بکی از چنل هایی که هم پست هاو هم عکسهاش بهم حس زندگی میده، مطمئنم برای شما هم همینطوره!🖤

Channel
𝐍𝐠𝐚𝐫ִֶָ ☽︎۪ ࣪
@The_Ngar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,950subscribers
-1,988 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001610482052 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @The_Ngar |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/The_Ngar |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 20,950 | -176 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 21,126 | -85 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 21,211 | -75 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 21,286 | -103 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 21,389 | -261 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 21,650 | -148 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 21,798 | -128 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:53 | 21,926 | -56 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 21,982 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:09 | 21,990 | +16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 21,974 | -46 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 22,020 | -60 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 22,080 | -63 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 22,143 | -43 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 22,186 | -51 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 22,237 | -60 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 22,297 | -107 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 22,404 | -101 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 22,505 | -79 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 22,584 | first reading |
Engagement
193 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.74%
- avg views ÷ 20,950 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,200
- 91 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 91
- of 193 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 193 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 109,482 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 30s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
بیاید بریم چنل دختر فرفری و اروم رو نگاه بندازیم؛
Sticker, posted without a caption
https://t.me/+ErFAHQWa8AszYmNk پرایوتم اگه دوست داشتید باشید؛
چند روز پیش ریمو کردم ممبرای دیلیمو⭐️
بچه ها
Sticker, posted without a caption
با خودم میگفتم که عيبی نداره، اين اولين بارى نيست كه اين اتفاق مى افته.
به خودت میای میبینی دیگه هیچچیز هیچ اهمیتی نداره.
از چی میترسی ؟ خدا نمیذاره داستان آدمی که قلب پاکی داره بد تموم بشه.
- This ( دوسش داشته باشید ) 🦋
مدام فکر میکردم گریه هایم تمام شده، قبلاً تمام شده اما باز هم مانده بود.
Showing the 12 most recent of 193 posts we hold for @The_Ngar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@The_Ngar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 2 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@astroxdaily · 18,38416 postsرقص پروانه
@MyButterfly_Dance · 162 postsAquaX🌀🌊
@coachreyyyyy · 672 posts⋆𐙚₊
@emmwitha · 362 posts𝓜ari‘s Daily
@parkmrn · 2602 posts𓏲⋆ ๋ دنیای کوچیک آریتی ⋆ִֶָ
@smallWorld010 · 932 postsÉchos du Cœur
@tmtylm_eiyd · 382 postsهمین فَــــࢪدا دوبٰاࢪه
@tomoag · 1132 postsLE SSERAFIM𒈒ᯓ𖥔
@LESSERAFIMIR5 · 2,1821 postیادداشت هایدمکشیدهیکبیگانه؛
@oncallfrin · 581 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Nargeswithani · 45710 postsکتابخانهیعجیب
@itsdarkor · 1,1564 posts Kissed by Sun 🔒
@sw1un · 7462 posts⊹ ࣪ ˖ About Atriya ⊹
@About_Atriya · 1,3031 postرقص پروانه
@MyButterfly_Dance · 161 post یونـگبـوك ؛ سۄم اٰکتبـر
@Petallwaves · 2641 postAquaX🌀🌊
@coachreyyyyy · 671 post⋆𐙚₊
@emmwitha · 361 postژِنـِرآلِنَقـآشـ اَرتِشهیتلِر
@painters_crow · 5291 post𝓜ari‘s Daily
@parkmrn · 2601 post𓏲⋆ ๋ دنیای کوچیک آریتی ⋆ִֶָ
@smallWorld010 · 931 post-𝗦ᴛᴀʀ 𝗟ᴀᴡ
@star1aw · 211 postÉchos du Cœur
@tmtylm_eiyd · 381 postهمین فَــــࢪدا دوبٰاࢪه
@tomoag · 1131 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@NegsBookList · 1158 postsاسترو دیلی ( 🤎 )
@astroxdaily · 18,3844 postsㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ۫ ࣪ 𓏲 𝖠𝖽𝗌
@AdsNeg · 251 postCaram’Ell⛧𓈒࣪ ᭡ ⋆
@caramellmeowto · 5,1361 post⋆𐙚₊
@emmwitha · 361 postㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ۫ ࣪ 𓏲 𝖭𝖾𝗀 ִֶָ ༊·
@NgarsHome · 281 postیادداشت هایدمکشیدهیکبیگانه؛
@oncallfrin · 581 post𝖣𝖤𝖲𝖲𝖨𝖱𝖤 `
@vkookdesire · 3,3731 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dostoevskyinsiberia · 47,730
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
@mmarrham · 65,597
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 22 August 2026
@CityOfBooks · 71,555
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
@khatzendgii · 31,499
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
@Ketab_17 · 22,980
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 September 2026
@akharin_dorna · 35,325
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
@Horriblygood · 361
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
@Hubottt · 89,582
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 18 August 2026
@ModBooks · 190,921
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
@T_Oofan · 44,506
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
@Abani_Blue · 24,403
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 September 2026
@LittlePrinceChnl · 55,231
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐍𝐠𝐚𝐫ִֶָ ☽︎۪ ࣪” (@The_Ngar), 20,950 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_Ngar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.