Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Annamorphin

Channel

Annamorphin

@anamorphyn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,182subscribers

+150 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001401168494
TypeChannel
Username@anamorphyn
Created10 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anamorphyn

Growth

24,00624,18224,0946 August 2026 — 24,032 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,063 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,074 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,063 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,098 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,080 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,060 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,048 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,022 subscribers15 August 2026 — 24,006 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,032 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,031 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,095 subscribers21 August 2026 — 24,182 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 15 days, net +150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,980–24,208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 07:2224,182+87
20 Aug 2026, 05:1524,095+64
18 Aug 2026, 08:4224,031-1
17 Aug 2026, 10:2724,032+26
15 Aug 2026, 18:5624,006-16
14 Aug 2026, 08:5524,022-26
12 Aug 2026, 23:0324,048-12
12 Aug 2026, 02:3424,060-20
11 Aug 2026, 04:5624,080-18
10 Aug 2026, 06:3024,098+35
9 Aug 2026, 06:4624,063-11
8 Aug 2026, 04:2824,074+11
7 Aug 2026, 03:4824,063+31
6 Aug 2026, 10:0224,032first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 24,182 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,830
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held55 (30 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total155,615
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 55 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anamorphyn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC114 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

لِدا، ۱۹۲۸ اثر بُلِسواف بیگاس Leda, 1928 By Bolesław Biegas

15 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC534 viewsread 15 August 2026

گفتم: «تنهایی را دوست ندارم، فقط آشنایی‌های غیرضروری ایجاد نمی‌کنم، تا یک بار دیگر از مردم ناامید نشوم.» _هاروکی موراکامی

15 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC836 viewsread 15 August 2026

بچه ها این اشتراکشون تمام هوش مصنوعی های گوگل را داره به مدت ۱۸ ماه اگه به کارتون میاد حتمن بگیرید

15 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Google AI Pro باورنکردنی! 🔥 🚀 دسترسی به تمام امکانات حرفه‌ای هوش مصنوعی گوگل با قیمت ویژه! ✨ ویژگی‌ها: ☁️ 5TB فضای ذخیره‌سازی 🤖 دسترسی به Gemini 3 Pro ⚡ دسترسی به Antigravity 🎬 دسترسی به Veo 3.1 🔐 اکانت قانونی و اختصاصی ⚡ تحویل فوری پس از پرداخت 🎧 پشتیبانی و ضمانت کیفیت 💰 قیمت اصلی: +۱۰۰ میلیون تومان 🔥 قیمت ویژه ما: فقط ۹۹۹ هزار تومان 🎯 ۹۹٪ صرفه‌جویی! 📲 برای خرید و دریافت فوری، از طریق ربات تلگرام اقدام کنید.

15 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 15 August 2026
File

بیا تا برات بگم من غرورم مال توست بیا تا فدات بشم من وجودم مال توست

15 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

هر سرِ موی مرا با تو هزاران کار است 📷: خانم آنامورفین

14 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC289 viewsread 14 August 2026

در جهانی که معناها مدام از دست می‌روند، سینما گاه چون پناهگاهی‌ست

14 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC550 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

*** گدار در تحقیر (۱۹۶۳) با سینماسکوپ و فاصله‌گذاری برشت‌وار، مکث و سکوت را به منطق شکل‌گیری ادراک بدل می‌سازد، در همان کاپری که باید محل شکوه اسطوره باشد اما به صحنه تهی‌سازی آن تبدیل می‌شود. دوربین Coutard تماشاگر را در مقام سوژه‌ای پرسشگر نگه می‌دارد و میزانسن را در مرز تامل متوقف می‌سازد. نولان اما در اودیسه‌ در برابر همان نگاه می‌ایستد و با چشم‌انداز وسیع‌تر Hoytema، مسیر دیگری می‌گشاید. او، عمده بار روایت را بر

14 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC898 viewsread 14 August 2026

« جایی برای علاقه‌مندان به هنر کلاسیک. »

14 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC922 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @MenogjournalPhoto

لیلیث، اثر جان کالیر (۱۸۹۲) @Menogjournal

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @anamorphyn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 330,300 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ÃAKLAB
@AAKLAB · 114,390
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
@litera999کتابخانه‌وموزه
@litera999 · 73,884
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
پادکست پلی لیست|Playlist
@Playlistpodcas · 152,522
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Annamorphin” (@anamorphyn), 24,182 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anamorphyn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.