در مقابل آدم های رویا زاده ، شخصیت های عادی قرار میگیرند که کاری ندارند جز اینکه جلوی آنها راه بروند. این شخصیت ها همان روستا نشین های "تانگوی شیطان" اند، همانهایی که ایریمیاش با سخنرانی اش به جاده میکشدشان و سپس آنهارا خلع سلاح شده و مردد، در جایی دور از ذهن، وسط ناکجا آباد نگه میدارد. 🎬 Sátántangó 1994 join 👉 @honar7modiran

Channel
کافه هنر
@honar7modiran
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,967subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001140298294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @honar7modiran |
| Description | ادمین، درخواست تبلیغات و فیلم : @g_rahimimanesh @cafe_honar_ads : تعرفه تبلیغات آدرس فیلم های ارائه شده: @List_Adres 🎞️ سفارش و درخواست فیلم پذیرفته می شود. اینستاگرام : instagram.com/_u/honar7modiran |
| Created | 18 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/honar7modiran |
Topic
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:00 | 34,967 | -21 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:15 | 34,988 | -10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:49 | 34,998 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:57 | 35,010 | -15 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:19 | 35,025 | -7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:05 | 35,032 | +32 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 35,000 | +3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 34,997 | -17 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:21 | 35,014 | -17 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:17 | 35,031 | -13 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:26 | 35,044 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:19 | 35,053 | +52 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 35,001 | +15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 34,986 | -18 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:57 | 35,004 | +67 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 34,937 | -17 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:20 | 34,954 | -9 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:10 | 34,963 | -21 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:09 | 34,984 | +54 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:37 | 34,930 | first reading |
Engagement
174 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.36%
- avg views ÷ 34,967 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,220
- 44 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.453%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 44
- of 174 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 43 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 174 (24 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 97,841 |
| Reactions total | 442 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 08:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,350
- Videos
- ≈3,270
- Links
- ≈3,120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 8h 54m
- Average length
- 9m 23s
Measured directly from 57 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,528 reactions across 147 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 942 | 61.6% | |
| 👍 | 213 | 13.9% | |
| 👏 | 125 | 8.18% | |
| 👌 | 80 | 5.24% | |
| 👎 | 64 | 4.19% | |
| 😢 | 28 | 1.83% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 1.18% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 0.524% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 0.458% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.458% | |
| 😇 | 7 | 0.458% | |
| 😡 | 7 | 0.458% | |
