یازدهم شهریور ۱۴۰۵ ۱ دلار آمریکا برابر است با دو میلیون و دویست هزار خمینی/۲۲۰ هزار تومان

Channel
دوزخ امّا سرد
@startreatments
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,908subscribers
+213 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001380907426 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @startreatments |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/startreatments |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 11,908 | +20 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 11,888 | +36 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 11,852 | +27 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 11,825 | +9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 11,816 | +17 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 11,799 | +59 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 11,740 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 11,743 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:08 | 11,741 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 11,747 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 11,748 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 11,749 | -13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 11,762 | +9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 11,753 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 11,748 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 11,741 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 11,737 | +8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 11,729 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 11,740 | +9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 11,731 | first reading |
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.2%
- avg views ÷ 11,908 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,590
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 57 (28 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 53,870 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 33m 50s
- Average length
- 33m 50s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 57 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @startreatments. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
ـــــــــــــ
تاریخ طبرستان در ابتدای قرن هفتم هجری نوشته شده، ابن اسفندیار از زبان ابن مقفع میگوید که (نامهٔ تنسر، مینوی، ص ۴۵-۴۷) اسکندر در نبرد با دارا (داریوش سوم) «به پارس لشکر کشید»، سپس «مُلک ایرانشهر بگرفت» و سپس از قولِ ارسطو خطاب اسکندر مینویسد: «رای آن است که مملکت فارس را موَزَع گردانی بر ابنای ملوک ایشان». درمتنی کهن، هر سه واژهٔ ایرانشهر، پارس و فارس با مضمونی مشابه بهکار رفتند و این موضوع برای نگارنده و مترجم …
ابن اسفندیار در مقدمهٔ «تاریخ طبرستان» مینویسد: مدت دو ماه این ضعیف به شهر رِی نوردهای شبانروز دَرهَمپیخت و آبِ عبرت به غربالِ دیدهٔ پُرحسرت میبیخت و با آن تقدیر تدبیری جز خویش را به مطالعهٔ کُتب آرام دادن ندید. یکی از مُلوک را پرسیدند غایتِ مُنْتَهای تو چیست؟ گفت: «حَبِيبٌ أَنْظُرُ إِلَيْهِ و وَ كِتَابٌ أَنْظُرُ فِيه» [یاری که بر او نظر کنم، و کتابی که در آن بنگرم]. و الحق از مطالعه [...] تسکین دل این مسکین حاص…
کمی نوشتم از بزرگترین آهنگساز انگلستانی قرن بیستم و جالبترین اثر متقدماش. بخوانید و بشنوید.
یکی از دوستان کتابهاش رو گذاشته برای فروش، از اینجا به پایین میتونید ببینیدشون. هم عناوین بسیار خوبن هم قیمتها اکثراً خیلی از ۵۰٪ تخفیف (که عُرف کتاب دست دومه) پایینتره، مثلاً: - ستیز با جهان مدرن، قیمت روز ۲.۶ میلیون، اینجا ۷۸۰ هزار تومان - بودنبروکها، قیمت روز ۲.۶ میلیون اینجا ۸۹۰ هزار تومان - طبل حلبی، قیمت روز ۱.۷ میلیون، اینجا ۵۸۰ هزار تومان
مقایسهٔ چهار شاخص حقوق زنان (حق سقط جنین، سهم در هیئت دولت، نرخ مشارکت در نیروی کار و نابرابری جنسیتی) روی نقشهٔ غرب آسیا و شمال آفریقا. ایرانِ جمهوری اسلامی برای زنان تنها در مقایسه با «اروپا و آمریکای شمالی» کشور بدی نیست، در قیاس با کشورهای مسلماننشین اطراف نیز افتضاح است.
روحالله خمینی با آنکه حق رأی زنان برایش مهم نبود اما از حضورشان در ادارات بسی برافروخته میشد: «شما ببینید بیست و چند سال است از این کشف حجاب مفتضح گذشته است. حساب کنید چه کردهاید؟ زنها را وارد کردید در ادارات. ببینید در هر ادارهای که وارد شدند، آن اداره فلج شد. فعلاً محدود است، عُلما میگویند توسعه ندهید، به استانها نفرستید. زن اگر وارد دستگاهی شد، اوضاع را بههم میزند. میخواهید استقلالتان را ز…
نقشهٔ جهانی سالِ به رسمیت شناخته شدن حق رأی زنان به تفکیک کشورهای امروزی (طبعاً بعضی تاریخها محل اختلاف است)
«در ایران ۸ سال زودتر از سوئیس زنان حق رأی داشتند» این جمله درست، اما مثالی بسیار خوب برای ارائهٔ گزینشی دادهها به مخاطب است. چندوقت پیش استادم با توسل به همین موضوع پیش خود نتیجه گرفت که «ایران در به رسمیت شناختن حق رأی زنان در دنیا پیشرو و در منطقه مطلقاً بینظیر بوده». طبعاً در ذهن ما وقتی سوئیس که مهد آزادی و دموکراسی است و با هیچکس هم سر جنگ ندارد اینقدر دیر به صف مدافعان حقوق زنان میپیوندند، کشورهای جهان …
فیلمی که دوستم متین کارگردانی کرده رو ببینید حتماً. (خیلی بهش افتخار میکنم) پوسترش رو هم خیلی دوست دارم، برای ساختنش که میخواستیم مقداری شبیه جلد نیویورکر و کارهای سامپه بشه یه کوچولو کمکش کردم.
