😩 هرچی زبان میخونی، هنوز نمیدونی چطور باید شروع کنی؟ لازم نیست راهشو تنهایی پیدا کنی! 🚀 یه مینیدوره مکالمه + تعیین سطح رایگان برات آماده کردیم 🎁 فقط کافیه وارد ربات بشی و شروع کنی👇🏻 🤖 @EnglishFastTalk_bot ⏳ ولی عجله کن؛ این فرصت برای مدت محدودی فعاله!

Channel
Shayan.behjati زبان انگلیسی
@shayanbehjatienglish
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
41,345subscribers
-1,045 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001495434822 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shayanbehjatienglish |
| Description | فقط کافیه اسم و شمارت رو به آیدی زیر بفرستی! از اونجا به بعدش دیگه با ما 👌 @shayanbehjatiweb یادگیری زبان انگلیسی اینجا تضمینیه! ✅ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shayanbehjatienglish |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 41,345 | -50 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 41,395 | -54 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 41,449 | -39 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 41,488 | -70 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 41,558 | -88 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 41,646 | -63 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 41,709 | -38 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:06 | 41,747 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:23 | 41,756 | -21 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 41,777 | -21 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 41,798 | -32 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 41,830 | -22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 41,852 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 41,870 | -28 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 41,898 | -22 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 41,920 | -24 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 41,944 | -37 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 41,981 | -43 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 42,024 | -26 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 42,050 | first reading |
Engagement
444 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.97%
- avg views ÷ 41,345 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 813
- 297 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.415%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 297
- of 444 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 156 of 297 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 444 (3 August 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 241,559 |
| Reactions total | 541 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 04:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,070
- Videos
- ≈2,250
- Links
- ≈1,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 21m 31s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,048 reactions across 240 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 652 | 62.2% | |
| 👍 | 245 | 23.4% | |
| 🙏 | 76 | 7.25% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 2.19% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 1.91% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 1.15% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 0.859% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 0.668% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.286% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.095% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 259 of the 444 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,099 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 444 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🌑 ساعت از نیمهشب گذشته… جاده خالیه، چراغهای ماشین روشنن؛ اما چیزی در تاریکی داره دنبالتون میکنه… 👀 🎬 Supernatural 🖤 داستان دو برادر، سم و دین وینچستره که بعد از یک اتفاق تلخ، وارد دنیایی از ارواح، شیاطین و موجودات ماورایی میشن. 👻🔥 🎯 یه چالش: هر وقت یه عبارت آشنا شنیدی، سریال رو نگه دار و ببین توی اون موقعیت چطور ازش استفاده شده. 🔎 🎁 این بار فقط دنبال شکار هیولاها نباش؛ انگلیسی واقعی رو هم شکار کن! 👻👇🏻 @Englis…
میدونی برای هر مریضی باید پیش کدوم دکتر بری؟ بریم که باهم یاد بگیریم👆📚 با Fast Talk انگلیسی رو ساده، سریع و کاربردی یاد بگیر؛ همین حالا دوره رو رایگان بگیر: @EnglishFastTalk_bot ⏳ فرصت محدوده!
