Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for vkends | مجله ایده‌ها

Channel

vkends | مجله ایده‌ها

@vkends

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,622subscribers

-109 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001376092775
TypeChannel
Username@vkends
Descriptionمجله ایده ها فلسفه، روانشناسی، ادبیات و هنر صفحه اینستاگرام : Instagram.com/vkends t.me/vkendspodcast : کانال تلگرام پادکست
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held47
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/vkends

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,62224,77724,699.57 August 2026 — 24,731 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,731 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,725 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,722 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,732 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,761 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,759 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,767 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,763 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,772 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,777 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,770 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,758 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,759 subscribers23 August 2026 — 24,752 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,750 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,751 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,745 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,743 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,740 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,745 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,744 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,741 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,737 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,734 subscribers5 September 2026 — 24,730 subscribers8 September 2026 — 24,722 subscribers11 September 2026 — 24,729 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24,736 subscribers14 September 2026 — 24,735 subscribers16 September 2026 — 24,740 subscribers19 September 2026 — 24,724 subscribers25 September 2026 — 24,706 subscribers4 October 2026 — 24,660 subscribers8 October 2026 — 24,643 subscribers12 October 2026 — 24,629 subscribers14 October 2026 — 24,637 subscribers15 October 2026 — 24,648 subscribers17 October 2026 — 24,645 subscribers18 October 2026 — 24,635 subscribers19 October 2026 — 24,633 subscribers20 October 2026 — 24,636 subscribers21 October 2026 — 24,629 subscribers22 October 2026 — 24,632 subscribers23 October 2026 — 24,634 subscribers24 October 2026 — 24,628 subscribers25 October 2026 — 24,622 subscribers7 August 202625 October 2026
47 measurements spanning 79 days, net -109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,599–24,800 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 08:2724,622-6
24 Oct 2026, 07:1724,628-6
23 Oct 2026, 05:3724,634+2
22 Oct 2026, 06:5924,632+3
21 Oct 2026, 02:5624,629-7
20 Oct 2026, 00:3424,636+3
19 Oct 2026, 03:5924,633-2
18 Oct 2026, 05:5724,635-10
17 Oct 2026, 07:2024,645-3
15 Oct 2026, 12:5524,648+11
14 Oct 2026, 13:4924,637+8
12 Oct 2026, 23:1824,629-14
8 Oct 2026, 12:5624,643-17
4 Oct 2026, 03:2224,660-46
25 Sept 2026, 07:3924,706-18
19 Sept 2026, 00:3724,724-16
16 Sept 2026, 18:5924,740+5
14 Sept 2026, 19:1924,735-1
13 Sept 2026, 02:4024,736+7
11 Sept 2026, 07:4024,729first reading

Engagement

217 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 24,622 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,540
117 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
117
of 217 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 109 of 117 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held217 (23 July 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Views total296,818
Reactions total4,235
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Oct 2026, 10:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,150
Videos
≈396
Links
≈103

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 25s
Average length
4m 13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

15,367 reactions across 209 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15,367100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 209 of the 217 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,367 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 217 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 217 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vkends. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 217 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 25 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Oct 2026, 06:03 UTC977 views59 reactionsread 25 October 2026

‌ مسیری که باید بروی، درست همان است که از رفتنش میترسی. فرانتس كافكا @vkends

❤59

24 Oct 2026, 17:40 UTC≈1,470 views18 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Forwarded from @vkendspodcastVoice message

۱۹ | آلبر کامو | راز شادی سیزیف در دنیای پوچ کامو مدت زمان : ۳۰ دقیقه @vkendspodcast @vkends / #podcast / #پادکست

❤18

24 Oct 2026, 17:40 UTC≈1,470 views12 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Forwarded from @vkendspodcastPhoto

۱۹ | آلبر کامو | راز شادی سیزیف در دنیای پوچ کامو مدت زمان : ۳۰ دقیقه @vkendspodcast @vkends / #podcast / #پادکست

