میخواستم حیاطو بشورم دیدم خیلی سرده موکول کردم فردا ظهر

Channel
𝐑𝐄𝐁𝐄𝐂𝐂𝐀𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐈
@rebccaghaderi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
281,928subscribers
+14,271 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001451985934 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rebccaghaderi |
| Description | به کانال تلگرام من خوش آمدید! 💕 ▶️ یوتوب: https://youtube.com/c/RebeccaGhaderi 📸 اینستاگرام: ناشناس من @RebeccaGhaderi_Unknown_bot چنل برندم RG https://t.me/Rebbecaghbrand - ربکا قادری |
| Created | 14 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rebccaghaderi |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:48 | 281,928 | -50 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:19 | 281,978 | -44 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:49 | 282,022 | +264 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:36 | 281,758 | +626 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:54 | 281,132 | +238 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:39 | 280,894 | +23 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 280,871 | +36 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:35 | 280,835 | +468 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 280,367 | +208 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:34 | 280,159 | -148 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 280,307 | +109 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 280,198 | +414 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:35 | 279,784 | -195 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 279,979 | -71 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 280,050 | +13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 280,037 | -116 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 07:29 | 280,153 | -129 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 280,282 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:14 | 280,285 | -8 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 280,293 | first reading |
Engagement
3,234 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.15%
- avg views ÷ 281,928 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 17,300
- 1,107 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1,110
- of 3,234 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3,234 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 19,201,808 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 01:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈41,700
- Videos
- ≈11,900
- Links
- ≈6,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 34s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 1,110 posts held from the last 30 days (0.27%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Photo, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
این کالکشن روحمو زنده کرد
😍🤭
Sticker, posted without a caption
بوی بهشت میده
برای تووووو میمیرممممممممم
عاشقشونم واقعا بهترینن
اینارم که تموم کردم دوباره جدید برداشتم
کمک به کاهش ظاهر چینوچروکهای ریز آبرسانی و نرمتر شدن پوست کمک به بهبود ظاهر پوست شل و خسته حاوی EGF، NAD و عصاره کلاژن
هر دوتاشم باید اول بزنی بعد بدنتو با اب بشوری
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,234 posts we hold for @rebccaghaderi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @rebccaghaderi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 18 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 18 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 12 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
?
- با هدبند40%
- بی هدبند63%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 October 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@yassikhatibi · 29,53115 postsRebca.sa
@Rebcasa · 2086 posts𝑬𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒃𝒛
@editerebzzz · 2795 postsتَلخ و شیرین¡° ایرانِ آزاد
@talkh_shirin61 · 95 posts❣️𝐑𝐄𝐁𝐄𝐂𝐂𝐀𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑❣️
@TestThatBotf · 4714 posts𝖱𝖦𝖢𝖸
@rebccacity · 1734 posts𝙍𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙘𝙖
@REBECCA_FATI · 2303 postsRG
@Rebbecaghbrand · 52,4023 postsورودی خلیج خوکها
@bay_ofpigs0 · 923 posts••𓏲𝐃𝐃𝐂𝐮𝐭𝐞🫀
@donyacute · 2363 posts①𝔈𝔡𝔦𝔦𝔱𝔬𝔯
@ediitori1 · 1042 postsDonya Dadrasan
@heyitsdonya · 16,1572 posts𝐑𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐜𝐚𝐆𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐢
@rebecaforever · 52 posts𝐑𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐜𝐚 𝐄𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐬🤍
@rebeccaworldd · 452 postsSara Amini (saraegram)
@saraegram · 13,1692 posts$"
@BlueNoir1 · 721 postیادداشتهایشِلبی.
@CallMeSamiShelby · 2,5391 postمحافظ پشت صحنه
@Mowj4_Tanz · 11 postMiNe🤍🥥
@QNIqXmWSoWllMzU0 · 7581 postRèb𝐋iora
@RebLiora · 3671 post𝐸𝒹𝒾𝓉𝑅𝑒𝒷𝑒𝒸𝒶
@RebecaaGh · 861 postᴇᴅɪᴛꜱᴛᴀʀ ֪⋆💕
@edittstar · 1911 postفلیم حسین
@foeflame · 65,7671 post𝑺𝒂𝒓𝒂 𝑲𝒂𝒃𝒊𝒓𝒊
@sarakabirii · 42,3501 post𝙫𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙖 𝙢𝙤𝙤𝙙
@vanilla_Dailyy · 1401 postژیکــان
@zhikan_128 · 3111 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@edirebecca · 4,74712 posts𝐒𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞
@Dreamaaa8 · 3,17011 posts𝑮𝒐𝒅
@LoveGod77 · 1,3169 posts𓆩 𝐑𝐄𝐁𝐄𝐂𝐂𝐀 𝐏𝐈𝐍𝐊𝐈 𓆪
@rebecca_pinki · 1,1229 postsYassikhatibi
@yassikhatibi · 29,5319 posts𝑀𝓎 𝐹𝒶𝓂𝒾𝓁𝓎
@MyFamilyyy00 · 7137 posts𝑵𝒐𝑻𝒐𝒑𝒊𝒄
@NoTopicTalks · 4,0177 posts①𝔈𝔡𝔦𝔦𝔱𝔬𝔯
@ediitori1 · 1044 posts𝒱𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖾
@yasilyona · 1754 posts𝐑𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐜𝐚 𝐄𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐬🤍
@rebeccaworldd · 453 postsSara Amini (saraegram)
@saraegram · 13,1693 postsEthereal✨🖤
@parigane · 2292 posts𝑺𝒂𝒓𝒂 𝑲𝒂𝒃𝒊𝒓𝒊
