اگر بیشعورها عاشق می شوند فقط به یک دلیل است: می خواهند در هیچ چیز کم نیاورند از جمله عشق! بیشعوری، خاویر کرمنت

Channel
داستایفسکی در سیبری
@dostoevskyinsiberia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
47,730subscribers
+3,200 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001921669950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dostoevskyinsiberia |
| Description | Russian Novelist (Nov 11, 1821_Feb 9, 1881) “Your worst sin is that you have destroyed and betrayed yourself for nothing.” اینستاگرام: https://www.instagram.com/dostoevskyinsiberia?igsh=dWJuMmxhanE1N2h4 ارتباط و تبلیغ: @Balderrrr |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dostoevskyinsiberia |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 47,730 | -58 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:42 | 47,788 | -15 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 47,803 | -30 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 47,833 | +147 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 47,686 | +908 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 46,778 | +422 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 46,356 | +49 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 46,307 | -32 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:34 | 46,339 | -29 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:26 | 46,368 | +42 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 46,326 | +634 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 45,692 | +63 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 45,629 | +29 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 45,600 | +44 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 45,556 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 45,560 | +15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 45,545 | -23 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 45,568 | +28 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 45,540 | +83 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 45,457 | first reading |
Engagement
362 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.6%
- avg views ÷ 47,730 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,030
- 196 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 196
- of 362 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 196 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 362 (3 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,182,682 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 657
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 105
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 30s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 13
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 9
- of 362 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dostoevskyinsiberia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 362 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
حقیقت ممکن است به شدت نازک و کشیده شود اما هرگز شکسته نمی شود و همیشه مانند روغن که روی آب شناور است نمایان می شود و بالای دروغ قرار می گیرد. دن کیشوت، میگل سروانتس
سگ بریند روی قسمت و همهچیز.
و من تشکری بیپایان به خودم بدهکارم؛ به خودم که درد به استخوانهایم رسید، اما انتخاب من «بودن» بود.
آدمیان به هم می رسند و سپس همچون برگهایی که به دست باد بیفتند از هم جدا میشوند. زوربای یونانی، نیکوس کازانتزاکیس
🔸فرصتی برای آشنایی با فلسفهٔ تحلیلی🔸 ◻️ محمّدامین خدامرادی، پژوهشگر فلسفه و دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه در دانشگاه تهران، در این کانال به معرفی و بررسی مباحث فلسفهٔ تحلیلی میپردازد و گاه نیز تأملات و دیدگاههای شخصی خود را با مخاطبان به اشتراک میگذارد. ◻️ اگر به فلسفه و مباحث فلسفی علاقهمندید، این کانال میتواند دریچهای برای آشنایی با فلسفهٔ تحلیلی و مسائل و رویکردهای آن باشد: 🖇@MohammadaminKhodamoradi
آری، بشر موجود سرسختیست. من تصور میکنم بهترین تعریفی که میتوان از انسان کرد این است: انسان عبارتست از موجودی که به همه چیز عادت میکند. خاطرات خانه مردگان، داستایفسکی
تو عاشق نبودی که دردِ دل عاشق هارو بفهمی؛ تو بارون نموندی که دلگیریه این هوا رو بفهمی تو گریه نکردی برای کسی تا بدونی چی میگم...💔 💿 - Dostoevsky
دیروز خوابت را دیدم و انگار شاخهای سبز بودی؛ خرامان و رقصان. روی ناهمواریهایم خم میشدی. مگر چیزی بیش از اینکه شاخهای سبز باشی، خوشحالم میکند؟ نزار قبانی
زیاد حرف زدن بلاست؛ کم حرفی هنر است؛ به موقع حرف زدن شعور است و به موقع سکوت کردن؛ اوج شعور.
