Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تعمّق - فلسفه و هنر

Channel

تعمّق - فلسفه و هنر

@Taamoq

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,678subscribers

+293 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001718175627
TypeChannel
Username@Taamoq
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Taamoq

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,38513,67813,531.56 August 2026 — 13,385 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,385 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,395 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,394 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,413 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,429 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,454 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,474 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,487 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,488 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,504 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,511 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,515 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,517 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,525 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,537 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,549 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,558 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,563 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,572 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,582 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,591 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,598 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,596 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,614 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,621 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,634 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,639 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,661 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,662 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,676 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,677 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,678 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,341–13,722 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 08:3613,678+1
16 Sept 2026, 05:1813,677+1
14 Sept 2026, 11:5413,676+14
11 Sept 2026, 03:3813,662+1
8 Sept 2026, 06:5813,661+22
5 Sept 2026, 01:1813,639+5
3 Sept 2026, 06:5713,634+13
2 Sept 2026, 03:5313,621+7
1 Sept 2026, 07:2613,614+18
31 Aug 2026, 08:0513,596-2
30 Aug 2026, 05:4613,598+7
29 Aug 2026, 04:0413,591+9
28 Aug 2026, 01:4513,582+10
26 Aug 2026, 22:2413,572+9
25 Aug 2026, 20:5313,563+5
24 Aug 2026, 23:3713,558+9
23 Aug 2026, 13:5613,549+12
22 Aug 2026, 03:4813,537+12
20 Aug 2026, 00:2613,525+8
18 Aug 2026, 23:1713,517first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 13,678 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,730
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.462%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held29 (1 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total1,730
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 26s
Average length
3m 26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

352 reactions across 24 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16546.9%
👍11532.7%
👎4813.6%
🕊246.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC≈1,730 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

درآمدی بر معماری ذهن — خلاصۀ نشست: مواجهۀ انسان با واقعیت، هرگز مواجهه‌ای مستقیم و عریان نیست؛ بلکه ما همواره جهان را از پشت منشور سازوکارهای پیچیدۀ شناختی، الگوهای ذهنی پیشین و بازنمایی‌های درونی تفسیر می‌کنیم. مسئلۀ بنیادین این است که ذهن چگونه از میان داده‌های خام حسی، تجربه زیسته، باورها و روایت‌های محیطی، دست به ساخت واقعیت می‌زند و این ساختار، تا چه حد مسیر تفکر، قضاوت و تصمیم‌گیری‌های روزمره ما را تعیین می‌کند

6👍2

17 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC244 viewsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @nutqiyyatPhoto

📣 آغاز ثبت‌نام دورهٔ آشنایی با عرفان نظری بر پایهٔ نقد النصوص جامی (شرح نقش الفصوص ابن‌عربی) (تابستان ۱۴۰۵) 👤 مدرس: دکتر محمد رایجی (پژوهشگر فلسفه و فلسفهٔ علوم اجتماعی و عرفان) 🗓 سه‌شنبه‌ها از ساعت ۱۹ تا ۲۰ (مجموعا سی جلسه) 🗓 شروع دوره: سه‌شنبه ۲۷ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ (❌ فردا) 🚮 آشنایی با استاد: - دانش‌‌آموختهٔ دکتری فلسفهٔ علوم اجتماعی - دانش‌آموختهٔ درس خارج فقه و اصول 🔴 برخی مقالات دکتر محمد رایجی: - بازخوانی نظریه

17 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈3,480 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

گایست در مقام صانع امر مطلق تأمّلاتی در بابِ خوانش رابرت براندوم بر معمای قصدیّت، از اسپینوزا تا هگل براندوم در مواجهه با اسپینوزا، کلِّ معماریِ اخلاق را از سطحِ متافیزیک به سطحِ معناشناختی، معرفت‌شناسی و نظریّۀ قصدیّت منتقل می‌کند. براندوم این ادّعای اسپینوزا را به‌رسمیّت می‌شناسد که می‌گوید: یک ایده می‌تواند در ذهنِ من ناکافی باشد در حالی که همان ایده در ذهنِ خدا کافی باشد. مسئلۀ اصلی اما این است که اگر محتوا خاصّی

8👍8👎1

13 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC204 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

کانال «فلسفه هنر» 🔘 مرجع فارسی فلسفهٔ هنر و زیبایی‌شناسی ▫️بررسی، تشریح و تحلیل مفاهیم، نظریه‌ها و مباحث فلسفهٔ هنر و زیبایی‌شناسی ▫️معرفی کتاب و مقاله | تحلیل آثار هنری | مباحث نظری هنر | دوره‌ها و نشست‌های آموزشی "هم‌چون هنر باش که هم‌واره خود را آغاز می‌کند." 📎 اگر به مباحث نظری هنر و اندیشه دربارهٔ هنر علاقه‌مند هستید، به ما بپیوندید: https://t.me/Philosophyof_art

2👍1

13 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈3,690 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💬چگونه انسان جهان را دیده است؟ درآمدی بر تاریخ نقاشی و شیوۀ دیدن انسان 👤با #عرفان_گرگین در این جلسه، این پرسش بنیادی به بحث گذاشته می‌شود که تاریخ نقاشی را چگونه می‌توان نه به‌مثابۀ گاه‌شماریِ صلب سبک‌ها و بیوگرافی هنرمندان، بلکه به‌عنوانی روایتی از تحول نگاه و تجربه زیسته بشر فهمید. با طرح پرسش از ضرورت تصویر در حیات انسانی و به آزمون گذاشتن مرز میان «نگاه‌کردنِ» سطحی و «دیدنِ» تحلیلی از طریق خوانش چند اثر شاخص، موا

