Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دوزخ امّا سرد

Channel

دوزخ امّا سرد

@startreatments

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,908subscribers

+213 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380907426
TypeChannel
Username@startreatments
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/startreatments

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,69511,90811,801.56 August 2026 — 11,695 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,695 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,700 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,719 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,717 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,714 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,715 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,727 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,745 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,746 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,733 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,724 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,713 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,719 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,712 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,731 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,740 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,729 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,737 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,741 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,748 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,753 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,762 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,749 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,748 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,747 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,741 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,743 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,740 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,799 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,816 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,825 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,852 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,888 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,908 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +213. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,663–11,940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:5811,908+20
16 Sept 2026, 17:5711,888+36
14 Sept 2026, 22:4111,852+27
13 Sept 2026, 06:5711,825+9
11 Sept 2026, 11:1811,816+17
8 Sept 2026, 17:1711,799+59
5 Sept 2026, 10:5711,740-3
3 Sept 2026, 16:1911,743+2
2 Sept 2026, 10:0811,741-6
1 Sept 2026, 06:3711,747-1
31 Aug 2026, 06:2711,748-1
30 Aug 2026, 06:3611,749-13
29 Aug 2026, 05:5311,762+9
28 Aug 2026, 02:5811,753+5
27 Aug 2026, 01:2611,748+7
26 Aug 2026, 01:3211,741+4
25 Aug 2026, 02:1511,737+8
23 Aug 2026, 16:5811,729-11
22 Aug 2026, 01:3711,740+9
20 Aug 2026, 18:1411,731first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.2%
avg views ÷ 11,908 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,590
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held57 (28 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total53,870
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33m 50s
Average length
33m 50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 57 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @startreatments. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC≈1,730 viewsread 3 September 2026

یازدهم شهریور ۱۴۰۵ ۱‌ دلار آمریکا برابر است با دو میلیون و دویست هزار خمینی/۲۲۰ هزار تومان

31 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC≈2,360 viewsread 3 September 2026

تاریخ طبرستان در ابتدای قرن هفتم هجری نوشته شده، ابن اسفندیار از زبان ابن مقفع می‌گوید که (نامهٔ تنسر، مینوی، ص ۴۵-۴۷) اسکندر در نبرد با دارا (داریوش سوم) «به پارس لشکر کشید»، سپس «مُلک ایران‌شهر بگرفت» و سپس از قولِ ارسطو خطاب اسکندر می‌نویسد: «رای آن است که مملکت فارس را موَزَع گردانی بر ابنای ملوک ایشان». درمتنی کهن، هر سه واژهٔ ایران‌شهر، پارس و فارس با مضمونی مشابه به‌کار رفتند و این موضوع برای نگارنده و مترجم

31 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC≈2,610 views0 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

ابن اسفندیار در مقدمهٔ «تاریخ طبرستان» می‌نویسد: مدت دو ماه این ضعیف به شهر رِی نوردهای شبان‌روز دَر‌هَم‌پیخت و آبِ عبرت به غربالِ دیدهٔ پُرحسرت می‌بیخت و با آن تقدیر تدبیری جز خویش را به مطالعهٔ کُتب آرام دادن ندید. یکی از مُلوک را پرسیدند غایتِ مُنْتَهای تو چیست؟ گفت: «حَبِيبٌ أَنْظُرُ إِلَيْهِ و وَ كِتَابٌ أَنْظُرُ فِيه» [یاری که بر او نظر کنم، و کتابی که در آن بنگرم]. و الحق از مطالعه [...] تسکین دل این مسکین حاص

29 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC≈3,310 viewsread 3 September 2026

کمی نوشتم از بزرگ‌ترین آهنگ‌ساز انگلستانی قرن بیستم و جالب‌ترین اثر متقدم‌اش. بخوانید و بشنوید.

29 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC≈3,460 viewsread 3 September 2026

یکی از دوستان کتاب‌هاش رو گذاشته برای فروش، از این‌جا به پایین می‌تونید ببینیدشون. هم عناوین بسیار خوبن هم قیمت‌ها اکثراً خیلی از ۵۰٪ تخفیف (که عُرف کتاب دست دومه) پایین‌تره، مثلاً: - ستیز با جهان مدرن، قیمت روز ۲.۶ میلیون، این‌جا ۷۸۰ هزار تومان - بودنبروک‌ها، قیمت روز ۲.۶ میلیون این‌جا ۸۹۰ هزار تومان - طبل حلبی، قیمت روز ۱.۷ میلیون، این‌جا ۵۸۰ هزار تومان

29 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC≈3,450 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

مقایسهٔ چهار شاخص حقوق زنان (حق سقط جنین، سهم در هیئت دولت، نرخ مشارکت در نیروی کار و نابرابری جنسیتی) روی نقشهٔ غرب آسیا و شمال آفریقا. ایرانِ جمهوری اسلامی برای زنان تنها در مقایسه با «اروپا و آمریکای شمالی» کشور بدی نیست، در قیاس با کشورهای مسلمان‌نشین اطراف نیز افتضاح است.

