Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 44 days, net +507. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,098–7,757 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 14:20
7,681
+2
15 Sept 2026, 09:01
7,679
+70
11 Sept 2026, 23:36
7,609
+12
7 Sept 2026, 21:56
7,597
+48
3 Sept 2026, 07:45
7,549
+14
31 Aug 2026, 09:17
7,535
+13
28 Aug 2026, 01:08
7,522
+11
25 Aug 2026, 10:52
7,511
+25
22 Aug 2026, 17:56
7,486
+46
19 Aug 2026, 08:26
7,440
+20
16 Aug 2026, 16:58
7,420
+189
13 Aug 2026, 07:35
7,231
+25
9 Aug 2026, 21:55
7,206
+31
7 Aug 2026, 01:51
7,175
+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:16
7,174
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:06
7,174
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.4%
avg views ÷ 7,681 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,260
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
24 (28 June 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
4,510
Reactions total
137
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,403 reactions across 24 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🗿
643
45.8%
👻
242
17.2%
👾
227
16.2%
😈
158
11.3%
🎃
133
9.48%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,403 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 24 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Harut_Marut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
شاهنامه، اسطوره، زن | تمدید شد
قصه اینبار، یک شب دیگه ادامه داره.
برای اونهایی که نرسیدن کنارمون باشن، «شاهنامه، اسطوره، زن» شنبه ۷ شهریور تمدید شد.
شبی که از فردوسی و جهان شاهنامه شروع میکنیم و همراه امیراحسان کامیاب، رد قصهها و بیتها رو تا اسطورهها و باورهای کهن ایرانی دنبال میکنیم.
از مهر و آتش و باده، عشق و سوگ میشنویم. از نشونههایی که بعد از هزاران سال هنوز در شعر و زبان ما زندهان و در بخش پایانی، ب…
قبیلهٔ نوئِر در آفریقا نوزادان ناهنجار را نه آدمیزاد، بلکه بچهٔ اسب آبی میپندارند که به اشتباه از انسان متولد شده است. از این رو نوزاد ناهنجار را با مهربانی در رود میگذارند تا به خانوادهٔ حقیقیاش بپیوندد.
منبع:
Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concept of Pollution and Taboo
Mary Douglas
@Harut_Marut
🖍 نطقیات برگزار میکند:
📣 دورهٔ آنلاین آیین در ادیان ابراهیمی
👤 آموزگار: استاد فؤاد دانشپژوه ( دانشآموختهٔ ادیان - پژوهشگر ادیان )
🗓 دوشنبهها از ساعت ۲۰ تا ۲۱ (چهار جلسه)
👈 برای آشنایی با استاد دانشپژوه به صفحه ایشان در ایکس (توییتر) و کانال تلگرامی ایشان مراجعه کنید:
🐣 ایکس ( توییتر ): فؤاد
📱 کانال تلگرامی هاروت و ماروت
🟢 معرفی دوره:
در این دوره به مطالعۀ آیینهای عبادی در ادیان ابراهیمی خواهیم پرداخت و …
و کُندُر چیزی است که [چون] او را بسوزی، از وی بوی و دود برآید و به هوا شود و بوی بر آسمان برود. و بوی هیچ چیز بر آسمان نرسد، مگر بوی کُندُر.
تاریخ بلعمی
ابوعلی بلعمی
@Harut_Marut
فرفوریوس، فیلسوف نوافلاطونی قرن سوم میلادی، در رسالهٔ «در باب پرهیز از گوشت حیوانات» الهیاتی نظاممند برای قربانی ارائه میدهد. فرفوریوس توضیح میدهد که خدایان سرشت یکسانی ندارند، بلکه سلسلهمراتبی از خدایان وجود دارد که سرشت هر طبقه برتر از سرشت طبقهٔ زیرین است. به هنگام تقدیم قربانی میبایست به این توجه داشت که آن چه قربانی میشود با خدایی که به او قربانی میشود متناسب باشد.
فرفوریوس طبقات خدایان و قربانیهای متنا…
قربانی کودکان، بخش سوم
الغای قربانی کودکان
قدیمیترین بخشهای کتاب مقدس به قربانی پسران نخستزاده فرمان میدهد:
پسران نخستزادهات را به من بده. با گاوان و گوسفندانت نیز چنین کن. نخستزادهٔ آنها را هفت روز نزد مادرشان نگاه دار، ولی در روز هشتم آن را به من بده. (خروج ۲۲: ۲۹-۳۰)
با این حال این فرمان به زودی به اشکال مختلف لغو شد.
