- 𝖠𝗋𝗍 | @VincentVangoghArts

Channel
هنر و دیوانگی | نقاشی
@VincentVangoghArts
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,119subscribers
-645 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001434959648 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VincentVangoghArts |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VincentVangoghArts |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 19:10 | 30,119 | -13 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 18:50 | 30,132 | -18 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:17 | 30,150 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:08 | 30,152 | -24 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:29 | 30,176 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:56 | 30,180 | -18 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:27 | 30,198 | -21 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 30,219 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:59 | 30,226 | -16 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:17 | 30,242 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 30,248 | -17 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 30,265 | +9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:30 | 30,256 | -27 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:58 | 30,283 | -16 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 30,299 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:09 | 30,301 | -15 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 30,316 | -17 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 30,333 | -23 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 30,356 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 30,368 | first reading |
Engagement
815 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.16%
- avg views ÷ 30,119 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 651
- 293 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 293
- of 815 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 815 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 190,749 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 12:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 20s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 815 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VincentVangoghArts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 815 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 293 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
معرفی هنرمند / چارلز آنگراند: یک هنرمند فرانسوی بود که به خاطر نقاشیها و طراحیهای نئو امپرسیونیستی خود شهرت یافت. او یکی از اعضای مهم صحنه هنر آوانگارد پاریس در اواخر دهه 1880 و اوایل دهه 1890 بود. - 𝖯𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋 | 𝖢𝗁𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝖠𝗇𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽 | 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍
- By George Frederic Watts. - 𝖠𝗋𝗍 | @VincentVangoghArts
️🟢 هنوز تو ZOMABET ثبتنام نکردی؟ پس ۵۰ دلار اول کار منتظرته! ثبتنام کن، بونوس خوشآمدتو بگیر و بعد خودت انتخاب کن با چی وارد بازی شی 👀 🎁 ۵۰$ بونوس ثبتنام 🪙 ۱۰۰٪ بونوس واریز کریپتو 💵 ۳۰٪ بونوس واریز تومانی 🌐 ZOMABET.COM 16r https://t.me/+slIyOOvofVg2ZjBk
- By Richard Diebenkorn. - 𝖠𝗋𝗍 | @VincentVangoghArts
- 𝖨𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅
🃏🔥 دیلر کارت رو میکنه؛ حالا نوبت تصمیم توئه! 😈 بلکجک زنده | یه میز، هزار تا لحظه نفسگیر! 🥂✨ اینجا همهچی از یه تصمیم شروع میشه!! 💥 💚 با ZOMABET فضای جذاب بلکجک زنده رو تجربه کن! 🎰 🎁 بونوسهای ویژه ZOMABET: 🤩🤩🤩🤩 بونوس واریز کریپتو 🤩🤩🤩 بونوس واریز تومانی 🤩🤩🤩 دلار بونوس ثبتنام 🌐 ZOMABET.COM 15a https://t.me/+bnTnbHERg7Y3NWU8
- By Antony Gormley. - 𝖠𝗋𝗍 | @VincentVangoghArts
- 𝖠𝗋𝗍 | @VincentVangoghArts
- 𝐀𝐫𝐜𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐚 1883,📍 - آرکادیا/اثر توماس ایکینز - ابعاد: ۹۸/۱ × ۱۱۴/۳ سانتیمتر - مکان نمایش: موزه هنر متروپولیتن، ایالات متحده آمریکا - 𝖮𝗂𝗅 𝖯𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 | 𝖳𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖤𝖺𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗌 | 𝖠𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖺
🔥⚽️ غولهای فوتبال آمادهان؛ چند شب طوفانی در راهه! 💣 👀 تو منتظر کدوم نبردی؟ کدوم تیم قراره همه رو غافلگیر کنه؟ 💚 با ZOMABET همراه بازیهای بزرگ باش و ضرایب و گزینههای پیشبینی مسابقات رو بررسی کن! 🎯 🎁 بونوسهای ویژه ZOMABET: 🪙 ۱۰۰٪ بونوس واریز کریپتو 💵 ۳۰٪ بونوس واریز تومانی 💎 ۵۰ دلار بونوس ثبتنام 🌐 ZOMABET.COM 15g https://t.me/+bnTnbHERg7Y3NWU8
- 𝖠𝗋𝗍 | @VincentVangoghArts
Showing the 12 most recent of 815 posts we hold for @VincentVangoghArts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 58 posts on @VincentVangoghArts as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 17 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 5
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@MelBet_Iran1 · 176,07511 postsMarcbet | مارک بت
@irmarcbet · 4,7547 posts@falerozhi
@falerozhi · 106,1572 postsخبری پلاس|خبرفوری 🔖فوری
@khabari · 2,001,9962 postsکانال رسمی وی پاری | Wepari iran
@weparig · 75,1352 postsآغوشِتو!..
