Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙈𝙗𝙩𝙞 𝙈𝙤𝙤𝙙𝙞 ࿐

Channel

𝙈𝙗𝙩𝙞 𝙈𝙤𝙤𝙙𝙞 ࿐

@mbtimoodi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,740subscribers

-697 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744254268
TypeChannel
Username@mbtimoodi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mbtimoodi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@mbtiuniverse/7922931 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC@mbtimoodi/49911 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mbtiuniverse6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@mbtiuniverse (5–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @xsfpType. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,7408,4378,088.57 August 2026 — 8,437 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,437 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,405 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,363 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,323 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,285 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,227 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,189 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,167 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,152 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,118 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,099 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,058 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,956 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,893 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,867 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,851 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,828 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,820 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,795 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,782 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,761 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,740 subscribers7 August 20262 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 87 days, net -697. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,635–8,542 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 19:467,740-21
30 Oct 2026, 23:597,761-21
28 Oct 2026, 02:007,782-13
25 Oct 2026, 00:497,795-25
22 Oct 2026, 08:567,820-8
19 Oct 2026, 08:317,828-23
16 Oct 2026, 06:207,851-16
12 Oct 2026, 21:287,867-26
6 Oct 2026, 15:007,893-63
29 Sept 2026, 20:217,956-102
15 Sept 2026, 16:588,058-41
12 Sept 2026, 04:178,099-19
8 Sept 2026, 02:158,118-34
2 Sept 2026, 17:598,152-15
31 Aug 2026, 02:548,167-22
27 Aug 2026, 18:148,189-38
24 Aug 2026, 10:268,227-58
20 Aug 2026, 07:538,285-38
16 Aug 2026, 22:348,323-40
13 Aug 2026, 12:468,363first reading

Engagement

153 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.21%
avg views ÷ 7,740 subscribers
Avg views / post
93.8
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 153 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held153 (29 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total2,064
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
876
Videos
319
Links
346

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
53s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2026, 22:46 UTC11 viewsread 4 November 2026

"بلایند دیت مجازی" قضیه از این قراره که بلایند دیت مجازی برگزار میکنیم🔥 دونفرو انتخاب میکنیم که سناشون و شهراشون به هم بخوره و بعد براشون گروه میزنیم پروفایلاشونم برمیدارن یا مخفی میکنن ترجیحا سعی میکنم همشهری باشن بعد یسری سوال میپرسم و جواب میدن و حرف میزنیم از همدیگه سوال میپرسن و چالش! درآخر عکسایه همو میبینن و بهم نمره و لایک و دیس لایک میدن که میخان باهم اشنا بشن یا نه واسه شرکت تو برنامه بیاید اینجا: @Online…

3 Nov 2026, 22:46 UTC11 viewsread 4 November 2026

اگه سینگلی و دنبال رل هستی اینجا میتونی بلایندیت مجازی شرکت کنی👇 @OnlineBlindDatee

3 Nov 2026, 20:10 UTC36 viewsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @mbtiuniverse

៕ #FACT ―――—— • دسته‌بندی تایپ‌های MBTI از لحاظ مکالمه: ـ∽ #ISTJ و #INTJ و #ISTP ↜ دسته اونایی که فقط وقتی راجع به چیزی مطمئنن یا به نظرشون مهمه صحبت میکنن. ـ∽ #ISFJ و #ENFP و #ESFP ↜ دسته اونایی که مکالمه رو با چیزهای ساده و رندوم شروع میکنن. ـ∽ #INFJ و #ENFJ و #ESFJ ↜ دسته اونایی که سعی میکنن مکالمه رو خیلی سرزنده و پویا پیش ببرن. جالب بودن موضوع براشون خیلی مهمه پس میخوان تا جای ممکن مکالمه رو جالب کنن. ـ∽ #E…

2 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC97 viewsread 4 November 2026

کنجکاو ترین دوستی که میتونی داشته باشی، estp ئه.

2 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC100 viewsread 4 November 2026

صبور ترین دوستی که میتونی داشته باشی، infp ئه.

2 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC100 viewsread 4 November 2026

خشن ترین دوستی که میتونی داشته باشی، entp ئه.

2 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC103 viewsread 4 November 2026

بادرک ترین دوستی که میتونی داشته باشی، intp ئه.

2 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC102 viewsread 4 November 2026

بانمک ترین دوستی که میتونی داشته باشی، enfp ئه.

2 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC102 viewsread 4 November 2026

صبور ترین دوستی که میتونی داشته باشی، infp ئه.

2 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC95 viewsread 4 November 2026

مودی ترین دوستی که میتونی داشته باشی، isfp ئه.

Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @mbtimoodi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@mbtimoodi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 6 posts on @mbtimoodi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTCAnonymous Poll1 voter

اونایی که شغل اینترنتی بدون سرمایه میخواستن اومدن؟

  1. نه صبر کن جوین بدم.0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 00:26 UTCAnonymous Poll0 voters

اونایی که شغل اینترنتی بدون سرمایه میخواستن اومدن؟

  1. آره.0%
  2. نه صبر کن جوین بدم.0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ام‌بی‌تی‌آی دیلی.
@OurMbtiDaily · 29,126
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 7 September 2026
MBTI Universe.
@mbtiuniverse · 49,563
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
MEOW
@meowmbti · 25
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 27 August 2026
「INTP . ENTP」
@XntpType · 19,579
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 September 2026
𝐘𝐀𝐍.𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐘𝐒 🫟 بازی و تست
@MakeYourCharacter · 112,522
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 August 2026
۫ ⦁ ݂
@TheGamepc · 211
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 16 August 2026
⊰ Good Reads⛄ کتاب
@CityOfBooks · 70,434
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
آرت پروفایل
@whoseartprofile · 53,121
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
maybe us.
@xbeus · 19,250
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 3 October 2026
Verse Vibes
@Lyricsteach · 40,335
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 30 August 2026
﮼انجمن‌نهنگ‌های‌نَوازنده؛
@Dayan_Zhakaw · 32,429
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 4 September 2026
explore
@explorextelegram · 76,750
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
﮼شیرکاکائو
@Cacoamilk · 22,799
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 September 2026
POV
@samepov · 51,365
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 27 August 2026
دلقکِ عنکبوتی
@spiiderclown · 105,435
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 August 2026
خوشگله غمارو بریز دور
@clownText · 66
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 16 August 2026
منِ‌او
@janahousee · 19,777
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 22 September 2026
هنر و دیوانگی | نقاشی
@VincentVangoghArts · 30,176
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 7 September 2026
آرکی‌تایپ | Archetype
@ArchetypesGraphy · 18,907
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 October 2026
بوبزپایدرمن
@boobspider · 18,465
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 4 October 2026
saba.music3
@sabamusic3 · 30,452
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
قفل
@EveryPov · 131
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌𝖿ᥙ 𝗉ᥱrs᥆ᥒ .
@my_persony · 37,419
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 September 2026
Star Me
@starme69 · 255,779
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙈𝙗𝙩𝙞 𝙈𝙤𝙤𝙙𝙞 ࿐” (@mbtimoodi), 7,740 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mbtimoodi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.