حرومزاده داستانو از اونجایی تعریف میکنه که تو صبرت تموم شده بود.

Channel
تراپیست
@Rlighthere
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
136,799subscribers
+1,932 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001845982857 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rlighthere |
| Description | شرابی مثل رنگ لبات. 140k.....🏊.....130k تبلیغات: https://t.me/tbtherapist/3 ناشناس: http://t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=297880955 گپ حمایتیمون https://t.me/terafikhb |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rlighthere |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 136,799 | +104 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 136,695 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 136,700 | +28 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 136,672 | -93 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 136,765 | +265 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 136,500 | +431 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 136,069 | +500 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 135,569 | +108 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 135,461 | +57 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 135,404 | +25 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 135,379 | +265 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 135,114 | -66 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 135,180 | +245 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 134,935 | +68 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 134,867 | first reading |
Engagement
102 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.3%
- avg views ÷ 136,799 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 33,200
- 102 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 102
- of 102 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 102 (28 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,391,043 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 490
- Videos
- 70
- Links
- 483
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
موزیک ویدیو مسیج تلگرامی کی میخواست؟ منبعش اینجاس
Video message, posted without a caption
امروز 22 August، روز جهانی فرشتههاست.
New
Video message, posted without a caption
از جمله نیازمندی های هر آدمی:
به مامانت بگو شام درست نکنه، چون عادت کردی گوه مارو بخوری.
دیساش از دیسای مامانمم قویتر بود🤣🤣🤣
ک*یرم تو مرده و زندت
از هرچی شانس نیاوردم از دوست صمیمی واقعا شانس آوردم.
امروز 21 August، روز جهانیِ بلاک کردنه.
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @Rlighthere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
وضعیت؟
- کنکور دارم16%
- ندارم85%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 9,280 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@amirhoseiynghiasi · 20,4107 postsPony.💤
@pony_Zz · 1162 postsEdge of Dreams
@afroxdit · 4591 post-𝘔𝘦^᪲
@asalo021 · 2001 post🌶
@aydmjjooee · 1721 postBlue🪼
@Blue0_086 · 311 postBlue Hour
@Blue_Hourr · 701 postInner Universe
@bluehair17 · 2621 post𝕭𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖓𝖌
@Boring666u · 161 post-𝐸🪼
@Elina_0_core · 811 post𝑳𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝒊𝒏 𝑫𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎𝒔💤
@Ellililin720 · 8131 postM,
@fafaerio · 1311 postG
@fiendgu · 831 postNo Hiller
@HillerHill · 8051 postجوانه زخمی🖤🥀
@javanehzakhmi · 371 post..KRTX..
@KRTX123 · 2671 postla flame
@laflaaaa · 42,1371 postL-D
@liyana_1 · 881 post𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧
@Maximuss193 · 1291 postwho?
@meandwho5 · 6,6851 postNemo🤍
@mee_youuuuu · 1231 postMe<3
@meitarkati · 1521 postMy playlist
@momo878i · 1451 post͛ 𝟳𝟲𝟬𝟬¸
@NettSouls · 211 post𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗘
@Parvanehasli · 120,4591 postقِـشا؏
@Sahebdelllll · 751 postₛₐₙ Fᵣₐₙcᵢₛcₒ Gₒ
@sanfransisgo · 2921 post𝗧𝗥𝟯𝗫 𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗗🦖
@TR3X_LAND · 2691 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@mexxyoux · 100,400#1
@WryVur · 135,370#2
@idiewith · 8#3
@xbeus · 19,174#4
@yourperfuumm · 61,397#5
@December0_3 · 28,068#6
@letskills · 71,330#7
@istarbeat · 24,693#8
@iDeathBirth · 81#9
@coucoa · 104,678#10
@Amyraly · 115,853#11
@Lyricsteach · 40,896#12
@samepov · 46,244#13
@iciou · 264,810#14
@spiiderclown · 10#15
@minemetanoia · 4#16
@sigwhar · 4,567#17
@Xunsent · 113,125#18
@irobah · 22,418#19
@hawwne · 10,358 (as read 13 August 2026)#20
@boobspider · 19,554#21
@pinkCiggar · 31,553#22
@beautydepp · 7,419#23
@titlimahiw · 11,238#24
@isoolatedw · 5,384#25
@royemaaah · 17,653#26
@RegaPlus · 1,452,660#27
@texspoweris · 3,826#28
@phtneh · 8,930 (as read 13 August 2026)#29
@ZAPASYOUNG · 34,723#30
@rebccaghaderi · 268,735#31
@my_soul_21g · 72,353#32
@urstochange · 4,740#33
@TheGamepc · 105,831#34
@GaArea · 51,445#35
@iMTProto · 7,464,691#36
@injaneb_Bitab · 5,562#37
@MasteMaqmom · 26,407#38
@baacheeasli · 42,640#39
@ndanqbb · 5#40
@darkproxy · 4,918,871#41
@shadesofthemoon · 1,655#42
@talllllllllllk · 63,931#43
@pedaretdiana · 49,488#44
@YouBgo · 101,797#45
@Neustaaa · 18,628#46
@yegansdaily · 13,211#47
@skarlet_pab · 2,595 (as read 13 August 2026)#48
@SaeidBaratpour · 89,885#49
@initiatur · 188,246#50
@Codeain · 334,516#51
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 524,611#52
@Sickliy · 32,468#53
@parcasplaylist · 15,139#54
@crayingroom · 288,276#55
@MakeYourCharacter · 112,848#56
@iRoProxy · 7,865,368#57
@meandwho5 · 6,685#58
@meowmbti · 26#59
@baraop8 · 3,325 (as read 13 August 2026)#60
@explorextelegram · 79,792#61
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@yourperfuumm · 61,397
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 22 August 2026
@HotHoom69 · 78,735
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 August 2026
@xFades · 34
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 15 August 2026
@typingnotes · 71,533
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
@iLoveisOurs · 101,039
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
@Senariochanell · 188,992
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 August 2026
@SaeidBaratpour · 89,885
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 August 2026
@x0505xi · 103,789
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@dismaying · 133,462
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@Xunsent · 113,125
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 14 August 2026
@Hupelless · 84,356
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 August 2026
@MIIIMSN · 130,198
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@ppaaranoya · 75,576
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 19 August 2026
@perapranol · 93,577
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 August 2026
@iDeathBirth · 81
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@d_Rhyshkrdi · 115,384
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@RezZonez · 150,536
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026
@stormheree · 74,061
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
@bedemure · 60
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
@Gangstersdonotcry · 153,087
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 13 August 2026
@offnot · 107,480
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@DAARKKHEART · 121,279
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
@coucoa · 104,678
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
@iciou · 264,810
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 57 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تراپیست” (@Rlighthere), 136,799 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rlighthere.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.