@aghooshet0 · 6141 postAtlas_Flow
@Atlas_Flow · 1061 postAtlas Relay VPN
@AtlasRelay · 18,3511 postبنیانِ آرامش
@bonyanearamesh70 · 1,7401 postنتایج دلارکس
@dollerx_result · 1651 postEivazkhani Strategy
@Eivazkhani_Strategy · 4671 postLearn English|آموزش زبان انگلیسی
@englishier · 315,3911 postExistland
@existland_ir · 3,2421 postHush Crush
@Hush_Crush_Pod · 1741 postخبر
@khabar · 80,6301 postدعا طلسم فال
@Ostask_5 · 114,7191 postZ
@OurCloudyMind · 41 postکلینیک دندانپزشکی سرو
@sarvpalladium · 1,0431 postشُڪرِ بے پایان.. 🕊️
@Shokr_Gozari · 4041 postوحدت تجارت سالار
@vahdat_tejarat_salar · 5301 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@VincentVangoghArts named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@classicthemes · 471,049#1
@gaamtu · 1,700#2
@TheStoriesOfArt · 9,311#3
@Codeain · 349,316#4
@Ersalihatun · 139,185 (as read 7 September 2026)#5
@licotiic · 39,644#6
@RegaPlus · 1,509,386#7
@iRoProxy · 7,994,058#8
@iMTProto · 7,730,279#9
@YouBgo · 129,546#10
@razcom · 1,218,490#11
@ocbooks · 324,289#12
@Bahmanbekesh · 14#13
@proxy_qavi · 3,260,320#14
@TheGamepc · 116,645#15
@darkproxy · 4,574,975#16
@CottageOrg · 746,259#17
@meowmbti · 25#18
@TweetyChannel · 824,286#19
@starme69 · 23#20
@yegansdaily · 13,960#21
@neartothewildheartt · 15,094#22
@Lyricsteach · 40,554#23
@MNIOcean · 6,961#24
@xbeus · 19,433#25
@WildestBlue · 13,014#26
@elfairya · 3,127#27
@Art_death · 26,469#28
@vinyvidzam · 60,212#29
@thenimbuss · 94,912#30
@herwonderland · 218,651#31
@pedaretdiana · 48,550#32
@artistsmeme · 226#33
@kianaafr · 403,699#34
@thusers · 29,236#35
@Blue_library · 262,977#36
@lNaomll · 14,693#37
@spiiderclown · 16#38
@bluo_vangog · 8,281#39
@mbtimoodi · 7,726#40
@Vernios_kpop · 9,393#41
@tajvizAngize · 298,401#42
@Herochnl · 420,953#43
@Dayan_Zhakaw · 32,822#44
@XntpType · 19,537#45
@paintingco · 13,218#46
@ThemeTellgram · 9,519#47
@hawlsu · 10,639#48
@ParsTwt · 534,646#49
@letskills · 83,459#50
@TH3EME · 4,596#51
@OurMbtiDaily · 29,076#52
@samepov · 51,617#53
@Beustaa · 18,662#54
@RegaLeakShit · 40,927#55
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 565,940#56
@Afkar · 1,016,118#57
@Mohi_watercolor · 2,439#58
@pony_meme · 6,982#59
@MyAnimes · 61,791#60
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@licotiic · 39,644
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هنر و دیوانگی | نقاشی” (@VincentVangoghArts), 30,119 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VincentVangoghArts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.