دیگه شیر کاکائو نمیخورم😭😐چون…

Channel
دانش آموز :
@danshamuz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
81,088subscribers
-2,633 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001496824411 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @danshamuz |
| Description | اینجا پاتوق دانشآموزاست 😌❤️ من: @MeofMe_bot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2019 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/danshamuz |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 81,088 | -203 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 81,291 | -104 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 81,395 | -101 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:53 | 81,496 | -133 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 81,629 | -85 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 81,714 | -67 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 81,781 | -65 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 81,846 | -48 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 81,894 | -61 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 81,955 | -74 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 82,029 | -92 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 82,121 | -161 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 82,282 | -181 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 82,463 | -194 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 82,657 | -105 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 82,762 | -69 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 82,831 | -77 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 82,908 | -98 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 83,006 | -95 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 83,101 | first reading |
Engagement
375 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.81%
- avg views ÷ 81,088 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,470
- 287 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.62%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 287
- of 375 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 143 of 287 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 375 (3 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 421,289 |
| Reactions total | 4,942 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 12:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈13,200
- Videos
- ≈3,960
- Links
- ≈406
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 23m 08s
- Average length
- 32s
Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,285 reactions across 169 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,359 | 37.5% | |
| 🤣 | 1,695 | 27.0% | |
| 👍 | 1,206 | 19.2% | |
| 💔 | 854 | 13.6% | |
| 👎 | 171 | 2.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 180 of the 375 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,285 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 375 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ذهن من : عه شیرکاکائو خریده برام حتما دوستم داره ولی واقعیت : عهههه شل شدم که چرا دارم اینجوری میشم جلو این پسره
وای تازه فهمیدم چرا شیرکاکائو به خورد دوست دختراتون میدین:) کثافتا😐
موقعیت من و اِکس بیشرفم وقتی هر بار که میرفتم پیشش شیر کاکائو به خوردم میداد ، منم میدیدما هعی دارم شل میشمم ولی خب از کجا بدونم ، تازه الان فهمیدم اون شیرکاکائو برا چی بوده ؛ کیان هر جا هستی بدون خیلیییی پست فطرتی ؛ اگه دوس پسر توام هعی شیر کاکائو به خوردت میده پس بیا برو دلیلش و از اینجا بخون ؛ یه چیزایی از اینجا فهمیده ام که تو این ۲۴ سال عمرم حتی به ذهنمم خطور نکرده بود : @Etelaateomoomi 🌱
پیک می آکادمیک @Danshamuz
🤣7
کار پاره وقت دانشجویی با حقوق بالا @daramd
بقیه اینجا دارن پول پارو میکنن اونوقت تو داری چَت میکنی فقط! @Daramd
دنبال شغل خوب در منزلی؟! بیا اینجا بین ۵ تا ۱۵ میلیون درمیاری : @Daramd
سلام بچه ها چند نفرتون دنبال کار مجازی و ادمینی و... بودید و بهم پیام دادید. این کانال رو داشته باشید، شاید به دردتون بخوره و جایگزین خوبی برای کسب درامد باشه🌱 @daramad
تو افسرده نیستی فقط دستت تو جیب خودت نیست! تو افسرده نیستی فقط پول درنمیاری که هرچی بخوای بخری و بتونی بری تفریح و عشق و حال! تو افسرده نیستی فقط هنوز کانال زیر و نداری که یه حقوق بالا داشته باشی : @darmad
بچهها چندتا فروشنده تلفنی میخوام کارش سخت نیست خودم بهتون آموزش میدم حقوقش هم خوبه بین 10-20میلیون درماهه اگه بینتون کسی هست که به کار علاقمنده بیاید اینجا تا جزئیات کار رو براتون توضیح بدم: @AdminiAmoozesh
@Danshamuz
👍10
Showing the 12 most recent of 375 posts we hold for @danshamuz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@winro_io · 15,97720 postsکانال اطلاع رسانی دربی بت
@derbybetm · 325,31714 postsمل بت
@melbet_chaneel · 49,3045 postsمحافظ الف ( بیا چنل اصلی )
@Allef · 1242 postsشاتولی :
@Shatoli · 17,1822 postsهوش مصنوعی | ChatGPT
@Ai_FreeRoBot · 120,3201 post@Comment of the day
@comment · 3041 postقاب گوشی 📱🤳💗