❤12

24 Oct 2026, 06:32 UTC≈2,000 views100 reactionsread 25 October 2026

‌ کافیست به جهان بیرون وابسته نباشی، آن وقت لازم نیست که از آنچه در آن روی می دهد، بترسی. لودویک ویتگنشتاین @vkends

❤100

23 Oct 2026, 18:15 UTC≈2,140 views15 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Forwarded from @vkendspodcastPhoto

۱۸ | لودویک ویتگنشتاین | تراکتاتوس ویتگنشتاین و مرزهای زبان مدت زمان : ۲۵ دقیقه @vkendspodcast @vkends / #podcast / #پادکست

❤15

23 Oct 2026, 18:15 UTC≈2,190 views15 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Forwarded from @vkendspodcastVoice message

۱۸ | لودویک ویتگنشتاین | تراکتاتوس ویتگنشتاین و مرزهای زبان مدت زمان : ۲۵ دقیقه @vkendspodcast @vkends / #podcast / #پادکست

❤15

22 Oct 2026, 18:02 UTC≈2,510 views71 reactionsread 25 October 2026

‌ گوویندا اگر چه عمر را بر سر تعالیم بودا گذاشته بود و به علت پیری و فروتنی احترامی در میان پیروان بودا داشت اما هنوز به آرامش قلبی نرسیده بود و احساس میکرد جستجویش بیفایده بوده است. گوویندا با رسیدن به رودخانه از قایقران خواست تا او را به سمت دیگر رود ببرد. گوویندا وقتی در سمت دیگر رودخانه از قایق پیاده میشد به قایق ران گفت: تو نسبت به رهبانان و مسافران مهربانی. و بسیار از رهروان بودا را از رود رد کرده ای. آیا تو ه…

❤71

22 Oct 2026, 14:51 UTC≈2,290 views24 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Forwarded from @vkendspodcastVoice message

۱۷ | هرمان هسه | چرا سیذارتا از بودا پیروی نکرد مدت زمان : ۱۴ دقیقه @vkendspodcast @vkends / #podcast / #پادکست

❤24

22 Oct 2026, 14:51 UTC≈2,240 views17 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Forwarded from @vkendspodcastPhoto

۱۷ | هرمان هسه | چرا سیذارتا از بودا پیروی نکرد مدت زمان : ۱۴ دقیقه @vkendspodcast @vkends / #podcast / #پادکست

❤17

21 Oct 2026, 17:59 UTC≈2,840 views78 reactionsread 25 October 2026

‌ عشق یعنی بخشیدن آنچه ندارید به کسی که در طلب آن نیست. ‌ ژاک لاکان @vkends

❤78

21 Oct 2026, 17:56 UTC≈2,760 views19 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Forwarded from @vkendspodcastVoice message

۱۶ | ژاک لاکان | عشق در روانکاوی فروید و لاکان مدت زمان : ۲۹ دقیقه @vkendspodcast @vkends / #podcast / #پادکست

❤19

21 Oct 2026, 17:56 UTC≈2,630 views12 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Forwarded from @vkendspodcastPhoto

۱۶ | ژاک لاکان | عشق در روانکاوی فروید و لاکان مدت زمان : ۲۹ دقیقه @vkendspodcast @vkends / #podcast / #پادکست

❤12

Showing the 12 most recent of 217 posts we hold for @vkends. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@vkends edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 October 2026
Most recent edit
18 October 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