| 🤷 | 7 | 0.458% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.327% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.327% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.131% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.065% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.065% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.065% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 151 of the 174 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,571 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 44 posts held from the last 30 days (4.55%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
سینمای خصوصی محافل نخبگانی غرب: نسبت داستان با فیلم چگونه است؟ آیا همانند نسبت بین نقشه و ساختمان است یا مانند نسبت بین شئی با عکس؟ یا به تعبیری دیگر زیبایی از قلم به اثر منعکس میشود یا از نو خلق؟ چه رمانهایی که جوایز نفیس بردند اما اثری قدرتمند از آنها ساخته نشد و در سینما دچار ورشکستگی شدند و چه بسا داستانهایی که چندان اقبالی در نشر نداشتند اما اثر سینمایی قدرتمندی از آنها داشتیم خصوصا در داستانهای کمیک بو…
❤3👍1
#معرفیکارگردان بلا تار متولد ۲۱ ژوئیه ۱۹۵۵ (۶۳ سال) کارگردان و فیلمساز و تهیه کننده که در شهر پچ مجارستان به دنیا آمد اما در بوداپست بزرگ شد. شروع کار بلا تار در فیلمسازی، ساختن فیلمهای آماتور در ۱۶ سالگی بود. بیشتر کارهای آماتور او را مستندهایی دربارهٔ زندگی کارگران و مردم فقیر مناطق شهری مجارستان تشکیل میداد. نخستین اثر بلند خود با نام «آشیانه خانوادگی» را در ۲۲ سالگی جلوی دوربین ببرد. تار این فیلم ر…
❤6
. «لسلو کراسناهور کایی» در «تانگوی شیطان» در روایتی آخرالزمانی ، از زندگی و سلوک اهالی روستایی دور افتاده و تقریبٱ متروک در مجارستان می گوید.روستایی که باران یکریز بر آن می بارد و انگار همراه قطرات باران محنت و فلاکت نیز بر سر و روی اهالی آن فرو می ریزد.روستایی که زمین اش به باتلاقی می ماند که آرزوها و رؤیاهای مردمان را در خود فرو کشیده و آسمانش ،غمگین و خاکستری، سرنوشت شوم آنان را به نظاره نشسته است. مردمان این وا…
❤5
Satantango 1994 Bèla tarr بلا تار اغلب به سبب برداشتهای طولانی و تم فلسفی فیلمهایش در بین سینما دوستان شناخته میشود؛تانگوی شیطان را همچنان برترین و کاملترین فیلم او میشمارند. در تمام۷ساعت و۱۲دقیقهٔ فیلم ردپای بیهمتای بلا تار دیده میشود و آن را به یکی از بهترینهای تاریخ سینما تبدیل میکند. ریتم کند فیلم و برداشتهای فوق طولانی فیلم نیز به بار درونگرایانهٔ فیلم میافزایند و ترکیبی بیمثال را بر روی پ…
❤7👏5😁1
«تانگوی شیطان» و الهام اولیه کراسناهورکایی درباره آغاز نگارش «تانگوی شیطان» میگوید: داستانی تیره از زندگی در روستاهای مجارستان که با ورود مأموری سابق به نام ایریمیاس شروع میشود؛ کسی که هم میتواند یک شیاد و دغلباز باشد و هم منجی دهکده. این رمان در ۱۹۸۵ در مجارستان کمونیستی منتشر شد و در سال ۱۹۹۴ توسط دوستش، فیلمساز مشهور بلا تار، به فیلمی هفتساعته و سیاهوسفید تبدیل شد و بعدا به انگلیسی انتشار یافت. خودش می…
❤8
"فاجعه دنیای ما این نیست که روزی به آخر خواهد رسید، فاجعه این است که این دنیا هرگز به پایان نمیرسد." #بلاتار خیلی وقت بود که دوست داشتم نسخه ی کامل این فیلم را تماشا کنم، و با توجه به طولانی بودنش امکانش برایم فراهم نشده بود. به هر حال، قرنطینه است و بی خوابی و ساعات طولانی بیکاری اجباری، و شاید تنها مزیتش این باشد که فرصتی ست برای انجام کارهایی که در شتاب تند روزمرگی هایمان نمی گنجند ... تانگوی شیطان بی شک یک شاهک…
❤10👏1
در فضایی پسا آخرالزمانی و گرفتار در ناامیدی، با رئالیسمی تراژیک به تصویر کشیده شده و به دنبال نجات دهندهٔ خود میگردد. فضای داستان: ویرانشهر دهکدهٔ مجارستانی دور افتادهای را تصور کنید؛ به قدری فرسوده که گویا پایان دنیاست. جهانی تاریک و غوطهور در بارانهای پیاپی، غرق در گِل و تجسم زوالی گریزناپذیر. کراسناهورکای، در یک توالی تانگو مانند - شش قدم به جلو، شش قدم به عقب - زندگی کاراکترها را ترسیم میکند؛ پی…
❤7😁1
