Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,746. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 09:38
74,646
-104
15 Sept 2026, 07:59
74,750
-86
13 Sept 2026, 14:21
74,836
-153
11 Sept 2026, 16:39
74,989
-178
9 Sept 2026, 02:59
75,167
-262
5 Sept 2026, 20:18
75,429
-407
3 Sept 2026, 15:41
75,836
+75,776
26 Aug 2026, 12:03
60
-72,588
25 Aug 2026, 11:52
72,648
-141
24 Aug 2026, 14:17
72,789
-592
22 Aug 2026, 18:43
73,381
-1,128
21 Aug 2026, 11:54
74,509
-2,100
20 Aug 2026, 11:04
76,609
-1,856
19 Aug 2026, 10:05
78,465
+72
18 Aug 2026, 09:22
78,393
+307
17 Aug 2026, 09:58
78,086
+866
15 Aug 2026, 17:38
77,220
+727
14 Aug 2026, 04:06
76,493
+352
12 Aug 2026, 19:56
76,141
+248
11 Aug 2026, 21:02
75,893
first reading
Engagement
493 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 74,646 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,500
149 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
151
of 493 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
493 (5 August 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
2,166,370
Reactions total
58,023
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 16:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,060
Videos
≈2,080
Links
≈1,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
44m 20s
Average length
2m 07s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
401,796 reactions across 466 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
286,877
71.4%
😁
55,187
13.7%
👍
15,788
3.93%
🔥
15,441
3.84%
🤣
9,667
2.41%
❤🔥
9,323
2.32%
🥰
2,550
0.635%
😍
2,362
0.588%
👌
2,305
0.574%
😘
999
0.249%
🤗
714
0.178%
🤩
583
0.145%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 486 of the 493 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 412,236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 493 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
206
across the posts below
Posts paid on
83
of 486 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ghozzati. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 493 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
سلتم
استاد بانک تستو واقعا بهشون پیشنهاد بدید 🩶
من رفیقم پارسال فقط نکته و تست شمارو شرکت کرد
کلا دیر شروع کرد به خوندن با پایه ضعیف واقعا
ولی کنار کلاس تون بانک تستو زد
زد و فیزیک ۷۰ زد
واقعا واقعا واقعا بانک تست از هزار تا انتشارات کتاب خوبتره🩶🌹
🌀 گلچین سوالات کار انرژی 🌀
گلچین ۳۰ تست از فصل کار انرژی از آزمون های آزمایشی که تابستان برگزار شده 😍
حتما خودتون اول سعی به حل سوالات کنید ، ویدیو تحلیل هم قرار میگیره ✅
@ghozzati
۲ تا جزوه کلاس همراه با بانک تست یعنی ۳ جلد باهم(حدود ۱۰۰۰ صفحه رنگی با کاغذ ۸۰ گرم با بالاترین کیفیت چاپ) همراه با هزینه ارسال همش شد ۲/۸۹۹/۰۰۰
پول یک جلد کتاب بازارم هم نشد❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
🔝 چندتا از مهمترین نکات انتخاب رشته که باید بدونی! 💜
🟩قبل از اینکه انتخاب رشتهات رو انجام بدی، این موضوعات رو حتماً بررسی کن
✅سهمیه های کنکور
✅آزمون لیسانس به پزشکی
✅بومی گزینی
✅سربازی و معافیت
✅صفر تا صد خوابگاه های دانشجویی پارت۱
✅صفرتا صد خوابگاه های دانشجویی پارت۲
✅پیراپزشکی بدون کنکور
✅انواع تعهد
✅پزشکی تعهدی
✅انواع قبولی و پذیرش در دانشگاه ها
✅غلط نامه انتخاب رشته پارت۱
✅غلط نامه انتخاب رشته پارت۲
✅انتقالی…
🔺 معرفی رشته های تجربی
🔺 معرفی رشته های ریاضی
🔺 مقایسه بین رشته های مختلف
آیدی رزرو انتخاب رشته جهشینو👇
☎️@jaheshinomoshavere
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
✅کانال جهشینو
📱@jaheshino
✅گروه تخصصی مشاوره و انتخاب رشته
📱 https://t.me/psghozzati
😎 کل نکات و حفظیات فصل کار و انرژی
🔵@ghozzati
✈️@jaheshino
🌐 www.jaheshino.ir
🌐amir_ghozzati
❤96❤🔥6🤩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 493 posts we hold for @ghozzati. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@ghozzati edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
هنوز تو شک هستم اصلاً نمیدونم چیکار کنم نمیتونم تصمیم بگیرم15%
به پشت کنکور موندن فکر میکنم24%
راستش خودمم نمیدونم خوب دادم آزمون امروز رو یا نه15%
راضی بودم از خودم ببینیم خدا جی میخواد8%
دیدن نتایج39%
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
مثل بقیه با ادب باشم،چت هام بسته باشه توجه نکنم،پیویم رو ندم به دانش آموزام،کلاس های جدید رو شروع کن7%
نه همین که هستی بمون قضک93%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 493 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کانال فیلم کنکوری @filmkonkori · 28,373 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 September 2026
احسان غیاثی | ریاضی کنکور @math_ehsan_ghiassi · 33,918 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
زیست حسین زاده 1406 @testbaks · 52,084 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
پارسا فراهانی شیمی(تنها کانال اصلی استاد) @farahani_shimi · 170,792 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
سالیانه فیزیک قضاتی | 1406 @GHOZTI · 59,797 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
مدرسه آنلاین آلفا @alphaedu · 128,912 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
معین کرمی|ریاضی کنکور @math_karami · 274,613 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
شیمی با استاد مسعود جعفری @masoudjafarishimi · 22,091 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
🥇 ریاضی به سبک امید سلمانی @salmani_riazi · 67,032 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
کانال فیزیک مهندس نوکنده @mnokandeh · 26,660 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
ریاضی معین کرمی @riazikaramii1403 · 75,584 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
طرح درس 1406✨ @Tarh_dars1401 · 273,381 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
طرح درس 1406 @tarhdaars1403 · 25,307 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
تحلیل آزمون آزمایشی @Tahlilazemoon · 23,300 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
آیروتیم @iroTeam · 32,609 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
ادبیات یکتا 1406 @adabiat_ostadyekta · 93,938 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
فارسیِ احسان @farsi_ehsan · 56,656 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
پایه لایو | Jame Live @payelive404 · 80,028 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
شیمی و فیزیک| دکتر میلاد قادری @drmiladghadery · 23,468 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
دوره های معین کرمی 1406 @FinitoKarami · 27,566 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
عربی فلاح رایگان @Live_Mafia · 59,726 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
شیمی فراهانی 1406 @BigbangFarahani · 71,950 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
زیست حنیف عظیمی @hanif_azimiiii1405 · 84,769 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
کانال رسمی(مهندس مهدی یحیوی) @YahyaviPhysics · 23,950 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 201 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فیزیک قضاتی | کانال رسمی” (@ghozzati), 74,646 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghozzati.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.