ابوریحان بسی ایرانیستیز بوده و در جایجای آثارش میتوان نفرت از عجمان را مشاهده کرد. در همان آثار الباقیه (ص ۲۸۰) مینویسد: «میکوشم به نقل ماههای فارسی بسنده کنم و چیزی از خود به آن نمیافزایم، زیرا دروغ و محالات رکیکه بر اخبار آنان غالب است.» و میافزاید: «اگر در تصحیح این سخنان خاموش مانم، ترک نصیحت کرده باشم.» او در کتاب 'تحدید' شخصی را که فارسی را بر عربی برگزیده با کسی مقایسه میکند که از دانش مسافات (اند…
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @startreatments. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
راجع به مسئلهٔ «اعدام» (کشتن قانونی فردی توسط دولت به عنوان مجازات) در کشور ایران با تصور حکومتی نزدیک به ایدههای خودتان، چه نگرشی دارید؟
- بهطور کلی موافقم: بازدارندهای قوی برای جرایم خشن و عادلانه برای انواع جنایتکاران و خلافکاران است.3%
- به تمامی مخالفم: غیرانسانی و غیرقابل جبران است و کارایی آن در کاهش جرم ثابت نشده.49%
- گاهی موافقم: فقط در جنایات خاص، مثلاً قتلهای زنجیرهای یا تروریسم، آن هم با احراز قطعی ادله.43%
- نظری ندارم - دیدن نتایج5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@its5sos · 3353 postsزاویه ناپیدا
@invisibleangle · 1272 postsVertigo
@vertigodreamer · 102 postsGhost in the Wind
@CallMeYellowAndGray · 1821 postاطلاعرسانی انقلاب
@Etelaresanirev · 2751 postHosokawa
@Hosokawariver · 2881 postInternerds - TeXT
@Internerds_TeXT · 31 post5 Seconds Of Summer 🤘🏻❤
@SOSFams · 4511 post’𝖬𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾
@ab0utHecate · 2411 postآرمین جنت خواه (حافظهٔ تاریخی)
@armin_jannatkhah · 2171 postAsk The Dust
@askthedustfella · 2521 postبایگانی.
@bayganys · 201 postchérie.
@cheriemoom · 671 postWhy I feel Weird.
@davidam0davidam · 3821 post . 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑙𝑠
@decay_o_angels · 1241 postThreshold of revelation🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
@idyeudiee · 3621 postHoor | هور
@kolbe_hoor · 401 postㅤ𝟣𝟤ㅤ[the end]
@lyn1st · 1041 postsunghoon luv bot (خونه نیستیم)
@sunghoonloveofmylife · 1,2041 postنازیستههای یک نادانشجو
@thestoryofamir · 8271 postWise Gex (DiscoDoll ver.)
@wisegex · 711 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Documentary20 · 22,9584 postsIt's 5SOS
@its5sos · 3353 posts𝑆𝐾𝑍𝐼𝑆𝑀 - Slow-
@skzism · 1,5332 postsبایگانی.
@bayganys · 201 postsungcore.
@chocohan · 4331 postShahrvand™
@csosoli · 4811 postWhy I feel Weird.
@davidam0davidam · 3821 postFrank Ocean
@FrankOceanStats · 2,5021 postزاویه ناپیدا
@invisibleangle · 1271 post jeonghaniyoo ִֶָ. (closed)
@jeonghancore · 6461 post little puppy
@jiwoodolly · 551 postmoon garden library.
@moongardenlibrary · 4661 post 𝐍𝐀𝐑𝐀
@nrmdewv · 3,7811 postرندستان
@Rendestan · 4011 post5 Seconds Of Summer 🤘🏻❤
@SOSFams · 4511 postقَـروقاطــے 👀
@special_chums · 2,3371 post tall puppy , closed
@tallpuppy · 1311 postvoid cat
@TimeOfDying · 3,7671 postکمد آقای ووپی
@tiredfirefly · 2301 postYEHETIC TALK 🍷
@YEHETICTALK · 7781 post🍋Young writers🏳️🌈
@youngwritersshr · 2221 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,175
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
@khateraaat · 22,210
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
@vernte · 27,981
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,794
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@anarconomy · 46,570
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
@nutqiyyat · 29,956
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
@Philosophy_files · 29,893
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
@freeforbiddenbooks · 42,532
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
@litera999 · 74,822
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
@RahmaniRamin · 27,699
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
@caulfild · 33,130
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
@anamorphyn · 24,577
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026
@NazariyehAdabi · 42,703
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,716
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
@nabayad_m · 39,233
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,367
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@pv44telegram · 23,040
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
@ScientificDialectics · 24,277
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دوزخ امّا سرد” (@startreatments), 11,908 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startreatments.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.