🤩1
🚨 هنوز تعیین سطح انجام ندادی؟! 😍🔥 این فرصت جذاب برای تو هست! 🎁 هم سطح زبانت رو رایگان مشخص کن و هم دوره هدیهات رو دریافت کن! 🤩✨ فرصت رو از دست نده، حالا شروع کن! 👇 @EnglishFastTalk_bot 🎯 انجام تعیین سطح رایگان
🤔 میخوای به انگلیسی بگی «چقدر … هستی»؟ یه ساختار خیلی ساده و کاربردی داره که تو مکالمه زیاد میشنوی! 👇 🌸 How pretty you are! چقدر زیبایی! 💪 How strong you are! چقدر قوی هستی! 🙄 How rude she is! چقدر اون دختر گستاخ و بیادبه! 🧐 How careful he is! چقدر اون پسر محتاطه! 🍀 How lucky we are! چقدر ما خوششانسیم! با Fast Talk انگلیسی رو ساده، سریع و کاربردی یاد بگیر؛ همین حالا دوره رو رایگان بگیر: @EnglishFastTalk_bot…
🙏3
یکی از شیرینترین بخشهای آموزش، وقتیـه که میبینیم زبانآموزامون از مسیری که طی کردن راضی و خوشحالن. 🤍✨ این ویدئو، تجربه و رضایت خانم روشنک عزیز از دورهمونه؛ نتیجهی مسیری که با تلاش، استمرار و همراهی طی شده. 🌱 اگه تو هم میخوای اولین قدمو برداری، از اینجا شروع کن 👇 @EnglishFastTalk_bot
🔥 انگلیسی رو سخت و پیچیده یاد نگیر! اگه همیشه دوست داشتی انگلیسی رو بهتر یاد بگیری، ولی نمیدونستی از کجا شروع کنی، Fast Talk میتونه شروع خوبی برات باشه. 😍 توی این دوره قراره انگلیسی رو ساده، روان و کاربردی یاد بگیری؛ طوری که بتونی چیزهایی که یاد میگیری رو توی مکالمات روزمره هم استفاده کنی. 🗣️✨ 🎯 پس اگه میخوای از همین امروز شروع کنی، وارد بات شو و دوره رو دریافت کن 👇 @EnglishFastTalk_bot ⏳ فرصت محدوده؛ شروع یاد…
😳 یه وقت جوگیر نشی! 🔴 Get carried away = جوگیر شدن / زیادی هیجانزده شدن برو تو لینک پایین تا رایگان ببرمت تو موقعیت های روزمره و زبان و یادبگیری👇 👉 @EnglishFastTalk_bot
🎥 فکر میکنی TAKE یعنی فقط «گرفتن»؟! 😏 اتفاقاً این کلمه توی جملههای مختلف، معنیهای متفاوتی پیدا میکنه! 👇🏻 1️⃣ How long does it take? چقدر طول میکشه؟ ⏳ 2️⃣ What took you so long? چرا اینقدر طولش دادی؟ 😅 3️⃣ My order is taking too long. سفارشم خیلی طول کشیده. 🍔 4️⃣ Take your time. عجله نکن / با خیال راحت انجامش بده. 🌱 5️⃣ It won’t take long. زیاد طول نمیکشه. 😉 📌 پس از این به بعد، وقتی TAKE دیدی، سریع ترجمه…
❤3
🤔 یه سؤال مهم برای تو! اگه ازت بپرسن سطح انگلیسیت چیه، چی میگی؟ A2؟ B1؟ B2؟ 👀 📚 قبل از اینکه جواب بدی، ببین هر سطح دقیقاً چه چیزایی لازم داره! 🎁 از طریق بات زیر میتونی ببینی که توی چه سطحی هستی👇🏻 @EnglishFastTalk_bot
برای شب بخیر بجای یک عبارت تکراری این ۸ تا رو یاد بگیر تا انگلیسیت طبیعیتر و به نظر برسه 👆✨ 🌱 هنوز نمیدونی سطح زبانت دقیقاً چیه؟ پس همین الان شروع کن @EnglishFastTalk_bot
❤3
🔥 “Keep going. Every step counts.” «ادامه بده؛ هر قدمی که برمیداری مهمه.» ✨ سلام به روی ماهتون😍 حاضرید امروز هم یه قدم دیگه جلو بریم؟ ❤️🔥
🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 444 posts we hold for @shayanbehjatienglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
جوابشو بگو😎
- There he snores a lot28%
- Then he store a lot9%
- Then he snores a lot63%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدومش درسته؟🤔
- 1) Let's miss with him21%
- 2) Let's mess with me22%
- 3) Let's mess with him57%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدومشه🤔
- Ugh! Hazy not ? - You don't like hazy not?18%
- Ugh! Hazelnut? - You don't like hazelnut?64%
- Ugh! Hazel knut? - You don't like hazel knut?18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدومشو میشنوی 🤔
- We're the great Winner13%
- When the gate winners come18%
- When this great winter comes69%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدومش درسته🤔
- Want to pour the water?14%
- Wanna please the Conner?26%
- Want to place the order?59%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدومش رو میگه🤔
- Was anyone else involved61%
- Has anyone else loved16%