۱. برّهٔ جایگزین
برخی بخشهای کتاب مقدس این فرمان را با «فدیه» لغو کردند. فدیه گونها…
قربانی کودکان، بخش دوم
یهوه یا مولِک؟
در کتاب مقدس بارها از قربانی کودکان «برای مولِک» سخن به میان رفته است:
فرزندان خود را در آتش برای مولِک (به عبری: لِـ مولِک) تقدیم مکن و با این کار نام خدای خویش را بیحرمت مساز. (لاویان ۱۸: ۲۱)
باور سنتی آن بود که مولِک نام خدایی کنعانی همچون بعل، کَموش، و عشتاروت بوده است که اسرائیلیان فرزندان خود را برایش قربانی میکردند. در قرن بیستم با کاوشهای باستانشناسی کتیبههای فرا…
قربانی کودکان، بخش اول
در جهان باستان قربانی کودکان نامعمول نبود. قدیمیترین بخشهای کتاب مقدس به این قربانی فرمان میدهد:
پسران نخستزادهات را به من بده. با گاوان و گوسفندانت نیز چنین کن. نخستزادهٔ آنها را هفت روز نزد مادرشان نگاه دار، ولی در روز هشتم آن را به من بده. (خروج ۲۲: ۲۹-۳۰)
هدف از این قربانی متفاوت بود.
۱. بدهبستان
گاه فرزند اول را به خدایان اهدا میکردند تا خدا در مقابل فرزندان بیشتری ببخشد و از …
رقص بسمل
رقص بسمل نامی است که فارسیزبانان به حرکات غیر ارادی موجودات زنده در آستانۀ مرگ دادهاند.
در مصر باستان این حرکات دارای معنایی رمزی از سوی خدایان تلقی میشدند. باور آن بود که با خروج جان حیوان، خدایان مهار بدن حیوان را در دست میگیرند و ارادهٔ خود را با این رقص هولناک به نمایش میگذارند. از همینجا، کاهنان مصری گوسفندی را به آستانۀ معبد میآوردند و شاهرگش را میبریدند. سپس عقب میرفتند تا حرکات گوسفند در ح…
جعفر بن محمد صادق گفت: «در نوجوانی طواف میکردم و بسیار میکوشیدم و عرق از من سرازیر بود. پدرم در این حال مرا دید و گفت: پسرم جعفر، هرگاه خدا بندهای را دوست بدارد، از عمل اندک او نیز خرسند میشود و او را به بهشت درمیآورد.»
کافی ۲: ۸۶
از چه رو بهعبث بامدادان برمیخیزید، و دیرگاه میخوابید، و نان رنج میخورید؟
که خدا آن که را دوست بدارد، حتی اگر خفته باشد، از نعمتها میآکَنَد.
مزمور ۱۲۷: ۲
@Harut_Marut
در باور باستانی، حالات روانی مختلف انسان محصول «روحی» تلقی میشدند که در انسان حلول کرده است.
در کتاب مقدس افسردگی شائول روحی از سوی خدا نامیده میشود که در شائول حلول کرده بود و او را رنج میداد. (۱سموئیل ۱۶: ۱۴)
این تنها باوری خرافی نبود، بلکه دلیلی قانونی بود که میشد در دادگاه ارائه داد. بنا به کتاب مقدس بددلی شوهر به همسرش نیز محصول «روح غیرت» است که از سوی خدا در مرد حلول کرده است. مرد میتوانست بر اساس همین …
🗿20👻9🎃8👾6😈4
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @Harut_Marut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@litera999کتابخانهوموزه @litera999 · 74,822 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
گفت و چای | فهیم عطار @fahimattar · 43,042 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
برترین کتابها @bartarinbookk · 32,725 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
دنياى گمشده @lostworldss · 33,175 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
vkends | مجله ایدهها @vkends · 24,724 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
نگاران | ادبیات @negaaraan_ac · 33,760 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
جامعهشناسی @iransociology · 37,496 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هاروت و ماروت” (@Harut_Marut), 7,681 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Harut_Marut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.