Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
6.6 average views per post against 29,813 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.022%. Across the 5,544 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.78% and 12.9%, with a median of 6.37%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (26 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Posts measured
480 of 480 published in the window (480 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
3,172
Mature posts only
0.042% over 35 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 25 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 49 days, net -5,470. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,993–36,104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 11:19
29,813
-520
17 Sept 2026, 06:18
30,333
-150
15 Sept 2026, 04:21
30,483
-70
13 Sept 2026, 16:38
30,553
-138
11 Sept 2026, 18:15
30,691
-162
9 Sept 2026, 03:40
30,853
-242
5 Sept 2026, 21:01
31,095
-194
3 Sept 2026, 19:01
31,289
-107
2 Sept 2026, 13:03
31,396
-57
1 Sept 2026, 15:13
31,453
-94
31 Aug 2026, 12:08
31,547
-93
30 Aug 2026, 13:14
31,640
-101
29 Aug 2026, 16:02
31,741
-99
28 Aug 2026, 15:27
31,840
-128
27 Aug 2026, 13:44
31,968
-130
26 Aug 2026, 11:54
32,098
-128
25 Aug 2026, 11:32
32,226
-168
24 Aug 2026, 08:47
32,394
-334
22 Aug 2026, 16:16
32,728
-745
21 Aug 2026, 06:03
33,473
first reading
Engagement
735 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.022%
avg views ÷ 29,813 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.6
478 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
478
of 735 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
735 (5 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
3,166
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 20:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈15,000
Videos
≈14
Links
≈18,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
53s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
31 reactions across 31 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
31
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 735 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 735 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#سالیانه_زیستجامع_فرهمندنیا_1406
➕سالیانه فرهمندنیا
💬 جلسات اصلی
جلسه 00 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 01- ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 01 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 02 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 03 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 04 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 05 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه مروری ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 06 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 07 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 08 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 09 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 101 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 10 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 11 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 12 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه 13 ←[ دریافت ]
جلسه …
Showing the 12 most recent of 735 posts we hold for @tiire_konkor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tiire_konkor named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@takhmin_taraz named in 2 posts, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026
@nahayi11_bot named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
@nahayi12_bot named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
@takhminr_bot named in 1 post, 23 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
آکادمی افرا | فرهنگیان و انسانی @AFRA_ACADMY · 16,838#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کلاسینو 1406| Clasino @clasiino · 50,952 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
زیست فرهمندنیا 1405 @Farahmandniiy · 71,987 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
تاملند رایگان | Tamland @Tamlund · 32,515 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 September 2026
نهایی ریاضی کرمی دهم یازدهم دوازدهم @fjgec · 32,857 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
نهایی فیزیک یحیوی دهم یازدهم دوازدهم @wsgyg · 28,479 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
دیجی کلاس @DiGi_CLASSS · 508,771 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
سالیانه زبان قریشی | 1406 @Livekonkore · 23,070 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
نهایی فیزیک قضاتی @sgucp · 37,318 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
ریاضی معین کرمی 1406 @riyazi_Karamiii · 75,629 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
✧ جامع لایو | دوازدهم ✧ @JameLiive · 23,703 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
پک کنکوری نهایی @PremiumVIPPack · 56,053 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
رسـانـه ڪـنـڪـورے | 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐞 • @resaneh_darsi · 61,378 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
طرح درس 1406 @tarhdaars1403 · 25,307 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
زیست فرهمندنیا @Turbo_Tamlland · 73,303 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
فیلم کنکوری ناب @filmnub2 · 64,342 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
تاملند/کلاسینو @nahaey_tarmim · 38,647 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
گروه آموزشی ماز @Teste_Talaei · 72,063 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
معین کرمی سالیانه 1406 @mobodars · 81,264 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
یِ همکلاسی @YeHamClasi · 120,833 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
خرخون کلاس|kharkhon class @kharkhon_class · 58,001 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
زیست عمارلو 1406 @zistaamarloo · 67,788 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
فرمول 20 بیست کتاب نهایی جزوه @KTBTE · 76,045 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
فیلم کنکوری رایگان @koonekoor03 · 70,813 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
کلاسینو @nahay_exam · 62,708 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تایر کنکور | Tire konkor” (@tiire_konkor), 29,813 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tiire_konkor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.