Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for just_movie

Channel

just_movie

@Just_Movieeee

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,572subscribers

+575 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001121139050
TypeChannel
Username@Just_Movieeee
Descriptionادمین: دانیال زین‌العابدینی [This Channel is not intended to violate any condition of use. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism]
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 March 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Just_Movieeee

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,9979,5729,284.56 August 2026 — 8,997 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,997 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,002 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,021 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,028 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,040 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,058 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,062 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,088 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,103 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,116 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,145 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,228 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,275 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,316 subscribers25 September 2026 — 9,376 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,426 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,483 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,494 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,504 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,509 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,522 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,526 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,537 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,547 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,572 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net +575. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,911–9,658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 03:219,572+25
1 Nov 2026, 19:099,547+10
29 Oct 2026, 20:469,537+11
26 Oct 2026, 21:599,526+4
24 Oct 2026, 04:079,522+13
20 Oct 2026, 22:549,509+5
18 Oct 2026, 02:409,504+10
14 Oct 2026, 23:569,494+11
12 Oct 2026, 00:369,483+57
5 Oct 2026, 00:019,426+50
25 Sept 2026, 18:579,376+60
15 Sept 2026, 00:209,316+41
11 Sept 2026, 15:209,275+47
7 Sept 2026, 02:409,228+83
2 Sept 2026, 02:459,145+29
30 Aug 2026, 05:249,116+13
27 Aug 2026, 14:089,103+15
24 Aug 2026, 19:399,088+26
21 Aug 2026, 10:029,062+4
18 Aug 2026, 09:359,058first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 9,572 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,820
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held93 (27 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total40,001
Reactions total1,025
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 09:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,440
Videos
≈503
Links
≈847

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,066 reactions across 86 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,71366.7%
👍54513.4%
❤‍🔥3207.87%
👀1563.84%
🔥751.84%
💅711.75%
🐳471.16%
👏471.16%
👌290.713%
🕊250.615%
🤩180.443%
🥰100.246%
🍾50.123%
💯40.098%
⚡10.025%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,396 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 93 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Just_Movieeee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 93 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 16:41 UTC835 views19 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

- از بین فیلم‌هایی که ساخته‌اید کدام‌ را بیشتر دوست دارید؟ فرانسیس فورد کوپولا: مثل این می‌ماند که از کسی بپرسی از بین فرزندانت یکی را انتخاب کن. همه‌شان را دوست دارم. اما اگر بخواهم یکی را انتخاب کنم، باید بگویم Rumble Fish. ____ فیلم Rumble Fish در مورد یک خلافکار خیابانیِ افسارگسیخته با بازی مت دیلون است که می‌خواهد خود را به شهرت برادرش، با بازی میکی رورک، نزدیک کند. یک فیلم اسیدی و دیوانه‌وار که بعداً به منبع…

❤16👍3

Signed Danial Znl

4 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,010 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

فرانسیس فورد کوپولا در مصاحبه‌ای که در دهه نود انجام داد، ادعا کرد که ای کاش هیچوقت پدرخوانده را نمی‌ساخت یا جایزه اسکار را نمی‌برد. در واقع، کوپولا از ابتدا هم تصمیم به ساخت پدرخوانده نداشت و با رد شدن پروژه توسط سرجیو لئونه، استودیو او را انتخاب کرد. چرا کوپولا چنین احساسی نسبت به ساخت یکی از مشهورترین تولیدات تاریخ سینما دارد؟ چون کوپولا هیچوقت نمی‌خواست فیلمسازی باشد که قرار است فیلم‌های روایی، محبوب، گیشه‌ای و …

❤20❤‍🔥4👍2👀1💅1

Signed Danial Znl

4 Nov 2026, 16:08 UTC946 views22 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

ممکن است بگویید فرارا باید خوشحال باشد که دو فیلم بزرگ در کارنامه دارد که به این حد شهرت دارند. اما این مسئله برای بسیاری از فیلمسازان و رمان‌نویسان مشابه بوده. در واقع هنرمند دوست دارد اثرش تحسین شود، اما نه آنقدر شدید که باقی آثارش کم‌ارزش یا غیرمهم‌ دانسته شوند‌. این مشکلی بود که اورسن ولز با همشهری کین پیدا کرد. هر فیلم جدید و هر خلاقیت تازه از سوی او، با موفقیت همشهری کین مقایسه می‌شد، تا حدی که منتقدان یا مخاطب…