- Is anyone else in love with23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 444 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@lingano_com · 168,897#1
@mohammd_karimi_com · 186,809#2
@mlienglish · 265,173#3
@asatirezaban_official · 210,633#4
@EnglishForYou · 423,605#5
@FreeEnglishQuiz · 75,657#6
@Startquiz · 63,894#7
@english_kamran · 50,780#8
@espaniran · 6,919#9
@Englishgrammar606 · 50,487#10
@soheyl_english · 57,998#11
@clinic_sonati · 11,613#12
@soymahtab · 3,138#13
@halekhoob_rabetekhoob · 2,422#14
@English_with_Majidi · 2,390#15
@alphalanguageacademy · 3,887#16
@speaking_zaban · 15,996#17
@RezaArashniaConversation · 5,087#18
@EnglishForYou_Original · 11,894#19
@englishfarzan2 · 186,830#20
@eleetalkk · 12,438#21
@Essential_word · 22,200#22
@englishier · 319,321#23
@hamidrezasotoudeh98 · 72,689#24
@moshavereavin · 795#25
@Barandaaaz · 2,888#26
@rozhan_english · 4,851#27
@viktoria_farsi · 2,637#28
@icrc_iran · 2,563#29
@Russian_in_Persian · 1,613#30
@Nilingua · 4,364#31
@Zaban7ir · 12,591#32
@Search4_ir · 3,228#33
@Easyenglish900 · 1,380 (as read 29 August 2026)#34
@GoldHookOrg · 5,345#35
@kelid_ir · 1,950#36
@englishcrv · 64,056#37
@nohe_torky · 7,909#38
@RMS_Song · 11,050#39
@jalebeh_bedaniid · 6,696#40
@estekhdam_mazandaran · 7,251#41
@transformation_m · 4,661#42
@farayand_project · 8,462#43
@singenglish · 6,747#44
@tomertuurk · 8,032#45
@rezaeinia_porsesh · 5,343#46
@diyareashegan · 521#47
@meghdad_cn · 214#48
@bishuoori · 25,814#49
@IRANinHK · 294#50
@rezaarashnia · 126,359#51
@all_englishstories · 22,783#52
@gindjavid · 463#53
@Yashil_Qaradag · 379#54
@Tehran_daneshjoo · 2,941#55
@idea_Varzeshi · 15,887#56
@English_With_Rahmani · 9,996#57
@esfgeo · 798#58
@professormadjidsamiico · 41,936#59
@marjakanalhayearabi · 3,086#60
@godadmen · 8,954#61
@honar7modiran · 35,093#62
@rsandgis · 9,809#63
@syria_street · 4,062#64
@kinopager · 645#65
@E4E_Audio · 2,269#66
@aaagghjhddf · 12,140#67
@NeurosurgeryAssociation · 1,397#68
@dogs · 7,065,215#69
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#70
@notcoin · 8,573,554#71
@NiceMotivation_Words · 1,249#72
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lingano_com · 168,897
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@mlienglish · 265,173
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
@english_kamran · 50,780
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
@englishcrv · 64,056
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
@Startquiz · 63,894
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
@asatirezaban_official · 210,633
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
@hamimohajer · 51,743
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 25 August 2026
@hamidrezasotoudeh98 · 72,689
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
@rezaarashnia · 126,359
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 August 2026
@soheyl_english · 57,998
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
@englishfarzan2 · 186,830
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
@FreeEnglishQuiz · 75,657
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
@Englishgrammar606 · 50,487
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
@bishuoori · 25,814
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shayan.behjati زبان انگلیسی” (@shayanbehjatienglish), 41,345 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shayanbehjatienglish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.