Channel
@XstpTYPE
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,561subscribers
-150 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001281159486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XstpTYPE |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XstpTYPE |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 10,561 | -32 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 10,593 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 10,606 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 10,615 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 10,622 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 10,630 | -16 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 10,646 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 10,650 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 10,652 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 10,663 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 10,669 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 10,679 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 10,685 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 10,703 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 10,709 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 10,711 | first reading |
164 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 101 of 164 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 164 (3 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 56,470 |
| Reactions total | 798 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
798 reactions across 101 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 798 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 164 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 798reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 164 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
• از جمله صفاتِ یک دوستِ ESTP همون دوستی که سعی میکنه پایه و پاسخگوی احساسات و نیاز های شما باشه. زیرِ پوسته ی شوخ، پر انرژی و سرگرم کننده اش، زیرکی و حواس جمعی خاصی نهفته ست. منطقیه و سعی میکنه تا جای ممکن با شرایطی که هست سازگار بشه. ―――———―――———―― ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ESTP
• خودباوریِ ESTP ها بر اساس CPI، ای اس تی پی ها خیلی خودشون رو باور دارن و این بخاطر اینکه اونها به داشتن اعتماد به نفس، اطمینان و قاطعیت مشهورن. ―――———―――———―― ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ESTP
• نقطه قوت ESTP ها توی روابط افراد این تایپ از طریق شیرجه زدن وسط کار یاد میگیرن. مرکز مهمونی ها هستن و توجه همه رو به خودشون جلب می کنن. موضوعات انتزاعی معمولا حوصلشونو سر میبره و اونا بیشتر طرفدار مکالمات پر انرژی و جالب هستن و ترجیح میدن قبل از بررسی اوضاع و فکر کردن بیش از حد کار رو شروع کنن. این تایپ برای هیجان و لذت زندگی میکنه و در روابطش جذاب، شوخ و خوش گذرونه و میتونه در گیری ها رو خوب کنترل کنه. زیر فشار …
⚡4
៕ #FACT ―――—— • عادت عجیب تایپهای MBTI ـ INFP همون تایپیه که میتونه ساعتها توی دنیای خیالی خودش زندگی کنه و کسی هم نفهمه. ـ ENFP همون تایپیه که هیجانزده میشه و وسط حرف دیگران ایده جدید پرت میکنه. ـ INFJ همون تایپیه که به طرز عجیبی حس ششمش درست درمیاد. ـ ENFJ همون تایپیه که حتی وقتی خودش حالش بده، اول حال بقیه رو میپرسه. ـ INTP همون تایپیه که شب تا صبح دنبال جواب یه سوال توی گوگل میگرده. ـ ENTP همون تایپ…
⚡4
• چیزی که تایپ ISTP به زبون نمیاره " باید کل شبو بشینیم دور هم و داستان های احساسی غم انگیزمونو با هم به اشتراک بذاریم. تو اول شروع کن! " ―――———―――———―― ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ISTP
⚡7
🌸 Roselunette VPN | اتصال همیشگی با بهترین قیمت حتی تو قطعی هم وصل بمون✨ 🌟 بدون محدودیت تعداد کاربر 😱 مناسب استفاده چندکاربره 📞 آیپی ثابت؛ مناسب برای اینستاگرام و جیمیل 🤍 دارای لینک ساب برای مدیریت راحتتر 🚨 اکانت تست قبل از خرید 🧋 ربات اختصاصی + مینیاپ 🌺 پشتیبانی ۲۴ ساعته 🔴 اتصال امن و پایدار 👫 سرورهای متنوع 💚 قابل استفاده روی تمام دستگاهها 🔥 بیش از ۱۰۰۰ کاربر فعال در حال استفاده از Roselunette VPN 👼👼 بستهها…
• رابطهی تایپ های درونگرا با انتقام چطوریه؟ ـ #INTP ↜ اتفاقاً خفن ترین نقشه ها رو برای انتقام از دشمن فرضیشون دارن اما... معمولاً شرایط انتقام جدی، اونطور که باید و شاید براشون پیش نمیاد. ـ #INFP ↜ شاید اینطور بنظر بیاد که انتقام چیز بی رحمانه ای هست و infp دست به انتقام نمیزنه... اما نه. کاملا اشتباهه. اگر اراده کنه میتونه انتقام بگیره و اون موقع ست که حق هم به خودش میده. گرچه ممکنه بعدش عذاب وجدان سختی بگیرن...…
⚡8
• نوع ارتباط مد نظر ESTP ها این تایپ رابطهای پر اشتیاق و الهامبخش میخوان با کسی که بهشون حس زندگی بده. از ثبات متنفرن و دنبال آدماییان که بتونن با هم از لحظه لذت ببرن. از اینکه حوصلشون سر بره متنفرن و رابطهی پر هیجان رابطهایه که بیش از هر چیزی خوشحالشون میکنه. ―――———―――———―― ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ESTP
⚡1
• تایپ ESTP در حمله ی زامبیها ∽ به ساخت سلاح کمک میکنه ∽ اتفاقی از گروه جدا شد ولی راه برگشت رو پیدا کرد ∽ توی خط مقدم مبارزه با زامبیها میجنگه و حتی یه ذره هم نترسیده. ―――———――――――—— ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ESTP
⚡4
៕ #Fact ―――—— • راز تاریک تایپهای MBTI ـ INFP رازی که مخفی میکنه اینه که پشت ظاهر مهربونش، خیلی راحت میتونه آدمها رو از زندگیاش حذف کنه و دیگه هیچ وقت برنگرده. ـ INFJ رازش اینه که در ظاهر آرومه، اما درونش پر از کشمکشهای شدید ذهنی و احساسیه که هیچوقت بروز نمیده. ـ INTP چیزی که پنهان میکنه اینه که در عین بیخیالی ظاهری، مدام درگیر ترس از بیکفایتی و شکست فکریه. ـ INTJ مخفیترین ترسش اینه که نکنه تمام برن…
⚡9
• یه نویسنده ESTP ممکنه چه نوع کتابی بنویسه؟ کتابهای گلیتی، البته نه اینکه به سبکی نوشته شده باشن که جدی گرفته نشن، اما وجود این نوع سبک نوشتاری باعث میشه این کتابها بسیار سرگرم کننده و خوندنی باشن، "Crazy Rich Asians" فضای نوشتاری ESxP رو به نمایش میذاره. (اما به دلیل جزئیات بسیار زیاد و درام توصیف شدهای که خیلی از احساسات بهره نبرده و یه جورایی اکشنه، بیشتر شبیه ESTP هست.) ―――———―――———―― ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ESTP
⚡3
• کلیشهای اشتباه ISTP ⧿ کلیشه : هیجانی هستن و آدرنالینشون خیلی بالاعه. چرا نادرسته : با اینکه با محیط اطرافشون ارتباط خوبی برقرار میکنن، اما با این حال خیلی هم درونگران. از غرق شدن توی ذهن درونیشون لذت میبرن و با اینکار خیلی چیز ها رو یاد میگیرن. ―――———―――———―― ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ISTP
⚡9
Showing the 12 most recent of 164 posts we hold for @XstpTYPE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اونایی که شغل اینترنتی بدون سرمایه میخواستن اومدن؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
اونایی که شغل اینترنتی بدون سرمایه میخواستن اومدن؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 164 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 410,600 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@XstpTYPE named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“「ISTP . ESTP」” (@XstpTYPE), 10,561 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XstpTYPE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.