من اگه کنار یکی دیگه ببینمت مهم نیس ولی تو اگه ببینی اتیش میگیری چون میدونی چجوری میتونم یه نفر رو دوست داشته باشم.

Channel
سیگار صورتی
@pinkCiggar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,288subscribers
-708 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001613484696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pinkCiggar |
| Description | somewhere between pink and fucked up. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pinkCiggar |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:26 | 31,288 | +3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:28 | 31,285 | +38 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:58 | 31,247 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:44 | 31,252 | -14 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:19 | 31,266 | -16 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:27 | 31,282 | -14 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 31,296 | -16 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 31,312 | -25 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:39 | 31,337 | -23 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 31,360 | -20 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:40 | 31,380 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:40 | 31,388 | -13 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 31,401 | -23 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 31,424 | -29 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:41 | 31,453 | -15 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 31,468 | -13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:31 | 31,481 | -26 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:36 | 31,507 | -6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:44 | 31,513 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:48 | 31,525 | first reading |
Engagement
1,430 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 211 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.28%
- avg views ÷ 31,288 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,030
- 570 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 570
- of 1,430 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,430 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 584,692 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 19:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,360
- Videos
- ≈328
- Links
- ≈43
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 13m 05s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 570 posts held from the last 30 days (0.175%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
بزرگترین دارایی هر انسانی دوست دخترشه.
Photo, posted without a caption
⚠️ #پیشنهاد_ویژه ⚠️ 🔥 حتما ویدیو آموزشی بالا روببینید بازی ساده و بسیار شیرینی که راحت میشه میشه ازش کلی پول درآورد👌🏼 20 درصد شارژ بیشتر با هربار شارژ برای بازی مرغ ⭐ یکمیلیون شارژ کن ⬇️ 6,000,000 میلیون موجودی بگیر 💻 betinja.bet
📣هرچی شارژ کنی 🤩 برابر موجودی میگیری با بونوس 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🤩🤩درصد شارژ اضافی ویژه این بازی: 🖱به راحتی کسب درامد کن 💵💰 فقط کافیه شکارچی خوبی باشی و مرغ هارو شکار کنی و پولت چند برابر کنی😍💵 🟢 ویدیو #آموزش بازی chicky choice رو براتون گذاشتم خیلی راحت و بدون ریسک و میتونی بازی کنی و کلی پول دربیاری🔥 💖 حتما ویدیو رو تا انتها ببینید 💻 betinja.bet 💻 betinja.bet 🌐 کانال بونوس های رایگان @betinjabet ✅ شرطبندی از طریق ربات g
بکیرم.
اکس عزیزم من مستقیم بهت نمیرینم چون این چنل ایدههای بهتری داره: @chnnel
دیدمش، ولی دیگه قشنگ نبود، دیدمش، ولی دیگه نور روش نبود، دیدمش ولی دیگه دوسش نداشتم، دیدمش و فقط یاد درد و رنج هام افتادم.
هرچى كاپل موفق تو زندگيم ديدم پسره عاشق تر بوده، lover girl میبازه.
Photo, posted without a caption
💖یکمیلیون شارژ کن ⬅️⬇️ 6,000,000 میلیون موجودی بگیر و باهاش بازی حساس امشب #پرسپولیس و #فجرسپاسی رو پیشبینی کن. #بدون_ریسک #بدون _استرس 💻 betinja.bet
💖یکمیلیون شارژ کن ⬅️⬇️ 6,000,000 میلیون موجودی بگیر و بازی تیم محبوبت #پرسپولیس رو با خیال راحت پیشبینی کن 📣هرچی شارژ کنی ۵ برابر موجودی میگیری 💳 واریز درگاه #ریالی و امکان کارت به کارت و واریز از طریق کریپتو 💻لینک سایت بازی: 💻 betinja.bet 💻 betinja.bet 🌐 کانال بونوس های رایگان @betinjabet ✅ شرطبندی از طریق ربات r15: @Betinja_bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,430 posts we hold for @pinkCiggar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 123 posts on @pinkCiggar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 18 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 42
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@OKBUT · 117,19328 posts” گا
@GaArea · 58,44417 postsMelBet | مل بت
@MelBet_Iran1 · 176,07517 postsBetinja
@betinjabet · 21,6295 posts﮼شیرکاکائو
@Cacoamilk · 22,7553 postsهلوکیتی🎀
@KittyShity · 6,2113 postsrandomshit.
