Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ﮼شیرکاکائو

Channel

﮼شیرکاکائو

@Cacoamilk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,802subscribers

+1,779 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001463831015
TypeChannel
Username@Cacoamilk
Descriptionبیا بغلم کن برام شیرکاکائو باز کن بده دستم؛بعد باهم دوتایی تام و جری ببینیم.
Created10 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Cacoamilk

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

20,46923,84522,15722,8026 August 20264 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 90 days, net +1,779. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,963–24,351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 21:1822,802+3
3 Nov 2026, 23:2122,799-20
2 Nov 2026, 19:5622,819-6
1 Nov 2026, 19:0122,825-29
31 Oct 2026, 18:3922,854-36
30 Oct 2026, 17:4622,890-33
29 Oct 2026, 16:4922,923-21
28 Oct 2026, 15:3622,944-27
27 Oct 2026, 17:4822,971-7
26 Oct 2026, 19:1722,978-25
25 Oct 2026, 19:0723,003-26
24 Oct 2026, 20:5423,029-28
23 Oct 2026, 20:2623,057-29
22 Oct 2026, 23:5623,086-35
21 Oct 2026, 20:4623,121-57
20 Oct 2026, 14:5023,178-27
19 Oct 2026, 13:1623,205-28
18 Oct 2026, 14:3823,233-32
17 Oct 2026, 16:1523,265-39
16 Oct 2026, 14:4023,304first reading

Engagement

803 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.62%
avg views ÷ 22,802 subscribers
Avg views / post
825
254 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
254
of 803 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 254 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held803 (4 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total209,548
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 04:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,200
Videos
≈659
Links
≈18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
47m 40s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 82 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 803 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Cacoamilk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 803 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 254 posts held from the last 30 days (0.394%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 22:41 UTC93 viewsread 5 November 2026

💎🎁 هر هفته قرعه کشی 10 اشتراک پرمیوم ۳ماهه گذاشتن حتما عضو باشید تا پرمویم برنده بشید.😎 ⬇️ @betinjabet 📍منتظر قرعه کشی استارز a13 ⭐️ هم باشید در این کانال

4 Nov 2026, 19:51 UTC418 viewsread 5 November 2026

اگر تو چشات کوره بیا من ردفلگ‌های زندگیتو نشونت بدم🫶🏼

4 Nov 2026, 19:46 UTC304 viewsread 5 November 2026

خب ردفلگ هست که هست. بهرحال قرمز هم رنگ خداست.

4 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC232 viewsread 5 November 2026

اره عزیزم تو همیشه بی تقصیری. مقصر همه مشکلاتت دیگرانن🚩.

4 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC534 viewsread 5 November 2026

یه آدم یهو میاد تو زندگیت، میشه همه‌ی زندگیت.. وقتی هست کُل دغدغه هات یادت میره، وقتی نیست هم کل دغدغه ت نبودشه! تو اون يه نفري برام. .ꪅ @Cacoamilk

4 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC619 viewsread 5 November 2026

بنظرم قشنگ‌ترین مدل عاشق شدن اینه که درست وقتی اصلا انتظارش رو نداری، عاشق کسی بشی که فکرش هم نمیکردی، نه چیزی زورکی باشه، نه حس ساختگی، فقط یه ارتباط واقعی که خودش آروم آروم شکل گرفت. .ꪅ @Cacoamilk

4 Nov 2026, 17:51 UTC527 viewsread 5 November 2026
File

#پیشنهاد_ویژه ⚠️ 🔥 حتما ویدیو‌ آموزشی بالا رو‌ببینید بازی ساده و بسیار شیرینی که راحت میشه میشه ازش کلی پول درآورد👌🏼 20 درصد شارژ بیشتر با هربار شارژ برای بازی مرغ ⭐ 📣یک‌میلیون شارژ کن⬇️ 6,000,000 میلیون موجودی بگیر 💻 betinja.bet

4 Nov 2026, 17:51 UTC490 viewsread 5 November 2026
Video

📣هرچی شارژ کنی 🤩 برابر موجودی میگیری با بونوس 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🤩🤩درصد شارژ اضافی ویژه این بازی: 🖱به راحتی کسب درامد کن 💵💰 فقط کافیه شکارچی خوبی باشی و مرغ هارو شکار کنی و پولت چند برابر کنی😍💵 🟢 ویدیو #آموزش بازی chicky choice رو براتون گذاشتم خیلی راحت و بدون ریسک و میتونی بازی کنی و کلی پول دربیاری🔥 💖 حتما ویدیو رو تا انتها ببینید 💻 betinja.bet 💻 betinja.bet 🌐 کانال بونوس های رایگان @betinjabet ✅ شرطبندی از طریق ربات g

Showing the 12 most recent of 803 posts we hold for @Cacoamilk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 51 posts on @Cacoamilk as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
18 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
17

