...

Channel
دوزخ امّا سرد
@startreatments
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,892subscribers
+197 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001380907426 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @startreatments |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/startreatments |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:01 | 11,892 | +14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:37 | 11,878 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:21 | 11,882 | +1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:15 | 11,881 | +4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:58 | 11,877 | +11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:29 | 11,866 | +36 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:50 | 11,830 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 11,834 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:51 | 11,843 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:48 | 11,844 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:21 | 11,845 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:49 | 11,844 | +4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 11,840 | +24 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:46 | 11,816 | -9 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:10 | 11,825 | -1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:18 | 11,826 | +12 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:18 | 11,814 | +2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:55 | 11,812 | +4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 11,808 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:17 | 11,813 | first reading |
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 54.1%
- avg views ÷ 11,892 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,430
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (28 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 109,270 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 19:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 33m 50s
- Average length
- 33m 50s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 75 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @startreatments. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 75 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (5.88%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«متأسفانه با ظهور فضای مجازی مورد تهاجم فرهنگ منحط غربی (جشن دهشتناک هالووین) قرار گرفتیم و رسوم خود را فراموش کردیم، کورش شرمندهایم، قاسم بن حسن شرمندهایم🗣️» در همین حال ایرانیان سالهای ۱۳۰۹-۱۳۰۶:
شما میتوانید تا یک قرن دیگر راجع به خوبی و بدیهای هالووین با یکدیگر «بحث کنید» اما جمهوری اسلامی بخاطر پوشیدن ماسک مرد عنکبوتی «دستگیرتان میکند». چون به گمانش پایههای «مقاومت اسلامی» سُست میشود. چون رقیبی برای فستیوالهای مذهبی میتراشد. باقیِ بهانهها یاوه است. پس اگر میان شیوهٔ تفریح برخی جوانان و پیاده کردن چند صد نیروی لباس شخصی در خیابان برای سرکوبشان اولی را نگرانکنندهتر میدانید، بسیار پرت رفتید.
دوستان گرامی، لطفاً در قسمت دیدگاههای این فرسته سایتها و برنامهها و کلاً چیزهایی که در دوران قطعی اینترنت به دردتون خورد رو به بقیه معرفی کنید.👇🏼
فهرست جعبهٔ ابزار شرایط قطعی کامل اینترنت
یادآوری: ترجیحاً محتواهای مهمی که لازم دارید رو پیدا و ذخیره کنید و برای شرایط قطعی دوبارهٔ اینترنت آماده باشید. سیستمعامل و برنامههاتون رو بهروزرسانی کنید.
تمام این حرفها راجع به مثلاً آمریکا هم صادقه، سر اعتراضات جرج فلوید هم مزخرفاتی میگفتند اگر یادتون باشه (نشأت گرفته از ادبیات ماگایی). اروپا رو از جهت به روز بودن مثال میزنیم.
ما به عنوان ایرانیان درگیر چنان کابوسیایم، چنان شکل وحشیانهای از اسلام سیاسی بهمون حکمرانی میکنه که جابهجا در تمام دنیا براش دنبال معادل میگردیم، اما چنین چیزی رو پیدا نخواهیم کرد و این برامون آزاردهندهست. چون این شکل از حکومت استبدادی از سیر تاریخی کشورمون ریشه و قدرت گرفته و چند دهه مبارزه در جهت خشکاندن اون ریشهها بوده که داغدار و بدبختمون کرده، و تازه هنوز هم به موفقیت نرسیده. پس تواضع و «عدم نصیحت ملل …
در تمام اون اعتراضات و «شورشهای عجیب» که چند قرن سابقهٔ مبارزاتی از طرف جنبشها و سابقهٔ مدیریتی از طرف دولتها پشتشه یک نفر به دست پلیس یا معترضان کشته نشده و برای همین دارن برای «ساختمانها» ابراز تأسف میکنند. که البته بیجا هم نیست. اما اختلاف جایی مثل ایران و عراق و افغانستان با اروپا اینه که اینجا در شبانه روزی چند هزار نفر رو میکشند، و این فرهنگ و خشونتیست که درش غوطهوریم. بله بخشی از ایرانیان بسیار مدرن …
چندان نمیفهمم چرا چند شورش عادی در فرانسه و ایتالیا اینقدر در رسانههای ایران مطرح شده. اما توهم «سقوط اروپا» که گرفتارش شدهاند (و در واقع آرزوش رو دارند) ماجرا رو واقعاً خندهدار کرده. به شکل هیستریک مینویسند: «بهبه، ۵۷ به اروپا هم رسید!» گویی جدا از عادت همیشگیشون به انداختن تقصیرها گردن عوامل خارجی و «کار کار انگلیسیهاست» گفتن، جدی فکر میکنند به نفعشونه که باقی دنیا هم به گِل بشینه و ما قراره سوگلی جدید با…
...