WIND
@windchannel · 2,001
#1
روان تحلیل
@ravantahlil · 10,123
#2
روان‌کاوی زندگی روزمره
@freudisalive · 10,135
#3
Kierkegaard | کی‌یرکگارد
@kierkegaard3 · 18,934
#4
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ
@Spirit_and_life · 39,337
#5
تعمّق - فلسفه و هنر
@Taamoq · 13,783
#6
آرتور شوپنهاور ©
@schopenhauer_page · 9,398
#7
چتمارس.
@chetmax · 8,439
#8
خلاصه‌ی فلاسفه
@Arts1992 · 19,829
#9
کلاب فلسفه لوگوس
@logoss24 · 18,193
#10
That’s all folks!
@IReallyHopeSoTwo · 7,261
#11
داستایفسکی در سیبری
@dostoevskyinsiberia · 47,884
#12
فروید و روانکاوی
@Sigmund_freuddd · 15,160
#13
فلسفه
@philosophicalir · 7,671
#14
آکادمی فلسفه و هنر مارزوک
@marzockacademy · 16,276
#15
روانشناسی نقاد
@mohammad_eynizadeh · 16,972
#16
کهربی - جنرالیست
@kahrobi_generalist · 1,706
#17
Sepblog | سپهر خدابنده
@Sepblog · 280,675
#18
نشر میلکان | Milkan
@nashremilkan · 31,037
#19
تاریخ فلسفه با ابوذر شریعتی
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,428
#20
Use it or Lose it
@usedata · 3,034
#21
دگرگون | Degargoon
@thegargoon · 7,701
#22
منابع بیگانه
@scientific_resources · 16,097
#23
عصیانگر
@osiangar24 · 3,569
#24
Professor Eskandari
@prof_eskandari · 4,526
#25
وکیل نیوز | Vakil News
@vakilnews1 · 3,178
#26
تاملاتِ شبانه: ابوذر شریعتی
@Schopenhauer71 · 13,305
#27
اگزیستانسیالیسم
@Dostoyevsky1980 · 14,000
#28
تصویر و زندگی
@poster_cinematography · 13,344
#29
هایدگر و‌ اگزیستانسیالیسم
@Heideggerrrr · 8,866
#30
کا
@ka_koohikar · 12,280
#31
نباید می‌ماندیم - معین دهاز
@nabayad_m · 39,222
#32
پیکسل‌هایی که زندگی‌ست
@pixels_ThatAreLife · 4,437
#33
The Catcher in the Rye
@caulfild · 33,505
#34
Anarconomy
@anarconomy · 46,214
#35
مشاوره‌‌ تحصیلی [دکتر‌ بهمنی]
@moshaver_bahmani · 73,897
#36
کرانه‌ها
@karanehaa · 8,739
#37
نباید می‌خواندیم
@nabayad_mikhandim · 31,483
#38
The Last Of House Romanov
@lohromanov · 10,821
#39
Moein Dehaz
@moein_dehaz · 12,286
#40
Annamorphin
@anamorphyn · 24,846
#41
صادق هدایت
@Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel · 18,084
#42
Soul of Dream️️
@SoulofDream · 166,231
#43
سینما پارادیـزو
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,888
#44
NPTONN𓄂𓆃
@nptonnmag · 11,020
#45
اتحادیه‌ی ابلهان
@AConfederacy_of_Dunces · 3,283
#46
𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖘𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖉
@ReasonableMind · 5,875
#47
An Ordinary Mind
@an_ordinary_mind · 3,594
#48
Science Magazine
@science_magazine · 22,805
#49
پادکست آدمهای معمولی
@ordmenpodcast · 4,435
#50
اضطراب | Angst
@voresangst · 3,925
#51
KAZA Visual
@karimzadehstudio · 1,823
#52
شعر، فرهنگ و ادبیات
@mohsenahmadvandi · 3,910
#53
شعرِ تَر
@Shearetar · 2,679
#54
زیبایی‌شناسی
@zibaishenasi · 19,498
#55
𝑻𝒓𝒊𝒃𝒖𝒕𝒆 𝑻𝒐 𝑨𝒓𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄
@tributetoartistic · 23,758
#56
The Imagist | ایماژیست
@The_Imagist · 8,269
#57
سخنرانی‌ها
@sokhanranihaa · 131,956
#58
مدرسه علوم انسانی [جیوگی]
@jivegionline · 9,390
#59
CogniPlus | کاگنی پلاس
@CogniPlus · 2,884
#60
هستی و نیستی
@hastionistiii · 8,963
#61
be
@bahmangharbi · 3,140
#62
آشفتار
@ashoftar · 1,460
#63
اکبر جباری
@drakbarjabari · 3,366
#64
اگزیستانسیالیسم
@egzistanasialist · 2,552
#65
نگاران | ادبیات
@negaaraan_ac · 34,162
#66
امیرالکلام علی علیه السلام
@amirolkalam · 5,825
#67
آن؛
@monadchannel · 52,508
#68
Liszt0maniaa (اشکان شریعت)
@Liszt0maniaa · 3,302
#69
ميلاد دخانچی
@miladdokhanchi · 8,585
#70
چراغبان
@cheraaghbaan · 3,860
#71
شاعران جهان
@world_poets · 10,089
#72
روایتِ روانبُد
@mana_ravanbod · 4,845
#73
Dr.mostafanaeimi
@drmostafanaeimi · 139,779
#74
آگرافوس
@agrafoss · 14,397
#75
کانال کتاب خوانی
@iketabkhani · 4,946
#76
حسام ایپکچی | Hesam Ipakchi
@hesam_ipakchi · 8,320
#77
هاروت و ماروت
@Harut_Marut · 7,736
#78
ScienceWay
@Sourceofneuroscince · 7,851
#79
مجله ادبی گرته
@garte_mag · 4,851
#80
گروه کاگنوز| Cognos team
@cognosteam · 2,869
#81
TechTube 𝕏 تک توب
@TechTube · 75,321
#82
Art and death.
@Art_death · 25,989
#83
Old Persian Pop selection
@oldpersianp · 1,541
#84
In the Fade
@nowinthefade · 11,619
#85
Pure Dudes
@Pure_Dudes · 6,735
#86
Echoes
@ayoooooooooyyy · 1,242
#87
UpdateMD آپدیت ام دی
@updatemd · 5,278
#88
Homonoia
@Homonoia · 3,351
#89
کتابسار
@ketaabsaar · 10,524
#90
The.Voice.Of.Life
@TheVoiceOfLife · 5,215
#91
همچون در یک آینه
@ThroughaGlassDarkly · 5,385
#92
| Book | Art | Life |
@Book_Art_Life · 1,767
#93

