این اولین رخنمایی گدارِ ۲۰ ساله با این موهای پرپشت در جهان سینماست. هنوز فیلمی نساخته و فیلمنامهای ننوشته. فیلم کوتاه ۴۰ دقیقهای و بیدیالوگ که ژاک ریوت ساخته و به گفته خود ریوت: ۴۰ دقیقه طول میکشه و هیچ اتفاقی نمیفته. تنها چهار نفر دور یک میز نشستن و به همدیگه نگاه میکنن. این فیلم که ۷۶ سال پیش ساخته شده، ۱۷ سال پیش پیدا شد و بهدست سینماتک فرانسه بهروش دیجیتالی اسکن و نوسازی شد. میتونید از [اینجا] ببینید. …

Channel
The Catcher in the Rye
@caulfild
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,010subscribers
+306 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001282145965 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @caulfild |
| Description | تبلیغات ندارم. کانالهای آرشیو: @caulfild2 @caulv |
| Created | 20 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/caulfild |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 33,010 | +41 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 32,969 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:53 | 32,964 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 32,959 | +15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:09 | 32,944 | +13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 32,931 | +60 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 32,871 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 32,872 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 32,876 | +14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 32,862 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 32,880 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 32,876 | -55 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 32,931 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 32,927 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 32,923 | +18 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 32,905 | +9 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 32,896 | +14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 32,882 | +17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 32,865 | +23 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 32,842 | first reading |
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.3%
- avg views ÷ 33,010 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 9,680
- 48 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 49
- of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 71 (31 July 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 464,580 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 16:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈8,940
- Videos
- ≈408
- Links
- ≈2,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 19s
- Average length
- 40s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 15
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 70 we hold a reading for · 9%
- Most on one post
- 8
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @caulfild. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 71 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
۸۰ درصد کسانی که اینجان، زیر ۳۰ سال دارن. و از اونجایی که خودم ۳۳ سالمه، یعنی از نزدیک به ۸۵ درصد شما بزرگترم.
پرسش دلخواهم: چند سالتونه؟
- زیر ۲۰12%
- ۲۰ تا ۲۵44%
- ۲۵ تا ۳۰23%
- ۳۰ تا ۳۵10%
- ۳۵ تا ۴۰6%
- ۴۰ تا ۴۵4%
- ۴۵ به بالا2%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
دیوید بویی ۲۵ سال پیش David Bowie, 2001. by Markus Klinko
فرتورهای تازهی استاد که انگار داره نماز میخونه. Willem Dafoe, 2026. by Daniel Sannwald
دستنوشتنش شبیه کارهاشه. Modern Madonna, 1918. Ceres, 1928. Forms in Space, 1924.
دستنوشتِ جان استورز، مجسمهساز آمریکایی توی دفتر یادداشتش. بند پایانی همچین چیزی نوشته: امروز صبح وقتی از خواب بیدار شدم و شنیدم که مونک دارد با خودش «صحبت» میکند، مارگریت گفت: «تماشای روح کوچک او که دارد شکل میگیرد دلنشین است.» اما با خودم فکر کردم: روح هرگز کوچک نیست. اگر روح از جانب خداوند میآید، باید از کامل بودن او سهمی داشته باشد. این زندگی، مدرسهای برای ابراز و تجلی است؛ تحت محدودیتهایی که جهانی که در آ…
ویم وندرس در روند ساخت «روزهای عالی» در توکیو Perfect Days (2023) dir. Wim Wenders
یونوی خفته پیکاسو آبرنگ روی کاغذ [در افسانههای رومی، طاووس پرندهی یونو بود] Sleeping Juno, 1905-6. by Pablo Picasso
از ماههای سپتامبر و اکتبر (پیرامونِ مهرماه)، که کمابیش در هر اقلیمی دلپذیرترین ماههای سالاند، اوج بهره را ببرید. بریدهای از یک روزنامهی آمریکایی در ۲۷ شهریور ۱۲۹۸ خورشیدی (۱۰۷ سال پیش) The Greenville Daily News, South Carolina, September 19, 1919.
سراسر ادا
[بیماریشناسی درختان، بلانچارد و تاتار، ترجمهی بهروز جعفرپور]
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @caulfild. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@caulfild edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 27 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
پرسش دلخواهم: چند سالتونه؟
- زیر ۲۰12%
- ۲۰ تا ۲۵44%
- ۲۵ تا ۳۰23%
- ۳۰ تا ۳۵10%
- ۳۵ تا ۴۰6%
- ۴۰ تا ۴۵4%
- ۴۵ به بالا2%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Tahmandeh_Kalamat · 1662 postsبَعلْزِبوب
@baaelzebub · 1501 postدیرپای خُجَسته
@dirpaykohjaste · 2,2821 postگوشه عزلت من ☕︎
@donyafromajummaland · 1,0521 post'O brave new world.
