Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views and reactions moved apart
On 104 of the 976 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0223 reactions per view.
Each interval, as we read it — views and reactions before and after
Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 7 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net -63,861. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,307,152–1,558,276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 20:50
1,417,698
-3,487
5 Nov 2026, 21:19
1,421,185
-2,822
5 Nov 2026, 00:10
1,424,007
-2,981
3 Nov 2026, 22:57
1,426,988
-3,151
3 Nov 2026, 02:18
1,430,139
-3,387
1 Nov 2026, 22:49
1,433,526
-4,050
31 Oct 2026, 20:36
1,437,576
-3,709
30 Oct 2026, 20:27
1,441,285
-4,626
29 Oct 2026, 21:46
1,445,911
-4,599
28 Oct 2026, 20:48
1,450,510
-4,775
27 Oct 2026, 17:16
1,455,285
-3,937
26 Oct 2026, 16:05
1,459,222
-3,756
25 Oct 2026, 17:44
1,462,978
-3,786
24 Oct 2026, 18:07
1,466,764
-4,550
23 Oct 2026, 16:57
1,471,314
-5,809
22 Oct 2026, 16:50
1,477,123
-5,506
21 Oct 2026, 14:01
1,482,629
-6,468
20 Oct 2026, 08:31
1,489,097
-5,278
19 Oct 2026, 09:59
1,494,375
-6,366
18 Oct 2026, 10:15
1,500,741
first reading
Engagement
3,731 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 235 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.895%
avg views ÷ 1,417,698 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,700
1,201 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,201
of 3,731 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1,142 of 1,201 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
3,731 (6 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
15,241,686
Reactions total
381,456
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 20:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,370
Videos
≈794
Links
≈622
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 19m
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 132 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 1,228 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (5 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 841 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3.2 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 28.4% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 73.2% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 13,400 views — 0.945% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 17,800).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 6,593 interp.still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
24 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
310,343 reactions across 957 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
107,707
34.7%
🤣
90,984
29.3%
💔
30,399
9.80%
👍
25,117
8.09%
🔥
12,948
4.17%
🗿
11,107
3.58%
😭
4,928
1.59%
💅
4,154
1.34%
🤝
3,086
0.994%
❤🔥
2,874
0.926%
🕊
2,341
0.754%
🍓
2,088
0.673%
🤔
1,933
0.623%
💯
1,442
0.465%
😱
1,324
0.427%
😢
1,225
0.395%
😍
1,017
0.328%
👀
990
0.319%
🫡
784
0.253%
👏
780
0.251%
8 further kinds
3,115
1.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 957 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310,343 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 October 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AkhbarDrsi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 October 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 72 of 1,201 posts held from the last 30 days (6.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴فوری تعطیلی کهگیلویه و بویراحمد | تعطیلی مدارس و دانشگاههای کهگیلویه و بویراحمد در روز یکشنبه
🔹منوچهر محمدی، مدیرکل مدیریت بحران استانداری کهگیلویه و بویراحمد اعلام کرد: با توجه به هشدار قرمز هواشناسی، تشدید سامانه بارشی، قطعیت وقوع سیل و احتمال آبگرفتگی معابر، برای پیشگیری از حوادث و حفظ سلامت دانشآموزان و دانشجویان، تمامی مدارس و دانشگاههای استان در همه مقاطع، در نوبت صبح و عصر روز یکشنبه ۱۷ آبان تعطیل هستند.…
🔴مدارس خرم آباد فردا یکشنبه دایر است
🔹بر اساس مصوبه ستاد مدیریت بحران لرستان مدارس خرم آباد فردا یکشنبه هفدهم آبان ماه دایر هستند و فعالیت آموزشی خود را به روال عادی دنبال می کنند.
در مقابل فعالیت آموزشی مدارس شهرستانهای الیگودرز، دورود، چگنی، ازنا و مناطق زاغه، پاپی و زز و ماهرو در هر دو نوبت صبح و عصر به صورت غیرحضوری برگزار خواهد شد.
🪽 @AKHBARDRSI
🔴 هشدار نارنجی هواشناسی فارس برای بارشهای سیلآسا و وزش باد شدید | فعلا تصمیمی برای تعطیلی گرفته نشده!
🔹 حسینی، مدیرکل هواشناسی استان فارس، با تشریح جزئیات هشدار نارنجی شماره ۹ این اداره کل اظهار کرد: فعالیت سامانه بارشی از روز شنبه ۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۷ آغاز شده و تا صبح دوشنبه ۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۸ ادامه خواهد داشت!