@sarakabirii · 42,3502 postsSepideh (sepitips)
@sepitips · 11,0652 posts𝖠 𝗉𝗂𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗆𝖾
@APOM_y · 451 postMemoa
@Memoa2025 · 4391 post𝐸𝒹𝒾𝓉𝑅𝑒𝒷𝑒𝒸𝒶
@RebecaaGh · 861 post🩰ྀི 𝑅𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 ౨ৎ
@Rebeccalland · 211 post𝗔𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘂𝘀
@aliferous_editw · 5131 post𝐀𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐚 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐢 🎙♡
@anita_natalini · 17,7481 post"بهجزتو"
@bejjozto · 311 postEliw💄
@eliwdlw8 · 1251 postFerovaal
@ferovaal · 124,2671 postgroucci girl
@grouccigirl · 4,9781 post𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗮
@languorapv · 2421 post 𝑀𝐴𝑅𝐼𝐸𝐻 𝑀𝐼𝑅
@mariehmim · 15,6011 postnovan
@novanmusic · 60,6591 postRebecca Diary✨
@rebeccavibe · 301 post𝗬𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶✨
@yasiiipinki · 991 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@edirebecca · 4,7474 postsزندگی در لحظه
@sunnesa · 1524 posts𝐒𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞
@Dreamaaa8 · 3,1702 posts𝑬𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒃𝒛
@editerebzzz · 2792 posts𝑮𝒐𝒅
@LoveGod77 · 1,3162 postsMemoa
@Memoa2025 · 4392 posts𝐑𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐜𝐚 𝐄𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐬🤍
@rebeccaworldd · 452 postsفِرمێسک✨
@fermiskvibe · 5221 post𝙍𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙘𝙖
@REBECCA_FATI · 2301 postRebecca Diary✨
@rebeccavibe · 301 postwhatsmusicbot
@whatsmusicbot · 1,104,7191 post𝗬𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶✨
@yasiiipinki · 991 post𝒱𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖾
@yasilyona · 1751 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@rebccaghaderi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@RegaPlus · 1,506,654#1
@pedaretdiana · 48,550#2
@vinyvidzam · 60,148#3
@rapking · 314,031#4
@llfreak · 228,889#5
@rainsaw444 · 14,899#6
@bawranamm · 142,388#7
@parmidamamaghani · 39,889#8
@SeviHopss · 15,299#9
@ParsTwt · 531,821#10
@he1iyaa · 49,417#11
@talllllllllllk · 74,769#12
@sogangyt · 82,969#13
@WryVur · 143,476#14
@istarbeat · 23,001#15
@usychannel · 19,142#16
@idiewith · 6#17
@RegaLeakShit · 41,000#18
@thedelfam · 5,637#19
@annakxqq · 19,247#20
@lifeofahavij · 19,210#21
@darkproxy · 4,584,008#22
@niktamokhtariii · 6,003#23
@spiiderclown · 105,435#24
@mahshidyonesi · 1,920#25
@zedlieeee · 40,767#26
@diyyaanaa · 3,137#27
@boobspider · 18,487#28
@Amyraly · 40#29
@bymehrab · 7,270#30
@iRoProxy · 7,981,620#31
@yassikhatibi · 29,531#32
@urcloudi2222 · 77,817#33
@ashkan_kagan · 119,216#34
@letskills · 83,620#35
@YouBgo · 130,472#36
@samepov · 51,464#37
@mariehmim · 15,601#38
@iMTProto · 7,718,952#39
@hamclasixii · 101#40
@Lyricsteach · 40,375#41
@Codeain · 348,501#42
@anneaas · 11,482#43
@Neginworkout · 6,743#44
@nightwatchmannn · 1,321#45
@HipHopTweety · 263,909#46
@xbeus · 19,302#47
@Beustaa · 18,643#48
@staw999 · 47,598#49
@Aliztory · 162,310#50
@TH3EME · 220,027#51
@proxy_qavi · 3,265,583#52
@bynusha · 2,565#53
@afshartikk · 132,890#54
@KhalafNama · 14,455#55
@cs30chanel · 366 (as read 10 August 2026)#56
@iDeathBirth · 29#57
@honeeyami · 10,348#58
@rapcity · 82,301#59
@marychanelll · 5,162 (as read 10 August 2026)#60
@lotfiMGMT · 6,316#61
@crayingroom · 315,585#62
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@usychannel · 19,142
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 29 September 2026
@parmidamamaghani · 39,889
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 29 August 2026
@he1iyaa · 49,417
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
@sogangyt · 82,969
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@qazalopal · 18,804
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 30 September 2026
@sunmtji · 32,454
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 7 September 2026
@khotaaan · 32,002
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@faaaltaroot6145 · 43,938
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
@ghazallchanel · 50,707
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 August 2026
@Absurdwolrd · 67,981
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
@Ashi_ley · 200,198
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
@peripatetiicc · 19,180
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 October 2026
@haparooutt · 33,983
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
@mahdiehbagheri14 · 35,704
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 31 August 2026
@stayeshmortzvi · 26,286
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
@mehrnvzzz · 30,476
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 2 September 2026
@sajjad_abtahi1 · 44,995
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
@setayeshhwj · 160,272
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 25 August 2026
@talllllllllllk · 74,769
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 21 August 2026
@lifeofahavij · 19,210
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 September 2026
@yassikhatibi · 29,531
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 September 2026
@saharhoseiinii · 69,909
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 August 2026
@soogowu · 101,838
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 17 August 2026
@pedaretdiana · 48,550
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 236 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ 𝐑𝐄𝐁𝐄𝐂𝐂𝐀𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐈” (@rebccaghaderi), 281,928 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rebccaghaderi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.