Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -188. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,110–17,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:01
16,246
-10
15 Sept 2026, 12:55
16,256
-15
13 Sept 2026, 22:21
16,271
+12
12 Sept 2026, 02:38
16,259
+14
9 Sept 2026, 20:38
16,245
-11
6 Sept 2026, 15:19
16,256
+43
2 Sept 2026, 20:35
16,213
-19
1 Sept 2026, 19:19
16,232
-19
31 Aug 2026, 18:47
16,251
-17
30 Aug 2026, 20:33
16,268
-15
29 Aug 2026, 19:13
16,283
+5
27 Aug 2026, 17:34
16,278
-14
26 Aug 2026, 14:11
16,292
-19
25 Aug 2026, 13:46
16,311
-70
24 Aug 2026, 12:05
16,381
-52
22 Aug 2026, 16:55
16,433
-197
21 Aug 2026, 09:28
16,630
-268
20 Aug 2026, 11:39
16,898
+352
19 Aug 2026, 10:58
16,546
-31
18 Aug 2026, 10:48
16,577
first reading
Engagement
142 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.4%
avg views ÷ 16,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,960
78 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.768%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
78
of 142 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 78 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
142 (26 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
308,710
Reactions total
2,356
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
50s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,193 reactions across 141 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,635
50.7%
🫡
907
17.5%
👍
586
11.3%
👌
485
9.34%
👏
174
3.35%
🎉
142
2.73%
🔥
138
2.66%
💯
126
2.43%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 141 of the 142 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,193 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴جلسه دوم کلاس دما و گرما همین الان در حال برگزاریه!
✅بچهها از کلاسها جا نمونید و نذارید عقب افتادن از یکی دو جلسه، تبدیل به کلی کلاس عقبافتاده بشه
با انگیزه و انرژی کلاسهاتون رو شروع کنید و قدمبهقدم با استاد جلو برید 💪🤍
و اگه هنوز ثبتنامتون رو کامل نکردید، حتماً سریعتر اقدام کنید؛
تخفیفها فقط تا آخر هفته برقرارن! ⏳🔥
⭐️ثبت نام با تخفیف ویژه
@jaheshino
@ghozzati
اینم نمرات سال دوازدهم
↗️دیگه وقتی از دهم با جهشینو و مشاورای خفنش هم مسیر میشی
نتیجه چیزی جز این نیست
(عربی هم اعتراض زده و قطعا نمره اش بالاتر میشه)
مشاور: خانم زهره رنجبر | دانشجوی دندان پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
⬇️پشتیبانی رزرو مشاوره⬇️
@jaheshinomoshavere
@jaheshino
💾نمرات یازدهمش
که قراره یه تاثیر مثبت خفن روی نتیجه اش بذاره
مشاور: خانم زهره رنجبر | دانشجوی دندان پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
⬇️پشتیبانی رزرو مشاوره⬇️
@jaheshinomoshavere
@jaheshino
این دانشآموز از دهم با ما شروع کرد و همون سال تونست نمرههای امتحان نهاییش رو خیلی خوب بالا بیاره.
✅دوازدهم هم کنارمون موند و امسال نتیجهای گرفت که نشون میده این پیشرفت فقط یه اتفاق نبوده 🔥
🔴اول کارنامهی یازدهمش رو ببینید، بعد نتیجهی دوازدهمش رو با هم مقایسه کنیم
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 142 posts we hold for @jaheshino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اول یه خسته نباشید بگیم بهتون بابت تموم شدن امتحانا🤗🧡
بچه های ریاضی هم بگین ببینم هندسه امروزو چیکار کردین؟
خیلی سخت بود 😣13%
هم سوال راحت داشت هم سوال سخت، چند نمره غلط دارم🫠9%
در سطح امتحانات سال های قبل بود👌9%
راحت بود من کامل میشم🤩16%
امتحان نداشتم60%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
فیزیک قضاتی | کانال رسمی @ghozzati · 74,327 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
احسان غیاثی | ریاضی کنکور @math_ehsan_ghiassi · 33,614 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
زمین شناسی کنکور | دکتر چلاجور @Zamin_dr_Chalajour · 31,016 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
مدرسه آنلاین آلفا @alphaedu · 125,469 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
کانال رسمی آریان حیدری @arianheidarii · 67,126 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
پارسا فراهانی شیمی(تنها کانال اصلی استاد) @farahani_shimi · 170,792 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
زیست، زمین و سلامت | همدانی @bioHamedani · 33,121 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
معین کرمی|ریاضی کنکور @math_karami · 284,406 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
سالیانه فیزیک قضاتی | 1406 @GHOZTI · 59,123 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
زیست شناسی دکتر عمارلو | کانال رسمی @bioammarlou · 31,219 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
آریو کنکور | رسانه دانش آموزی @Aryo_Konkur · 223,622 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
محافظ زمین شناسی کنکور|خیراللهی @zamine100 · 325 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
زبان انگليسي (دکتر سید میلاد قريشي) @English_MiladGhoreishi · 31,833 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
موسسه آموزشی انتخاب @entekhablink_edu · 108,440 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
اعتماد انانیموس کنکور @Anonymous_trust1 · 62,753 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
ادبیات فارسی با دکتر علیرضا جعفری @adabiat_drjaafari · 127,692 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jaheshino | جهشینو” (@jaheshino), 16,246 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jaheshino.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.