❤17❤‍🔥4👍1

Signed Danial Znl

4 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,010 views30 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

داشتم خودزندگی‌نامه خواندنی ایبل فرارا را می‌خواندم، استاد ۷۰ درصد زندگی‌اش نشئه بوده و آن فیلم‌های دیوانه‌وار دهه هشتاد و نود که ساخت همگی در وضعیت بین هشیاری و ناهشیاری‌ ساخته شدند. خود فرارا گفته از ۱۶ سالگی تا ورود به ۶۱ سالگی روزی نبود که با مواد شروع نشود. اما چه پدر حمایتگری‌ داشت. پدرش با آنکه دائم‌الخمر بود، اما همیشه و همه‌جا به فرارا کمک کرد و بدون کمک پدر امکان نداشت فرارا بتواند فیلم بسازد. پدر فرارا به…

❤22❤‍🔥7👍1

Signed Danial Znl

3 Nov 2026, 19:25 UTC≈1,450 views33 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

۱۰ فیلم برتر سال ۲۰۲۶ به انتخاب جردن کرانک (نظرسنجی سایت‌اند‌ساوند‌ برای شماره ماه آینده) (به ترتیب الفبا): All of a Sudden — Ryûsuke Hamaguchi Diary of a Chambermaid — Radu Jude The Dreamed Adventure — Valeska Grisebach Everytime — Sandra Wollner La libertad doble — Lisandro Alonso Life of Jorge Luis Borges — Mariano Llinás My Wife Cries — Angela Schanelec Paper Tiger — James Gray Possible Love — Lee Chang-dong Th…

❤28👍3❤‍🔥2

Signed Danial Znl

3 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC≈1,740 views90 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

هروقت احساس شکست یا ناکافی بودن کردید، به این فکر کنید که مارتین اسکورسیزی در اواخر دهه هفتاد به‌خاطر شکست تجاری و نقدهای منفی فیلم نیویورک نیویورک، آنقدر افسرده شد که عملا داشت با مصرف کوکائین خودش را می‌کشت و به این نتیجه رسیده بود که شاید آدم بی‌استعدادی است. از این نظر که ژورنالیست‌ها با شکست تجاری و مطبوعاتی فیلم‌های او، ادعا کردند که اسکورسیزی اگر تا پیش از این موفقیتی هم داشته فقط خوش‌اقبالی بوده و در نهایت او…

❤69❤‍🔥9👍8🔥4

Signed Danial Znl

2 Nov 2026, 22:38 UTC≈1,940 views63 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

دوم نوامبر زادروز فیلمساز محبوبم از سینمای ایتالیا بود: لوکینو ویسکونتی. چند فکت جالب در مورد استاد: ویسکونتی کمونیست بود و با آنکه در خانواده‌ای اشرافی در میلان به دنیا آمد، به این حزب پیوست و حتی تا تیغ اعدام نیز جلو رفت و از کاخ خود به‌عنوان مقر مخفی نیروهای مقاوت استفاده کرد. ویسکونتی همجنسگرا بودن خود را به‌صورت عمومی اعلام کرده بود و به دون ژوانِ همجنسگرا معروف است. او روابط عاطفی با افراد مشهوری چون فرانکو …

❤46💅8👍3👀2🤩2❤‍🔥1🔥1

Signed Danial Znl

2 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,690 views48 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

مایکل جکسن و مارتین اسکورسیزی، پشت‌صحنه‌ی موزیک ویدئوی Bad به کارگردانی اسکورسیزی مایکل جکسن، فرانسیس فورد کوپولا و جورج لوکاس در پشت‌صحنه‌ی فیلم کوتاه Captain EO به کارگردانی فرانسیس کوپولا. @just_movieeee