🪽 @AKHBARDRSI
🔴احتمال تعطیلی مراکز آموزشی و اداری دزفول در صورت تشدید بارشها
🔹️فرمانداری دزفول اعلام کرد: در صورت افزایش شدت بارندگیها و وزش تندباد، شرایط مجدداً بررسی و درباره تعطیلی احتمالی مراکز تصمیمگیری خواهد شد.
🔹️ تاکنون تصمیم جدیدی در این مورد اعلام نشده.
🪽 @AKHBARDRSI
😭67❤50😍17
Signed Amir
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,731 posts we hold for @AkhbarDrsi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AkhbarDrsi edited 14 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 78 posts on @AkhbarDrsi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
8.4 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
32
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
26
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
26
vacant every time we have ever looked
@AkhbarDrsi named 26 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@admin_sevda named in 13 posts, 18 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
@daily_bartar named in 6 posts, 14 September 2026 – 15 September 2026
@sorohokm named in 5 posts, 2 October 2026 – 3 October 2026
@barname named in 4 posts, 18 August 2026 – 26 October 2026
@moshavere_man named in 4 posts, 3 October 2026 – 13 October 2026
@rutbe_konkor named in 4 posts, 2 October 2026 – 2 October 2026
@admin_org named in 4 posts, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026
@kheilisabz named in 3 posts, 2 November 2026 – 5 November 2026
@glamchi named in 3 posts, 9 October 2026 – 24 October 2026
@karnamehschool named in 2 posts, 5 October 2026 – 6 October 2026
@karname1405 named in 2 posts, 4 October 2026 – 5 October 2026
@bokmlpdfh named in 2 posts, 4 October 2026 – 4 October 2026
@takhmim_rutbe named in 2 posts, 6 September 2026 – 27 September 2026
@kanoon_ghalamchi_bot named in 1 post, 2 November 2026 – 2 November 2026
@azmon_vip named in 1 post, 24 October 2026 – 24 October 2026
@kilid_ghalamchi named in 1 post, 24 October 2026 – 24 October 2026
@momedical named in 1 post, 20 October 2026 – 20 October 2026
@gap_chat named in 1 post, 10 October 2026 – 10 October 2026
@karami named in 1 post, 9 October 2026 – 9 October 2026
@moeinkarami named in 1 post, 9 October 2026 – 9 October 2026
@karnamehghabool named in 1 post, 5 October 2026 – 5 October 2026
@tahlilkarname named in 1 post, 5 October 2026 – 5 October 2026
@pchap named in 1 post, 8 September 2026 – 8 September 2026
@nahayi12_bot named in 1 post, 6 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
@nahayi11_bot named in 1 post, 6 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
@konkor_tajrobi named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
فیزیک یحیوی @fizik_yahavi · 24,888 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 September 2026
نهایی زبان قریشی @film_paye · 35,223 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 August 2026
کانال پایه یازدهم @Paye_classe · 48,028 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
سوالات و پاسخنامه قلمچی 📈 @SoalGlamchi · 73,282 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
نهایی دینی فکری @gdhbp · 33,190 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
همایش ریاضی کرمی @tomoclasi · 56,560 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
سالیانه زیست فرهمندنیا 405 @farhmand405 · 66,418 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
شیمی فراهانی 1406 @shimi_farrrhani · 135,369 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
📚کتاب و جزوه کنکوری📚 @pdfkonkourie · 124,756 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
فیزیک شجاعی ماز @ShojaeiMaz · 38,364 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 September 2026
کنکور پایه | 𝐊𝐮𝐧𝐤𝐮𝐫 𝐩𝐚𝐲𝐞 @Konkur_payee · 52,259 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
تـجـربــی هـــا 🩺💊 @imTagrobi · 63,321 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
اخبار کنکوری / خبر درسی @khabrDRSI · 87,029 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 August 2026
🟡 کنکور ماز 1406 @konkor_maz · 64,253 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
نهایی فیزیک شجاعی @eonrv · 97,013 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
اخبار کنکوری @KONKORINEWSS · 174,184 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
تاملند @nahayi_paye · 18,857 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 October 2026
گروه آموزشی ایماض @imazacademy1406 · 23,694 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
یِ کنکوری @ye_Konkorie · 232,179 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
مانستر پایه | سالیانه دهم یازدهم @MonsterPaye · 24,787 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
نهایی زیست فرهمندنیا دهم یازدهم دوازدهم @dhewv · 33,922 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 31 August 2026
رسـانـه ڪـنـڪـورے | 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐞 • @resaneh_darsi · 60,200 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
تگزاس کنکور @Texas_konkure · 57,304 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
گروه آموزشی ماز @mediajozveh · 72,191 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 305 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار درسی | فوری” (@AkhbarDrsi), 1,417,698 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AkhbarDrsi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