@Ghab_Center · 5,8451 postGirlsss
@Girlstweet · 1271 postلوکس شو
@Lux_Show · 721 postDownloader +
@MyDLPlusBot · 84,0181 post🚔
@OKBUT · 431 postTwitt
@Twitt · 5381 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 10
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 10
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@danshamuz named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 1 September 2026 – 1 September 2026
named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 – 1 September 2026
named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 – 1 September 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hamclasixii · 41#1
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 964,248#2
@iRoProxy · 7,896,307#3
@iMTProto · 7,484,600#4
@TweetyChannel · 785,953#5
@Ersalihatun · 140,005 (as read 18 August 2026)#6
@drtel · 770,403#7
@UnNurmal · 545,981#8
@madrese_official · 165#9
@Daneshjoo · 354,076#10
@proxydaemi · 1,756,552#11
@Radiokocsher · 909,632#12
@Danshjuyar · 59,963#13
@chekhabarre · 246,501#14
@ir_javan · 634,038#15
@ParsTwt · 513,947#16
@officialpersiatwiter · 567,789#17
@proxy_qavi · 3,453,557#18
@RegaLeakShit · 42,651#19
@EfshaKhabar · 280,095#20
@ParalWorld · 235,571#21
@moallemannews · 326,685#22
@YouBgo · 100,708#23
@letskills · 81,361#24
@alonews · 926,319#25
@okhtapooous · 1,088,120#26
@SeMeej · 30,371#27
@akh_mam · 185,213#28
@kosinuse · 178,277#29
@Maagas · 670,903#30
@meowmbti · 44,457#31
@twite_hub · 142,025#32
@madre3_irani · 48,428#33
@vinyvidzam · 62,883#34
@BadCandom · 621,045#35
@Herochnl · 359,487#36
@tweet_Khabari · 645,312#37
@Ruzmaregi · 32,319#38
@ouriran · 255,764#39
@RegaPlus · 1,463,288#40
@futballbadtv · 323,491#41
@Comentive · 204,502#42
@rapking · 307,017#43
@SportBaadNews · 928,395#44
@bistodo · 391,229#45
@kianaafr · 400,696#46
@Comentiat · 382,974#47
@CottageOrg · 811,447#48
@FutballBadBoys · 107,081#49
@vaarzesh_plus · 323,988#50
@MemeHubOriginal · 98,981#51
@razcom · 1,237,225#52
@hip_hopi · 273,504#53
@darkproxy · 4,817,504#54
@varzesh3 · 1,294,838#55
@funhiphop · 225,927#56
@RapGodNews · 176,191#57
@meme_ol_ski · 222,822#58
@Barca_We · 165,745#59
@RapBad_Newz · 278,477#60
@CommentMelat · 272,863#61
@raptv · 378,023#62
@Myporoxy · 4,487,728#63
@EsteghlalFc_We · 140,111#64
@MARIZMEDIA · 57,458#65
@SportBadTweet · 144,656#66
@MakeYourCharacter · 113,270#67
@Realmadrid_we · 133,682#68
@FUTBALLI18 · 488,214#69
@shark_meme · 63,860#70
@TheoryTopia · 69,390#71
@classicthemes · 445,144#72
@Afkar · 1,020,917#73
@mexxyoux · 97,888#74
@roidbest · 1,651,782#75
@RapPlusNews · 87,743#76
@animotionart · 497,902#77
@samepov · 47,412#78
@irproxy · 1,285,388#79
@NPROXY · 2,448,015#80
@HipHopTweety · 201,708#81
@proxymtproto · 11,950,489#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Danshjuyar · 59,963
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@madre3_irani · 48,428
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
@Daneshjoo · 354,076
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@My_Madrese · 245,985
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
@madrese_official · 165
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@Foodatun · 43,665
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026
@Timetowedding · 1,127
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 August 2026
@UnNurmal · 545,981
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 August 2026
@Doneshjoo · 80,858
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 964,248
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@faxtheory · 58,906
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
@iToxicNews · 156,702
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 4 September 2026
@ideaa_day · 84,178
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
@acalchnll · 31,207
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
@School_Reall · 127,901
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
@Ruzmaregi · 32,319
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 5 September 2026
@kharkhon_class · 60,754
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
@salamkonkurii · 126,905
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
@Twittbad · 113,977
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
@DrFunyTel · 33,247
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
@bemolake · 106,364
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
@Twitter_Persiann · 320,539
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@hamclasixii · 41
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@Akhbare_madrs · 435,302
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 112 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دانش آموز : ” (@danshamuz), 81,088 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danshamuz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.