من با اینکه انتقامجو و کینهتوز نیستم، اما حافظهام در مورد جراحات و تحقیرها بسیار قوی است. جوان خام، فئودور داستایفسکی
یه چنل به ژرفای ادبیات از یاد رفته فارسی؛
Showing the 12 most recent of 362 posts we hold for @dostoevskyinsiberia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@savemetonight · 110 postsKierkegaard | کییرکگارد
@kierkegaard3 · 18,8904 postsنـــــــ و الـــقـــلــــم
@noon_va_alghalam · 2384 postsاونجا که میگه:
@unja_kee · 412,9454 posts𓏲 آکادمی زبان شکسپیر 𓏲
@Shakespearelanguage · 17,5883 postsThanatos Maximus
@Thanatos_Maximus · 2592 posts| Kafkaesque |
@fragmentsofme12 · 5712 postsAmatisBook📚💜
@Amatis_Book · 2,6321 post"روزمرگیهای یک روانشناسِ آینده"
@FDpsychology · 671 postV e n u S i a n🪴
@Ven_usiaN · 2361 post«سهشنبهها با دایانودو🦕»
@anjomanposhti · 29,4671 post⋆࿙˚ཐི⋆小圈子⋆ཋྀ˚࿚⋆
@charmquarke · 1641 post「حـــرفــِ دلـ♥️ــ✨」
@harfedeletoon · 791 postتیکه کتاب
@irTBook · 255,3981 postنیمبیتها
@nim_beyt_ha · 3231 post•Muted Sorrows•
@sarawiism · 7661 postچــــای و خیـــــال...
@tea_and_dream · 301 postWho we are?!
@whoo_we_are · 1011 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@kimiaa_bi · 54,27110 postsMe
@sabz_sa · 38 postsاز اینجا که منم.
@mane_inja · 82,0566 postsسرمست•
@Targhoveam · 5,2514 postsهفت | چهار
@Haft4Channel · 19,7382 posts𝚃𝚎𝚊 & 𝚃𝚢𝚙𝚎 ☕️✨
@Inksocietyy · 3,2862 postsجریدهی منگنه | مجلهی الکترونیکی
@Manganeh_mag · 5072 posts|مُحَرَّض|
@Moharraz_1 · 28,0222 postsدر سایهیِگیسویِ نگار؛
@Negar_is_writing · 1,6082 postsپنجرهای رو به ساکورا
@Sakuraaa_M · 1,1622 postsارغـوانـ
@arghavanesaye · 6,5932 postsSilent13"
@marialonesokot · 1,1572 postsحرفهای نگفته
@qalbemahi · 8,5282 postsآریوپاد؛🐆
@Ariopad · 6091 postاز تبعید شدگان
@ExistentialExile · 1,9581 post•آوای سبز•
@Greenaspeace · 9,5951 postMast VPN
@MastVPN_Shop · 7581 postآنجا که کلمات زنده اند؛
@bookstoryyi · 5831 postencephalitis soul
@encephalitissoul · 17,2781 postفرهنگ جاوید
@farhangejavid_pub · 1,4001 postitsSpoty
@itSpoty · 4,9691 postـبُرشـ
@kboresh · 6,3361 postوارونگی
@verkehrung · 1,3691 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Dostoevskyir · 17,46035 postsهفت | چهار
@Haft4Channel · 19,7385 postsاز اینجا که منم.
@mane_inja · 82,0565 posts|مُحَرَّض|
@Moharraz_1 · 28,0225 postsMe
@sabz_sa · 35 posts𝚃𝚎𝚊 & 𝚃𝚢𝚙𝚎 ☕️✨
@Inksocietyy · 3,2864 postsدویستوچند تکه استخوان.
