خوابگاه با چیت چتای هلی💖🎀✨

Channel
He1iya
@he1iyaa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,396subscribers
+2,312 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001480903467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @he1iyaa |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/he1iyaa |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:46 | 49,396 | -7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:59 | 49,403 | -14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:47 | 49,417 | -18 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:27 | 49,435 | -16 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:40 | 49,451 | -14 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:36 | 49,465 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 49,466 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:11 | 49,465 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 49,470 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 49,474 | -27 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:36 | 49,501 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 49,505 | -21 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 49,526 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 49,531 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:55 | 49,537 | -31 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 49,568 | -36 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 49,604 | -21 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 49,625 | +2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:28 | 49,623 | +3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:51 | 49,620 | first reading |
Engagement
1,248 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.4%
- avg views ÷ 49,396 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12,500
- 134 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 134
- of 1,248 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,248 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,680,210 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈14,300
- Videos
- ≈2,870
- Links
- ≈3,960
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 20m 20s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 74 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 134 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
چند روزه داستانیی که میگی انگار نشونس برای من یکی همون داستان دکتر چون من خیلی غصه میخورم برای کنکورم و یکی ام اسم کرکتر امروز که ( هستی ) بود .... خلاصه که مرسی ازت ... با مامانم نگاه میکنیم چیت چتارو❤❤❤
همههه میدونن دیگه هلی و چیت چت و..... 💖💞
🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
دوربینم خراب شده رفته تعمیر💔
هلیااا ی نظری داشتم راجب چیت چتتتت مرسی ک هر روز میزاری ولی فک کنم دوربینی ک باهاش ویدیو میگیری رو تغییر دادی خیلی صورتتو بلوری میکنه و اصن اون حس صمیمیته رو بهم نمیده بخاطر جایی که میشینی هم میشه عین چند روز پیشا بگیری ک رو مبل بودی و اون حس کوزی بودنه رو میداد و با همون دوربین؟ خیلی حس خوبی میته بهمم
Love u هلی🥹🧚🏻♀️💕🪄
https://youtu.be/t6XX9zmNXc4?is=kdvu1Yj1Abxx5XOs
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Photo, posted without a caption
بامزه نیست؟ حالا بعدی کیه😂
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,248 posts we hold for @he1iyaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @he1iyaa as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 10 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 25 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
چیت چت هر روز؟ + محتوای دیگه. یعنی گاهی روزی دوتا ویدیو داشته باشیم!
- اره85%
- نه16%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 13 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@abcdettttttttt · 5551 postBOY “57”
@alirezaradfarrr · 10,2951 postB
@bnieeo · 1931 postCommentiat | کامنتیات
@Comentiat · 666,1841 postdéjà vu
@ddejavyou · 1131 postDelakyo🫧
@delarammir09 · 771 postفالوده🍧
@falode_fff · 18,1401 post𝘍𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘏𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤
@FashionHolicm · 5051 post𝐆𝐙𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐌
@gzllammm · 43,1201 postHASTI
@hasstiz09 · 531 postHipHop NoCap
@HipHopNoCap · 8521 post𝟓𝟓𝟓
@kia9aa · 261 postLuna shop میکاپ بگ
@Luna_mkh · 8091 postMiash🪽
@minashmlll · 1411 postNij🦢
@nanaaaii11 · 891 post𝑴𝒆:)
@Notebook_A · 2971 postکتابهایی که باید بخونیم
@ocbooks · 324,3281 postPrivate
@samapvvvver · 2,0001 postS H A D A N
@shadan_tune · 2271 postsilent|glow
@sileNtglow3 · 321 post𝖲𝗎𝗇 𝓝
@sunnazn · 1241 postTrap Farsi
@TrapeFarsi · 47,8551 postRM
@whosmiya01 · 1,2961 postWarRoom with YASHAR
@withyashar · 520,1571 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 6
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 6
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@he1iyaa named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 18 August 2026 – 20 August 2026 · confirmed gone 30 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 2 posts, 15 August 2026 – 16 August 2026 · confirmed gone 31 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 2 posts, 15 August 2026 – 16 August 2026 · confirmed gone 25 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 31 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 4 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@rebccaghaderi · 281,837#1
@parmidamamaghani · 39,845#2
@vinyvidzam · 60,129#3
@usychannel · 19,101#4
@diyyaanaa · 3,137#5
@sogangyt · 82,896#6
@pedaretdiana · 48,550#7
@lifeofahavij · 19,198#8
@paareeaa · 8,358#9
@starme69 · 254,549#10
@poobon_tel · 41,186#11
@rainsaw444 · 14,842#12
@niktamokhtariii · 5,976#13
@wadafakkk · 7,071#14
@putakk · 219,665#15
@Ersalihatun · 139,548 (as read 26 August 2026)#16
@Koooriwantons · 434#17
@yassikhatibi · 29,485#18
@RegaPlus · 1,508,709#19
@ashkan_kagan · 119,437#20
@rapking · 313,945#21
@residambetashh · 55,712#22
@Neginworkout · 6,747#23
@iRoProxy · 7,988,659#24
@rapcity · 82,315#25
@HipHopTweety · 270,363#26
@kamand_fnd · 15,064#27
@koorosh_wanton · 290#28
@iMTProto · 7,723,502#29
@YouBgo · 129,875#30
@samepov · 51,515#31
@wantonstor · 2,018#32
@llfreak · 228,328#33
@ParsTwt · 533,575#34
@letskills · 83,575#35
@mexxyoux · 11#36
@rxiran_pack · 172#37
@wts_ir · 1,321#38
@Beustaa · 18,646#39
@istarbeat · 23,013#40
@RapBad_Newz · 245,264#41
@MakeYourCharacter · 112,223#42
@itsmarrisa · 5,195#43
@Codeain · 348,667#44
@Lyricsteach · 40,407#45
@yacitchannel · 17,823#46
@behniyaabt · 5,568#47
@MBTIV · 18,095#48
@mirosslight · 271#49
@hip_hopi · 362,661#50
@amirmohammadFASHI · 2,417#51
@TweetyChannel · 824,489#52
@razcom · 1,218,660#53
@GossipGirlvibe · 743#54
@bikemirossgame · 239#55
@TheGamepc · 116,845#56
@yegansdaily · 13,959#57
@sadafsoltaani · 1,847#58
@KhalafNama · 14,423#59
@raptv · 393,598#60
@White_feelingg · 6,029#61
@TheFrisky · 2,181#62
@koorowshOfficial · 105,206#63
@ArmanMiladiMusic · 1,759#64
@wantonsamor · 1,443#65
@marychanelll · 5,085 (as read 26 August 2026)#66
@crayingroom · 319,136#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@anita_natalini · 17,740
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 September 2026
@usychannel · 19,101
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 29 September 2026
@parmidamamaghani · 39,845
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 29 August 2026
@yassikhatibi · 29,485
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 September 2026
@rebccaghaderi · 281,837
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
@rahaawts · 18,595
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 October 2026
@Absurdwolrd · 67,948
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
@khotaaan · 31,971
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@residambetashh · 55,712
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
@papillonisam · 18,699
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 October 2026
@koorowshOfficial · 105,206
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“He1iya” (@he1iyaa), 49,396 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/he1iyaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.