Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
47 measurements spanning 77 days, net -17,892. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,604–75,988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 01:31
55,398
-143
23 Oct 2026, 00:57
55,541
-144
21 Oct 2026, 23:57
55,685
-174
20 Oct 2026, 21:49
55,859
-137
19 Oct 2026, 17:10
55,996
-157
18 Oct 2026, 19:47
56,153
-267
17 Oct 2026, 16:47
56,420
+85
16 Oct 2026, 13:31
56,335
+207
15 Oct 2026, 14:00
56,128
+452
14 Oct 2026, 11:01
55,676
+374
12 Oct 2026, 18:27
55,302
-702
8 Oct 2026, 06:59
56,004
-693
3 Oct 2026, 15:55
56,697
-1,304
24 Sept 2026, 21:21
58,001
-915
18 Sept 2026, 14:42
58,916
-384
16 Sept 2026, 04:39
59,300
-322
14 Sept 2026, 08:19
59,622
-242
12 Sept 2026, 19:59
59,864
-335
10 Sept 2026, 22:38
60,199
-555
8 Sept 2026, 00:37
60,754
first reading
Engagement
545 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 141 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.198%
avg views ÷ 55,398 subscribers
Avg views / post
110
131 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
131
of 545 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 131 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held
545 (5 August 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total
14,347
Reactions total
45
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Oct 2026, 10:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
42m 50s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
498 reactions across 160 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
164
32.9%
❤
94
18.9%
👍
75
15.1%
💔
51
10.2%
🤯
20
4.02%
😢
16
3.21%
😁
15
3.01%
🔥
12
2.41%
😭
8
1.61%
👏
7
1.41%
👎
5
1.00%
🤨
4
0.803%
🤬
4
0.803%
🥴
4
0.803%
🍌
3
0.602%
😐
3
0.602%
🤔
3
0.602%
🥰
3
0.602%
🤡
2
0.402%
✍
1
0.201%
4 further kinds
4
0.803%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 545 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 498 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 545 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖥 رتبهات رو وارد کن، شانس قبولیت رو در هر رشته و دانشگاه، در کمتر از چند ثانیه محاسبه کن 🔍
📊 قابل اعتماد و مبتنی بر کارنامههای واقعی (براساس اخرین دیتاها)
👨🦱 آزمون های شخصیت شناسی و روانشناسی
🔄 استفاده رایگان از فرم تخمین👇
@zankoplusVIP_bot
@zankoplusVIP_bot
🔴 داستان آرش محمدی؛ پسری که از مهر شروع کرد و رتبه 1 آورد...
1️⃣ منابعی که اگه نداشتم موفق نمیشدم
2️⃣ چه مباحثی رو خوندم و چیا حذف کردم
3️⃣ آزمون هایی که زدم...
😐 راز جهش سریع درصدای کنکورم :)
عکس اتاق مطالعه آرش محمدی:) با چه امکاناتی درس میخونده💸♥️
Signed خسروپناه
Showing the 12 most recent of 545 posts we hold for @kharkhon_class. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@kharkhon_class named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@takhmin_taraz_bot named in 2 posts, 31 August 2026 – 3 September 2026
@kharkhon_classs named in 2 posts, 14 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
معین کرمی سالیانه 1406 @mobodars · 86,452 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
کلاهبرداران کنکور @konkor1404_scam · 96,130 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
اخبار کنکوری / خبر درسی @khabrDRSI · 87,140 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 August 2026
نهایی زبان قریشی دهم یازدهم دوازدهم @siewi · 41,447 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
سوالات کنکور @azmonnnnii · 65,175 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
شیمی پارسا فراهانی @parsa_farahani00 · 144,809 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
emtnaha @emtnaha · 1 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
سلام کنکوری 1406 @salamkonkurii · 116,609 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
زیست فرهمندنیا و خیراندیش 1406 @zist_farahmandd · 74,960 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خرخون کلاس|kharkhon class” (@kharkhon_class), 55,398 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kharkhon_class.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.