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

” گا
@GaArea · 58,533
#1
RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,507,609
#2
باشه ولی"
@OKBUT · 117,403
#3
randomshit.
@imOfelia · 4,352
#4
lisztomania .
@iciou · 288,260
#5
POV
@samepov · 51,464
#6
حرفای‌پیشی‌کوچولو.
@thelittlepishi · 2,526
#7
𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖻ɘ𝖺𝗍 .
@istarbeat · 23,007
#8
دیاستومی
@kianaafr · 403,985
#9
kill ourselves
@letskills · 83,609
#10
قشاع.
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 566,766
#11
Verse Vibes
@Lyricsteach · 40,375
#12
دلقکِ عنکبوتی
@spiiderclown · 105,291
#13
﮼کدئین
@Codeain · 348,501
#14
[ تم کلاسیك ]
@classicthemes · 472,209
#15
Y E G A N
@yegansdaily · 13,975
#16
پارس توییت
@ParsTwt · 532,607
#17
۫ ⦁ ݂
@TheGamepc · 211
#18
MEOW
@meowmbti · 25
#19
Vinyv
@vinyvidzam · 60,148
#20
this user
@thusers · 29,234
#21
‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌ 𝐑𝐄𝐁𝐄𝐂𝐂𝐀𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐈
@rebccaghaderi · 281,928
#22
رادیوکصشر
@Radiokocsher · 1,154,656
#23
maybe us.
@xbeus · 19,359
#24
I'll DIE YOUNG 🪱
@WryVur · 143,455
#25
قفل idie
@idiewith · 6
#26
بهمن؛
@Bahmanbekesh · 207,465
#27
دهه هشتادیا
@Dhei80 · 65,859 (as read 26 September 2026)
#28
بوبزپایدرمن
@boobspider · 18,487
#29
دختری که رهایش کردی.
@d_Rhyshkrdi · 118,282
#30
تراپیست
@Rlighthere · 149,180
#31
روان نَشناس
@urstochange · 5,022
#32
‌وقتایی‌که‌آهنگ‌گوش‌میدی“
@howtlisten · 324,595
#33
حرفایی ک کاش میزدم.
@liwish · 178,434
#34
اگه دوست دخترم بودی
@mygirlfriendddd · 17,137
#35
𝙈𝙗𝙩𝙞 𝙈𝙤𝙤𝙙𝙞 ࿐
@mbtimoodi · 7,740
#36
𝗖𝗼𝗰𝗼𝗮
@coucoa · 113,746
#37
درامـا تـراپـی .
@kdramathrapy · 17,641
#38
𓏺 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝗌𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺
@isoolatedw · 5,066
#39
dismaying
@dismaying · 139,466
#40
پلاک ۷
@hawwne · 10,695
#41
Un Normal
@UnNurmal · 517,816
#42
‌ׁ کیپاپ مود ‌ׁ
@Vernios_kpop · 9,393
#43
عطر‌تن‌تو
@yourperfuumm · 57,662
#44
سعید
@SaeidBaratpour · 91,418
#45
دیالوگ های مود :
@timemoodz1 · 282,984
#46
سیگار صورتی
@pinkCiggar · 31,285
#47
کتاب‌هایی که باید بخونیم
@ocbooks · 324,357
#48
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 7,984,325
#49
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
@iMTProto · 7,720,892
#50
𝐘𝐀𝐍.𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐘𝐒 🫟 بازی و تست
@MakeYourCharacter · 112,346
#51
محافظ
@iDeathBirth · 29
#52
تو بگو:
@YouBgo · 130,195
#53
توییتی
@TweetyChannel · 822,936
#54
everyone obsessed with song lyric's
@Beustaa · 18,659
#55
“ گـا لنــد “
@GaLandarea · 4,813
#56
ام‌بی‌تی‌آی دیلی.
@OurMbtiDaily · 29,100
#57
Vague
@irobah · 23,670
#58
Naomi.
@lNaomll · 14,719
#59
مستِ مغموم.
@MasteMaqmom · 26,028
#60
explore
@explorextelegram · 76,693
#61
Sickliy
@Sickliy · 26,459
#62
دانش آموز :‌‌‌ ‌
@danshamuz · 77,413
#63
‌ ‌ ͏ ͏ ͏ ‌𝚝𖹭𝗄︎í𝖾 𝗍‌𝗁𝖾𝗆𝖾ᜳִ
@TH3EME · 219,545
#64
Crying room
@crayingroom · 315,286
#65

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝐖𝐢𝐬𝐡
@xwish · 42,399
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 August 2026
خبر آنلاین | 𝗧𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁
@Khabar_Text · 113,328
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“﮼شیرکاکائو” (@Cacoamilk), 22,802 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cacoamilk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.