29 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈4,140 viewsread 3 September 2026

روح‌الله خمینی با آن‌که حق رأی زنان برایش مهم نبود اما از حضورشان در ادارات بسی برافروخته می‌شد: «شما ببینید بیست و چند سال است از این کشف حجاب مفتضح گذشته است. حساب‌‎ ‌‏کنید چه کرده‌اید؟ زن‌ها را وارد کردید در ادارات. ببینید در هر اداره‌ای که وارد شدند، آن‌‎ ‌‏اداره فلج شد. فعلاً محدود است، عُلما می‌گویند توسعه ندهید، به استان‌ها نفرستید. زن اگر‌‎ ‌‏وارد دستگاهی شد، اوضاع را به‌هم می‌زند. می‌خواهید استقلال‌تان را ز

29 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC≈3,480 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

نقشهٔ جهانی سالِ به رسمیت شناخته شدن حق رأی زنان به تفکیک کشورهای امروزی (طبعاً بعضی تاریخ‌ها محل اختلاف است)

29 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈3,900 viewsread 3 September 2026

«در ایران ۸ سال زودتر از سوئیس زنان حق رأی داشتند» این جمله درست، اما مثالی بسیار خوب برای ارائهٔ گزینشی داده‌ها به مخاطب است. چندوقت پیش استادم با توسل به همین موضوع پیش خود نتیجه گرفت که «ایران در به رسمیت شناختن حق رأی زنان در دنیا پیشرو و در منطقه مطلقاً بی‌نظیر بوده». طبعاً در ذهن ما وقتی سوئیس که مهد آزادی و دموکراسی است و با هیچ‌کس هم سر جنگ ندارد این‌قدر دیر به صف مدافعان حقوق زنان می‌پیوندند، کشورهای جهان

25 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC≈4,200 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @MyGreenSilence

فیلمی که دوستم متین کارگردانی کرده رو ببینید حتماً. (خیلی بهش افتخار می‌کنم‌) پوسترش رو هم خیلی دوست دارم، برای ساختنش که می‌خواستیم مقداری شبیه جلد نیویورکر و کارهای سامپه بشه یه کوچولو کمکش کردم.

25 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈4,890 viewsread 3 September 2026

ابوریحان بسی ایرانی‌ستیز بوده و در جای‌جای آثارش می‌توان نفرت از عجمان را مشاهده کرد. در همان آثار الباقیه (ص ۲۸۰) می‌نویسد: «می‌کوشم به نقل ماه‌های فارسی بسنده کنم و چیزی از خود به آن نمی‌افزایم، زیرا دروغ و محالات رکیکه بر اخبار آنان غالب است.» و می‌افزاید: «اگر در تصحیح این سخنان خاموش مانم، ترک نصیحت کرده باشم.» او در کتاب 'تحدید' شخصی را که فارسی را بر عربی برگزیده با کسی مقایسه می‌کند که از دانش مسافات (اند

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @startreatments. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTCAnonymous Poll1,340 voters approx.

راجع به مسئلهٔ «اعدام» (کشتن قانونی فردی توسط دولت به عنوان مجازات) در کشور ایران با تصور حکومتی نزدیک به ایده‌های خودتان، چه نگرشی دارید؟

  1. به‌طور کلی موافقم: بازدارنده‌ای قوی برای جرایم خشن و عادلانه برای انواع جنایتکاران و خلافکاران است.3%
  2. به تمامی مخالفم: غیرانسانی و غیرقابل جبران است و کارایی آن در کاهش جرم ثابت نشده.49%
  3. گاهی موافقم: فقط در جنایات خاص، مثلاً قتل‌های زنجیره‌ای یا تروریسم، آن هم با احراز قطعی ادله.43%
  4. نظری ندارم - دیدن نتایج5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

باشگاه ادبیات
@BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,175
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
خاطرات و خطرات
@khateraaat · 22,210
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
le vent nous portera
@vernte · 27,981
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
تاریخ فلسفه با ابوذر شریعتی
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,794
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Anarconomy
@anarconomy · 46,570
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
نطقیات
@nutqiyyat · 29,956
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
فلسفه و جامعه‌شناسی
@Philosophy_files · 29,893
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
کتاب‌های کمیاب و نایاب
@freeforbiddenbooks · 42,532
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
@litera999کتابخانه‌وموزه
@litera999 · 74,822
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Dr. Ramin Rahmani
@RahmaniRamin · 27,699
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
The Catcher in the Rye
@caulfild · 33,130
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
Annamorphin
@anamorphyn · 24,577
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026
ادبیات، فلسفه و سینما
@NazariyehAdabi · 42,703
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
سینما پارادیـزو
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,716
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
نباید می‌ماندیم - معین دهاز
@nabayad_m · 39,233
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,367
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
پانته‌آ وزیری
@pv44telegram · 23,040
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
دیالکتیک علمی
@ScientificDialectics · 24,277
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دوزخ امّا سرد” (@startreatments), 11,908 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startreatments.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.