nov 2026, 07:25 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 5 November 2026

کودکی سرچشمهٔ همهٔ بی‌اعتمادی‌ها بود. دیگران بی‌رحمانه دستت می‌انداختند و تو هم بعدتر بی‌رحمانه دیگران را دست می‌انداختی. درد و رنجی را که خودت کشیده بودی، با رنجاندن دیگران از یاد می‌بردی. ● @freudisalive ● گراهام گرین(Graham Greene) آدم ما در هاوانا

1 Nov 2026, 05:36 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 5 November 2026

معنای این گفته که انسان «حیوانی اجتماعی» است چیست؟ یعنی انسان‌ها برای شناختن خود و رسیدن به خودآگاهی به یکدیگر نیاز دارند؛ نیازی که نرم‌تنان یا کرم‌های خاکی ندارند. اگر دیگرانی نباشند که به ما نشان دهند چه جور آدمی هستیم، نمی‌توانیم به درک درستی از خودمان برسیم. استاندال(Stendhal) نوشته است: «انسان در تنهایی می‌تواند هر چیزی به دست آورد، جز منش.» منظور او این است که منش آدمی در واکنش دیگران به گفتار و کردار ما شکل …

31 Oct 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 5 November 2026

هر مردی باید از خودش دو سؤال بپرسد: نخست، «به کجا می‌روم؟» و دوم، «چه کسی با من خواهد آمد؟» اگر این دو سؤال را به ترتیب نادرستی مطرح کنید، به دردسر خواهید افتاد. ● @freudisalive ● سم کین (Sam Keen) آتش درون: در باب مرد بودن

28 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC≈2,310 viewsread 5 November 2026

برچسب‌زدن به دیگران معمولا فرایندی خاموش است. بیشتر آدم‌ها آشکارا ما را به پذیرش نقش‌های خاصی وادار نمی‌کنند؛ آن‌ها صرفا با واکنش‌هایشان به ما القا می‌کنند که آن نقش‌ها را بپذیریم و به این ترتیب، پنهانی مانع می‌شوند از قالبی که برایمان تعیین کرده‌اند فراتر برویم. ● @freudisalive ● آلن دوباتن، دربارهٔ عشق

28 Oct 2026, 05:26 UTC≈2,290 viewsread 5 November 2026

اگرچه رنج مرا برمی‌انگیزد و حتی گاهی برایم دلپذیر است، هرگز نمی‌توانم دفاعیه‌ای بر آن بنویسم چراکه رنج درازمدت -- که رنج حقیقی همیشه طولانی است -- هر چند در آغاز تطهیر می‌کند، قدرت استقلال را پریشان، حواس را کُند و در آخر ویران می‌کند. اشتیاق زودیاب به رنج تنها ادعای دروغین زیبایی‌شناسان و هنردوستان تازه‌کاری است که رنج را با تفنن اشتباه می‌گیرند و درک نمی‌کنند که در رنج هم زهر هست، نیرویی مهیب و ویرانگر، و هم زایش…

Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @freudisalive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

vkends | مجله ایده‌ها
@vkends · 24,571
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ
@Spirit_and_life · 39,579
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
پرسونا
@psychology_personaa · 20,686
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 September 2026
نشر میلکان | Milkan
@nashremilkan · 32,082
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
فلسفه اگزیستانسیالیسم و روانکاوی
@phenomenology_existentialism · 19,513
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
علاقمندان به «دکتر آذرخش مکری»
@azarakhsh_mokrii · 24,503
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
دکتر آذرخش مکری | آرشیو
@Dr_Azarakhsh_Mokri_Public_Files · 22,925
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
کانال فایل های صوتی وفیلم های روانشناسی وبهترین کتابها
@psycology_OM · 23,120
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
خلاصه‌ی فلاسفه
@Arts1992 · 19,755
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 September 2026
دکتر محمدرضا سرگلزایی drsargolzaei
@drsargolzaei · 35,625
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
نشر روان‌ آموز | مرجع تخصصی کنکور ارشد و دکتری روانشناسی
@ravanamooz · 23,383
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
ترجمان علوم انسانى
@tarjomaanweb · 79,140
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
فایل کارگاههای روانشناسی
@psykargah · 23,120
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 September 2026
غلط ننویسیم
@ghalatnanevisimm · 21,490
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
کارگاههای آسیب شناسی dsm5
@psychologyservice · 21,781
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 September 2026
Dr Sargolzaee podcast
@drsargolzaeipodcast · 23,732
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
انبارستان🎧
@anbar100 · 29,514
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
کنکور ارشد و دکتری روانشناسی (آکادمی روان‌تاج 👑)
@RavanTajj · 22,373
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 September 2026
تاریخ فلسفه با ابوذر شریعتی
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,313
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
مرکز مشاوره دانشگاه تهران
@UTcounseling · 24,645
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 September 2026
کتابهای روانشناسی و روانپزشکی
@psyologistravanbook · 23,062
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
روعان | روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی ایران
@psyedumedia · 20,071
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 29 September 2026
کتابخانه روانشناسی تخصصی
@Psychological_Tools · 45,366
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
آکادمی زبان روانشناسی
@PsyEngAcademy · 23,923
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روان‌کاوی زندگی روزمره” (@freudisalive), 10,206 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freudisalive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.