@imOfelia · 4,3523 postsوان ایکس بت | وانيكس بت | 1XBET
@one_Mn85m_xbet · 28,2502 postsدربی بت | Derby bet
@DerbyBet_offici · 27,3621 post𝐇𝐚𝐉 | 𝐅𝐢𝐱𝐞𝐝
@HaJFixed · 7,1221 postNBA
@NBA2kBet · 29,9961 post𝗧𝗶𝗽𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 | 𝗠𝗮𝗳𝗶𝗮
@Tipster_Mafiaa · 15,9911 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@betinjabet · 21,62958 postsمل بت
@melbet_chaneel · 36,01825 postsکانال شرطبندی دربی کلاب
@derbybetm · 156,96215 postsMelBet | مل بت
@MelBet_Iran1 · 176,07512 postsVorex
@vorexofficial · 2,51511 posts4xBet
@Bet4xinfo · 16,7326 posts𝗧𝗮𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗶 | 𝗠𝗮𝗳𝗶𝗮
@tabani_mafia · 33,8166 postsآموزش وان ایکس بت
@Education_iran_wanx · 10,7185 postsوان ایکس بت
@onexbet_iran_chanel · 7,8775 posts𝗧𝗶𝗽𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 | 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗻 تیپستر پرشین
@Tipster_Persians · 2,7975 postsHUNTER BET
@HUNTTER_BET · 6,9704 postsوان ایکس بت | وانيكس بت | 1XBET
@one_Mn85m_xbet · 28,2504 postsNBA
@NBA2kBet · 29,9963 postsدربی بت | Derby bet
@DerbyBet_offici · 27,3622 posts𝐇𝐚𝐉 | 𝐅𝐢𝐱𝐞𝐝
@HaJFixed · 7,1222 posts@shortcuts (23)
@peanut · 912 posts𝗧𝗶𝗽𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 | 𝗠𝗮𝗳𝗶𝗮
@Tipster_Mafiaa · 15,9912 postsWinro.io
@winro_io · 8,6792 postsبنر گرلز
@Girl2GirlClub · 1371 postمحافظ
@letsfucka · 521 postزاپاس لیروس . ♥️
@LiROOS · 1,3001 postprompt 🤖 AI News
@prompt · 13,4161 postPartner Tarkett Swatch Surprise Stripping SmartLab ShoppingMalls Rowenta ParisFashion CesareAttolini
@tarkett · 3021 postمحافظ جنون
@Thedementia · 841 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 10
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 10
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@pinkCiggar named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 23 September 2026 – 24 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 23 August 2026 – 4 September 2026
named in 1 post, 4 November 2026 – 4 November 2026
named in 1 post, 3 November 2026 – 3 November 2026
named in 1 post, 28 October 2026 – 28 October 2026
named in 1 post, 15 October 2026 – 15 October 2026
named in 1 post, 9 October 2026 – 9 October 2026
named in 1 post, 5 October 2026 – 5 October 2026
named in 1 post, 5 September 2026 – 5 September 2026
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@WryVur · 143,561#1
@iDeathBirth · 269,232#2
@Rlighthere · 149,629#3
@starme69 · 254,549#4
@Amyraly · 40#5
@hawwne · 10,706#6
@idiewith · 183,744#7
@yourperfuumm · 57,660#8
@irobah · 23,687#9
@samepov · 51,617#10
@letskills · 83,575#11
@Lyricsteach · 40,428#12
@iciou · 288,915#13
@xbeus · 19,383#14
@spiiderclown · 16#15
@December0_3 · 29,547#16
@istarbeat · 23,013#17
@ZAPASYOUNG · 37,379#18
@itegirl · 604 (as read 6 September 2026)#19
@boobspider · 18,502#20
@Oopsmoods · 19,684#21
@RegaPlus · 1,508,709#22
@isoolatedw · 5,049#23
@MasteMaqmom · 26,016#24
@GaArea · 58,444#25
@sigwhar · 4,561#26
@titlimahiw · 12,074#27
@soogowu · 102,338#28
@x0505xi · 11#29
@rebccaghaderi · 281,586#30
@beautydepp · 6,862#31
@urstochange · 5,022#32
@mygirlfriendddd · 17,099#33
@Codeain · 348,592#34
@baacheeasli · 49,799#35
@iMTProto · 7,725,467#36
@shadesofthemoon · 1,524#37
@talllllllllllk · 74,642#38
@texspoweris · 3,846#39
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 565,940#40
@bedemure · 72#41
@YouBgo · 129,875#42
@TheGamepc · 116,845#43
@phtneh · 9,727#44
@injaneb_Bitab · 5,176#45
@ndanqbb · 60,829#46
@pedaretdiana · 48,550#47
@my_soul_21g · 1#48
@liwish · 178,285#49
@vinyvidzam · 60,069#50
@SaeidBaratpour · 91,467#51
@llbeelll · 29,542#52
@luminescenceofyourheart · 2,209#53
@Icouldnttellyou · 20,335#54
@parcasplaylist · 16,003#55
@crayingroom · 319,136#56
@Sickliy · 26,363#57
@iRoProxy · 7,990,706#58
@Lroic · 3,089#59
@baraop8 · 2,984#60
@rapking · 313,968#61
@royemaaah · 17,893#62
@explorextelegram · 76,613#63
@darkproxy · 4,574,975#64
@Hnule · 59,181#65
@Beustaa · 18,646#66
@okrra · 101,558#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MasteMaqmom · 26,016
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 September 2026
@afson_tel · 33,936
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 26 August 2026
@xFades · 144,097
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 15 August 2026
@im403error · 40,360
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
@iboseh · 48,551
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
@x0505xi · 11
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@havaliafkaram · 21,030
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 24 September 2026
@typingnotes · 69,975
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
@Hupelless · 79,991
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 August 2026
@dismaying · 139,735
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@iDeathBirth · 269,232
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@Oopsmoods · 19,684
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 30 September 2026
@Hug_org · 30,723
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 4 September 2026
@bedemure · 72
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
@yalitilmiss · 106,512
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@yourperfuumm · 57,660
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 22 August 2026
@offnot · 105,457
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@MIIIMSN · 186,969
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@minemetanoia · 111
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 25 August 2026
@Hnule · 59,181
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 August 2026
@DAARKKHEART · 126,623
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
@d_Rhyshkrdi · 118,243
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@Xunsent · 102,203
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 14 August 2026
@ifYouSense · 124
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 73 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سیگار صورتی” (@pinkCiggar), 31,288 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pinkCiggar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.