Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dostoevsky ¦ داستایفسکی

Channel

Dostoevsky ¦ داستایفسکی

@Dostoevskyir

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

22,220subscribers

+9,985 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003143981890
TypeChannel
Username@Dostoevskyir
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dostoevskyir

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

522,35511,1806 August 2026 — 12,235 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,235 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,392 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,344 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,703 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,767 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,119 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,180 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,343 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,619 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,692 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,770 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,763 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,730 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,701 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,674 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,659 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,174 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,128 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,110 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,078 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,050 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7 subscribers19 September 2026 — 17,460 subscribers26 September 2026 — 18,328 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11 subscribers13 October 2026 — 19,372 subscribers15 October 2026 — 19,367 subscribers15 October 2026 — 19,356 subscribers16 October 2026 — 19,357 subscribers17 October 2026 — 19,330 subscribers18 October 2026 — 19,321 subscribers19 October 2026 — 19,310 subscribers20 October 2026 — 19,330 subscribers22 October 2026 — 19,355 subscribers23 October 2026 — 19,396 subscribers24 October 2026 — 19,431 subscribers25 October 2026 — 19,427 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12 subscribers2 November 2026 — 22,355 subscribers3 November 2026 — 22,325 subscribers4 November 2026 — 22,263 subscribers5 November 2026 — 22,220 subscribers22,2206 August 20265 November 2026
44 measurements spanning 91 days, net +9,985. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 10:4622,220-43
4 Nov 2026, 12:4622,263-62
3 Nov 2026, 13:1622,325-30
2 Nov 2026, 11:5922,355+22,343
26 Oct 2026, 00:1012-19,415
25 Oct 2026, 01:3719,427-4
24 Oct 2026, 04:0719,431+35
23 Oct 2026, 00:4419,396+41
22 Oct 2026, 01:4019,355+25
20 Oct 2026, 22:3619,330+20
19 Oct 2026, 20:3019,310-11
18 Oct 2026, 21:1019,321-9
17 Oct 2026, 21:4419,330-27
16 Oct 2026, 18:5919,357+1
15 Oct 2026, 21:4719,356-11
15 Oct 2026, 00:4419,367-5
13 Oct 2026, 21:4519,372+19,361
4 Oct 2026, 18:0211-18,317
26 Sept 2026, 21:5618,328+868
19 Sept 2026, 16:5517,460first reading

Engagement

194 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 22,220 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,070
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
36
of 194 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held194 (1 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total146,615
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
146
Videos
11
Links
83

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 194 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Dostoevskyir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 194 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC287 viewsread 5 November 2026

فایل هر کتابی که بخوای، اینجاست 🤩

5 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 5 November 2026

با چنان اطمینانی حرف می‌زد که کسی نمی‌توانست بفهمد که گفته‌اش حاصل خردمندی است و یا از سر سبک‌مغزی بیان شده است... - جنگ و صلح - #لئو_تولستوی

5 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 5 November 2026

حالا فکر کردن برای من عادت شده. هدف شده. همه‌اش دلم می‌خواهد بنشینم و فکر کنم. مهم نیست که دست‌هام به چه کاری مشغولند... - سمفونی مردگان - #عباس_معروفی

5 Nov 2026, 05:47 UTC46 viewsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @Papershredderr

مطمئن‌ترین راه برای فاسد کردن یک جوان این است که به او بیاموزیم کسانی را که مانند او فکر می‌کنند، برتر از کسانی بداند که متفاوت می‌اندیشند. | فریدریش نیچه |

5 Nov 2026, 05:27 UTC175 viewsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @Papershredderr

زمانی که بخواهید وصیت‌نامه بنويسید، متوجه خواهید شد تنها کسی که از داراییتان سهمی ندارد، خودتان هستید! پس تا می‌توانید از زندگی لذت ببرید! لئو تولستوی

5 Nov 2026, 05:23 UTC195 viewsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @Papershredderr

تنهایی، چه از نظر منطقی چه از نظر تجربی، ربطی به تنها بودن ندارد. آنچه درباره تنهایی مهم است شمار افرادی نیست که دوروبر آدم هستند، بلکه احساسی است که فرد از رابطه‌اش با دیگران دارد... از کتاب فلسفه تنهایی

4 Nov 2026, 20:46 UTC≈2,540 viewsread 5 November 2026

خیلی خسته‌ام، باید کمی استراحت کنم و بخوابم، وگرنه به کلی داغان می‌شوم. زنده بودن چه مشقتی دارد! - یادداشت‌ها - #آلبر_کامو

4 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC≈3,070 viewsread 5 November 2026

می‌گويند که نبايد دوبار سر يک ميز به‌ دنبال بخت و اقبال رفت... - قمارباز - #داستایفسکی🪶

4 Nov 2026, 14:23 UTC742 viewsread 4 November 2026

کتابخونه؟ نه مرسی گلچین همه کتاب‌ها رو تو این چنل می‌خونم : 📚😍 - t.me/+e_8gYQrtiL0xOGY0

Showing the 12 most recent of 194 posts we hold for @Dostoevskyir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 9 posts on @Dostoevskyir as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
20 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
4

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dostoevsky ¦ داستایفسکی” (@Dostoevskyir), 22,220 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dostoevskyir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.