١١/١٣ چشماندازی از گذشته– تانگوی شیطان 🎥 Satantango 1994 join 👉 @honar7modiran
❤4😇1
در تانگوی شیطان، شاهد تأثیرات حاصل از سقوط کمونیسم بر ساکنان یک روستای کوچک هستیم... تانگوی شیطان (۱۹۹۴) کارگردان: بلا تار Join👉 @honar7modiran
❤4👏1
. . کسیکه هفت ساعت وقت ندارد تا به تماشای بارش باران در فیلمهای بلا تار بنشیند، وقتِ سر در آوردن از سعادت هنر هم ندارد ! 👤 #ژاک_رانسیر 🎬 Sátántangó 1994 join 👉 @honar7modiran
👍17❤11😁2👌1👎1🤷1😘1
● قاب هایی زیبای سینما 🖼 #شات ⬆️ تانگوی شیطان 1994 اثر بلاتار ↔️ آینه 1975 اثر آندری تارکوفسکی ⬇️ هارمونی های ورکمایستر 2000 بلاتار Join 👉 @honar7modiran
❤10👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 174 posts we hold for @honar7modiran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@honar7modiran edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 2 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 1 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 32 posts on @honar7modiran as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 30 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 11
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@peyke_pouyesh · 2,0554 postsفنسالاران صنعت داروی کشور
@Fansalaran · 16,5843 postsPerspective | پرسپکتیو
@Perspective_7 · 5973 postsعصآ موزیک
@asaaa68 · 1193 postsرضا غیاث
@reza_qias · 7503 postsسینما نوستالژیا
@NostalgiaCinematheque · 2,0381 postگاهی نویسنده
@gahinevisande · 721 postکمی کژی
@kamikazhi · 6,1021 postیکشنبه های سوررئال
@surrealsundays · 1,2921 postتنآمیزی
@tan_amizi · 1,4571 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 61 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@econviews · 18,8468 postsLet's learn English آموزش زبان انگلیسی
@english1388 · 66,2187 postsباغ سبز مولانا / زهرا غریبیان
@gharibianlavasanii · 17,1027 postsتقویت (مکالمه) با کارتون های 8 دقیقه ای سان شاین
@EnglishCartoonn2024 · 23,1445 posts「 آنک 」
@its_anak · 19,4665 postsنومنولوژی|شایان اویسی
@Noumenology · 625 postsهمســفر بـا ماه
@hamsafarbamah · 9,0624 postsروانشناسی و پزشکی
@matlabravanshenasi · 25,3764 postsمدرسه ی زبان، مکالمه و موسیقی
@RealEnConversations · 16,4694 posts🍀زیبایی های آفرینش🍀
@stiiiiicker · 15,0204 posts𝑨𝒑𝒑𝒛_𝒌𝒂𝒎𝒚𝒂𝒃 | برنامه های کمیاب
@appz_kamyab · 20,5363 posts🌸آرامش با داستان🌸
@arameshbadastan · 10,8683 posts✌ ENG Learners 📚
@Eng_learners_Mb · 18,4763 postsکتاب ، کتاب ، کتاب بخوانیم
@LibMajazi · 10,8883 posts👑novin.english👑
@novinenglish_new · 13,9113 postsترفندهای روانشناسی💚🍃
@aramesh_roh_ravan · 5,0202 postsدیر بوک
@DeyrBook · 14,9292 postsمشاوره خانواده و ازدواج روان کاشفان
@ghasemi8483 · 13,8502 postsروانشناس/ مجتبی قاسمی
@ghasemi8484 · 10,0712 postsجعلیات ادبی
@jaliateadabi · 4,4182 postsشـ؏ـر و مشـاعـره
@sher_moshaer · 8,5362 postsنردبان نور✨
@shine41 · 5,0552 postsSupernova
@Supernova · 5,6102 postsدکوراسیون حرفه ای منزل رو رایگان یاد بگیر
@ZibaManzel · 11,9032 posts
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@asaaa68 · 1193 posts📎
@attachdb2025 · 1553 postsفنسالاران صنعت داروی کشور
@Fansalaran · 16,5843 postsPerspective | پرسپکتیو
@Perspective_7 · 5973 postsرضا غیاث
@reza_qias · 7503 postsUp Studio
@uplabstudio · 643 postsگاهی نویسنده
@gahinevisande · 722 postsکمی کژی
@kamikazhi · 6,1022 postsکاتارسیس مووی
@catharsis_movie · 1,4271 postThe Catcher in the Rye
@caulfild · 33,6111 postCinemacinema.ir
@cinemacinemair · 3,1821 postسینما پارادیـزو
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,9271 postفلسفیدن
@falsafidan · 5,2271 postجامعهشناسی
@iransociology · 37,3591 postخرمگس
@kharmagaas · 18,2881 postسینما نوستالژیا
@NostalgiaCinematheque · 2,0381 postSaho Education