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

چکیدا | Chekida
@chekida_com · 22,519
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ
@Spirit_and_life · 39,337
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
نشر میلکان | Milkan
@nashremilkan · 31,037
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
کافه کتاب
@kettab · 21,420
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
خلاصه‌ی فلاسفه
@Arts1992 · 19,829
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 September 2026
Sepblog | سپهر خدابنده
@Sepblog · 280,675
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,152
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
تاریخ فلسفه با ابوذر شریعتی
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,428
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Dr.mostafanaeimi
@drmostafanaeimi · 139,779
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
نباید می‌ماندیم - معین دهاز
@nabayad_m · 39,222
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
فلسفه اگزیستانسیالیسم و روانکاوی
@phenomenology_existentialism · 19,315
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
HIGH MOVIES
@high_moviess · 52,660
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
علی ميرصادقی
@ali_mirsadeghi · 46,007
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
امید امانی | Omid Amani
@dr_amaniiiii · 96,410
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
غلط ننویسیم
@ghalatnanevisimm · 21,308
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
🔸فروغ_فرخزاد🔸
@foroghfarokhzad · 45,019
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
نباید می‌خواندیم
@nabayad_mikhandim · 31,483
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
boufe_koor
@boufe_koor_insta · 33,933
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
| پادکست فارسی انسانک |
@ensanak · 31,417
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vkends | مجله ایده‌ها” (@vkends), 24,622 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vkends.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.