Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ MBti 4Q ‌‌‌ ‌

Channel

‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ MBti 4Q ‌‌‌ ‌

@mbti4Q

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,749subscribers

-150 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001720443077
TypeChannel
Username@mbti4Q
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mbti4Q

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@mbtiuniverse/7922931 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC@mbti4Q/46747 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@xsfpType11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@xsfpType (74)
@mbtiuniverse6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@mbtiuniverse (51)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 22 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @xsfpType. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4,7494,8994,8247 August 2026 — 4,899 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,899 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,891 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,874 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,852 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,844 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,827 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,799 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,788 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,779 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,776 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,771 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,755 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,749 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net -150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,727–4,922 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 13:394,749-6
11 Sept 2026, 11:364,755-16
6 Sept 2026, 19:204,771-5
2 Sept 2026, 12:244,776-3
30 Aug 2026, 12:154,779-9
27 Aug 2026, 10:024,788-11
24 Aug 2026, 07:434,799-28
20 Aug 2026, 12:364,827-17
17 Aug 2026, 15:164,844-8
14 Aug 2026, 17:084,852-22
11 Aug 2026, 13:024,874-17
8 Aug 2026, 03:124,891-8
7 Aug 2026, 12:334,899no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:234,899first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 47 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 00:26 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

اونایی که شغل اینترنتی بدون سرمایه میخواستن اومدن؟

  1. آره.0%
  2. نه صبر کن جوین بدم.0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 00:26 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026

بچه‌ها چندتا ادمین می‌خوام کارش سخت نیست خودم بهتون آموزش میدم حقوقش هم خوبه بین ۶ تا ۸ میلیون درماهه اگه بینتون کسی هست که به کار ادمینی علاقمنده بیاید اینجا تا جزئیات کار رو براتون توضیح بدم: @AdminiAmoozesh ظرفیت محدود! بعد تکمیل لینک باطل میشه.

11 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC81 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mbtiuniverse

៕ #FACT ―――——— • تایپ هایی که در نوشتار بهتر از گفتار عمل میکنن : - تایپ INTP - تایپ INTJ - تایپ INFJ - تایپ INFP - تایپ ISTJ • ریلکس ترین و موفق ترین تایپ ها در پنهان کردن استرس : - تایپ ISTP - تایپ INTP - تایپ ENTP - تایپ ESTP • خسته ترین تایپ های شخصیتی : - تایپ INTP - تایپ INFP - تایپ ISFP - تایپ ENFP - تایپ ENTP • منطقی ترین تایپ های شخصیتی : - تایپ ENTP - تایپ INTP - تایپ INTJ - تایپ ENTJ - تایپ ESTJ ―――———

10 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC123 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mbtiuniverse

៕ #FUN ―――——— • تایپ‌های MBTI و آشپزی ـ ESTJ, INFJ, ISFJ, ENTJ : احتمالا آشپزهای خوبی هستن یا اگر امتحانش کنن از پسش برمیان. ـ ISTJ, INTJ : غذاهای ابتدایی رو بلدن درست کنن و از گرسنگی تلف نمیشن. ـ INFP, ENFP, ISFP : احتمالا فقط غذاهای نیمه آماده مثل ناگت و رامن و غیره رو امتحان میکنن. ـ ENFJ, ESFJ : آشپزی نمیکنن ولی بدشون نمیاد غذاهای ابداعی خودشون رو درست کنن. ـ ESFP, ESTP : تا به حال یه اجاق گاز از نزدیک ندید

9 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC219 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mbtiuniverse

៕ #Fact ―――—— • رتبه‌بندی تایپ‌ها از نظر، فراوانی بین مردم (( آقایان )) 1= ISTJ 2= ESTJ 3= ISTP 4= ISFJ 5= ISFP 6= ESFJ 7= ESFP 8= ENFP 9= ESTP 10= INTP 11= INFP 12= ENTP 13= INTJ 14= ENTJ 15= ENFJ 16= INFJ ―――———―――——————— ᚚ @MBTISUB . #AllTypes

9 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC190 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mbtiuniverse

៕ #Fact ―――—— • رتبه‌بندی تایپ‌ها از نظر، فراوانی بین مردم (( خانم‌ها )) 1= ISFJ 2= ESFJ 3= ESFP 4= ISFP 5= ENFP 6= ISTJ 7= ESTJ 8= INFP 9= ENFJ 10= ESTP 11= ENTP 12= ISTP 13= INTP 14= INFJ 15= INTJ 16= ENTJ ―――———―――——————— ᚚ @MBTISUB . #AllTypes

8 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC13 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

⩩🪐ببین... بــزرگ‌تــریــن کــالج ماورائـی و فانتــزی رو برات آوردم. 🌙✨ اگر همیشه تو رمانها و فیلم‌های فانتزی دنبال رؤیاهات گشتی، من یه پورتال برات آوردم که این دنیا رو برات واقعی کنم. 🐕⁺ 🌟@alfea_schooI @alfea_schooI🌟 ⩩🎀اینجا میتونی هرکسی که میخوای باشی، پس دست دوستات رو بگیر و با این دعوتنامه، سوار قطار شو و به کالج جادوگری آلفیا بیار. تست بده ببین جزء کدوم گروه میوفتی.🎀✉️

8 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026

اگه تابستونه و میخوای جلوی بوی عرقتو بگیری : 🎀

8 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026

#سوال_شما من تقریبا دوهفتس با یه پسره اشنا شدم رابطمون لانگه بنظذتون نود بدم سیسیااا؟ جواب 🎀

8 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC6 viewsread 8 August 2026

#سوال_شما دوس پسرم فوت فتیشه دوستام مسخره میکنن شما نظرتون چیه=))) جواب 🎀

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @mbti4Q. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 00:26 UTCAnonymous Poll0 voters

اونایی که شغل اینترنتی بدون سرمایه میخواستن اومدن؟

  1. آره.0%
  2. نه صبر کن جوین بدم.0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ام‌بی‌تی‌آی دیلی.
@OurMbtiDaily · 30,444
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 7 September 2026
𝐌𝐞𝐨𝐰 𝐌𝐁𝐓𝐈 ִֶָ ☁️
@meowmbti · 45,724
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 27 August 2026
MBTI Universe.
@mbtiuniverse · 51,005
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
محافظ YanPlays
@MakeYourCharacter · 1,296
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 August 2026
🎀
@TheGamepc · 144
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 16 August 2026
POV
@samepov · 48,272
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 27 August 2026
explore
@explorextelegram · 79,706
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
Wanna be yours
@loventaste · 107,147
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 August 2026
𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖻ɘ𝖺𝗍 .
@istarbeat · 23,908
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 September 2026
لینک شیوان
@Horriblygood · 361
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
fu person
@my_persony · 36,931
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 September 2026
Dialogues teach the greatest lessons
@DialogStories · 43,422
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 28 August 2026
محافظ دژم
@dozhaami · 16
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 1 September 2026
ستاره‌یِ شب
@Stareshb · 83,621
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
‌ ‌ ‌ 𝚝𖹭𝗄︎ı𑂁𝖾 𝗍‌𝗁𝖾𝗆𝖾ᜳִ
@TH3EME · 219,200
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 11 August 2026
⊰ Good Reads⛄ کتاب
@CityOfBooks · 71,555
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
عربی فلاح 1406
@tarmiimfallah · 46,409
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ MBti 4Q ‌‌‌ ‌” (@mbti4Q), 4,749 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mbti4Q.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.