@SahoEducation · 4,4721 postkanzou
@sanaeinar · 8521 postیکشنبه های سوررئال
@surrealsundays · 1,2921 postتنآمیزی
@tan_amizi · 1,4571 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@cinemayanii · 24,147#1
@NazariyehAdabi · 43,467#2
@caligula_mas · 2,723#3
@cineemagic · 6,854#4
@motion_picture_love · 8,790#5
@cinema_twittt · 29,523#6
@ciine_phile · 6,420#7
@OfficialCinemaTwitter · 21,511#8
@Cinema_Twitter_Farsi · 67,198#9
@CooFilm · 41,928#10
@NaghdeShab · 4,422#11
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,927#12
@Just_Movieeee · 9,572#13
@pezhmaneveshte · 1,847#14
@Filmkootahh · 22,224#15
@honartohi · 27,464#16
@ARTTJOURNAL · 36,064#17
@filmemrooz_official · 14,382#18
@AHS_ART · 7,656#19
@NAcinema · 13,018#20
@Art_death · 26,420#21
@artchanel · 20,142#22
@anamorphyn · 25,186#23
@r_dorost · 1,139#24
@anarconomy · 46,129#25
@classiccinema · 3,450#26
@Video_Archives · 13,156#27
@Alborzname · 6,551#28
@MAH_7ART · 11,720#29
@Jouissance_me · 6,019#30
@PishgumTeam · 4,904#31
@zibaishenasi · 19,674#32
@caulfild · 33,611#33
@dtonline · 7,201#34
@JasteGorikhte · 12,429#35
@anbar100 · 29,514#36
@Cinema_New_Wave · 27,182#37
@Film_Music_Collection · 10,755#38
@Nazariyeh_Cinema · 19,874#39
@bankema · 32,613#40
@hoseinmoazezinia · 9,023#41
@kierkegaard3 · 18,999#42
@RamaGhavidel · 648#43
@Pranaa_Art · 2,990#44
@astrakancafe · 3,775#45
@Pure_Dudes · 6,712#46
@makhfigah_channel · 62,608#47
@Cinemaee_ir · 22,810#48
@naghdpazhouh · 404#49
@CineManiaa · 11,926#50
@sharethemysoul · 5,734#51
@massoud_farassati · 3,957#52
@mohamadd_qorbani · 1,838#53
@bookhapdf · 75,479#54
@cahiersdumeme · 926#55
@Vinylhub · 893#56
@MetalWorld · 26,182#57
@RockMusicHistory · 6,571#58
@musicandeternity · 4,599#59
@Nymphaea_Om · 168 (as read 2 September 2026)#60
@GezichtopDelft · 1,562#61
@nowinthefade · 11,609#62
@The_Imagist · 8,240#63
@cineartgraph · 4,430#64
@Manaseks · 2,302#65
@arthistorism · 4,517#66
@Tastes_Of_Music · 3,248#67
@pianoland123 · 9,031#68
@rockmag · 10,836#69
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@honarefilmnameh · 27,103
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
@cinemayanii · 24,147
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
@honartohi · 27,464
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 September 2026
@NazariyehAdabi · 43,467
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@artchanel · 20,142
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 September 2026
@anbar100 · 29,514
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
@bookhapdf · 75,479
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@Cinemaee_ir · 22,810
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 September 2026
@ARTTJOURNAL · 36,064
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
@makhfigah_channel · 62,608
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
@shayanbehjatienglish · 40,530
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,927
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
@mylibraries · 73,884
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
@parsslibrary · 33,539
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@phenomenology_existentialism · 19,513
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
@LibraryinternationaL · 20,411
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
@MohtavaNemunesoal · 62,641
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کافه هنر” (@honar7modiran), 34,967 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/honar7modiran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.