7👍4🕊1

13 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈3,210 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

نقطۀ صفر جنگ (3): چگونه تعمق بر رخداد ما را به تأسیس می‌رساند؟ — خلاصۀ نشست: رخداد غیرمنتظره، غریب و سهمگین است. لحظه‌ای تاریخی که تمام نظم موجود را به پرسش می‌کشد و همۀ زبان‌ها را به سکوت وا می‌دارد. اما لحظۀ تاریخی اگر به تأسیس نینجامد، جنینی است که پیش از تولد سقط می‌شود. ما تأسیس را هم همچون لحظه‌ای در تاریخ می‌فهمیم؛ مثل استعارۀ سقوط سیب و کشف جاذبه توسط نیوتن! اما تأسیس در امتداد انباشت راه‌حل‌های نوآورانه برای

11👍3👎1

11 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈4,070 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

❓سؤالات پرتکرار در مورد درس‌گفتار «مبانی جامعه‌شناسی (۲): نظریه‌های کلاسیک جامعه‌شناسی» 🎓برای ثبت‌نام کلیک کنید ❓مشاوره و ثبت‌نام قسطی: @TaamoqSupport

4👍1

10 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈7,630 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

تعمق با همکاری پاریا برگزار می‌کند: مبانی جامعه‌شناسی ترم دوم: نظریه‌های کلاسیک جامعه‌شناسی 👤مدرس: #امین_بزرگیان ــــــــــــــ 💬معرفی: جامعه‌شناسی پیش از آنکه مجموعه‌ای از نظریه‌ها و مفاهیم دربارۀ جامعه باشد، شیوه‌ای برای دیدن و فهمیدن جهان اجتماعی است. نقطۀ آغاز دوره، پرسش از خودِ جامعه‌شناسی است: جامعه چیست، چگونه می‌توان آن را شناخت و چه نوع دانشی می‌تواند روابط، ساختارها و مناسبات اجتماعی را توضیح دهد؟ در ادامه،

4👍2

9 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC≈3,050 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

نقش روشنفکر آن اکثریت(های) خاموش، بی‌هیچ آینهٔ بازنمایندهٔ وجودشان، خود را همچون اشباحی که در فرآیندِ تسخیرِ زمینِ خویش‌اند نشان می‌دهند. در این فرآیند سویه‌ای آشکار است که فقدانِ حضورشان به‌منزلهٔ آن‌چه که می‌باید روشنگرِ مسیرهای محتمل، آیندهٔ ممکن و امکاناتِ کنونیِ مردم باشد، هردم بیشتر احساس می‌شود: رابطهٔ روشنفکر و جامعه. 📰مطالعۀ متن کامل در وب‌سایت تعمق ✍ #عرفان_بیگدلی Taamoq | تَعَمُّق✅️

9👍3

8 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC≈3,470 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💬درآمدی بر معماری ذهن 👤با #بهارک_اعظمی مواجهۀ انسان با واقعیت، هرگز مواجهه‌ای مستقیم و عریان نیست؛ بلکه ما همواره جهان را از پشت منشور سازوکارهای پیچیدۀ شناختی، الگوهای ذهنی پیشین و بازنمایی‌های درونی تفسیر می‌کنیم. مسئلۀ بنیادین این است که ذهن چگونه از میان داده‌های خام حسی، تجربه زیسته، باورها و روایت‌های محیطی، دست به ساخت واقعیت می‌زند و این ساختار، تا چه حد مسیر تفکر، قضاوت و تصمیم‌گیری‌های روزمره ما را تعیین می

👍43👎1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Taamoq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فلسفه و جامعه‌شناسی
@Philosophy_files · 29,893
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
تاریخ فلسفه با ابوذر شریعتی
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,794
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
vkends | مجله ایده‌ها
@vkends · 24,724
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
کتاب خانه جامع 📚
@KetabTOpdf · 62,627
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
انبارستان🎧
@anbar100 · 28,665
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
National Geographic farsi
@nationalgeographicfarsi · 35,613
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,367
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
ادبیات، فلسفه و سینما
@NazariyehAdabi · 42,703
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
نطقیات
@nutqiyyat · 29,956
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
مستری بوک | کتاب رایگان
@mastrybook · 90,972
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
داستایفسکی در سیبری
@dostoevskyinsiberia · 47,730
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ
@Spirit_and_life · 38,077
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
@litera999کتابخانه‌وموزه
@litera999 · 74,822
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
یافته‌های نوین روانشناختی
@Hrman11 · 23,378
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
دیالکتیک علمی
@ScientificDialectics · 24,277
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
کانال هُنرواره | Art
@Honarrvareh · 29,974
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
کتاب‌های کمیاب و نایاب
@freeforbiddenbooks · 42,532
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
علم سیاست
@PoliticalScience_ir · 26,297
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
خُنیآگر شعر و قلم (کتب صوتی، زندگینامه ی مشاهیر و ...)
@feqdanedel · 28,281
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
Discourse
@Discourseees · 23,633
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
𝘼𝙍𝙏 𝙅𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙉𝘼𝙇 مجله هنری
@ARTTJOURNAL · 34,566
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
کتاب 📚زاپاس
@ReadingLandzapas · 23,917
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
مخفیگاه
@makhfigah_channel · 63,252
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
سینمای موج نو
@Cinema_New_Wave · 25,347
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تعمّق - فلسفه و هنر” (@Taamoq), 13,678 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Taamoq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.