@HistoryOfDrowningBoy · 2721 postانستیتو ایرانشهر
@IRANSHAHRINSTITUTE · 1701 postPrague | پِراگ
@prague_7 · 2,0251 post«سپیز»
@spiiz · 11,9751 postترجمانک | فاطمه مدیحی بیدگلی
@tarjomanak · 2,3251 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Art_death · 25,250#1
@neartothewildheartt · 14,970#2
@Just_Movieeee · 9,228#3
@kamikazhi · 5,891#4
@bidgolpublishing · 8,826#5
@nuance_0 · 1,559#6
@demonkratia · 3,079#7
@anamorphyn · 24,390#8
@paintingco · 12,696#9
@RegaPlus · 1,463,288#10
@nowinthefade · 11,715#11
@caulfild2 · 11,835#12
@aqvalanam · 39,397#13
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,555#14
@BipolarDepression · 4,412#15
@swingerofbirchess · 9,331#16
@PeintureEtVie · 14,357#17
@chetmax · 8,387#18
@lurkupy · 2,522#19
@Manaseks · 2,320#20
@Alborzname · 6,378#21
@OneBeautifulShot · 5,647#22
@GezichtopDelft · 1,552#23
@mamlekate · 568,244#24
@MyCinemaFact2 · 288,661#25
@Dahaar · 10,425#26
@sparrow_is_typing · 1,529#27
@AHS_ART · 7,614#28
@Parasounder · 9,653#29
@IReallyHopeSoTwo · 7,163#30
@poster_cinematography · 13,292#31
@xHelterSkelterx · 4,017#32
@chaosmotics · 4,042#33
@Silent_Island · 6,493#34
@TheWeepingMeadow · 2,135#35
@private_film_club · 3,137#36
@Video_Archives · 13,034#37
@PishgumTeam · 4,578#38
@aysoosdiaries · 9,596#39
@NazariyehAdabi · 42,696#40
@kierkegaard3 · 18,793#41
@startreatments · 11,799#42
@Everythingaboutphotography · 13,117#43
@filmsandnotes · 1,436 (as read 4 September 2026)#44
@tarikja · 5,504#45
@TaIsLost · 5,741#46
@zibaishenasi · 19,617#47
@MeinMondlicht · 2,725#48
@naghashineveshte · 1,271#49
@petitanalysis · 4,292#50
@Filmkootahh · 22,018#51
@newmashupline · 1,256#52
@sarahband · 4,940#53
@spiiz · 11,975#54
@anarconomy · 46,691#55
@musicandeternity · 4,653#56
@vahidonline · 1,409,057#57
@razcom · 1,237,225#58
@Homonoia · 3,287 (as read 4 September 2026)#59
@cineartgraph · 4,490#60
@ayoooooooooyyy · 1,210 (as read 4 September 2026)#61
@TechTube · 75,416#62
@BipolarDepression_II · 931#63
@Emood · 4,846#64
@persianmusixarchive · 1,239 (as read 4 September 2026)#65
@reverchannel · 7,037#66
@wishofshine · 1,597 (as read 4 September 2026)#67
@cahiersdumeme · 909#68
@Tastes_Of_Music · 3,254 (as read 4 September 2026)#69
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bookhapdf · 75,583
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@classicmusic3 · 40,624
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
@redcurtainswhisper · 43,502
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 4 September 2026
@owrsi · 55,036
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@Honarrvareh · 29,316
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
@ARTTJOURNAL · 34,204
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
@BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,147
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
@bankema · 31,901
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@nabayad_m · 39,271
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
@honar7modiran · 35,127
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
@NazariyehAdabi · 42,696
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,401
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@negaaraan_ac · 33,741
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@nabayad_mikhandim · 31,394
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@Official_MohsenNamjoo · 45,185
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
@privateart · 49,760
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
@makhfigah_channel · 63,415
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,888
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@painting · 41,686
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
@NahadChannel · 169,360
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
@monadchannel · 52,326
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
@radiolimoo · 36,374
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@anhaaparat · 64,153
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
@tarjomaanweb · 42,861
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Catcher in the Rye” (@caulfild), 33,010 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caulfild.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.