Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pont des Arts

Channel

Pont des Arts

@PontDesArts_s

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,357subscribers

+113 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001835241109
TypeChannel
Username@PontDesArts_s
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PontDesArts_s

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2442,3572,300.57 August 2026 — 2,244 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,244 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,251 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,293 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,305 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,310 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,309 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,314 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,311 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,338 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,350 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,354 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,357 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net +113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,227–2,374 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 17:002,357+3
12 Sept 2026, 09:362,354+4
8 Sept 2026, 13:152,350+12
2 Sept 2026, 21:192,338+27
30 Aug 2026, 10:232,311-3
27 Aug 2026, 09:442,314+5
24 Aug 2026, 06:362,309-1
20 Aug 2026, 10:122,310+5
17 Aug 2026, 11:542,305+12
14 Aug 2026, 02:152,293+42
10 Aug 2026, 21:022,251+7
7 Aug 2026, 14:332,244no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:082,244first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

172 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16294.2%
👌31.74%
👍21.16%
👏21.16%
😘21.16%
10.581%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PontDesArts_s. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC273 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اوژن گرین در آمریکا متولد شد، اما از آنجایی که باور داشت آمریکا محل فرهنگ و شعر نیست، به فرانسه مهاجرت کرد. این مسئله را کاملا می‌توان در آثار او دید: او تماماً به فرهنگ، تاریخ و مفاهیم هنر اروپا در درون قرون وسطی، رنسانس و پست‌مدرنیسم علاقه دارد. فیلم‌های او شعر بصری‌اند: پرندگان حرف می‌زنند، درختان صدا دارند، حیوانات بخشی از روایت هستند و تمایزی میان یک گیاه زنده و انسان وجود ندارد. برای گرین، هنر دست‌مایه‌ای برای

19

3 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC395 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

دایدو موریاماما عکاس آوانگارد ژاپنی‌ست که سال‌ها با نشریات تاثیرگذاری چون «پرووک» همکاری کرد. وقتی به تصاویر ثبت‌شده توسط موریاماما نگاه می‌کنیم، اولین چیزی که خودنمایی می‌کند مسئله‌ی آشنایی‌زدایی است: چگونه ابژه‌ها و چشم‌اندازهای زیست روزمره ناگهان به تصویری انتزاعی و فراتر از آنچه تصور می‌کردیم، تبدیل می‌شوند. در تصاویر از بدن فاحشه‌های ژاپنی، مدل‌ها و خیابان‌ها، می‌توان امر آشنایی‌زدایی را مشاهده کرد، تصاویری که د

18

1 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC539 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

حقیقتی که با نیتی منفی گفته شده، تمام دروغ‌ها را شکست می‌دهد‌. —ویلیام بلیک @PontDesArts_s

23

30 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC725 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

شاید بتوان گفت جیمز انسور، نقاش قرن نوزدهم، پیش از سینما تصویر مردگان متحرک یا همان زامبی را تجسد بخشید. به آثارش که نگاه می‌کنیم، مردگان همچنان هشیار هستند و در این جهان ترسیم‌شده گویی هیچ انسان واقعاً زنده‌ای وجود ندارد. ساکنین جهان انسور همگی شبیه یک‌دیگرند: جمجمه‌ها، حذف چشمان و لبخندهای ترسناک و اهریمنی، اندام زشت و در کل هیبتی دفرمه. تصاویر او را می‌توان خوانش سیاسی-تاریخی کرد. یکی از وجوه آثارش عینیت ایده‌ی کا

18👌2

28 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC753 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«تصورِ آینده، که آبستن از بی‌نهایت احتمالات است، از خودِ آینده ثمربخش‌تر است. از همین رو، امید برای ما دل‌انگیزتر از تصاحب و رؤیا دلرباتر از واقعیت است.» آنری برگسون @PontDesArts_s

151👌1👏1

25 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC772 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

پائولو روورسیِ ایتالیایی سال‌ها به‌عنوان عکاس مجله «ووگ ایتالیا» کار کرد و از او به‌عنوان یکی از افراد مشهور در زمینه‌ی عکاسی از بازیگران و مدل‌ها یاد می‌شود. در واقع، باید گفت که در اکثر تصاویر روورسی یک خصیصه‌ی ثابت دیده می‌شود: او شیفته‌ی امر گروتسک و اگزوتیک در عکس گرفتن از بازیگران است. روورسی لباس‌های عجیب به تن مدل‌ها می‌کند، آن‌ها را با ژست‌های مرموز نشان می‌دهد و جلوه‌ای از آن‌ها را نمایان می‌کند که در دیگر

22👍2😘2👏1

23 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC768 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

چشم‌ها به افقی در دوردست‌ خیره می‌شوند. تمام تن به‌دنبال چیزی‌ست. انتظار برای دیداری، رخدادی، معجزه‌ای، استحاله‌ای، انفجار یا سایه‌ای. در تاریخ نقاشی چنین ایماژی‌ بارها تولید شده: یک چشم‌انداز عظیم و فیگوری که همچون لکه‌ای در این محیط به‌انتظار مانده. فیگوری که انتظار می‌کشد تجسدی از یک وضعیت فیزیکی است: بدن در تمنای آن‌ چیزی‌ست که در دوردست‌ها مانده و به احتمال زیاد قادر است اکنونیت‌ِ در تعلیق را سامان دهد. چشم‌ها د

16

21 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC≈2,560 views17 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اعمال راه‌ رفتن، گوش سپردن، خیره شدن و درنگ کردن چیزهایی‌اند که می‌توان میراث میکل‌آنجلو آنتونیونی در سینما دانست. فکر کردن به زمان و فضا، برای پی‌بردن به رازهای برملا نشده. تنها کسانی شنیدنی‌ها و دیدنی‌ها را درمی‌یابند که به درون خود فضاها بروند. برای همین است که در فیلمی مانند ماجرا ساخته‌ی آنتونیونی هیچ اهمیتی ندارد که زن گمشده کجاست و واقعا چه چیزی را تجربه کرده. همانطور که در فیلم مموریا، ساخته‌ی ویراستاکول، اکن

17

19 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC969 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

نقاشی‌های رنه مگریت تبدیل کردن جادو به امر روزمره است. دستکاری کردن قوانین جهان طبیعت به‌واسطه‌ی تخیل. مگریت دنیایی تصور می‌شود که در آن جاذبه وجود ندارد و چیزها در جاهایی حضور پیدا می‌کنند که انتظار نداریم. نقاشی‌های مگرت پاسخی به این پرسش است که چه می‌شود اگر ماه در یک ظرف کوچک آرام می‌گرفت یا اگر ابر به داخل اتاق می‌آمد و جای یک ماه، سه ماه کنارهم قرار می‌گرفتند. هنر مگریت در ابتدا ممکن است کودکانه و معصومانه به‌ن

14

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @PontDesArts_s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Red Curtains Whisper
@redcurtainswhisper · 39,191
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 4 September 2026
سینما پارادیـزو
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,716
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
سینما یعنی . . .
@cinemayanii · 23,686
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
ادبیات، فلسفه و سینما
@NazariyehAdabi · 42,703
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
Paintings Place
@paintingsplace · 24,632
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pont des Arts” (@PontDesArts_s), 2,357 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PontDesArts_s.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.