@kimiaa_bi · 54,2714 posts•آوای سبز•
@Greenaspeace · 9,5953 posts𝑺𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒏🪐
@saturrn_planet · 2,4453 postsدیدرو و دوستان 📚
@diderotfriend · 3852 postsاز تبعید شدگان
@ExistentialExile · 1,9582 postsGoldmund bookstore
@goldmund_bookstore · 1,2242 postsـبُرشـ
@kboresh · 6,3362 posts"شیوید"
@khodeshivid · 5662 postsجریدهی منگنه | مجلهی الکترونیکی
@Manganeh_mag · 5072 postsنوترامینکس|Nutraminx
@nutraminx · 682 postsAway From The Earth
@awayfromthe_earth · 6,0781 postآنجا که کلمات زنده اند؛
@bookstoryyi · 5831 postفرهنگ جاوید
@farhangejavid_pub · 1,4001 postitsSpoty
@itSpoty · 4,9691 postمدرسه سینما تئاتر جادو
@jadooartschool · 6111 postمحمّدامین خدامرادی
@MohammadaminKhodamoradi · 8721 postسرمست•
@Targhoveam · 5,2511 postوارونگی
@verkehrung · 1,3691 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@kierkegaard3 · 18,890#1
@beyond_borders_academy · 15,422#2
@magicalBackpaackOfRey · 7,368#3
@ttpdella · 15,602#4
@Shakespearelanguage · 17,588#5
@piecesbook · 6,459#6
@libraryVellichor · 32,190#7
@Phiilosophiy · 21,136#8
@Horriblygood · 361#9
@Abani_Blue · 24,403#10
@T_Oofan · 44,506#11
@The_Ngar · 21,743#12
@nili_gift · 8,978 (as read 27 August 2026)#13
@Ghahveisookhteh · 12,586#14
@anamorphyn · 24,577#15
@phenomenalikeme · 23,625#16
@MNIOcean · 7,521#17
@Art_death · 25,370#18
@sajiazz · 20,015#19
@Bookloverss_ir · 33,945#20
@franz_kafka · 7,786#21
@herwonderland · 191,894#22
@fragmentsofme12 · 571#23
@Taamoq · 13,678#24
@hawlsu · 10,699#25
@NazariyehAdabi · 42,703#26
@kimiko_english · 12,481#27
@hashurr · 8,611#28
@hossein_pannahi · 10,927#29
@tosurvivemus · 13,463#30
@ADeadlySin · 4,477#31
@sama_dailyart · 12,299#32
@Silent_Island · 6,507#33
@The_Imagist · 8,360#34
@neartothewildheartt · 14,996#35
@addictedtobook · 12,013#36
@AHS_ART · 7,603#37
@HONARBARTTAR · 14,623#38
@blackstar_writes · 8,253#39
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377#40
@paintingco · 12,782#41
@vir486 · 12,051#42
@Liminal_world · 2,503#43
@JasteGorikhte · 12,297#44
@Mariyachanell · 12,741#45
@bluehomeplus · 4,691#46
@oklm_hash · 10,523#47
@Fly_with_the_Music · 14,870#48
@Titiisblooming · 10,653#49
@devanegii · 20,605#50
@AFrameofArt · 7,262#51
@DYsickmind · 229#52
@Honarrvareh · 29,974#53
@ARTTJOURNAL · 34,566#54
@gaamtu · 1,854#55
@morteza_news · 4,517#56
@Philosophy_files · 29,893#57
@shabahng1 · 19,919#58
@abraabaft · 7,709#59
@sp4luv · 21,002#60
@lC3LE · 8#61
@himenosenpaie · 5,071#62
@MBTIV · 19,320#63
@rawarchive · 2,759#64
@Holyfroce · 27,022#65
@mmarrham · 65,597#66
@TheStoriesOfArt · 9,330#67
@evilspiris · 13,941#68
@Video_Archives · 13,056#69
@cineartgraph · 4,461#70
@nowinthefade · 11,700#71
@cineemagic · 6,919#72
@Rock_metal1 · 8,614#73
@farsimovieland · 7,049#74
@FanoskheMusic · 4,506#75
@Cinema_New_Wave · 25,347#76
@Nazariyeh_Cinema · 19,025#77
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Phiilosophiy · 21,136
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 September 2026
@KetabTOpdf · 62,627
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
@T_Oofan · 44,506
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
@foroghfarokhzad · 45,058
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@makhfigah_channel · 63,192
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
@NazariyehAdabi · 42,703
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@Honarrvareh · 29,974
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,794
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@Ketab_17 · 22,980
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 September 2026
@vkends · 24,706
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@ardeshire_rostami · 25,908
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 September 2026
@nabayad_mikhandim · 31,426
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@ARTTJOURNAL · 34,566
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
@anamorphyn · 24,577
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026
@Philosophy_files · 29,893
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
@matalebtarikhim · 30,148
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
@ghalatnanevisimm · 20,973
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
@MenuKetab · 64,591
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
@sadeghhedayat · 32,036
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
@khatzendgii · 31,499
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
@negaaraan_ac · 33,760
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@phenomenalikeme · 23,625
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
@Mahditabatabaei73 · 35,099
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
@Cinema_New_Wave · 25,347
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“داستایفسکی در سیبری” (@dostoevskyinsiberia), 47,730 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dostoevskyinsiberia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.