«خشایارشاه» نداریم. «خشایارشا» داریم. نورمن شارپ و اکثر متخصصان تاریخ هخامنشیان تلفظاش را «خشَیارشا» ضبط کردند. به خط میخی: 𐎧𐏁𐎹𐎠𐎼𐏁𐎠 (X-š-y-a-r-š-a) مرکب از دو جزء خشایَ (xšaya-) از بُن فعلی به معنای «فرمانرواییدن» و اَرشا (ṛšā) مرتبط با واژهای به معنای «قهرمان» یا «مرد» (منبع).
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @startreatments. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @startreatments as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 1 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 3 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
راجع به مسئلهٔ «اعدام» (کشتن قانونی فردی توسط دولت به عنوان مجازات) در کشور ایران با تصور حکومتی نزدیک به ایدههای خودتان، چه نگرشی دارید؟
- بهطور کلی موافقم: بازدارندهای قوی برای جرایم خشن و عادلانه برای انواع جنایتکاران و خلافکاران است.3%
- به تمامی مخالفم: غیرانسانی و غیرقابل جبران است و کارایی آن در کاهش جرم ثابت نشده.49%
- گاهی موافقم: فقط در جنایات خاص، مثلاً قتلهای زنجیرهای یا تروریسم، آن هم با احراز قطعی ادله.43%
- نظری ندارم - دیدن نتایج5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@its5sos · 3233 postsبیدار
@Rahebidar · 34,5862 postsزاویه ناپیدا
@invisibleangle · 1202 postsVertigo
@vertigodreamer · 82 postsGhost in the Wind
@CallMeYellowAndGray · 1771 postاطلاعرسانی انقلاب
@Etelaresanirev · 2721 postHosokawa
@Hosokawariver · 3051 postInternerds - TeXT
@Internerds_TeXT · 31 post5 Seconds Of Summer 🤘🏻❤
@SOSFams · 4391 post’𝖬𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾
@ab0utHecate · 2351 postآرمین جنت خواه (حافظهٔ تاریخی)
@armin_jannatkhah · 2191 postAsk The Dust
@askthedustfella · 2691 postبایگانی.
@bayganys · 191 postchérie.
@cheriemoom · 661 postWhy I feel Weird.
@davidam0davidam · 3781 post . 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑙𝑠
@decay_o_angels · 1181 postThreshold of revelation🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
@idyeudiee · 3381 postHoor | هور
@kolbe_hoor · 421 postCartwheel
@looloolly · 251 postㅤ𝟣𝟤ㅤ[the end]
@lyn1st · 1021 postsunghoon luv bot (خونه نیستیم)
@sunghoonloveofmylife · 1,1281 postنازیستههای یک نادانشجو
@thestoryofamir · 8221 postImagine how tired we are.
@uknowihavetogo · 9421 postWise Gex (DiscoDoll ver.)
@wisegex · 771 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Documentary20 · 24,1294 postsIt's 5SOS
@its5sos · 3233 posts𝑆𝐾𝑍𝐼𝑆𝑀
@skzism · 1,6232 postsبایگانی.
@bayganys · 191 postsungcore.
@chocohan · 4101 postShahrvand™
@csosoli · 5731 postWhy I feel Weird.
@davidam0davidam · 3781 postFrank Ocean
@FrankOceanStats · 2,4471 postزاویه ناپیدا
@invisibleangle · 1201 post jeonghaniyoo ִֶָ. (closed)
@jeonghancore · 6011 post little puppy
@jiwoodolly · 521 postmoon garden library.
@moongardenlibrary · 4541 post 𝐍𝐀𝐑𝐀
@nrmdewv · 3,5871 postرندستان
@Rendestan · 4051 post5 Seconds Of Summer 🤘🏻❤
@SOSFams · 4391 postقَـروقاطــے 👀
@special_chums · 2,2601 post tall puppy , closed
@tallpuppy · 1291 post𝑾𝒉𝒐𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒆’𝒔 𝑪𝒉𝒂𝒐𝒕𝒊𝒄 𝑴𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒛𝒊𝒏𝒆💥
@tiredfirefly · 2411 postYEHETIC TALK 🍷
@YEHETICTALK · 7621 post🍋Young writers🏳️🌈
@youngwritersshr · 2141 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ghalatnanevisimm · 21,490
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
@BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,637
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
@khateraaat · 22,710
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
@vernte · 28,748
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
@Arts1992 · 19,857
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 September 2026
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,313
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@anarconomy · 46,129
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
@nutqiyyat · 30,665
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
@Philosophy_files · 31,106
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
@freeforbiddenbooks · 46,470
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
@litera999 · 77,870
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
@RahmaniRamin · 27,504
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
@caulfild · 33,611
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
@anamorphyn · 25,177
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026
@NazariyehAdabi · 43,467
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,930
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
@nabayad_m · 39,249
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
@kierkegaard3 · 19,007
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,145
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@ali_atri · 20,774
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 30 September 2026
@pv44telegram · 22,808
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
@Marham_Foundation · 18,426
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 October 2026
@FarazTed · 21,078
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 September 2026
@ScientificDialectics · 23,682
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دوزخ امّا سرد” (@startreatments), 11,892 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startreatments.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.