❤37❤‍🔥5👍4💅1🤩1

Signed Danial Znl

2 Nov 2026, 17:39 UTC≈1,640 views48 reactionsread 5 November 2026

از آنجایی که علاقه شخصی زیادی به مایکل جکسن دارم، تا حالا چند مقاله و کتاب پژوهشی نوشته‌شده در موردش را خوانده‌ام. یک نوشته در موردش جالب بود و اشاره کرده بود که در دوره‌ای، مایکل جکسن از هر پیامبر مذهبی و حتی از مسیح هم مشهورتر بود و قدرتی به‌منزله‌ی یک اسطوره‌ داشت و به‌واقع اگر جکسن تصمیم می‌گرفت یک روز را تعیین کند تا تمام مردمان کشورها علیه دولت/حکومت خود طغیان کنند، بی‌تردید این اتفاق رخ می‌داد. قدرتی که جکسن ب…

❤37👀5👍5💅1

Signed Danial Znl

2 Nov 2026, 13:48 UTC≈2,070 views51 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

ارتباط انسانی، به سبک هاماگوچی ماشینم را بران (۲۰۲۱) ناگهان (۲۰۲۶) @just_movieeee

❤45❤‍🔥5💅1

Signed Danial Znl

2 Nov 2026, 06:41 UTC≈1,890 views53 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

نیویورک، هالووین ۲۰۲۶ چهل‌و‌سه سال از انتشار موزیک ویدئوی تریلر مایکل جکسن می‌گذرد و همچنان از فرهنگ عامه‌پسند جدانشدنی است. @just_movieeee

❤48👍4🤩1

Signed Danial Znl

1 Nov 2026, 14:05 UTC≈1,830 views57 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

شاید ندانید، اما یکی از دلایلی که بین دو فیلم آخر لی چانگ-دونگ هشت سال فاصله افتاد، این بود که او به‌خاطر باورهای چپ‌گرایانه توسط دولت وقت کره‌ جنوبی در لیست سیاه قرار گرفت و برای ساخت فیلم خود با مشکات زیادی دست‌و‌پنجه نرم کرد‌. اما خود چانگ-دونگ یکی از دلایل این وقفه را وسواس شخصی در فیلمنامه‌نویسی نیز اعلام کرد. پوستر جدیدی از فیلم عشق محتمل ساخته چانگ-دونگ که سیاسی‌تربن فیلم کارنامه‌اش نیز توصیف شده و ملهم از ات…

❤41👍11💅3❤‍🔥2

Signed Danial Znl

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @Just_Movieeee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

سینما پارادیـزو
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,930
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
The Catcher in the Rye
@caulfild · 33,592
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
سینمای موج نو
@Cinema_New_Wave · 26,826
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
سینما یعنی . . .
@cinemayanii · 24,167
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
ART CHANNEL
@artchanel · 20,143
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 September 2026
CINEMAee | سینمایی
@Cinemaee_ir · 22,813
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 September 2026
HIGH MOVIES
@high_moviess · 52,622
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
دیالوگ هایی که به یاد می ماند
@dialogbeyadmandani · 22,088
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
کافه هنر
@honar7modiran · 34,967
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
برترین‌های سینما
@Nazariyeh_Cinema · 19,881
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 4 October 2026
سینما توییتر فارسی ⚫⚫
@Cinema_Twitter_Farsi · 67,187
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
بایگانی
@bankema · 32,610
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
باشگاه ادبیات
@BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,622
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
ادبیات، فلسفه و سینما
@NazariyehAdabi · 43,485
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
حرفه:هنرمند
@herfeh_honarmand · 21,951
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
سرای دانایی
@llib7 · 26,349
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
Red Curtains Whisper
@redcurtainswhisper · 33,557
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 4 September 2026
𝘼𝙍𝙏 𝙅𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙉𝘼𝙇 مجله هنری
@ARTTJOURNAL · 35,612
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
کتابخانه
@bookhapdf · 75,478
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
CinemaDaily | سینمادیلی
@Cinemadaily · 59,794
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Annamorphin
@anamorphyn · 25,177
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026
Paintings Place
@paintingsplace · 24,542
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
مخفیگاه
@makhfigah_channel · 62,623
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
کتاب نایاب
@bookshop · 22,082
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“just_movie” (@Just_Movieeee), 9,572 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Just_Movieeee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.